Molecular simulations show that melts of nonconcatenated ring polymers, when quenched into the glassy state and stretched, form stable crazes whose structure implies an effective entanglement network in which only about one quarter of the melt's elementary topological constraints act as load-bearing junctions. This network, however, was inferred indirectly from craze geometry and mechanical response, never from an explicit enumeration of the constraints themselves. The open problem is to determine which topological constraints (threadings and related interlockings) survive vitrification and large tensile deformation, what microscopic mechanism selects them, and how individual constraints nucleate, persist, and fail during craze growth; related open directions include whether a tube-like theoretical construct can be defined for ring polymers in the glassy state, how the microscopic picture transfers to the macroscopic fracture toughness of ring-polymer glasses, and whether synthesized long nonconcatenated ring polymers cooled below the glass transition exhibit the predicted crazing behavior and scaling relations.

Background

Crazing is the dominant deformation-and-failure mode of amorphous polymer glasses under tension: narrow zones of localized plastic deformation open and are bridged by nanoscale fibrils of highly drawn polymer, and these crazes are the usual precursors of brittle fracture. For linear chains (chains with two free ends), the mechanical scaffold of a craze is the entanglement network, the mesh of topological interchain constraints inherited from the melt. Its mesh size is quantified by the entanglement length NeN_{\mathrm{e}}, the average number of monomers between consecutive constraints along a chain. Classical geometric arguments connect NeN_{\mathrm{e}} to the craze extension ratio Λ\Lambda (the maximum draw ratio of the fibrillated material, limited by full extension of an entanglement strand), to the spacing between craze fibrils, and, through the surface energy cost of creating fibril surface, to the plateau drawing stress. In the melt, the same network is rationalized by the tube model: each linear chain escapes its constraints by reptation, diffusing along a tube-shaped cage defined by its neighbors, which produces the rubbery plateau of linear-polymer viscoelasticity.

Nonconcatenated ring polymers are closed macromolecules with no free ends and no links between different rings. Because reptation is impossible, ring melts instead adopt compact, double-folded, tree-like conformations that thread one another; their viscoelastic response lacks a rubbery plateau and shows anomalous power-law relaxation. Whether this topology provides any mechanically relevant entanglement network in the glassy state was therefore unknown, and with it whether ring glasses can form stable crazes at all.

Wang and Ge (2021) simulated a standard coarse-grained bead-spring model (each polymer represented as a chain of Lennard-Jones beads connected by springs, with σ\sigma and ϵ\epsilon the bead diameter and interaction energy scale) of nonconcatenated ring melts, quenched the melts deep into the glass, and deformed them uniaxially. Long-ring glasses do form stable crazes with the canonical three-regime stress–stretch response (yield peak, steady drawing plateau, breakdown). The craze structure is quantitatively consistent with an effective entanglement network whose strands average NeR≈120N_{\mathrm{e}}^{\mathrm{R}} \approx 120 monomers, about 4.3 times the linear-polymer entanglement length Ne=28N_{\mathrm{e}} = 28 of the same model; equivalently, only about one quarter of the elementary topological constraints act as load-bearing network junctions. The inferred network obeys scaling relations such as NeR=Ne(ΛR/ΛL)3/2N_{\mathrm{e}}^{\mathrm{R}} = N_{\mathrm{e}}(\Lambda_{\mathrm{R}}/\Lambda_{\mathrm{L}})^{3/2} (with ΛR\Lambda_{\mathrm{R}}, ΛL\Lambda_{\mathrm{L}} the ring and linear craze extension ratios) and ΛR/ΛL=(NeR/Ne)2/3\Lambda_{\mathrm{R}}/\Lambda_{\mathrm{L}} = (N_{\mathrm{e}}^{\mathrm{R}}/N_{\mathrm{e}})^{2/3}, predicts the larger fibril spacing of ring crazes, and is corroborated by perturbative cutting simulations in which stable crazing requires linear subsections longer than roughly 3NeR3N_{\mathrm{e}}^{\mathrm{R}}. Crucially, however, this network was deduced indirectly — from craze geometry, drawing stresses, and scaling arguments — and not from an explicit enumeration of the persistent topological constraints: contour-reduction algorithms such as CReTA (which collapse chains onto their primitive paths to count entanglements), Gauss-linking-number integrals (the standard double-integral measure of how much two closed curves interwind), and threading-detection schemes had not been applied to deforming ring glasses. A further puzzle is that in cross-linked ring elastomers, by contrast, ring–ring entanglements do not act as effective cross-links, so the load-bearing role of ring constraints in the glass has no explanation that carries over from rubbery networks.

Problem Statement

The problem is to give a predictive, microscopically grounded account of the load-bearing entanglement network of glassy nonconcatenated ring polymers, replacing the indirect geometric inference of Wang and Ge (2021) with an explicit mechanistic description. The core scientific objective — explaining how chain topology selects the entanglement network that carries mechanical load in a polymer glass — consists of the following linked questions:

(i) Identification and selection mechanism: determine which of the topological constraints present in the ring melt (threadings and related interlockings) survive vitrification and subsequent large tensile deformation to act as load-bearing entanglements, and establish the physical mechanism that selects them — in particular why, in the Wang and Ge (2021) bead-spring model, only about one quarter of the elementary constraints (NeR≈4.3 NeN_{\mathrm{e}}^{\mathrm{R}} \approx 4.3\,N_{\mathrm{e}}) end up as network junctions, and whether this fraction is universal, cooling-history dependent, or model specific.

(ii) Fate during crazing: follow the creation, persistence, and release of individual constraints through craze nucleation, growth, and breakdown, establishing which constraints persist as effective entanglements and at which stage.

Within (i), the required result is the identification of the surviving constraints and the physical mechanism that selects them; the one-quarter fraction quoted above is the concrete instantiation of that mechanism rather than an independent empirical target, and its generality — universal, cooling-history dependent, or model specific — remains part of (i). Within (ii), the required result is the constraint-level account of creation, persistence, and release during crazing.

The following related directions are broader motivation and open outlook for this research program rather than part of the problem above: whether a concept analogous to the reptation tube of linear polymers can be defined for ring polymers in the glassy state, distinguishing constraints that act as transient tubes from those that behave like permanent cross-links, and whether such a construct can account for the observed scalings (NeR=Ne(ΛR/ΛL)3/2N_{\mathrm{e}}^{\mathrm{R}} = N_{\mathrm{e}}(\Lambda_{\mathrm{R}}/\Lambda_{\mathrm{L}})^{3/2}, fibril spacing, drawing stress); and connecting the microscopic picture to macroscopic failure — in particular the fracture toughness of ring-polymer glasses, which Wang and Ge's finite simulations could not compute — including an eventual experimental test of whether sufficiently long (above the stable-crazing threshold), topologically pure, nonconcatenated ring polymers cooled below the glass transition temperature TgT_{\mathrm{g}} (the temperature at which the melt falls out of equilibrium into an amorphous glass) exhibit the predicted crazing behavior and scaling relations.

References

  1. Jiuling Wang and Ting Ge, "Crazing Reveals an Entanglement Network in Glassy Ring Polymers", Macromolecules 54(16), 7500–7511 (2021). DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.1c01080, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.1c01080
  2. Jiuling Wang, Pieter J. in 't Veld, Mark O. Robbins, and Ting Ge, "Effects of Coarse-Graining on Molecular Simulation of Craze Formation in Polymer Glass", Macromolecules 55(4), 1267–1278 (2022). DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.1c01969, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.1c01969
  3. Jiuling Wang, Thomas C. O'Connor, Gary S. Grest, and Ting Ge, "Superstretchable Elastomer from Cross-linked Ring Polymers", Physical Review Letters 128, 237801 (2022). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.237801, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.237801
  4. Siteng Zhang, Thomas C. O'Connor, Gary S. Grest, and Ting Ge, "Elastomer Mechanics of Cross-Linked Linear-Ring Polymer Blends", ACS Macro Letters 14, 509–515 (2025). DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.5c00095, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmacrolett.5c00095
  5. Tongkui Yue, Hengheng Zhao, Yuan Wei, Pengwei Duan, Liqun Zhang, Jiuling Wang, and Jun Liu, "Influence of Nanoparticles on the Structure, Dynamics, and Mechanical Behavior of Nonconcatenated Ring Polymers", Macromolecules 57(3), 1207–1219 (2024). DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.3c01871, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.3c01871
  6. Daniel L. Vigil, Ting Ge, Michael Rubinstein, Thomas C. O'Connor, and Gary S. Grest, "Measuring Topological Constraint Relaxation in Ring-Linear Polymer Blends", Physical Review Letters 133, 118101 (2024). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.118101, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.118101
  7. Cristian Micheletti, Iurii Chubak, Enzo Orlandini, and Jan Smrek, "Topology-Based Detection and Tracking of Deadlocks Reveal Aging of Active Ring Melts", ACS Macro Letters 13, 124–129 (2024). DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.3c00567, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmacrolett.3c00567
  8. Mattia Alberto Ubertini, Jan Smrek, and Angelo Rosa, "Entanglement Length Scale Separates Threading from Branching of Unknotted and Non-concatenated Ring Polymers in Melts", Macromolecules 55, 10723–10736 (2022). DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.2c01264, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.2c01264
  9. Charles M. Schroeder, Ralf Everaers, Kurt Kremer, Margarita Kruteva, Christos N. Likos, Gregory B. McKenna, Thomas O'Connor, J. Ravi Prakash, Dieter Richter, Rae Robertson-Anderson, Michael Rubinstein, Kenneth S. Schweizer, and Dimitris Vlassopoulos, "Ring polymer physics and rheology: Challenges and opportunities", Journal of Rheology 70, 183–216 (2026). DOI: 10.1122/8.0001099, https://doi.org/10.1122/8.0001099
  10. Arabinda Behera, Projesh Roy, Pinaki Chaudhuri, and Satyavani Vemparala, "Aging of ring polymeric topological glass formers via thermal quench", arXiv:2504.02557 (2025). https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.02557
  11. Shota Goto, Takenobu Nakamura, Davide Michieletto, Kang Kim, and Nobuyuki Matubayasi, "Persistent Homology Reveals the Role of Stiffness in Forming Topological Glasses in Dense Solutions of Ring Polymers", arXiv:2411.10970 (2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.10970
  12. Zihan Tang, Weikang Xian, and Ying Li, "Molecular Mechanisms of Strength and Toughness in Slide-Ring Polymer Networks: Insights from Coarse-Grained Molecular Dynamics Simulations", Macromolecules 59, 3938–3956 (2026). DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.5c03515, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.5c03515
  13. Wuyang Zhao, Yash Jain, Florian Müller-Plathe, Paul Steinmann, and Sebastian Pfaller, "Investigating fracture mechanisms in glassy polymers using coupled particle-continuum simulations", Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 193, 105884 (2024). DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2024.105884, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2024.105884
  14. Zihan Tang, Weikang Xian, Jianxin He, Rong Long, and Ying Li, "From bonds to breaks: multiscale perspectives on polymer network fracture", International Journal of Smart and Nano Materials 16(4), 779–844 (2025). DOI: 10.1080/19475411.2025.2582826, https://doi.org/10.1080/19475411.2025.2582826
  15. Paul A. O'Connell, Gregory B. McKenna, and Ting Ge, "Yield and Crazing in Polymers", Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology, pp. 1–59 (2026). DOI: 10.1002/0471440264.pst463.pub2, https://doi.org/10.1002/0471440264.pst463.pub2
  16. Lingfeng Gao, Joongsuk Oh, Yingfeng Tu, Taihyun Chang, and Christopher Y. Li, "Glass transition temperature of cyclic polystyrene and the linear counterpart contamination effect", Polymer 170, 198–203 (2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.03.018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2019.03.018
  17. Daniele Parisi, Salvatore Costanzo, Youncheol Jeong, Junyoung Ahn, Taihyun Chang, Dimitris Vlassopoulos, Jonathan D. Halverson, Kurt Kremer, Ting Ge, Michael Rubinstein, Gary S. Grest, Watee Srinin, and Alexander Y. Grosberg, "Nonlinear Shear Rheology of Entangled Polymer Rings", Macromolecules 54, 2811–2827 (2021). DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.0c02839, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.0c02839
  18. Mehak Bhatia, Siteng Zhang, and Ting Ge, "Effects of Topological Constraints on Equilibrium Swelling of Polymer Gels", ACS Polymers Au 6(3), 792–805 (2026; published online November 14, 2025). DOI: 10.1021/acspolymersau.5c00107, https://doi.org/10.1021/acspolymersau.5c00107