Humans can communicate emotional states through axillary sweat: in a landmark 2012 experiment, sweat collected from male donors after fear-inducing or disgust-inducing film clips induced emotion-congruent facial expressions and patterns of sensory acquisition or rejection in female receivers, outside conscious access. Which molecules carry this signal, how they are detected, and when the communication works remain unresolved. This problem asks for the chemical identification of the emotion-specific 'chemosignal fingerprints' — the compounds and mixtures distinguishing fear-related and disgust-related sweat from each other and from neutral sweat — together with causal validation by synthetic reconstruction, the olfactory receptors and central processing routes that transduce them (humans lack a functional vomeronasal organ, so reception must be resolved within the main olfactory system), and the ecological boundary conditions of the communication. Later work has consolidated the behavioral phenomenon meta-analytically (Hedges' g = 0.36), separated fear from neutral sweat at the level of overall volatile-pattern classes, shown one abundant compound (hexadecanoic acid) sufficient for a single receiver effect, extended behavioral chemosignaling to happiness and aggression, and confirmed cross-cultural robustness — but no emotion-specific compound or mixture has been identified with bioassay confirmation, no receptors are known, and real-world conditions are untested. The problem remains open.

Background

Many animals release chemical signals (chemosignals) that carry social information between individuals; when both the emission and the response have evolved for a communicative function, such a signal is called a pheromone. Whether humans possess anything comparable was long dismissed, partly because the human vomeronasal organ (VNO) — a nasal structure that detects pheromones in many other mammals — is vestigial and non-functional in adults, so any human chemical sensing must run through the main olfactory epithelium, the ordinary smell tissue. A prerequisite finding came from neuroimaging: sweat collected from people during an acute emotional stressor (as opposed to physical exercise) activated the amygdala, the brain's threat-processing hub, in receivers. The pivotal behavioral demonstration was de Groot, Smeets, Kaldewaij, Duijndam, and Semin (2012), who collected axillary (armpit) sweat from male donors after fear-inducing, disgust-inducing, or neutral film clips, then presented it, double-blind, to female receivers while recording facial electromyography (EMG, the electrical activity of facial muscles, which reveals expressions too subtle for the eye), sniffing magnitude, and eye movements. Fear sweat generated a fearful expression and sensory acquisition (stronger sniffs, more eye scanning); disgust sweat generated a disgusted expression and sensory rejection (weaker sniffs, reduced target-detection sensitivity and scanning). The authors framed this as a multilevel correspondence between sender and receiver: the sender's emotional state is partially reproduced in the receiver through chemistry, outside conscious access. Follow-up research consolidated the behavioral effect (a 2017 meta-analysis of 26 studies found a small-to-moderate effect size, Hedges' gg = 0.36, with p-curve analysis — a test of the distribution of significant p-values — indicating a true effect rather than publication bias) and extended it to happiness and aggression-related sweat, across ethno-cultural boundaries, and robust to the ABCC11 gene variant (common in East Asia) that drastically reduces body-odor production.

What the field still lacks is the chemistry and the mechanism. Chemical ecologists hold that establishing a pheromone requires three steps: demonstrating an odor-mediated behavioral or physiological response, identifying and synthesizing the bioactive molecule(s), and confirming activity by bioassay with the synthetic compound(s) (Wyatt 2015). Human emotional chemosignaling rests almost entirely on step one. Untargeted two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled to time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC×GC-ToF-MS, an analytical technique that separates and identifies trace-level volatile molecules) has shown that the overall volatile pattern of fear sweat differs statistically from neutral sweat, with candidate chemical classes (linear aldehydes, ketones, esters, cyclic molecules) — but no specific compound or mixture has been identified as the signal. One exploratory study found hexadecanoic acid (palmitic acid, a common fatty acid) elevated by roughly 44% in fear sweat and sufficient to reproduce one perceptual bias in receivers, yet it is abundant in neutral sweat too and covered only one receiver measure. Which olfactory receptors (the protein sensors on olfactory sensory neurons, each binding particular odorant molecules) detect these volatiles, and which central brain routes they engage, is unknown; neuroimaging of body-odor processing is heterogeneous and only coarsely mapped. Finally, nearly all evidence comes from laboratory studies with male donors and female receivers, so the ecological boundary conditions — sex reciprocity, real-world distances and crowd settings, mixed emotional states, cultural and genetic variation in production and sensitivity — remain to be established.

Problem Statement

Determine the chemical and mechanistic basis of human emotional chemosignaling, as left open by de Groot, Smeets, Kaldewaij, Duijndam, and Semin (2012):

  1. Identify the emotion-specific chemosignal fingerprints: the specific compounds and/or mixtures that distinguish fear-related and disgust-related axillary sweat from each other and from emotionally neutral sweat, and validate them causally — a synthetic reconstruction at naturally occurring concentrations, delivered blind, must reproduce the emotion-congruent receiver effects obtained with natural sweat, that is, the full pattern of receiver effects (facial mimicry, altered sniff magnitude, sensory vigilance or rejection, and emotion-congruent perceptual biases), not a single isolated measure.

  2. Establish the reception mechanism: which olfactory receptors detect these compounds, and through which central processing routes they produce the receiver effects. Because the human vomeronasal organ is non-functional, this must be resolved within the main olfactory system and its cortical and limbic targets.

  3. Establish the ecological boundary conditions of the communication, resolving each of the axes enumerated below rather than a subset of them. For the axes whose coarse behavioral robustness is already reported — ethno-cultural context, the ABCC11 body-odor variant, and extension to other emotions — establish whether these hold for the chemically identified signal; and determine how the communication depends on sender and receiver sex (including cross-sex reciprocity), on genetic and hormonal variation in production and sensitivity (e.g., ABCC11 body-odor status), on ethno-cultural context, on other basic emotions (e.g., happiness, anger) and mixed affective states, and on whether it operates outside the laboratory at real-world distances and in naturalistic social settings.

These three sub-questions jointly serve one objective: establishing whether, by which molecules, and through which mechanisms humans chemically communicate emotions outside conscious access. The decisive missing piece is chemically specific, causally validated identification, together with its reception pathway and demonstrated scope.

References

  1. de Groot, J. H. B., Smeets, M. A. M., Kaldewaij, A., Duijndam, M. J. A., & Semin, G. R. (2012). Chemosignals Communicate Human Emotions. Psychological Science 23(11):1417–1424. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612445317. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612445317
  2. Semin, G. R., & de Groot, J. H. B. (2013). The chemical bases of human sociality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17(9):427–429. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.05.008. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.05.008
  3. Meredith, M. (2001). Human Vomeronasal Organ Function: A Critical Review of Best and Worst Cases. Chemical Senses 26(4):433–445. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/26.4.433. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/26.4.433
  4. Mujica-Parodi, L. R., Strey, H. H., Frederick, B., Savoy, R., Cox, D., Botanov, Y., Tolkunov, D., Rubin, D., & Weber, J. (2009). Chemosensory Cues to Conspecific Emotional Stress Activate Amygdala in Humans. PLoS ONE 4(7):e6415. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006415. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006415
  5. Keller, A., Zhuang, H., Chi, Q., Vosshall, L. B., & Matsunami, H. (2007). Genetic variation in a human odorant receptor alters odour perception. Nature 449(7161):468–472. DOI: 10.1038/nature06162. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06162
  6. Wyatt, T. D. (2015). The search for human pheromones: the lost decades and the necessity of returning to first principles. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282(1804):20142994. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2994. URL: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2994
  7. Radulescu, A. R., & Mujica-Parodi, L. R. (2013). Human Gender Differences in the Perception of Conspecific Alarm Chemosensory Cues. PLoS ONE 8(7):e68485. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068485. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068485
  8. de Groot, J. H. B., Semin, G. R., & Smeets, M. A. M. (2014). Chemical communication of fear: A case of male–female asymmetry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143(4):1515–1525. DOI: 10.1037/a0035950. URL: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035950
  9. de Groot, J. H. B., Smeets, M. A. M., Rowson, M. J., Bulsing, P. J., Blonk, C. G., Wilkinson, J. E., & Semin, G. R. (2015). A Sniff of Happiness. Psychological Science 26(6):684–700. DOI: 10.1177/0956797614566318. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614566318
  10. Mutic, S., Parma, V., Brünner, Y. F., & Freiherr, J. (2016). You Smell Dangerous: Communicating Fight Responses Through Human Chemosignals of Aggression. Chemical Senses 41(1):35–43. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjv058. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjv058
  11. Haviland-Jones, J. M., McGuire, T. R., & Wilson, P. (2016). Testing for Individual Differences in the Identification of Chemosignals for Fear and Happy: Phenotypic Super-Detectors, Detectors and Non-Detectors. PLOS ONE 11(5):e0154495. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154495. URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154495
  12. de Groot, J. H. B., & Smeets, M. A. M. (2017). Human Fear Chemosignaling: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis. Chemical Senses 42(8):663–673. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjx049. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjx049
  13. de Groot, J. H. B., van Houtum, L. A. E. M., Gortemaker, I., Ye, Y., Chen, W., Zhou, W., & Smeets, M. A. M. (2018). Beyond the west: Chemosignaling of emotions transcends ethno-cultural boundaries. Psychoneuroendocrinology 98:177–185. DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.08.005. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.08.005
  14. Zheng, Y., You, Y., Farias, A. R., Simon, J., Semin, G. R., Smeets, M. A., & Li, W. (2018). Human chemosignals of disgust facilitate food judgment. Scientific Reports 8:17006. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-35132-w. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35132-w
  15. Wyatt, T. D. (2020). Reproducible research into human chemical communication by cues and pheromones: learning from psychology's renaissance. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 375(1800):20190262. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0262. URL: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0262
  16. de Groot, J. H. B., Kirk, P. A., & Gottfried, J. A. (2020). Encoding fear intensity in human sweat. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 375(1800):20190271. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0271. URL: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0271
  17. Dal Bò, E., Gentili, C., & Cecchetto, C. (2020). Human Chemosignals and Brain Activity: A Preliminary Meta-analysis of the Processing of Human Body Odors. Chemical Senses 45(9):855–864. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjaa067. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjaa067
  18. Smeets, M. A. M., Rosing, E. A. E., Jacobs, D. M., van Velzen, E., Koek, J. H., Blonk, C., Gortemaker, I., Eidhof, M. B., Markovitch, B., de Groot, J., & Semin, G. R. (2020). Chemical Fingerprints of Emotional Body Odor. Metabolites 10(3):84. DOI: 10.3390/metabo10030084. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo10030084
  19. de Groot, J. H. B., Kirk, P. A., & Gottfried, J. A. (2021). Titrating the Smell of Fear: Initial Evidence for Dose-Invariant Behavioral, Physiological, and Neural Responses. Psychological Science 32(4):558–572. DOI: 10.1177/0956797620970548. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620970548
  20. Mishor, E., Amir, D., Weiss, T., Honigstein, D., Weissbrod, A., Livne, E., Gorodisky, L., Karagach, S., Ravia, A., Snitz, K., Karawani, D., Zirler, R., Weissgross, R., Soroka, T., Endevelt-Shapira, Y., Agron, S., Rozenkrantz, L., Reshef, N., Furman-Haran, E., Breer, H., Strotmann, J., Uebi, T., Ozaki, M., & Sobel, N. (2021). Sniffing the human body volatile hexadecanal blocks aggression in men but triggers aggression in women. Science Advances 7(47):eabg1530. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abg1530. URL: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abg1530
  21. Roberts, S. C., Třebická Fialová, J., Sorokowska, A., Langford, B., Sorokowski, P., Třebický, V., & Havlíček, J. (2022). Emotional expression in human odour. Evolutionary Human Sciences 4:e44. DOI: 10.1017/ehs.2022.44. URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2022.44
  22. de Groot, J. H. B., Haertl, T., Loos, H. M., Bachmann, C., Kontouli, A., & Smeets, M. A. M. (2023). Unraveling the universality of chemical fear communication: evidence from behavioral, genetic, and chemical analyses. Chemical Senses 48:bjad046. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjad046. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjad046
  23. Loos, H. M., Schaal, B., Pause, B. M., Smeets, M. A. M., Ferdenzi, C., Roberts, S. C., de Groot, J., Lübke, K. T., Croy, I., Freiherr, J., Bensafi, M., Hummel, T., & Havlíček, J. (2025). Past, Present, and Future of Human Chemical Communication Research. Perspectives on Psychological Science 20(1):20–44. First published online September 5, 2023. DOI: 10.1177/17456916231188147. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916231188147
  24. Ripszam, M., Bruderer, T., Biagini, D., Ghimenti, S., Lomonaco, T., & Di Francesco, F. (2023). Biological studies with comprehensive 2D-GC-HRMS screening: Exploring the human sweat volatilome. Talanta 257:124333. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2023.124333. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2023.124333
  25. Wunder, A., Bürkel, N., Guder, I., Zorzin, J. I., Mühle, C., Loos, H. M., & Freiherr, J. (2025). Enhanced sensitivity to odors due to chemosignals associated with anxiety. Communications Chemistry 8(1):129. DOI: 10.1038/s42004-025-01512-3. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-025-01512-3