Lignocellulosic hydrolysates mix glucose with xylose, but industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae consumes the two sugars sequentially: glucose represses xylose-metabolism genes and blocks xylose uptake, and heterologous xylose isomerase (XI) activity in the yeast cytosol is low. Li et al. (2024, FEMS Yeast Research 24:foae001) constructed an economical xylose-utilizing industrial strain (an engineered Piromyces XI, xylulokinase and pentose-phosphate-pathway genes, delta-site multi-copy chromosomal integration, adaptive domestication) that reaches near-complete xylose utilization and 0.48 g ethanol per g sugar in 30 m3 pilot fermentations, yet glucose and xylose are still consumed one after the other. The authors leave open, as the requirements for efficient co-utilization: which genomic integration sites and copy-number configurations maximize stable XI-pathway expression without genomic instability or metabolic burden; how to raise the intrinsic in-vivo activity of the heterologous XI; and which glucose-linked transcriptional-inhibition mechanisms, and which xylose transporters, must be engineered for glucose-insensitive simultaneous uptake. All three requirements are actively pursued in the published literature - novel mined and ancestral xylose isomerases, and AtSWEET7 and ancestral-transporter relief of glucose repression - but only with partial success: transporter strategies (including the Arabidopsis sugar transporter AtSWEET7 and reconstructed ancestral xylose transporters) relieve glucose repression only in specific strain backgrounds, and no integration-locus design rules have been established, while the review literature still describes xylose fermentation as far inferior to glucose and as not resolvable by single-pathway engineering.

Background

Second-generation (cellulosic) ethanol is produced from lignocellulosic biomass, whose enzymatic hydrolysate contains the six-carbon sugar glucose (mainly from cellulose) and the five-carbon sugar xylose (the principal hemicellulose sugar). The industrial ethanol yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae cannot metabolize xylose because it lacks an enzyme converting xylose to xylulose, so in mixed hydrolysates the xylose fraction is either left unfermented or consumed only after glucose is depleted, lengthening fermentation time and undermining process economics. Two heterologous routes introduce xylose metabolism: the oxidoreductase route (xylose reductase plus xylitol dehydrogenase), which suffers redox imbalance and xylitol by-product formation, and the isomerase route, in which a heterologous xylose isomerase (XI) directly converts xylose to xylulose; xylulokinase (encoded by XKS1) then phosphorylates xylulose, which enters the non-oxidative pentose phosphate pathway (PPP; the reactions of RPE1, RKI1, TAL1, TKL1) and thence glycolysis. The XI route gives higher ethanol yield but its flux is limited by the low activity of heterologous XI enzymes in the yeast cytosol. Because high-copy plasmids are unstable in industrial practice, pathway genes are integrated into chromosomes - for example at the repeated delta-sites (long-terminal-repeat sequences of Ty retrotransposons, of which the yeast genome carries more than one hundred copies), which accept multiple expression-cassette copies - and expression is subsequently raised by adaptive laboratory evolution, i.e. prolonged domestication of the strain under selection on xylose or industrial media. Kuyper et al. (2005) first demonstrated rapid anaerobic xylose fermentation with an XI-expressing strain, and dos Santos et al. (2016) showed that delta-integration followed by evolution can raise the XI-encoding xylA copy number to 26-36 copies. A second, regulatory bottleneck dominates mixed-sugar fermentations: carbon catabolite repression (glucose repression), the hierarchy by which glucose suppresses the use of other sugars. In S. cerevisiae this repression acts both at transport - the native HXT-family hexose transporters strongly prefer glucose and exclude xylose, while known heterologous xylose transporters are inhibited by glucose - and at transcription, where glucose represses the expression of xylose-metabolism genes, so that xylose uptake and fermentation begin in earnest only after glucose depletion. Li et al. (2024), the source of this problem, combined an engineered Piromyces XI (Pi-xylA carrying an Ala144Thr substitution), XKS1 and four PPP genes, disruption of the glycerol-efflux gene FPS1, and delta-site integration in an industrial diploid strain, then domesticated the strain on corn-stover hydrolysate; the resulting strain reached near-100% xylose utilization, an ethanol yield of 0.48 g per g sugars, and a volumetric xylose consumption rate of 0.87 g/L/h in 30 m3 pilot fermentations - an industrially meaningful but still sequential glucose-then-xylose fermentation.

Problem Statement

As stated by Li et al. (2024), the open problem is to achieve efficient simultaneous co-utilization of glucose and xylose in the xylose-isomerase-based industrial S. cerevisiae platform, which requires resolving three coupled issues the authors explicitly leave open. First, determine the integration sites of the heterologous genes on the genome - which loci and integration/copy-number configurations maximize the expression and activity of the heterologous xylose isomerase and the attendant pathway genes (xylulokinase and the non-oxidative pentose-phosphate-pathway genes) without deleterious genomic instability or metabolic burden. Second, improve the enzyme itself: raise the catalytic performance and in-vivo stability of the heterologous xylose isomerase, including the Pi-xylA-type enzyme used in the source work. Third, relieve the regulatory bottleneck: identify the gene-transcription-inhibition mechanisms related to xylose metabolism that operate while glucose is present, and explore new or engineered xylose transporters that mediate glucose-insensitive xylose uptake. The completion boundary of the combined objective is a resolution of all three coupled issues together - design rules for the genomic integration sites and copy-number configurations, a specified improved xylose-isomerase variant with the structural or catalytic basis of its higher in-vivo activity, and a specified relief of glucose-linked gene-transcription inhibition together with a glucose-insensitive xylose transporter. The resolution must account for the target phenotype: a genome-integrated strain in which xylose is consumed at a substantial rate while glucose is still present (genuine simultaneous co-consumption rather than sequential depletion) - quantitatively, at least a fifth of the xylose consumed while residual glucose is still above about 5 g/L, at a xylose consumption rate of at least 0.87 g/L/h, the volumetric rate reached by the source strain - with pathway expression stable across serial cultivation, at industrially relevant rates, yields, and inhibitor/substrate conditions such as those of lignocellulosic hydrolysate; a co-consumption phenotype obtained without identifying the integration configurations, enzyme improvements, and regulatory interventions that produce it is partial progress toward, rather than a resolution of, the problem.

References

  1. Li F, Bai W, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Zhang D, Shen N, Yuan J, Zhao G, Wang X (2024). Construction of an economical xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its ethanol fermentation. FEMS Yeast Research 24:foae001. DOI 10.1093/femsyr/foae001. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/foae001
  2. Kuyper M, Hartog MM, Toirkens MJ, Almering MJ, Winkler AA, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT (2005). Metabolic engineering of a xylose-isomerase-expressing strain for rapid anaerobic xylose fermentation. FEMS Yeast Research 5:399-409. DOI 10.1016/j.femsyr.2004.09.010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsyr.2004.09.010
  3. dos Santos LV, Carazzolle MF, Nagamatsu ST, Sampaio NMV, Almeida LD, Pirolla RAS, Borelli G, Correa TLR, Argueso JL, Pereira GAG (2016). Unraveling the genetic basis of xylose consumption in engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Scientific Reports 6:38676. DOI 10.1038/srep38676. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38676
  4. Vargas BO, Carazzolle MF, Galhardo JP, Jose J, de Souza BC, Correia JBL, Santos JRD, Pereira GAG, de de Mello FDSB (2025). Engineering Saccharomyces Cerevisiae With Novel Functional Xylose Isomerases From Rumen Microbiota for Enhanced Biofuel Production. Biotechnology Journal 20(6):e70050. DOI 10.1002/biot.70050. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.70050
  5. Nam KH (2024). Engineering Xylose Isomerase for Industrial Applications. Catalysts 14(9):597. DOI 10.3390/catal14090597. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14090597
  6. Yan K, Li M, Ma X, Chen S, Ding B, Huo J, Zhai R, Sha Y, Xu Z, Jin M (2025). Harnessing native nitrogen in lignocellulosic biomass for cellulosic ethanol production by ancestral xylose isomerase-engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioresource Technology 432:132662. DOI 10.1016/j.biortech.2025.132662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2025.132662
  7. Huang M, Jin Z, Ni H, Zhang P, Li H, Liu J, Weng C, Jiang Z (2025). Secretory expression of xylA under high dissolved oxygen to improve the xylose fermentation efficiency of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biomass and Bioenergy 193:107543. DOI 10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107543
  8. Yang L, Huang Y, Chen X, Cheng W, Liu J, Jiang Z, Li H (2026). Dual-module engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient glucose-xylose Co-utilization via secretory xylose isomerase and xylulose transport activation. Biomass and Bioenergy 208:108863. DOI 10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108863
  9. Huang M, Cui X, Zhang P, Jin Z, Li H, Liu J, Jiang Z (2024). Engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae harbors xylose isomerase and xylose transporter improves co-fermentation of xylose and glucose for ethanol production. Preparative Biochemistry & Biotechnology 54(8):1058-1067. DOI 10.1080/10826068.2024.2315479. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826068.2024.2315479
  10. Kuanyshev N, Dai D, Kim J, Kang NK, Cheng MH, Singh V, Jin YS (2026). All You Can Eat Yeast: Substituting Hexose Transporters With AtSWEET7 Alleviates Glucose Repression, Enabling Simultaneous Utilization of Sugars in Renewable Feedstocks. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 123(6):1518-1530. DOI 10.1002/bit.70188. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.70188
  11. Zhang P, He Z, Li H, Jiang Z (2026). Resurrection and characterization of ancestral xylose transporters enhance the capability of xylose uptake in the mixed sugar co-fermentation of recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioresources and Bioprocessing 13(1):1. DOI 10.1186/s40643-025-00995-1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-025-00995-1
  12. Gao S, Liu ZH, Zhang HR, Zhao GR, Zha J, Yuan YJ (2026). Systems-Level Metabolic Regulation Strategies of Xylose Metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnology Journal 21(6):e70258. DOI 10.1002/biot.70258. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.70258
  13. Demeke MM, Echemendia D, Belo E, Foulquie-Moreno MR, Thevelein JM (2024). Enhancing xylose-fermentation capacity of engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae by multistep evolutionary engineering in inhibitor-rich lignocellulose hydrolysate. FEMS Yeast Research 24:foae013. DOI 10.1093/femsyr/foae013. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/foae013
  14. Kruger F, den Haan R (2026). Adaptive laboratory evolution and rational engineering enabled xylose utilisation and xylan conversion in natural isolates of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Biotechnology 417:17-30. DOI 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2026.05.007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2026.05.007
  15. Rehman O, Chen J, Zhang Q, Hu M, Sun C, Wu Y, Gao H, Jawad M, Shahid A, Peng C, Xue C (2025). Genetic engineering and adaptive evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for robust xylose uptake and ethanol production. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering 88:124-132. DOI 10.1016/j.cjche.2025.06.034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2025.06.034