Comparative diffusion tractography in humans and chimpanzees (Rilling, Glasser, Jbabdi, Andersson and Preuss, 2011) concluded that the dorsal arcuate fasciculus, rather than the ventral extreme capsule pathway, was the principal white-matter locus of language-related change in human evolution, and that the arcuate is the pathway most essential for syntax and lexical-semantics. This conclusion rests on an indirect, model-based measurement — normalized probabilistic streamline counts — and on correlational anatomy. The open problem is to establish, with direct anatomical validation and causally interpretable evidence: (i) whether and in what graded form the arcuate was preferentially augmented in human evolution (including its temporal projections into the middle temporal gyrus and superior temporal sulcus); (ii) the causal contributions of the arcuate, extreme capsule, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF) and other perisylvian pathways to specific language processes (syntax, lexical-semantic retrieval, semantic access); (iii) whether expansion of the arcuate displaced the inferior longitudinal fasciculus and accounts for spatial reorganization of cortical visual and language areas across hominid evolution; and (iv) the robustness of cross-species tractography to methodological choices. Later literature confirms a quantitative dorsal expansion but has partially revised the strong human-uniqueness claim (a weak arcuate-middle temporal gyrus connection exists in chimpanzees), while the causal division of labor among these tracts and the validation of tractography-derived species differences remain unsettled.

Background

Human language relies on a distributed left-lateralized fronto-temporal cortical network whose long-range connections run in identifiable white-matter tracts. The arcuate fasciculus is the dorsal tract arching around the Sylvian fissure, connecting posterior temporal cortex (classically Wernicke's area) with inferior frontal cortex (Broca's area); the extreme capsule is a ventral tract joining the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex with the anterior and middle temporal lobe, which in macaques carries auditory object recognition; the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF) is a ventral tract linking frontal cortex with parietal, posterior temporal and occipital cortex; and the inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF) connects occipital and temporal cortex within the ventral visual stream. In dual-stream models of language, dorsal pathways are emphasized for phonological and syntactic processing while ventral pathways are emphasized for semantic processing, but the division of labor among specific tracts is contested.

Because soft tissue does not fossilize, the evolution of these pathways is studied with the comparative method: humans are compared with their closest living relatives, chimpanzees, so that traits present in humans but absent in chimpanzees and macaques are inferred to have arisen in the human lineage after the human-chimpanzee split about six to eight million years ago. The relevant measurement technology is diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) tractography, which infers tract trajectories from the preferred direction of water diffusion in white matter; probabilistic tractography with crossing-fibre modelling tracks through voxels containing several fibre populations. The number of streamlines successfully traced between two regions of interest (the "waytotal") is only a rough, normalization-dependent proxy of connection strength — it depends on region-of-interest (ROI) definition, on the assumption that total streamline counts are comparable across individuals, and on acquisition parameters. The gold standard for connectional anatomy is invasive tract-tracing (injecting anatomical tracers in post-mortem animal tissue), which cannot be used in humans or apes; direct electrostimulation during awake neurosurgery and focal lesion studies provide the main causal evidence in humans.

Against this background, Rilling and colleagues (2008, 2011) tracked the dorsal (arcuate) and ventral (extreme capsule) pathways between homologous frontal and temporal ROIs in 26 humans and 26 chimpanzees. They reported that the dorsal pathway was strengthened relative to the ventral one in humans versus chimpanzees (asymmetry index for the dorsal/ventral contrast AIDV=(WD−WV)/(WD+WV)AI_{DV}=(W_D-W_V)/(W_D+W_V), where WW is the normalized streamline count), that human arcuate projections reach the middle temporal gyrus (MTG) and the superior temporal sulcus (STS) — core lexical-semantic and syntactic cortex, ventral to classical Wernicke's area — whereas chimpanzee projections concentrate in the superior temporal gyrus (STG), and that the expanded human arcuate appears to have displaced the ILF ventromedially. They argued, against the continuity-based emphasis of Saur et al. (2010) on the ventral extreme capsule route for word meaning, that the arcuate is likely the pathway most essential for higher-order language functions such as syntax and lexical-semantics, while acknowledging stimulation evidence implicating the extreme capsule and IFOF in semantic processing (Duffau, 2008; Martino et al., 2010). Every load-bearing element of this argument — the species differences, the functional attribution, and the displacement claim — rests on indirect streamline-based evidence whose validation, causal force, and methodological robustness were explicitly left open by the source.

Problem Statement

Establish, with direct anatomical validation and causally interpretable evidence, how human language pathways were rewired in evolution and what each pathway contributes to language. This requires answering, for the arcuate fasciculus, the extreme capsule, the IFOF and neighbouring perisylvian pathways: (1) whether the dorsal arcuate was preferentially augmented in human evolution relative to the ventral extreme capsule pathway — where "augmented" is operationalized by the source's own graded quantities (normalized probabilistic streamline counts, dorsal/ventral and left/right asymmetry indices, and the cortical targets of temporal projections, e.g. the inferred human-specific strengthening of arcuate projections into mid-MTG/STS versus STG) — and whether these tractography-derived species differences are confirmed by direct anatomical evidence (for example tracer studies where ethically and technically possible, post-mortem high-resolution diffusion imaging, or combined stimulation/tract-disruption experiments) rather than only by model-based streamline counts; (2) the causal functional contribution of each identified tract to specific language processes — syntax versus lexical-semantic retrieval versus semantic access — established by perturbation or direct measurement of information flow along identified tracts (for example lesion, intraoperative electrostimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), or high-resolution functional studies), not by correlational anatomy alone; (3) whether the apparent ventromedial displacement of the ILF by an expanded arcuate, and the associated spatial shifts of cortical visual and language areas across hominid evolution, hold under quantitative anatomical mapping of the human and chimpanzee brains from which they were inferred; and (4) the sensitivity of cross-species tractography conclusions to ROI definition, normalization assumptions (including the assumption that total streamline counts across the compared pathways are comparable across individuals), and diffusion acquisition parameters, so that the limits of inference from normalized streamline counts across species are known. These four parts are jointly posed: resolving one part does not by itself resolve the others. Parts (1), (3) and (4) ask what the available direct-anatomical, comparative-anatomical and methodological evidence establishes, and where that evidence remains insufficient. Part (2) rests on evidence that directly perturbs or measures information flow along the identified tracts. Together these four answers bear on the source's overarching question — is the arcuate-centered account of human language pathway evolution correct, and what does each pathway causally do for language? — and may confirm, refute, or quantitatively revise the source's claims (for example, by establishing graded rather than human-unique arcuate-MTG connectivity).

References

  1. Rilling JK, Glasser MF, Jbabdi S, Andersson J, Preuss TM (2011). Continuity, Divergence, and the Evolution of Brain Language Pathways. Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience 3:11. doi:10.3389/fnevo.2011.00011. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnevo.2011.00011
  2. Rilling JK, Glasser MF, Preuss TM, Ma X, Zhao T, Hu X, Behrens TEJ (2008). The evolution of the arcuate fasciculus revealed with comparative DTI. Nature Neuroscience 11:426-428. doi:10.1038/nn2072. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn2072
  3. Saur D, Schelter B, Schnell S, Kratochvil D, Küpper H, Kellmeyer P, Kümmerer D, Klöppel S, Glauche V, Lange R, Mader W, Feess D, Timmer J, Weiller C (2010). Combining functional and anatomical connectivity reveals brain networks for auditory language comprehension. NeuroImage 49:3187-3197. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.009
  4. Duffau H (2008). The anatomo-functional connectivity of language revisited: new insights provided by electrostimulation and tractography. Neuropsychologia 46(4):927-934. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.10.025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.10.025
  5. Martino J, Brogna C, Robles SG, Vergani F, Duffau H (2010). Anatomic dissection of the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus revisited in the lights of brain stimulation data. Cortex 46(5):691-699. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.07.015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2009.07.015
  6. Eichert N, Verhagen L, Folloni D, Jbabdi S, Khrapitchev AA, Sibson NR, Mantini D, Sallet J, Mars RB (2019). What is special about the human arcuate fasciculus? Lateralization, projections, and expansion. Cortex 118:107-115. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2018.05.005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.05.005
  7. Roumazeilles L, Eichert N, Bryant KL, Folloni D, Sallet J, Vijayakumar S, Foxley S, Tendler BC, Jbabdi S, Reveley C, Verhagen L, Dershowitz LB, Guthrie M, Flach E, Miller KL, Mars RB (2020). Longitudinal connections and the organization of the temporal cortex in macaques, great apes, and humans. PLOS Biology 18(7):e3000810. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000810. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000810
  8. Balezeau F, Wilson B, Gallardo G, Dick F, Hopkins W, Anwander A, Friederici AD, Griffiths TD, Petkov CI (2020). Primate auditory prototype in the evolution of the arcuate fasciculus. Nature Neuroscience 23:611-614. doi:10.1038/s41593-020-0623-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-0623-9
  9. Eichert N, Robinson EC, Bryant KL, Jbabdi S, Jenkinson M, Li L, Krug K, Watkins KE, Mars RB (2020). Cross-species cortical alignment identifies different types of anatomical reorganization in the primate temporal lobe. eLife 9:e53232. doi:10.7554/eLife.53232. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53232
  10. Becker Y, Loh KK, Coulon O, Meguerditchian A (2022). The Arcuate Fasciculus and language origins: Disentangling existing conceptions that influence evolutionary accounts. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 134:104490. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.12.013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.12.013
  11. Sierpowska J, Bryant KL, Janssen N, Blazquez Freches G, Römkens M, Mangnus M, Mars RB, Piai V (2022). Comparing human and chimpanzee temporal lobe neuroanatomy reveals modifications to human language hubs beyond the frontotemporal arcuate fasciculus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119(28):e2118295119. doi:10.1073/pnas.2118295119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2118295119
  12. Kourtidou E, Kasselimis D, Angelopoulou G, Karavasilis E, Velonakis G, Kelekis N, Zalonis I, Evdokimidis I, Potagas C, Petrides M (2022). Specific disruption of the ventral anterior temporo-frontal network reveals key implications for language comprehension and cognition. Communications Biology 5:1077. doi:10.1038/s42003-022-03983-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03983-9
  13. Zhang Y, Shen SX, Bibic A, Wang X (2024). Evolutionary continuity and divergence of auditory dorsal and ventral pathways in primates revealed by ultra-high field diffusion MRI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121(9):e2313831121. doi:10.1073/pnas.2313831121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2313831121
  14. Becker Y, Eichner C, Paquette M, Bock C, Girard-Buttoz C, Jäger C, Gräßle T, Deschner T, EBC Consortium, Amarasekaran B, Asiimwe C, Aschoff D, Bleyer M, Chantrey J, Fedurek P, Flores K, Gone Bi ZB, Jaffe JE, Hambrech S, Hanus D, Haun D, Kirilina E, Kopp K, Leendertz FH, Liptovszky M, Makouloutou-Nzassi P, Mätz-Rensing K, McElreath R, McLennan M, Mezö Z, Moittié S, Møller T, Morawski M, Olofsson-Sannö K, Pika S, Pizarro A, Pléh K, Rendel J, Romero Forero A, Steiner J, Stidworthy MF, Southern L, Szentiks CA, Tanga T, Ulrich R, Unwin S, Walker S, Weiskopf N, Wibbelt G, Wood K, Zuberbühler K, Gunz P, Wittig RM, Crockford C, Friederici AD, Anwander A (2025). Long arcuate fascicle in wild and captive chimpanzees as a potential structural precursor of the language network. Nature Communications 16:4485. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-59254-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59254-8
  15. Hecht EE, Vijayakumar S, Becker Y, Hopkins WD (2025). Individual variation in the chimpanzee arcuate fasciculus predicts vocal and gestural communication. Nature Communications 16:3681. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-58784-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-58784-5
  16. Giampiccolo D, Herbet G, Duffau H (2025). The inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus: bridging phylogeny, ontogeny and functional anatomy. Brain 148(5):1507-1525. doi:10.1093/brain/awaf055. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaf055
  17. Bain JS, Yeatman JD, Schurr R, Rokem A, Mezer AA (2019). Evaluating arcuate fasciculus laterality measurements across dataset and tractography pipelines. Human Brain Mapping 40(13):3695-3711. doi:10.1002/hbm.24626. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24626
  18. López-Barroso D, Catani M, Ripollés P, Dell'Acqua F, Rodríguez-Fornells A, de Diego-Balaguer R (2013). Word learning is mediated by the left arcuate fasciculus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(32):13168-13173. doi:10.1073/pnas.1301696110. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1301696110
  19. Maier-Hein KH, Neher PF, Houde JC, Côté MA, Garyfallidis E, Zhong J, Chamberland M, Yeh FC, Lin YC, Ji Q, Reddick WE, Glass JO, Chen DQ, Feng Y, Gao C, Wu Y, Ma J, He R, Li Q, Westin CF, Deslauriers-Gauthier S, González JOO, Paquette M, St-Jean S, Girard G, Rheault F, Sidhu J, Tax CMW, Guo F, Mesri HY, Dávid S, Froeling M, Heemskerk AM, Leemans A, Boré A, Pinsard B, Bedetti C, Desrosiers M, Brambati S, Doyon J, Sarica A, Vasta R, Cerasa A, Quattrone A, Yeatman J, Khan AR, Hodges W, Alexander S, Romascano D, Barakovic M, Auría A, Esteban O, Lemkaddem A, Thiran JP, Cetingul HE, Odry BL, Mailhe B, Nadar MS, Pizzagalli F, Prasad G, Villalon-Reina JE, Galvis J, Thompson PM, Requejo FS, Laguna PL, Lacerda LM, Barrett R, Dell'Acqua F, Catani M, Petit L, Caruyer E, Daducci A, Dyrby TB, Holland-Letz T, Hilgetag CC, Stieltjes B, Descoteaux M (2017). The challenge of mapping the human connectome based on diffusion tractography. Nature Communications 8:1349. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-01285-x. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01285-x
  20. Donahue CJ, Sotiropoulos SN, Jbabdi S, Hernandez-Fernandez M, Behrens TE, Dyrby TB, Coalson T, Kennedy H, Knoblauch K, Van Essen DC, Glasser MF (2016). Using diffusion tractography to predict cortical connection strength and distance: a quantitative comparison with tracers in the monkey. Journal of Neuroscience 36(25):6758-6770. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0493-16.2016. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0493-16.2016
  21. Murphy E, Woolnough O, Morse CW, Scherschligt X, Tandon N (2026). Frontotemporal network interactions causally support rapid concreteness judgments during reading. PLOS Biology 24(3):e3003723. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003723. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003723
  22. Chauvel M, Uszynski I, Pascucci M, Leprince Y, Herlin B, Rivière D, Mangin J-F, Hopkins WD, Poupon C (2026). Evolutionary signatures in deep white matter architecture: A comparative study of humans and chimpanzees. Imaging Neuroscience 4:IMAG.a.1154. doi:10.1162/IMAG.a.1154. https://doi.org/10.1162/IMAG.a.1154
  23. Wang Y, Cheng L, Li D, Lu Y, Hopkins WD, Sherwood CC, Xu T, Liu C, Paxinos G, Jiang T, Chu C, Fan L (2026). Homologous specialization of arcuate fasciculus ventrolateral frontal connectivity in marmosets and humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 123(18):e2600429123. doi:10.1073/pnas.2600429123. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2600429123
  24. Becker Y (2026). The arcuate fascicle middle temporal gyrus connection in chimpanzees: A missing link in language evolution? Biolinguistics 20:e22479. doi:10.5964/bioling.22479. https://doi.org/10.5964/bioling.22479