Many folded enzymes show curved (non-Arrhenius) rate-versus-temperature plots with an optimum temperature, and two mechanistic pictures compete to explain this: a negative activation heat capacity from conformational restriction along the reaction coordinate (macromolecular rate theory, MMRT), or a temperature-dependent equilibrium between more- and less-active conformations. For the alpha-glucosidase MalL, the source work (Walker et al., ACS Catalysis 2024) showed two temperature regimes — near-zero activation heat capacity below ~313 K and a large negative value above it — attributed to a cooperative transition from an enzyme-substrate conformation (ES) to a transition-state-like conformation (TLC), formalized as a two-state model (MMRT-2S). However, a conformational equilibrium model fits the same data equally well, so whether MalL's high-temperature regime reflects a genuine change in rate-determining step or a coupled equilibrium plus chemical step cannot be decided from existing data. The source's unresolved question is to discriminate these mechanisms for MalL. No published work has resolved this question for MalL.

Background

Many enzyme-catalysed reactions violate the straight Arrhenius or Eyring plots expected when the activation enthalpy is temperature-independent: the rate instead rises to a peak at an optimum temperature and falls while the enzyme remains folded. Macromolecular rate theory (MMRT) explains this curvature by adding a heat capacity of activation, ΔCP‡\Delta C_P^{\ddagger}, to Eyring transition-state theory; a negative ΔCP‡\Delta C_P^{\ddagger} arises when the transition-state ensemble samples a narrower conformational space than the ground state, as expected from a cooperative conformational tightening along the reaction coordinate (Hobbs et al. 2013; Arcus et al. 2016). A rival tradition, the equilibrium model, explains the same curvature by a temperature-dependent equilibrium between an active and an inactive (or less active) enzyme conformation, with the chemical step itself remaining Arrhenius-like (Daniel and Danson 2010; Klinman and colleagues for a thermophilic alcohol dehydrogenase, ADH, in Nagel et al. 2011). From molecular simulations, Åqvist and colleagues (2020) argued that for the alpha-amylase AHA and the alpha-glucosidase MalL the correct picture is an equilibrium involving an off-pathway dead-end conformation, with the chemical step rate-limiting at all temperatures.

The source work (Walker et al. 2024) measured high-precision kcatk_{cat} versus temperature (279–329 K) for MalL — a family-13 alpha-glucosidase from Bacillus subtilis that is a workhorse model for enzyme temperature adaptation — and for a V200A/T/S mutant series, combined with molecular dynamics simulations and a 1.10 Å X-ray structure of a ligand-free, transition-state-like conformation of an S536R variant, which they term the TLC (transition-state-like conformation). MalL displays two regimes: below roughly 313 K the activation heat capacity is near zero; above it, ΔCP‡\Delta C_P^{\ddagger} is large and negative (about −21 kJ mol⁻¹ K⁻¹), signalling a cooperative ES-to-TLC transition (involving shortening of more than 28 hydrogen bonds and increased correlated motions) immediately before the chemical step. They formalize this as a two-state extension of MMRT (MMRT-2S, five parameters, with a transition temperature TCT_C and an enthalpy difference ΔΔH‡\Delta\Delta H^{\ddagger} between the regimes) and offer a linear approximation (MMRT-1L) for the sparse datasets (7–8 temperature points) typical of the literature, where five parameters cannot be identified. Crucially, an equilibrium-model fit to the same data — with the conformational equilibrium on-pathway between ES and TLC — fits equally well: the residual sums of squares are similar, so the two mechanistic pictures cannot be distinguished from the kinetic data alone, and the authors' working hypothesis (chemical step rate-limiting below 305 K, mixed 305–325 K, conformational step above 325 K) remains unverified. The source proposes mutations that selectively alter the conformational (ES-to-TLC) barrier as a candidate decisive test of the two mechanisms. Resolving this matters because it fixes the microscopic meaning of activation heat capacities, temperature optima and cold-adaptation arguments, and because MMRT-based interpretations are now used from enzyme engineering to soil-carbon and microbial-growth modelling.

Problem Statement

The source work leaves a central unresolved question, aimed at establishing the cooperative-conformational mechanism of non-Arrhenius enzyme catalysis:

For MalL, determine whether the high-temperature regime (above the fitted transition temperature TC≈313.5T_C \approx 313.5 K; under the authors' working hypothesis the conformational step fully dominates only above 325 K) reflects a genuine change in rate-determining step — the cooperative ES-to-TLC conformational transition replacing the chemical step as the slow step — or a coupled conformational equilibrium plus chemical step as in the equilibrium model, given that the MMRT-2S and equilibrium formulations fit the existing data equally well.

Two broader directions are context rather than part of the posed question. First, the source remarks that "the relative stabilities of TLCs may be modulated by evolution, allosteric ligands and solvent effects, as well as by temperature": the detailed microscopic diversity of TLCs across enzymes is an open-ended comparative programme without a sharp completion boundary. Second, on inferring the full cooperative thermodynamics (MMRT-2S-type parameters: regime heat capacities, transition temperature TCT_C, and ΔΔH‡\Delta\Delta H^{\ddagger}) from the sparse temperature datasets typical of the literature, where only a few kinetic points are available and five-parameter models are not identifiable, the source offers the MMRT-1L linear approximation as its recommended practical answer; how far that approximation captures trends rather than full thermodynamics remains a methodological concern that the follow-up literature (below) sharpens but does not resolve.

The scientific objective is to distinguish among closely related conformational mechanisms of the temperature dependence of catalysis, since the stability of the rate-limiting conformational transition is what sets each enzyme's optimum temperature.

References

  1. Emma J. Walker, Carlin J. Hamill, Rory Crean, Michael S. Connolly, Annmaree K. Warrender, Kirsty L. Kraakman, Erica J. Prentice, Alistair Steyn-Ross, Moira Steyn-Ross, Christopher R. Pudney, Marc W. van der Kamp, Louis A. Schipper, Adrian J. Mulholland, Vickery L. Arcus (2024). Cooperative Conformational Transitions Underpin the Activation Heat Capacity in the Temperature Dependence of Enzyme Catalysis. ACS Catalysis 14(7): 4379–4394. DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.3c05584. URL: https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.3c05584
  2. E. J. Walker, C. J. Hamill, R. M. Crean, M. S. Connolly, A. K. Warrender, K. L. Kraakman, E. J. Prentice, A. Steyn-Ross, M. Steyn-Ross, C. R. Pudney, M. W. van der Kamp, L. A. Schipper, A. J. Mulholland, V. L. Arcus (2023). Cooperative conformational transitions and the temperature dependence of enzyme catalysis. bioRxiv preprint. DOI: 10.1101/2023.07.06.548038. URL: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.06.548038 (preprint version of the ACS Catalysis 2024 paper)
  3. Joanne K. Hobbs, Wanting Jiao, Ashley D. Easter, Emily J. Parker, Louis A. Schipper, Vickery L. Arcus (2013). Change in Heat Capacity for Enzyme Catalysis Determines Temperature Dependence of Enzyme Catalyzed Rates. ACS Chemical Biology 8(11): 2388–2393. DOI: 10.1021/cb4005029. URL: https://doi.org/10.1021/cb4005029
  4. Vickery L. Arcus, Erica J. Prentice, Joanne K. Hobbs, Adrian J. Mulholland, Marc W. Van der Kamp, Christopher R. Pudney, Emily J. Parker, Louis A. Schipper (2016). On the Temperature Dependence of Enzyme-Catalyzed Rates. Biochemistry 55(12): 1681–1688. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b01094. URL: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.5b01094
  5. Roy M. Daniel, Michael J. Danson (2010). A new understanding of how temperature affects the catalytic activity of enzymes. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 35(10): 584–591. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2010.05.001. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2010.05.001
  6. Zachary D. Nagel, Ming Dong, Brian J. Bahnson, Judith P. Klinman (2011). Impaired protein conformational landscapes as revealed in anomalous Arrhenius prefactors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108(26): 10520–10525. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1104989108. URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1104989108
  7. Johan Åqvist, Jaka Sočan, Miha Purg (2020). Hidden Conformational States and Strange Temperature Optima in Enzyme Catalysis. Biochemistry 59(40): 3844–3855. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00705. URL: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00705
  8. D. T. S. Pike, S. Singh, E. J. Prentice, T. A. Williams, M. W. van der Kamp, V. L. Arcus, A. J. Mulholland (2025). Correlated dynamics, reactive conformations and non-Arrhenius behaviour in the temperature-dependence of enzyme activity: triosephosphate isomerase. bioRxiv preprint. DOI: 10.64898/2025.12.31.695415. URL: https://doi.org/10.64898/2025.12.31.695415
  9. I. Aravena-Valenzuela, P. Maturana, L. Hernández-Cabello, F. González-Ordenes, V. Castro-Fernández, G. Vallejos-Baccelliere, V. Guixé (2026). Two activation heat capacity regimes underlie temperature-dependent catalysis in homologous archaeal ADP-dependent kinases. bioRxiv preprint. DOI: 10.64898/2026.08.05.742859. URL: https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.08.05.742859
  10. Nathaniel N. Carl, Yianni Tsigaris, Dan Ji, Norra K. Anpree, Kellie K. Omori, Cedric P. Owens (2026). Analysis of the Atypical Temperature Dependence and Conformational Changes During Turnover of a Lactobacillus Chlorogenic Acid Esterase. Biochemistry 65(16): 2587–2602. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.6c00440. URL: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.6c00440
  11. Jake P. Erbez, Griffin H. Rangel, Mia Davila, Jackson A. Englade, Alexander D. Erbez, Jasmine Rattanpal, Haocheng Li, Yuezhou Chen, Michael D. Toney (2024). Activation Heat Capacities in Pyridoxal Phosphate Enzymes. ACS Catalysis 14(15): 11178–11195. DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.4c01959. URL: https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.4c01959
  12. Christian Rapp, Annika Borg, Bernd Nidetzky (2024). Interplay of structural preorganization and conformational sampling in UDP-glucuronic acid 4-epimerase catalysis. Nature Communications 15: 3897. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-48281-6. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48281-6
  13. Christian Rapp, Bernd Nidetzky (2025). Effect of 2H2O solvent on protein conformational sampling linked to catalysis by UDP-glucuronic acid 4-epimerase. Cell Reports Physical Science 6(6): 102607. DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2025.102607. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2025.102607
  14. Jared J. Miller, Mikul Duggal, Brian J. Bahnson (2026). Macromolecular crowding and ionic strength diminish the energetic severity of the Arrhenius break point of thermolysin: Implications for biological significance. Protein Science 35(6). DOI: 10.1002/pro.70632. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.70632
  15. Matthew J. McLeod, Robert E. Thorne (2026). Activation parameters, enthalpy–entropy compensation and the temperature-dependent activity of enzymes. Protein Science 35(8). DOI: 10.1002/pro.70722. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.70722
  16. Matthew J. McLeod, Sarah A. E. Barwell, Todd Holyoak, Robert E. Thorne (2024). A structural perspective on the temperature-dependent activity of enzymes. bioRxiv preprint. DOI: 10.1101/2024.08.23.609221. URL: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.23.609221
  17. Caroline Simões Pereira, Sandrine Coquille, Céline Brochier-Armanet, Fabio Sterpone, Dominique Madern (2026). Unraveling the Link Between Thermal Adaptation and Latent Allostery in Malate Dehydrogenase From Methanococcales. Journal of Molecular Biology 438: 169552. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2025.169552. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2025.169552