Liquid nuclear condensates formed by phase separation of intrinsically disordered proteins mechanically exclude chromatin as they grow, preferentially nucleate in mechanically softer, low-density euchromatic regions, and can pull targeted genomic loci together through surface tension, motivating the 'chromatin filter' model of condensate-induced genome restructuring (Shin et al., Cell 2018). The open problem is to establish whether and how these condensate-chromatin mechanical interactions causally alter transcriptional output, and to determine the molecular and biophysical rules - chromatin-binding and targeting domains, reader motifs, condensate surface tension and wetting behavior - that set condensate adhesivity to chromatin and decide chromatin exclusion versus recruitment, including the HP1 counterexample.

Background

Many nuclear structures - the nucleolus (the ribosome-assembly factory), Cajal bodies, nuclear speckles, and transcriptional clusters - are now understood to be biomolecular condensates: liquid-like droplets that assemble by liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS), the spontaneous demixing of a supersaturated protein/nucleic-acid solution into a dense droplet phase and a dilute phase. A common driver of this assembly is intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs), protein segments without a stable folded structure whose multivalent, sequence-encoded interactions promote condensation. Whether and how the physical forces associated with nucleation, growth, and wetting of such liquid droplets restructure chromatin - the DNA-protein complex comprising the genome, packaged by histones into nucleosomes - was addressed directly by Shin et al. (Cell 175(6):1481-1491, 2018) using CasDrop, a CRISPR-Cas9-based optogenetic technology in which dCas9 (catalytically inactive Cas9) delivers light-activated IDR fusion proteins to chosen genomic loci. They found that growing IDR-driven condensates mechanically exclude chromatin (creating visible chromatin-depleted cavities), that condensates preferentially nucleate and grow in low-density, mechanically softer euchromatin (the gene-active, less compact chromatin fraction) rather than in denser, stiffer heterochromatin, and that surface tension of targeted droplets can coalesce and mechanically pull together distant genomic loci. A minimal physical model explains this stiffness sensitivity: the droplet free energy change is set by a surface term proportional to the droplet surface tension γ\gamma, a bulk chemical driving force Δμ⋅cdrop\Delta\mu\cdot c_{\text{drop}} (chemical-potential difference times saturated concentration in the droplet phase), and a mechanical penalty set by the elastic (Young's) modulus GG of the surrounding chromatin network, whose architecture is characterized by a typical mesh size rmeshr_{\text{mesh}} (the spacing between chromatin strands):

ΔF(R)=4πR2γ−43πR3(Δμ⋅cdrop−56G),\Delta F(R) = 4\pi R^2\gamma - \frac{4}{3}\pi R^3\left(\Delta\mu\cdot c_{\text{drop}} - \frac{5}{6}G\right),

so that droplet growth is suppressed when the driving pressure Δμ⋅cdrop\Delta\mu\cdot c_{\text{drop}} falls below the critical value Pc=5G/6P_c = 5G/6 and is favored where the local chromatin matrix is softer. Combining exclusion of non-targeted chromatin with surface-tension-driven coalescence of targeted loci, the authors proposed that nuclear condensates act as 'mechano-active chromatin filters'. Two families of open issues were stated in the same paper's discussion. First, an apparent counterexample: heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1), which binds the H3K9me3 histone mark of heterochromatin and was reported in 2017 to form liquid droplets that compact chromatin (Larson et al., Nature 547:236-240, 2017; Strom et al., Nature 547:241-245, 2017), appears to recruit rather than exclude chromatin; the authors described the effective adhesivity of condensates to chromatin as likely mediated in large part through their targeting domains - including reader motifs (protein modules that recognize specific histone modifications, such as the bromodomain of BRD4 that binds acetylated lysines) - and proposed a rich interplay between compaction-promoting chromatin-targeting domains and IDR-rich domains which tend to push out chromatin, competing with and modulating the purely mechanical effects. Second, the field of nuclear mechanobiology had established that mechanical forces influence gene expression, but the underlying biophysical mechanisms were still largely unknown, and the authors proposed that mechanical effects on nuclear condensates might be part of the missing link, stating that future work will explore these emerging links between nuclear mechanics and phase separation and their impact on functional changes in gene expression. The minimal model's parameters were estimated from in vitro measurements and literature values rather than measured in living cells. Later work gives the needed vocabulary: wetting (how a liquid droplet contacts and spreads on a surface or polymer) and elastocapillarity (the deformation of a soft elastic solid by liquid surface tension) turned out to be the unifying physical concepts for condensate-chromatin contact, and Ostwald ripening / coarsening (growth of large droplets at the expense of small ones, here strongly modified by the elastic chromatin matrix) describes the long-term dynamics of embedded condensates.

Problem Statement

For nuclear condensates that interact mechanically with chromatin, (i) establish whether and how mechanically driven chromatin exclusion and surface-tension-driven coalescence of targeted loci causally alter transcriptional output in living cells - i.e., close or refute the proposed causal chain from condensate-chromatin mechanics, through genome reorganization, to functional changes in gene expression, including in endogenous regulatory condensates and mechanotransduction pathways, whose underlying biophysical mechanisms remain largely unknown; and (ii) determine the molecular and biophysical rules - chromatin-binding and targeting domains, reader motifs, and condensate surface tension and wetting behavior - that set condensate adhesivity to chromatin and thereby decide chromatin exclusion versus recruitment, resolving the HP1-type counterexample in which a condensate-forming protein recruits and compacts chromatin instead of excluding it, and characterizing the interplay between compaction-promoting chromatin-targeting domains and IDR-rich domains that tend to push chromatin out. Both aims are required for a complete resolution: aim (i) is discharged by either closing or refuting the proposed causal chain, and aim (ii) by a mechanistic rule set that decides chromatin exclusion versus recruitment. The domains, motifs, surface properties, and pathways listed within each aim describe the scope over which the claims must hold rather than a checklist of separately required items. In vivo measurement of the minimal model's physical parameters (condensate surface tension γ\gamma, spatially varying chromatin elastic modulus GG, in situ chemical driving force Δμ⋅cdrop\Delta\mu\cdot c_{\text{drop}}, and chromatin mesh size rmeshr_{\text{mesh}}) and of the time-dependent viscoelastic response of chromatin - estimated from in vitro measurements and literature values - is a closely related direction that would support these aims but does not replace them.

References

  1. Shin Y, Chang Y-C, Lee DSW, Berry J, Sanders DW, Ronceray P, Wingreen NS, Haataja M, Brangwynne CP (2018). Liquid nuclear condensates mechanically sense and restructure the genome. Cell 175(6):1481-1491.e13. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.057, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.057
  2. Larson AG, Elnatan D, Keenen MM, Trnka MJ, Johnston JB, Burlingame AL, Agard DA, Redding S, Narlikar GJ (2017). Liquid droplet formation by HP1α suggests a role for phase separation in heterochromatin. Nature 547:236-240. DOI: 10.1038/nature22822, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22822
  3. Strom AR, Emelyanov AV, Mir M, Fyodorov DV, Darzacq X, Karpen GH (2017). Phase separation drives heterochromatin domain formation. Nature 547:241-245. DOI: 10.1038/nature22989, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22989
  4. Lee DSW, Wingreen NS, Brangwynne CP (2021). Chromatin mechanics dictates subdiffusion and coarsening dynamics of embedded condensates. Nature Physics 17:531-538. DOI: 10.1038/s41567-020-01125-8, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-01125-8
  5. Quail T, Golfier S, Elsner M, Ishihara K, Murugesan V, Renger R, Jülicher F, Brugués J (2021). Force generation by protein–DNA co-condensation. Nature Physics 17:1007-1012. DOI: 10.1038/s41567-021-01285-1, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01285-1
  6. Strom AR, Biggs RJ, Banigan EJ, Wang X, Chiu K, Herman C, Collado J, Yue F, Ritland Politz JC, Tait LJ, Scalzo D, Telling A, Groudine M, Brangwynne CP, Marko JF, Stephens AD (2021). HP1α is a chromatin crosslinker that controls nuclear and mitotic chromosome mechanics. eLife 10:e63972. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.63972, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.63972
  7. Pancholi A, Klingberg T, Zhang W, Prizak R, Mamontova I, Noa A, Sobucki M, Kobitski AY, Nienhaus GU, Zaburdaev V, Hilbert L (2021). RNA polymerase II clusters form in line with surface condensation on regulatory chromatin. Molecular Systems Biology 17(9):e10272. DOI: 10.15252/msb.202110272, https://doi.org/10.15252/msb.202110272
  8. Böddeker TJ, Rosowski KA, Berchtold D, Emmanouilidis L, Han Y, Allain FHT, Style RW, Pelkmans L, Dufresne ER (2022). Non-specific adhesive forces between filaments and membraneless organelles. Nature Physics 18:571-578. DOI: 10.1038/s41567-022-01537-8, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-022-01537-8
  9. Nguyen T, Li S, Chang JT, Watters JW, Ng H, Osunsade A, David Y, Liu S (2022). Chromatin sequesters pioneer transcription factor Sox2 from exerting force on DNA. Nature Communications 13:3988. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-31738-x, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31738-x
  10. Lee DSW, Strom AR, Brangwynne CP (2022). The mechanobiology of nuclear phase separation. APL Bioengineering 6:021503. DOI: 10.1063/5.0083286, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0083286
  11. Pundel OJ, Blowes LM, Connelly JT (2022). Extracellular adhesive cues physically define nucleolar structure and function. Advanced Science 9:2105545. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202105545, https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202105545
  12. Meng L, Mao S, Lin J (2024). Heterogeneous elasticity drives ripening and controls bursting kinetics of transcriptional condensates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 121(12):e2316610121. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2316610121, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2316610121
  13. Strom AR, Eeftens JM, Polyachenko Y, Weaver CJ, Watanabe HF, Bracha D, Orlovsky ND, Jumper CC, Jacobs WM, Brangwynne CP (2024). Interplay of condensation and chromatin binding underlies BRD4 targeting. Molecular Biology of the Cell 35(6):ar88. DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E24-01-0046, https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E24-01-0046
  14. Strom AR, Kim Y, Zhao H, Chang Y-C, Orlovsky ND, Košmrlj A, Storm C, Brangwynne CP (2024). Condensate interfacial forces reposition DNA loci and probe chromatin viscoelasticity. Cell 187(19):5282-5297. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.07.034, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2024.07.034
  15. Supakar A, Davis RB, Biswas S, Yang S, Potoyan DA, Banerjee PR (2025). Chromatin binding regulates phase behavior and morphology of condensates formed by prion-like domains. Journal of Molecular Biology 437(21):169398. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2025.169398, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2025.169398
  16. Furukawa A, Yonezawa K, Negami T, Yoshimura Y, Hayashi A, Nakayama JI, Adachi N, Senda T, Shimizu K, Terada T, Shimizu N, Nishimura Y (2025). A dynamic structural unit of phase-separated heterochromatin protein 1α as revealed by integrative structural analyses. Nucleic Acids Research 53(6):gkaf154. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaf154, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaf154
  17. Zhao H, Strom AR, Eeftens JM, Haataja M, Košmrlj A, Brangwynne CP (2025). Condensate-driven chromatin organization via elastocapillary interactions. bioRxiv preprint. DOI: 10.1101/2025.06.12.659369, https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.12.659369
  18. Narat Z, Figueroa S, Donjon A, Doucet C, Laabas N, Boumendil C (2025). Disorder in coiled-coils orchestrate chromatin organization and define a new permeability barrier at the nuclear pore basket. bioRxiv preprint. DOI: 10.1101/2025.07.18.665545, https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.18.665545
  19. Brandon CJ, Robinson-Thiewes S, Kaulage M, Rosikiewicz W, Cuneo MJ, Brett J, Kandola J, Lang WH, Low J, Mohammed A, Danda A, Rider S, Valentine M, Ochoada J, Young B, Nguyen T, Kietlinska SJ, Taylor AB, Hoeckendorf B, Rodrigues P, Lin W, Khairy K, Xu B, Shelat AA, Chen T, Mittag T, Ansari AZ (2026). BRD4 recruitment into HP1 condensates desilences transcription without erasure of repressive chromatin. Nature Cell Biology. DOI: 10.1038/s41556-026-02044-1, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-026-02044-1
  20. Shaalan F, Kdouh F, Salhab Z, Issa R, Soufan F, Al Dirani Z, Kourani J, Itani G, Mahmoud-Haidar J, Badawi S, Fayyad-Kazan H (2026). Mechanical forces and the nucleolus: a new frontier in cellular mechanotransduction. Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering 19(3):257-267. DOI: 10.1007/s12195-026-00919-9, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-026-00919-9