The SCOOP10 and SCOOP12 peptides compete for the same receptor-like kinase MIK2 yet exert opposite effects on Arabidopsis leaf senescence: SCOOP10 promotes and SCOOP12 suppresses senescence, with SCOOP10 diminishing and SCOOP12 enhancing MIK2 phosphorylation. The mechanistic wiring behind this antagonism is unresolved: the receptor complex composition in senescing leaves, the downstream signaling components engaged by each ligand, the in vivo operation of the proposed SCOOP12 'safeguard' timing model, the contribution of other MIK2-recognized SCOOP family members, and the integration with MIK2-dependent salt, cell wall integrity, and immune inputs are all open. This problem asks for the molecular mechanism by which one receptor decodes two competing endogenous peptide ligands into opposite developmental outputs.

Background

Leaf senescence is the genetically programmed, age-dependent deterioration of leaves that recycles nutrients from aging tissues to developing organs; it is marked by chlorophyll degradation and by the induced expression of senescence-associated genes (SAGs). Its timing is controlled by endogenous cues (age, peptide and hormone signals) and environmental stresses, but the receptor-level pathways that initiate it remain incompletely described. MIK2 (MALE DISCOVERER 1-INTERACTING RECEPTOR-LIKE KINASE 2) is a plasma-membrane leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase (LRR-RLK), a class of cell-surface receptors whose extracellular leucine-rich repeats bind ligands and whose intracellular kinase domain relays the signal by phosphorylation. MIK2 was first linked to pollen tube guidance, then to salt tolerance, cell wall integrity maintenance, and resistance to Fusarium pathogens. The SCOOPs (SERINE-RICH ENDOGENOUS PEPTIDES) are a Brassicales-specific family of small secreted signaling peptides (phytocytokines) produced from PROSCOOP precursors by subtilase (subtilisin-like serine) proteases; all characterized SCOOP perception is strictly MIK2-dependent, and the family contains at least 50 members in the Arabidopsis Columbia-0 genome, with SCOOP1–23 characterized functionally. Two 2021 studies established MIK2 as the SCOOP receptor: SCOOP12 binds MIK2 directly and triggers complex formation with co-receptors of the SERK (SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR-LIKE KINASE) family, namely SERK3/BAK1 and SERK4, relaying through the cytoplasmic kinases BIK1 and PBL1 to activate immunity-related responses including reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase activation. Zhang et al. (2024) then connected this module to development: mik2 loss-of-function mutants show premature leaf senescence while MIK2 overexpression delays it, so MIK2 is a negative regulator of senescence. SCOOP10 peptide treatment or PROSCOOP10 overexpression accelerates senescence in a MIK2-dependent manner, whereas SCOOP12 suppresses MIK2-dependent senescence. Biochemical measurements showed that both peptides bind MIK2 with comparable affinity (dissociation constants of roughly 0.75 and 0.84 micromolar for SCOOP10 and SCOOP12) yet have opposite effects on MIK2 phosphorylation: SCOOP12 enhances and SCOOP10 diminishes it, and SCOOP12 can displace SCOOP10 from the receptor. The authors proposed a sequential model in which early-senescence SCOOP10 signaling both promotes senescence and induces PROSCOOP12 expression, after which SCOOP12 outcompetes SCOOP10 to prevent overly rapid senescence progression ('safeguard' model). Structural work on the immune module has clarified recognition (the SCOOP SxS motif binds MIK2 while the C-terminal GGR residues bridge to BAK1, with specific N-glycans on MIK2 required for co-receptor association), and a downstream pathway from MIK2 through the MAP kinase MPK6 to PIN auxin-efflux transporters has been defined for SCOOP effects on root growth, but neither addresses how opposite ligand-dependent phosphorylation of MIK2 is converted into opposite senescence outcomes in leaves.

Problem Statement

Elucidate the molecular mechanism by which MIK2, when bound by SCOOP10 versus SCOOP12, produces antagonistic (pro-senescent versus anti-senescent) outputs in Arabidopsis leaves. Concretely, determine: (1) the composition of the MIK2 receptor complex in senescing leaves for each ligand — which co-receptors and receptor-like proteins associate with MIK2 upon SCOOP10 versus SCOOP12 binding, and how this changes across senescence stages; (2) the downstream signaling components and phosphorylation events that connect ligand-specific MIK2 activation states (SCOOP12-enhanced versus SCOOP10-diminished MIK2 phosphorylation) to SAG expression and the physiological senescence readouts (chlorophyll loss, photosystem II efficiency, ion leakage), distinguishing whether the same cascade is modulated in opposite directions or distinct cascades are engaged; (3) whether the proposed safeguard model holds in vivo — the timing of SCOOP10 and SCOOP12 peptide bioavailability during natural senescence and the biological relevance of their competitive binding, assessable by any valid experimental route (genetic and biochemical testing, for example epistasis among proscoop10, proscoop12, mik2 and higher-order mutants in time-resolved senescence assays, is one option among others); (4) whether other MIK2-recognized SCOOP family members (SCOOP4, SCOOP6, SCOOP8, SCOOP13, SCOOP14, SCOOP15, SCOOP20, and SCOOP23 — the SCOOPs other than SCOOP10 and SCOOP12 that are perceived by MIK2, not the entire at-least-50-member PROSCOOP family) contribute to senescence regulation under specific environmental or developmental conditions; and (5) how the senescence pathway is integrated at the receptor level with MIK2's other inputs (salt stress, cell wall integrity, and immunity signaling). A solution is complete when it provides a mechanistic account of (1) and (2) — how ligand-specific MIK2 complex composition and the downstream signaling and phosphorylation events convert the SCOOP12-enhanced versus SCOOP10-diminished MIK2 activation states into the opposite senescence outputs; aims (3)–(5) are optional extensions that would strengthen such an account but are not required to resolve the problem.

References

  1. Zhang Z, Gigli-Bisceglia N, Li W, Li S, Wang J, Liu J, Testerink C, Guo Y (2024). SCOOP10 and SCOOP12 peptides act through MIK2 receptor-like kinase to antagonistically regulate Arabidopsis leaf senescence. Molecular Plant 17(12):1805-1819. DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2024.10.010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2024.10.010
  2. Zhang Z, Gigli-Bisceglia N, Li W, Testerink C, Guo Y (2023). Antagonistic Regulation of Arabidopsis Leaf Senescence by SCOOP10 and SCOOP12 Peptides via MIK2 Receptor-Like Kinase. bioRxiv preprint. DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.27.564453. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.27.564453
  3. Hou S, Liu D, Huang S, Luo D, Liu Z, Xiang Q, Wang P, Mu R, Han Z, Chen S, Chai J, Shan L, He P (2021). The Arabidopsis MIK2 receptor elicits immunity by sensing a conserved signature from phytocytokines and microbes. Nature Communications 12:5494. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25580-w. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25580-w
  4. Rhodes J, Yang H, Moussu S, Boutrot F, Santiago J, Zipfel C (2021). Perception of a divergent family of phytocytokines by the Arabidopsis receptor kinase MIK2. Nature Communications 12:705. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-20932-y. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-20932-y
  5. Yang H, Kim X, Sklenar J, Aubourg S, Sancho-Andres G, Stahl E, Guillou MC, Gigli-Bisceglia N, Tran Van Canh L, Bender KW, Stintzi A, Reymond P, Sanchez-Rodriguez C, Testerink C, Renou JP, Menke FLH, Schaller A, Rhodes J, Zipfel C (2023). Subtilase-mediated biogenesis of the expanded family of SERINE RICH ENDOGENOUS PEPTIDES. Nature Plants 9(12):2085-2094. DOI: 10.1038/s41477-023-01583-x. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-023-01583-x
  6. Stahl E, Fernandez Martin A, Glauser G, Guillou MC, Aubourg S, Renou JP, Reymond P (2022). The MIK2/SCOOP signaling system contributes to Arabidopsis resistance against herbivory by modulating jasmonate and indole glucosinolate biosynthesis. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:852808. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.852808. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.852808
  7. Wu H, Wan L, Liu Z, Jian Y, Zhang C, Mao X, Wang Z, Wang Q, Hu Y, Xiong L, Xia Z, Xue J, Li S, He P, Shan L, Xu S (2024). Mechanistic study of SCOOPs recognition by MIK2-BAK1 complex reveals the role of N-glycans in plant ligand-receptor-coreceptor complex formation. Nature Plants 10:1984-1998. DOI: 10.1038/s41477-024-01836-3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-024-01836-3
  8. Wang X, Chen M, Li J, Kong M, Tan S (2024). The SCOOP-MIK2 immune pathway modulates Arabidopsis root growth and development by regulating PIN-FORMED abundance and auxin transport. The Plant Journal 120(1):318-334. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.16988. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.16988
  9. Snoeck S, Lee HK, Schmid MW, Bender KW, Neeracher MJ, Fernandez-Fernandez AD, Santiago J, Zipfel C (2024). Leveraging coevolutionary insights and AI-based structural modeling to unravel receptor-peptide ligand-binding mechanisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 121(32):e2400862121. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2400862121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2400862121
  10. Maroschek J, Rosgen Y, Rossner C, Snoeck S, Schwechheimer C, Zipfel C, Hueckelhoven R (2026). A tomato MIK2-clade receptor is involved in the perception of a Fusarium-derived elicitor. The New Phytologist 251(5):2777-2798. DOI: 10.1111/nph.71420. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.71420
  11. Zhai K, Derbyshire P, Zhang S, Choi S, Wang L, Song B, Kinoshita T, Zhou JM, Menke FLH, Bender KW, Zipfel C (2026). A phosphorelay circuit drives extracellular alkalinization in receptor kinase-mediated immune and cell-wall damage signaling. Molecular Cell 86(9):1797-1814. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2026.03.035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2026.03.035
  12. Qiu L, Lu R, Zhang Z, Nie J, Wang Y, Liu J, Han H (2025). Small signaling peptides define leaf longevity. Frontiers in Plant Science 16:1616650. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1616650. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1616650
  13. Li X, Si X, Zhang Z, Ni Q, Li W, Zhang Z, Wang J, Guo Y (2025). Peptide signals regulating leaf senescence. Annals of Botany. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcaf140. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaf140
  14. Brusslan JA (2025). Getting the SCOOP on peptide ligands that regulate leaf senescence. Molecular Plant 18(3):384-385. DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2025.01.013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2025.01.013
  15. Guillou MC, Balliau T, Vergne E, Canut H, Chourre J, Herrera-Leon C, Ramos-Martin F, Ahmadi-Afzadi M, D'Amelio N, Ruelland E, Zivy M, Renou JP, Jamet E, Aubourg S (2022). The PROSCOOP10 Gene Encodes Two Extracellular Hydroxylated Peptides and Impacts Flowering Time in Arabidopsis. Plants 11(24):3554. DOI: 10.3390/plants11243554. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11243554
  16. Zhu J, Lv R, Yang R, Luan Y (2026). Advances in the roles of SCOOP peptides and the receptor-like kinase MIK2 in plant stress responses. Plant Cell Reports 45(7):192. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-026-03878-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-026-03878-7
  17. Roy C, Majumder S, Sahid S (2026). Small Peptides, Smart Plants: The Emerging Significance of SCOOP Signalling. Plant, Cell & Environment 49(9):6453-6465. DOI: 10.1111/pce.70641. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.70641