Somatic embryogenesis (SE) in Arabidopsis proceeds through three auxin-controlled stages — acquisition of embryo identity, maintenance of embryonic identity with pro-embryo formation, and embryo patterning — yet the mechanistic account of how the synthetic auxin 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and endogenous indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) divide these roles remains incomplete. The problem, posed by Karami et al. (2022), is to explain how 2,4-D triggers the acquisition of embryo identity even though endogenous auxin biosynthesis is dispensable for that first step; why 2,4-D cannot itself maintain embryonic identity in the absence of endogenous IAA; and whether PIN1 is the only auxin efflux carrier during SE or whether other PIN proteins and ABC transporters also contribute. The same paper additionally notes, as requiring further verification, the suggestion that AT-hook motif nuclear localized (AHL) genes also trigger auxin biosynthesis in zygotic embryos — a related point about zygotic rather than somatic embryogenesis. Follow-up work by the same group (2024) established that poor efflux and intracellular accumulation explain much of 2,4-D's inducing action, but the stage-resolved molecular chain — from auxin accumulation and signaling to chromatin-level reprogramming and identity maintenance — remains unresolved.

Background

Somatic embryogenesis (SE) is the process by which differentiated somatic cells cultured in vitro reprogram into embryo-like structures that can develop into whole plants, and it is a core model for plant cell totipotency as well as a workhorse of clonal propagation. In Arabidopsis thaliana, SE is classically induced from immature zygotic embryo (IZE) explants by the synthetic auxin analog 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), or by overexpression of specific transcription factors, including the chromatin-associated DNA-binding protein AT-HOOK MOTIF NUCLEAR LOCALIZED 15 (AHL15). Natural auxin refers to endogenous indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), whose de novo production in this context proceeds mainly through the indole-3-pyruvic acid (IPyA) route catalyzed by YUCCA (YUC) flavin monooxygenases; the pathway can be chemically blocked by inhibitors such as yucasin and kynurenine. Auxin distribution within tissues is controlled by polar transport: PIN-FORMED (PIN) proteins mediate cellular auxin efflux, AUX1/LAX proteins mediate influx, and ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters of the ABCB family provide additional efflux; naphthylphthalamic acid (NPA) inhibits efflux and 1-naphthoxyacetic acid (1-NOA) inhibits influx. Auxin signaling proceeds through perception by TIR1/AFB co-receptors (TRANSPORT INHIBITOR RESISTANT1/AUXIN SIGNALING F-BOX, the F-box proteins of the SCF ubiquitin-ligase complex that bind auxin), which promotes degradation of Aux/IAA repressor proteins and thereby frees AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR (ARF) transcription factors to activate auxin-responsive genes. Common readouts are the synthetic auxin-response reporter pDR5:GFP and the early-embryo marker pWOX2 (a reporter for WUSCHEL-related homeobox 2, a WOX-family transcription factor gene expressed from early embryogenesis). Prior work had established that YUC-dependent auxin biosynthesis is required in SE systems induced by the transcription factors LEAFY COTYLEDON2 (LEC2) and BABY BOOM (BBM), and that AHL15 acts downstream of 2,4-D and upstream of YUC genes in 2,4-D-induced SE. Karami et al. (2022) combined these tools to define three developmental stages of 2,4-D- and AHL15-induced SE from IZE cotyledons, tracked by pWOX2:NLS-YFP: (i) acquisition of embryo identity, (ii) maintenance of embryonic identity and pro-embryo formation, and (iii) somatic embryo patterning. Chemical inhibition of IPyA-pathway biosynthesis did not prevent acquisition of embryo identity but caused its rapid loss and blocked pro-embryo formation, while co-applied IAA rescued embryo development; influx inhibition (1-NOA) similarly abolished identity maintenance, whereas efflux inhibition (NPA) allowed pro-embryos to form but blocked their conversion into patterned embryos, with PIN1 the only efflux carrier directly detected. These findings produced the stage-resolved module map — biosynthesis and influx required for maintenance, efflux required for patterning — whose mechanistic underpinnings the present problem asks to complete.

Problem Statement

Supply the stage-resolved mechanistic account that Karami et al. (2022) left open for Arabidopsis somatic embryogenesis induced from immature zygotic embryo (IZE) explants by 2,4-D or by AHL15 overexpression. Three linked questions posed by that paper define the objective. (1) By what molecular mechanism does 2,4-D trigger the acquisition of embryo identity, given that this first stage proceeds without endogenous YUCCA/IPyA-dependent auxin biosynthesis and without polar auxin transport — in particular, what is the chain from 2,4-D accumulation and signaling to the chromatin-level reprogramming hypothesized to underlie embryo-identity acquisition? (2) Why is 2,4-D itself incapable of maintaining embryonic cell identity once acquired, so that maintenance strictly requires elevated endogenous IAA — which auxin transport or signaling properties distinguish 2,4-D from IAA at the maintenance stage, and is the distinction a matter of polar transport, of receptor/Aux/IAA-level signaling differences, or both? (3) Is PIN1 the only auxin efflux carrier that facilitates auxin efflux during SE, or do other PIN proteins (for example, PIN3) or other auxin transporters, such as the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) auxin efflux transporters, also contribute to auxin distribution during SE — beyond the directly detected PIN1 and the functionally implicated PIN2 and ABCB1/ABCB19? These questions share one scientific objective: a mechanistic model of how synthetic and endogenous auxin inputs are converted, through auxin biosynthesis, transport, signaling, and chromatin-level reprogramming, into the acquisition, maintenance, and patterning of embryonic identity. A related point that the same paper flags for further verification — but that lies outside the objective stated above, which is defined by the three numbered somatic-embryogenesis questions and is complete once they are resolved — concerns zygotic rather than somatic embryos: whether AHL genes directly trigger auxin biosynthesis in zygotic embryos, as suggested by reduced auxin response in ahl loss-of-function embryos but not yet verified.

References

  1. Karami O, Philipsen C, Rahimi A, Nurillah AR, Boutilier K, Offringa R (2022). Endogenous auxin maintains embryonic cell identity and promotes somatic embryo development in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 113: 7–22. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.16024. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.16024
  2. Karami O, Khadem A, Rahimi A, Zagari N, Aigner S, Offringa R (2024). Transient efflux inhibition improves plant regeneration by natural auxins. The Plant Journal 118: 295–303. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.16682. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.16682
  3. Karami O, Rahimi A, Mak P, Horstman A, Boutilier K, Compier M, van der Zaal B, Offringa R (2021). An Arabidopsis AT-hook motif nuclear protein mediates somatic embryogenesis and coinciding genome duplication. Nature Communications 12: 2508. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22815-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22815-8
  4. Li M, Wrobel-Marek J, Heidmann I, Horstman A, Chen B, Reis R, Angenent GC, Boutilier K (2022). Auxin biosynthesis maintains embryo identity and growth during BABY BOOM-induced somatic embryogenesis. Plant Physiology 188: 1095–1110. DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiab558. https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiab558
  5. Wójcikowska B, Jaskóła K, Gąsiorek P, Meus M, Nowak K, Gaj MD (2013). LEAFY COTYLEDON2 (LEC2) promotes embryogenic induction in somatic tissues of Arabidopsis, via YUCCA-mediated auxin biosynthesis. Planta 238: 425–440. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-013-1892-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-013-1892-2
  6. Ma Q, Grones P, Robert S (2018). Auxin signaling: a big question to be addressed by small molecules. Journal of Experimental Botany 69: 313–328. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erx375. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx375
  7. Pierroz G (2022). Making babies: how auxin regulates somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis tissue culture. The Plant Journal 113: 5–6. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.16062. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.16062
  8. Balcerowicz M (2024). Stop the flow: Improving somatic embryogenesis using auxin transport inhibitors. The Plant Journal 118: 293–294. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.16720. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.16720
  9. Wójcikowska B, Chwiałkowska K, Nowak K, Citerne S, Morończyk J, Wójcik AM, Kiwior-Wesołowska A, Francikowski J, Kwaśniewski M, Gaj MD (2024). Transcriptomic profiling reveals histone acetylation-regulated genes involved in somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Genomics 25: 788. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-10623-5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-024-10623-5
  10. Peng J, Zhang Q, Tang L, Xu B, Laux T, Zhang XS, Su YH (2025). LEC2 induces somatic cell reprogramming through epigenetic activation of plant cell totipotency regulators. Nature Communications 16: 4185. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-59335-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59335-8
  11. Wittmer J, Pijnenburg M, Wijsman T, Pelzer S, Adema K, Kerstens M, Kutevska AN, Fierens J, Hofhuis H, Sevenier R, Kloosterman B, de Both M, Kohlen W, Nijveen H, Scheres B, Heidstra R (2025). Rational design of induced regeneration via somatic embryogenesis in the absence of exogenous phytohormones. The Plant Cell 37: koaf252. DOI: 10.1093/plcell/koaf252. https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koaf252
  12. Wójcik AM, Buchcik WM, Verezunska V, Gutzat R, Scheid OM, Gaj MD (2026). FANS uncovers WOX2-associated early regulators of auxin-induced somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biology 26: 404. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-026-08235-0. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-026-08235-0
  13. Wang PB, Duan YY, Tang YY, Quan RM, Feng MQ, Ren J, Xie KD, Guo WW, Wu XM (2026). The auxin–CsHAT14 signaling cascade coordinates somatic embryogenesis in citrus. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 68: 649–664. DOI: 10.1111/jipb.70114. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.70114
  14. Wójcikowska B, Belaidi S, Mironova V, Citerne S, Robert HS (2025). MONOPTEROS isoform MP11ir plays a role during somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiology 199: kiaf602. DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiaf602. https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiaf602