Narayan, Johnson & Gammie (2019) showed that a Schwarzschild black hole accreting optically thin spherical gas always displays a shadow whose outer edge lies at the photon-ring radius, and noted that the photon ring produces a sharp enhancement that is distinctive in Fourier space, opening the possibility of precise measurement with space-based very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) — while leaving open how precisely it can be measured in practice. The theoretical tools for photon-ring measurement matured rapidly after 2019 (universal interferometric signatures, shape-based spin and metric tests, mission forecasts), but as of August 2026 no observation separates the photon ring from the blended direct emission: current images lack the angular resolution to confidently detect it, and the dedicated space-VLBI mission (Black Hole Explorer) remains in NASA's Small Explorer proposal phase (proposal in 2026, launch planned circa 2031, with no selection announced as of August 2026). The surviving open problem is to demonstrate, in real or realistically simulated interferometric data of M87* or Sgr A* with realistic (spinning, geometrically thick, inclined, turbulent) accretion flows, that the lensed photon-ring signal can be separated and measured, and to quantify the precision with which such a measurement determines the black hole's mass, spin, and the Kerr metric's strong-field predictions.

Background

Very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) combines radio telescopes separated by thousands of kilometers into a single Earth-sized virtual telescope; the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT), a planet-scale VLBI array at 1.3 mm wavelength, used this technique to image the emission ring around the supermassive black holes M87* (2019) and Sgr A* (2022). General relativity predicts that a black hole of mass MM has a photon sphere at radius 1.51.5 times the horizon radius (in Schwarzschild, r=3GM/c2r=3GM/c^2), where light can orbit before escaping. Light passing near this region is strongly lensed: an observer sees a sequence of increasingly demagnified, ever-thinner images of the emitting flow — the direct image (labeled n=0n=0), then the first lensed subimage (n=1n=1), and so on. Their stacked envelope is the photon ring, a bright, sharp circular feature whose diameter and shape are determined almost entirely by the spacetime metric rather than by the details of the luminous gas. The outer edge of the dark central region (the shadow) coincides with this ring; Narayan, Johnson & Gammie (2019) demonstrated analytically, in a spherically symmetric Schwarzschild model with optically thin infalling gas, that the shadow edge always sits at the photon-ring impact parameter bph=27 GM/c2b_\mathrm{ph}=\sqrt{27}\,GM/c^2 independent of the accretion flow, and that relativistic infall Doppler-deboosts the interior, sharpening the contrast. The same paper emphasized two further facts. First, the photon ring's intensity enhancement is only logarithmically divergent, so its integrated flux excess is modest — but its sharpness produces a distinctive, robust signature in Fourier space, the domain in which VLBI actually measures: on baselines (the separations between pairs of telescopes) long enough to resolve the ring, the interferometric visibility amplitude — the correlated signal strength that a telescope pair measures as a function of baseline length — exhibits damped oscillations whose period encodes the photon-ring diameter. Second, real instruments have finite angular resolution, so the observed emission ring is a blurred convolution in which the photon ring is blended with the direct (astrophysical) emission; Earth-diameter baselines at 1.3 mm cannot separate the n≥1n\geq 1 subimages. Accretion flows onto real supermassive black holes are geometrically thick, quasi-spherical magnetized plasmas (modeled with general relativistic magnetohydrodynamics, GRMHD — relativistic fluid simulations including magnetic fields), typically spinning, viewed at finite inclination, and containing outflows and jets; these determine where the emission actually comes from and thus how the lensed subimages are populated. Consequently the central unresolved question left by that work is not whether a shadow exists, but whether the photon ring — the uniquely spacetime-determined component of the image — can be isolated in practice and exploited as a precision probe.

Problem Statement

Determine whether the photon ring of M87* or Sgr A* — the ensemble of strongly lensed (n≥1n \geq 1) subimages whose diameter and shape are fixed by the spacetime metric — can be separated from the blended direct astrophysical emission and measured in practice, and with what precision. Concretely: (1) given interferometric observations of finite angular resolution and realistic spinning, geometrically thick, inclined, turbulent accretion flows, identify the observational signature by which the photon ring can be distinguished from the direct emission; (2) quantify the angular resolution, baseline lengths (including space-based baselines), sensitivity, and data-analysis methods required for a statistically significant detection, at a significance threshold that the solution must state and justify (including whether significance is assessed per baseline or in the image domain); and (3) demonstrate — on real data, or end-to-end on synthetic data with known ground truth that reproduces the realistic accretion-flow and observational conditions of parts (1)–(2) — an extraction of the photon-ring diameter and/or shape, with the propagated uncertainty on derived black-hole properties such as mass, spin, and tests of the Kerr metric's strong-field predictions. If the analysis under the conditions of parts (1)–(2) shows that the photon-ring signal cannot be statistically separated or measured at the stated threshold, determine and characterize that limit.

References

  1. Narayan, R., Johnson, M. D., & Gammie, C. F. (2019). The Shadow of a Spherically Accreting Black Hole. The Astrophysical Journal Letters 885, L33. DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab518c. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab518c
  2. Gralla, S. E., Holz, D. E., & Wald, R. M. (2019). Black hole shadows, photon rings, and lensing rings. Physical Review D 100, 024018. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.024018. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.024018
  3. Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration (2019). First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. V. Physical Origin of the Asymmetric Ring. The Astrophysical Journal Letters 875, L5. DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0f43. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab0f43
  4. Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration (2019). First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole. The Astrophysical Journal Letters 875, L6. DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1141. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab1141
  5. Johnson, M. D., Lupsasca, A., Strominger, A., Wong, G. N., Hadar, S., Kapec, D., Narayan, R., Chael, A., Gammie, C. F., Galison, P., Palumbo, D. C. M., Doeleman, S. S., Blackburn, L., Wielgus, M., Pesce, D. W., Farah, J. R., Moran, J. M. (2020). Universal interferometric signatures of a black hole's photon ring. Science Advances 6, eaaz1310. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz1310. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz1310
  6. Gralla, S. E., Lupsasca, A., & Marrone, D. P. (2020). The shape of the black hole photon ring: A precise test of strong-field general relativity. Physical Review D 102, 124004. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.124004. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.124004
  7. Bronzwaer, T., & Falcke, H. (2021). The Nature of Black Hole Shadows. The Astrophysical Journal 920, 155. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1738. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac1738
  8. Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration (2022). First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. Testing the Black Hole Metric. The Astrophysical Journal Letters 930, L17. DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6756. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac6756
  9. Perlick, V., & Tsupko, O. Yu. (2022). Calculating black hole shadows: Review of analytical studies. Physics Reports 947, 1-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2021.10.004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2021.10.004
  10. Tamar, A., & Palumbo, D. C. M. (2024). Photon Ring Polarimetry with Next-generation Black Hole Imaging. I. M87*. The Astrophysical Journal 977, 147. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8dd5. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad8dd5
  11. Lupsasca, A., Cárdenas-Avendaño, A., Palumbo, D. C., Johnson, M., Gralla, S. E., Marrone, D. P., Galison, P., Tiede, P., Keeble, L. (2024). The Black Hole Explorer: photon ring science, detection, and shape measurement. Proceedings of SPIE 13092, 194. DOI: 10.1117/12.3019437. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3019437
  12. Walia, R. K., Kocherlakota, P., Chang, D. O., & Salehi, K. (2025). Spacetime measurements with the photon ring. Physical Review D 111, 104074. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.104074. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.104074
  13. Gates, D. E. A., Chang, D. O., Held, A., & Palumbo, D. C. M. (2026). Photon Ring Astrometry. I. A Simple Spin Measurement Technique for High-resolution Images of M87*. The Astrophysical Journal 1007, 96. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae8787. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae8787
  14. Guerrero, A. G., & Holz, D. E. (2026). A Simple Model for Extracting Astrophysics from Black Hole Images. The Astrophysical Journal 1007, 90. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae8d02. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae8d02