Bench ageing tests on railway vehicle yaw (anti-yaw) hydraulic dampers (Zeng, Song, Zhang, Hu and Chang, Vehicle System Dynamics 2020/2021) revealed a stochastic failure process: during a transition interval of accumulated service, the low-velocity damping characteristic splits into two randomly alternating regimes — normal and failed damping at the same test velocity — with the failure probability growing as ageing proceeds until failure becomes deterministic. The authors could model this bimodal random damping response stochastically (Poisson-impulse damping reduction with cumulant-neglect closure) and quantify its harmful effects on suspension vibration and full-vehicle dynamics, but the physical cause inside the damper was left unidentified. This problem asks for the physical mechanism that generates the observed bimodal stochastic failure statistics — a question that the subsequent literature on railway yaw-damper failure mechanisms and degradation modeling has not answered.

Background

High-speed railway vehicles rely on hydraulic dampers (shock absorbers) in their suspensions: secondary vertical and lateral dampers control body vibration and ride quality, while yaw (anti-yaw) dampers, mounted between the carbody and the bogie frame, suppress 'hunting' — a self-excited lateral/yaw oscillation of wheelsets and bogies that arises above a critical speed and compromises safety. The damping characteristic of such a damper is its force–velocity relation, measured in sinusoidal bench tests in which the damper is cycled at fixed amplitude and frequency while force and velocity are recorded; railway dampers are qualified and aged according to standardized bench protocols (here the Chinese standard TB/T 1491-2015).

A damper's damping characteristic was traditionally assumed to degrade deterministically — a gradual drift of the damping coefficient followed by failure at an identifiable threshold. Bench ageing tests reported by Zeng, Song, Zhang, Hu and Chang (Vehicle System Dynamics 59(5):703–718, online 2020; DOI 10.1080/00423114.2019.1711136) contradicted this picture for railway anti-yaw dampers: in the bench-aged dampers, after a few million load cycles the low-velocity force–velocity measurements separated into two distinct clusters — a high (normal) and a low (failed) damping level — occurring randomly at the same velocity, so that the damping response followed a bimodal probability distribution whose 'failed' mode grew in probability with further ageing until failure became deterministic. Because a partially aged damper can thus appear normal at a given instant, the failure mode poses a reliability risk that experience-based (single-threshold) failure descriptions miss.

To quantify the consequences, the same authors embedded this stochastic failure in suspension dynamics: the damping loss was represented as a Poisson white-noise term (random impulses arriving at rate λ\lambda, each reducing the damping force), response moments were obtained from the Itô stochastic differential rule (the chain rule of Itô calculus, which differentiates functions of noise-driven random processes) with a fourth-order cumulant-neglect closure (a standard technique that closes the infinite hierarchy of moment equations by discarding cumulants — joint statistical descriptors — above fourth order) and a truncated Poisson expansion, and a progressive iteration scheme was used for stable numerical solution. A SIMPACK–SIMULINK co-simulation (coupled simulation combining the commercial multibody-dynamics package SIMPACK and the control-system simulator SIMULINK) of a full vehicle then showed that growing failure probability and damping-reduction amplitude degrade vertical ride quality (measured by the Sperling index, a standard ride-comfort metric), prolong lateral responses under train-crossing aerodynamic loads, and enlarge hunting amplitudes.

What the source paper leaves open is the physical origin of the bimodal random damping response: no physical cause has been identified, and a fatigue-induced inflexible opening of the inner valve plate has been proposed as one candidate mechanism. Subsequent research has documented several deterministic failure or degradation mechanisms of railway yaw dampers — cavitation of the hydraulic oil, air entering the inner tube ('empty strokes'), obstruction of the damping valve by foreign particulates, and continuous performance degradation with service mileage — and has modeled damper degradation with continuous stochastic processes (Wiener processes) and treated the bimodality as an input distribution for multimodal uncertainty propagation. None of these works explains why an ageing damper randomly alternates between normal and failed damping levels with a failure probability that grows with age.

Problem Statement

What is the physical mechanism inside a railway vehicle hydraulic damper that produces the stochastic (bimodal) failure process observed in bench ageing tests of railway yaw (anti-yaw) dampers — the random alternation, at the same test velocity, between normal and failed low-velocity damping levels during the ageing transition interval, with a failure probability that grows as ageing proceeds until failure becomes deterministic (Zeng, Song, Zhang, Hu and Chang, Vehicle System Dynamics 2020/2021, DOI 10.1080/00423114.2019.1711136)?

The physical cause (or causes) must account for the observed bimodal force–velocity statistics: the normal and failed damping levels, the random switching during the transition interval, and the growth of failure probability with accumulated ageing. The mechanism must be capable of generating the bimodality and reproducing these statistics, and must be supported by evidence that reproduces them.

References

  1. Y. C. Zeng, D. L. Song, W. H. Zhang, Z. Y. Hu, Z. C. Chang, 'Stochastic failure process of railway vehicle dampers and the effects on suspension and vehicle dynamics', Vehicle System Dynamics 59(5):703–718 (2021; online 2020). DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2019.1711136, https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2019.1711136
  2. Hongxing Gao, Jianfeng Sun, Shiju E, Maoru Chi, 'Cavitation induced hydraulic yaw damper failure and its effect on railway vehicle dynamic stability', Engineering Failure Analysis 161:108318 (2024). DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108318, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108318
  3. Zhaotuan Guo, Maoru Chi, Jianfeng Sun, Yixiao Li, Liangcheng Dai, 'Experimental and numerical research on the bogie hunting of a high-speed train caused by the empty stroke of yaw damper', Vehicle System Dynamics 62(7):1637–1657 (2024; online 2023). DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2023.2250887, https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2023.2250887
  4. Pengcheng Zeng, Liangcheng Dai, Maoru Chi, Zhaotuan Guo, Yixiao Li, Di Zhou, 'The performance failure of yaw damper caused by air entering its inner tube and its impact on hunting instability of an intercity train', Engineering Failure Analysis 169:109147 (2025). DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.109147, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.109147
  5. Chenchen Jiang, Heng Zhang, Liang Ling, Xiaolong Ma, Jianmin Gao, Xin Ding, Kaiyun Wang, Wanming Zhai, 'The effect of yaw damper performance degradation on carbody hunting of high-speed trains', Vehicle System Dynamics 62(12):3122–3145 (2024; online 19 February 2024). DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2024.2317397, https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2024.2317397
  6. Liangcheng Dai, Yixiao Li, Maoru Chi, Pengcheng Zeng, Di Zhou, Jianfeng Sun, Shulin Liang, 'Accelerated degradation test method and performance prediction with service mileage of the yaw damper in railway vehicles', Engineering Failure Analysis 161:108285 (2024). DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108285, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108285
  7. Xinliang Dai, Pingbo Wu, Huailong Shi, Hao Sui, 'Failure time prediction for vehicle dynamics under performance degradation of dampers and track evolution', Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability 238(6):1256–1270 (2024; online 2023). DOI: 10.1177/1748006X231202289, https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X231202289
  8. Boqun Xie, Chao Jiang, Zhe Zhang, Jing Zheng, Jinwu Li, 'An uncertainty propagation method for multimodal distributions through unimodal decomposition strategy', Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 66:141 (2023). DOI: 10.1007/s00158-023-03591-z, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-023-03591-z
  9. Boqun Xie, Xinpeng Wei, Qiang Gu, Chao Jiang, Jinwu Li, 'A time-variant uncertainty propagation analysis method for multimodal probability distributions', Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 82:103840 (2025). DOI: 10.1016/j.probengmech.2025.103840, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2025.103840
  10. Weihua Zhang, Yuanchen Zeng, Dongli Song, Zhiwei Wang, 'Theory and practice for assessing structural integrity and dynamical integrity of high-speed trains', Railway Sciences 3(2):113–127 (2024). DOI: 10.1108/RS-01-2024-0002, https://doi.org/10.1108/RS-01-2024-0002
  11. Reza Hojjati-Talemi, Ali Zahedi, Patrick De Baets, 'Fretting fatigue failure mechanism of automotive shock absorber valve', International Journal of Fatigue 73:58–65 (2015). DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.11.010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.11.010
  12. Junlin Ren, Qiang Li, Zunsong Ren, Guangxue Yang, 'A new hydraulic damper dynamics model and the availability on high speed vehicle dynamics investigation', Vehicle System Dynamics 61(1):356–374 (2023; online 2022). DOI: 10.1080/00423114.2022.2053728, https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2022.2053728