At Langzhong Ancient City (China), a survey of 618 domestic tourists analyzed with partial least squares structural equation modelling found that tourism commercialization positively affects four types of perceived authenticity (objective, constructive, existential, postmodern) and tourist satisfaction, which in turn shape loyalty. Whether this positive commercialization–authenticity–satisfaction structure is general or context-bound remains unresolved: later studies report supportive, null, and opposite-sign results in other heritage settings, the commercialization measure has never been consolidated or re-validated, and the model has not been tested across destinations differing in commercialization intensity, across non-tourist stakeholder populations, or over time. The problem is to establish the measurement foundation and the boundary conditions — the destinations, populations, and conditions under which the positive structure holds, weakens, reverses, or vanishes.

Background

Cultural heritage tourism at conserved historic towns lives with a long-standing tension: tourism development requires commercial services (ticketing, lodging, retail, staged performances), yet heavy commercialization is often argued to erode the very sense of authenticity that attracts visitors. In this literature 'perceived authenticity' means tourists' own judgments of genuineness rather than experts' assessments, and the study underlying this question divides it into four widely used types: objective authenticity (genuineness of the original objects and artifacts themselves), constructive authenticity (authenticity as symbolically projected and socially constructed in tourists' beliefs), existential authenticity (a state of being that tourists achieve through their own embodied experience), and postmodern authenticity (acceptance of reproduced or staged settings as enjoyable in their own right). Tourist satisfaction is the visitor's overall evaluative judgment of the experience, and tourist loyalty the intention to revisit and to recommend. Zhang, Yin and Peng (2021) surveyed 618 domestic tourists in Langzhong Ancient City, a millennium-old county town in Sichuan whose tourism commercialization the authors describe as at a medium level among Chinese ancient cities and towns, and estimated a structural equation model (partial least squares SEM, a variance-based estimation technique suited to theory development) linking tourism commercialization to the four authenticity types, tourist satisfaction, and loyalty. Contrary to the frequent assumption that commercialization erodes heritage value, every path from commercialization to the four authenticity types and to satisfaction was positive; all four authenticity types increased satisfaction; and only objective authenticity, existential authenticity, and satisfaction increased loyalty. The authors themselves flag the fragility of the result: the commercialization scale was adapted from qualitative descriptions of commercialized heritage towns and still needs validation and possible redesign; the sample was domestic tourists only, although destinations also involve foreign tourists, operators, employees, and residents; the data were cross-sectional; and the single medium-commercialization site leaves open whether the same structure holds where commercialization is much stronger (the ancient cities of Lijiang or Pingyao) or shaped differently (the Huizhou towns). Subsequent work has sharpened rather than settled the issue: in other heritage settings the commercialization effect on tourist preference has been found negative via 'perceived essence loss' (the sense that commercialization is destroying the town's essential, enduring identity), some authenticity-to-satisfaction paths found at Langzhong were null in replications, and a large Indonesian survey found a small positive commercialization effect on object authenticity but negative direct effects of commercialization on satisfaction and loyalty. The open question is therefore the external validity and boundary conditions of the Langzhong model together with its measurement foundation.

Problem Statement

The problem is to establish the measurement foundation and the boundary conditions of the structural model estimated at Langzhong Ancient City by Zhang, Yin and Peng (2021), in which tourism commercialization positively affects objective, constructive, existential, and postmodern perceived authenticity and tourist satisfaction, and authenticity and satisfaction in turn affect tourist loyalty. An answer must determine, with supporting evidence:

  1. Measurement: whether tourism commercialization can be measured with a scale that is valid and equivalent across heritage destinations and populations — the Langzhong measure was adapted from qualitative descriptions of commercialized heritage towns and has not been re-validated, and competing conceptualizations of commercialization are still being proposed.

  2. Cross-intensity generalization: whether the positive paths from commercialization to the four authenticity types and to satisfaction hold at heritage destinations whose commercialization intensity differs substantially from Langzhong's medium level — for example the more heavily commercialized ancient cities of Lijiang and Pingyao or the towns of Huizhou — or whether the structure weakens, vanishes, or reverses (for example nonlinearly) as commercialization intensifies. Because the source characterizes intensity only ordinally (Langzhong at a 'medium level'), the answer must state the dimension and scale on which commercialization intensity is judged and apply it consistently when placing destinations on that scale.

  3. Cross-population generalization: whether foreign tourists, local residents, tourism operators, and tourism employees perceive commercialization and authenticity differently from the domestic tourists surveyed at Langzhong, and whether the model's structure holds for these populations.

  4. Temporal stability: whether the estimated relationships are stable over time and under changing destination conditions, rather than artifacts of a single cross-sectional data wave.

All four parts are mandatory: each must be resolved with supporting evidence, and a part counts as resolved when the answer either reports a supported verdict on it or establishes, with cited evidence, that the literature does not yet settle it. The closing characterization is an integration of these four parts, not a substitute for any of them: the answer should state, for which destinations, populations, and conditions the positive commercialization-authenticity-satisfaction structure holds, and where it fails or reverses.

References

  1. Zhang, T., Yin, P., & Peng, Y. (2021). Effect of Commercialization on Tourists' Perceived Authenticity and Satisfaction in the Cultural Heritage Tourism Context: Case Study of Langzhong Ancient City. Sustainability 13(12), 6847. DOI: 10.3390/su13126847, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126847
  2. Lyu, J., Huang, Y., & Wang, L. (2023). When Essence is Lost: The Consequences of Commercialization in Historical Towns. Journal of Travel Research 63(7), 1671-1687 (first published online 26 September 2023; print issue September 2024). DOI: 10.1177/00472875231200494, https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875231200494
  3. Genc, V., & Gulertekin Genc, S. (2022). The effect of perceived authenticity in cultural heritage sites on tourist satisfaction: the moderating role of aesthetic experience. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights 6(2), 530-548 (first published online 25 January 2022; print issue 2023). DOI: 10.1108/jhti-08-2021-0218, https://doi.org/10.1108/jhti-08-2021-0218
  4. Azizi, E., Nurhikmat, M., & Astuti, P. (2026). The cultural heritage tourism of Banten: Potentials, commercialization, and the challenges of sustainability. EduLite: Journal of English Education, Literature, and Culture 11(1), 350-370. DOI: 10.30659/e.11.1.350-370, https://doi.org/10.30659/e.11.1.350-370
  5. Zhu, P., Chi, X., Ryu, H. B., & Han, H. (2025). Experience economy and authenticity in the heritage tourism sector: A multiple-dimensional approach. Acta Psychologica 257, 105118. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105118, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105118
  6. Zhao, S., & Marzuki, A. (2026). From Cultural Motivation to Loyalty: Unveiling the Necessary Role of Place Attachment in Urban Heritage Tourism. SAGE Open 16(3). DOI: 10.1177/21582440261466907, https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440261466907
  7. Cao, Q., Zhang, J., Li, C., & So, K. K. F. (2025). From tradition to transaction: The effect of commercialization on tourism experience in cultural heritage attractions. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 63, 98-111. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2025.03.006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2025.03.006
  8. Zhou, J., Zhou, Y., & Cheng, D. (2026). Organic commercialization in historic towns: Rethinking tourism commercialization. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 68, 101524. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2026.101524, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2026.101524
  9. Shi, D., & Fuchs, K. (2026). Unpacking the Nexus of Authenticity and Commercialization in Heritage Tourism: Evidence from Phuket Old Town, Thailand. Tourism Planning & Development (online first), 1-27. DOI: 10.1080/21568316.2026.2650537, https://doi.org/10.1080/21568316.2026.2650537
  10. Su, X., & Rahman, S. (2025). The Effect of Push and Pull Motivations, Perceived Authenticity, and Satisfaction on Loyalty in Cultural Heritage Tourism: The Case of Hongcun Village in China. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning 20(4), 1697-1707. DOI: 10.18280/ijsdp.200431, https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.200431