Characters of two-dimensional rational conformal field theories are often expressible as Nahm sums, multi-sum q-series built from a positive-definite matrix, and Nahm's conjecture ties their modularity to torsion in the Bloch group. Gang, Kim, Park and Stubbs (SciPost Phys. 19, 128 (2025)) showed that modified Nahm sums, carrying a sign factor fixed by the spin structure on the boundary torus and linear-logarithm corrections to the dilogarithm identities, arise as half-indices of three-dimensional abelian Chern-Simons matter theories flowing to unitary topological field theories or rank-zero superconformal fixed points, and found modular sums absent from Zagier's classical list. Two jointly linked questions remain open and form this problem: (i) a precise formulation, and a proof or refutation, of this physics-generalized Nahm conjecture — the source itself only 'comment[s] on a possible generalization of Nahm's conjecture' and states no criterion — meaning a criterion on the half-index data (K,α,β,γ)(K,\alpha,\beta,\gamma) characterizing its modularity and supplying the signed replacement of Nahm's Bloch-group torsion condition; and (ii) the dynamical verification the source deferred for its candidate list: verifying the monopole-superpotential relevance conditions along the renormalization-group flow of the candidate theories of its r≤3r\le3, ∣Kij∣≤17|K_{ij}|\le17 scan, resolving the borderline examples it flags, and determining whether 12χ1U(1)2(q)\tfrac{1}{2}\chi^{U(1)_2}_1(q) is the vacuum character of a rational VOA.

Background

A large class of characters of two-dimensional rational conformal field theories (RCFTs) — equivalently of rational, C2C_2-cofinite vertex operator algebras (VOAs), the algebraic axiomatizations of chiral CFTs — can be written as Nahm sums. For a positive-definite symmetric rational r×rr\times r matrix AA, a rational vector BB of length rr, and a constant CC, the rank-rr Nahm sum is

χ(A,B,C)(q)=∑m∈Nrq12mtAm+Btm+C(q)m1⋯(q)mr,\chi_{(A,B,C)}(q)=\sum_{m\in\mathbb{N}^{r}}\frac{q^{\frac{1}{2}m^{t}Am+B^{t}m+C}}{(q)_{m_{1}}\cdots(q)_{m_{r}}},

where q=e2πiτq=e^{2\pi i\tau}, N\mathbb{N} is the set of non-negative integers and (q)n=∏j=1n(1−qj)(q)_n=\prod_{j=1}^{n}(1-q^{j}). RCFT characters transform as weight-zero modular functions under SL(2,Z)SL(2,\mathbb{Z}) (vector-valued) or under a congruence subgroup (a subgroup of SL(2,Z)SL(2,\mathbb{Z}) containing the principal congruence subgroup Γ(n)\Gamma(n)), so it is natural to ask for which data (A,B,C)(A,B,C) the Nahm sum is modular. W. Nahm conjectured an answer in terms of the Bloch group, an algebraic KK-theory invariant of a number field built from symbols [x][x] modulo the five-term relation of the dilogarithm: writing 1−xi=∏jxjAij1-x_i=\prod_j x_j^{A_{ij}}, the conjecture posits that the Bloch element [x1]+⋯+[xr][x_1]+\cdots+[x_r] is torsion for every solution xx exactly when there exist rational B,CB,C for which the sum is modular (D. Zagier, 'The Dilogarithm Function', 2007). The rank-one case is proved (Zagier and Terhoeven, as described by Vlasenko and Zwegers). Vlasenko and Zwegers found rank-two and rank-four counterexamples to one direction — modular sums whose AA fails the all-solutions torsion condition — leaving the correct formulation open. Calegari, Garoufalidis and Zagier later proved the necessity direction in general: modularity forces the Nahm element to vanish in the Bloch group of Q‾\overline{\mathbb{Q}}, using the all-orders radial asymptotics of Nahm sums at roots of unity computed by Garoufalidis and Zagier. Sufficiency remains open in every rank r≥2r\ge2, and recent work (Liuquan Wang; Boxue Wang and Liuquan Wang; Milas and Wang; Mizuno; Hakimoglu-Brown) confirms modularity only family by family, through Rogers-Ramanujan-type identities (explicit qq-series equalities), Bailey pairs (pairs of qq-hypergeometric identities adapted to proving such equalities) and YY-system periodicity (the property that solutions of the algebraic recurrence relations associated with AA are periodic).

Gang, Kim, Park and Stubbs approached the question from quantum field theory. Three-dimensional N=2\mathcal{N}=2 (four supercharges) abelian Chern-Simons matter theories U(1)KrU(1)^r_K with level matrix KK and rr charge-one chiral multiplets, deformed by superpotentials built from monopole operators (disorder operators parameterized by magnetic charges), can flow in the infrared either to unitary topological field theories (TFTs) or to N=4\mathcal{N}=4 rank-zero superconformal field theories (SCFTs; 'rank zero' meaning that the Coulomb branch, the moduli space of vacua of the abelian gauge multiplets, is trivial); in both cases the boundary is expected to support a rational VOA. The half-index — the supersymmetric partition function on D2×S1D^2\times S^1 with a chosen boundary condition — then takes the modified Nahm form

Ihalf=∑m∈Nr(−1)αtmq12mtKm+βtm+γ(q)m1⋯(q)mr,I_{\rm half}=\sum_{m\in\mathbb{N}^{r}}(-1)^{\alpha^{t}m}\frac{q^{\frac{1}{2}m^{t}Km+\beta^{t}m+\gamma}}{(q)_{m_{1}}\cdots(q)_{m_{r}}},

where the sign factor (−1)αtm(-1)^{\alpha^t m} is fixed by the choice of spin structure on the boundary torus. The Bethe equations 1−xa=ζa∏b=1rxbKab1-x_a=\zeta_a\prod_{b=1}^{r}x_b^{K_{ab}} acquire phases ζa\zeta_a, and the derivation of the modular TT matrix from the fibering operator (the supersymmetric partition-function operation that fibers the S1S^1 factor of the geometry over the base) shows that whenever the mixing parameter μ\mu has non-even entries, the Rogers dilogarithm L(x)L(x) and the Bloch-Wigner dilogarithm D(x)D(x) (two standard single-valued modifications of the dilogarithm Li2\mathrm{Li}_2) acquire additional terms linear in log⁡x\log x. The authors call this a genuine generalization of Nahm's conjecture: the physically natural sums are signed and carry linear-log corrections.

Scanning all positive-definite integer level matrices with r≤3r\le3 and entries between −17-17 and 1717 (under simplifying symmetry assumptions), they found 27 candidate rank-zero theories (one of rank 1, three of rank 2 and twenty-three of rank 3, excluding direct products), together with infinite families and further candidates flowing to unitary TFTs, organized into 8 duality classes; several half-indices match known RCFT characters and yield modular sums not on Zagier's list. However, the paper itself flags what is missing. The relevance of each monopole superpotential along the renormalization-group (RG) chain — the condition R0(I−1)(OI)<2R^{(I-1)}_{0}(\mathcal{O}_I)<2 on the F-maximized superconformal R-charge (F-maximization fixes the exact superconformal R-symmetry by extremizing the free energy F=−log⁡∣ZS3∣F=-\log|Z_{S^3}| of the theory on the three-sphere), needed for the chain of RG flows to make sense — was not verified and is called 'a challenging task, even numerically'. Two borderline examples (3-14-(2) and 3-20) show nonstandard features: both half-indices contain unexplained factors of χF−1\chi_F^{-1} (an inverse free-fermion character), and both involve non-primitive monopole operators (monopoles whose magnetic charge vector is a non-unit multiple of another charge) — V(−2,0,4)V_{(-2,0,4)} in 3-14-(2) and V(−2,2,2)V_{(-2,2,2)} in 3-20 — which the authors suspect to be irrelevant; in addition, the A/B-twisted S2×S1S^2\times S^1 partition functions (supersymmetric partition functions expected to equal 1 for a genuine unitary TFT) are not equal to 1 specifically in the 3-14-(2) case, while in the 3-20 case the half-index IA[W(1,1,0)]I_A[W_{(1,1,0)}] is a sum of two characters modulo χF−1\chi_F^{-1} even though W(1,1,0)W_{(1,1,0)} lies in the class WAsimW^{\rm sim}_A of UV Wilson lines expected to flow to simple IR lines. These features suggest some deformations are irrelevant and the candidate list is not yet provably correct. One of Zagier's rank-three modular sums, 12χ1U(1)2(q)\tfrac{1}{2}\chi^{U(1)_2}_1(q) — half the character of the charge-one module of the U(1)U(1) current algebra at level 2 — is reproduced by a half-index but has no known interpretation as a rational-VOA vacuum character. And the search over theories flowing to unitary TFTs was explicitly not exhaustive, the ∣Kij∣≤17|K_{ij}|\le17 bounds being, in the source's words, 'chosen primarily for technical reasons'. The source therefore leaves open both a precise formulation of the generalized Nahm conjecture on which it only 'comment[s]' and the dynamical validation of its candidate list, whose relevance checks are deferred to future work.

Problem Statement

The problem is to turn the half-index construction into established mathematics, along the directions the source paper itself leaves open: it only 'comment[s] on a possible generalization of Nahm's conjecture' without stating a precise criterion, and it defers to future work the dynamical verification of its candidate list. It consists of two jointly linked deliverables serving one objective, that of an established 3d realization of Nahm-type modular characters.

(1) Formulate precisely, and then prove or refute, a generalized Nahm conjecture for the modified Nahm sums arising as half-indices of 3d N=2\mathcal{N}=2 abelian Chern-Simons matter theories:

Ihalf=∑m∈Nr(−1)αtmq12mtKm+βtm+γ(q)m1⋯(q)mr.I_{\rm half}=\sum_{m\in\mathbb{N}^{r}}(-1)^{\alpha^{t}m}\frac{q^{\frac{1}{2}m^{t}Km+\beta^{t}m+\gamma}}{(q)_{m_{1}}\cdots(q)_{m_{r}}}.

A complete answer supplies a criterion on the data (K,α,β,γ)(K,\alpha,\beta,\gamma) — where KK is a positive-definite symmetric integer level matrix, while the spin-structure sign vector α\alpha and the exponent vector β\beta, together with the constant γ\gamma, are half-integral or rational in general, with the integer case β∈Zr\beta\in\mathbb{Z}^{r} recovered only when comparing to Zagier's list — incorporating the spin-structure sign factor (−1)αtm(-1)^{\alpha^t m}, the Bethe-equation phases ζa=eiπμa\zeta_a=e^{i\pi\mu_a} in 1−xa=ζa∏bxbKab1-x_a=\zeta_a\prod_b x_b^{K_{ab}}, and the linear-logarithm modifications of the Rogers dilogarithm L(x)L(x) and Bloch-Wigner function D(x)D(x) for non-even mixing parameters, that characterizes when such a series is a modular function (or a component of a vector-valued modular form), together with the corresponding replacement of Nahm's Bloch-group torsion condition in this signed setting, and a proof or refutation of that criterion. The formulation is subject to a fidelity standard: the criterion must reduce to Nahm's classical Bloch-group torsion condition when α=0\alpha=0 and the mixing parameter is even, and it must certify as modular the source's r≤3r\le3, ∣Kij∣≤17|K_{ij}|\le17 candidate half-indices that the source identifies with known modular characters. Membership in the class of genuine half-indices is conditional on the relevance condition of deliverable (2), which the source leaves unverified; this is why the two deliverables are linked.

(2) Carry out the dynamical verification the source deferred for its candidate list, drawn from the scan over positive-definite integer level matrices KK with r≤3r\le3 and entries ∣Kij∣≤17|K_{ij}|\le17 under the paper's simplifying symmetry assumptions; the source acknowledges the ∣Kij∣≤17|K_{ij}|\le17 bounds as 'chosen primarily for technical reasons' and the unitary-TFT search as non-exhaustive, and these stand as acknowledged limitations of the candidate list rather than as a completed classification. Completing the verification requires the dynamical checks the source deferred: verifying the relevance condition R0(I−1)(OI)<2R^{(I-1)}_{0}(\mathcal{O}_I)<2 for each monopole superpotential OI\mathcal{O}_I along every proposed RG step (via F-maximization of the R-charge, including possible decoupling of UV flavor symmetries), and resolving the borderline cases — whether the χF−1\chi_F^{-1}-bearing examples 3-14-(2) (the second superpotential choice for candidate 3-14) and 3-20 are artifacts of irrelevant deformations (their non-primitive monopoles V(−2,0,4)V_{(-2,0,4)} and V(−2,2,2)V_{(-2,2,2)} being plausibly irrelevant) or genuine bulk-boundary constructions, accounting for the A/B-twisted S2×S1S^2\times S^1 partition functions not equal to 11 in the 3-14-(2) case and for IA[W(1,1,0)]I_A[W_{(1,1,0)}] being a sum of two characters modulo χF−1\chi_F^{-1} in the 3-20 case — and determining whether the modular sum 12χ1U(1)2(q)\tfrac{1}{2}\chi^{U(1)_2}_1(q) is the vacuum character of a rational VOA or a fractional combination thereof.

The two deliverables are jointly supporting: (1) provides the criterion that makes modularity decidable within the class and connects it to the Bloch-group framework, while (2) verifies the physical candidate list to which the criterion applies; a list without a criterion is a catalogue of conjectures, and a criterion without the verification does not upgrade the candidate list. Together they capture the open program the source leaves: a mathematically precise generalized Nahm conjecture for the signed half-index sums, and the dynamical validation of its candidate 3d realizations of Nahm-type modular characters.

Scope. The source's future-work discussion additionally lists two items that are recorded here as auxiliary context rather than completion criteria: the general criterion for producing every infrared simple object from explicit ultraviolet Wilson-line operators (the ultraviolet-infrared map for line operators), and a fully rigorous derivation of the modular SS and TT matrices — including overall phases and framing ambiguities — for all candidate examples. Both concern the line-operator sector and the extraction of modular data rather than the modularity and physical realizability of the Nahm-type sums; they are not required for the two deliverables above, although a solution would naturally illuminate them.

References

  1. D. Gang, H. Kim, B. Park, S. Stubbs, 'Three Dimensional Topological Field Theories and Nahm Sum Formulas', SciPost Phys. 19, 128 (2025). DOI: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.19.5.128, arXiv:2411.06081, https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.06081
  2. D. Zagier, 'The Dilogarithm Function', in Frontiers in Number Theory, Physics and Geometry II, Springer, Berlin (2007), pp. 3-65. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30308-4_1, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30308-4_1
  3. F. Calegari, S. Garoufalidis, D. Zagier, 'Bloch groups, algebraic K-theory, units, and Nahm's conjecture', Ann. Sci. Ec. Norm. Super. (4) 56, 383-426 (2023). DOI: 10.24033/asens.2537, arXiv:1712.04887, https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.04887
  4. S. Garoufalidis, D. Zagier, 'Asymptotics of Nahm sums at roots of unity', Ramanujan J. 55, 219-238 (2021). DOI: 10.1007/s11139-020-00266-x, arXiv:1812.07690, https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.07690
  5. M. Vlasenko, S. Zwegers, 'Nahm's conjecture: asymptotic computations and counterexamples', Commun. Number Theory Phys. 5(3), 617-642 (2011). DOI: 10.4310/cntp.2011.v5.n3.a2, arXiv:1104.4008, https://arxiv.org/abs/1104.4008
  6. K. Sun, H. Wang, 'Dynkin diagrams, generalized Nahm sums and 2d CFTs', arXiv:2604.00847 (2026), https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.00847
  7. Y. Yoshida, '3d N=4 rank-zero mirror symmetry, TQFT interfaces, and Zagier duality of Nahm sums', arXiv:2608.08780 (2026), https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.08780
  8. L. Wang, 'Counterexamples to some duality principles of modular Nahm sums', Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 154, 2383-2396 (2026). DOI: 10.1090/proc/17624, arXiv:2411.09701, https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.09701 (preprint version entitled 'Counterexamples to Zagier's duality conjecture on Nahm sums')
  9. B. Wang, L. Wang, 'Mizuno's rank three Nahm sums I: identities of index (1,1,2)', arXiv:2402.06253 (2024), https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.06253
  10. Y. Mizuno, 'Periodic Y-systems and Nahm sums: the rank 2 case', SIGMA 21 (2025), 094. DOI: 10.3842/sigma.2025.094, arXiv:2301.13239, https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.13239
  11. A. Milas, L. Wang, 'Modularity of Nahm sums for the tadpole diagram', Int. J. Number Theory 20(1), 73-101 (2024). DOI: 10.1142/S1793042124500040, https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793042124500040
  12. L. Wang, 'Identities on Zagier's rank two examples for Nahm's problem', Res. Math. Sci. 11, Paper No. 49 (2024). DOI: 10.1007/s40687-024-00460-z, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40687-024-00460-z
  13. C. Hakimoglu-Brown, 'On a conjecture due to Kanade related to Nahm sums', arXiv:2603.00836 (2026), https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.00836
  14. D. Gang, H. Kim, S. Stubbs, 'Three-Dimensional Topological Field Theories and Nonunitary Minimal Models', Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 131601 (2024). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.131601, arXiv:2310.09080, https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.09080
  15. D. Gang, B. Park, H. Sohn, 'Torus Knots and Minimal Models Revisited: Rational VOA characters from non-hyperbolic knots', arXiv:2512.23122 (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.23122
  16. C. Closset, A. Keyes, S. Kim, 'Three-dimensional TQFTs from Argyres-Douglas theories via the 3d/3d correspondence', arXiv:2607.20308 (2026), https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.20308
  17. K. Jeong, H. Sohn, 'Non-unitary Haagerup-like TQFTs and RCFTs from generalized S-fold SCFTs', arXiv:2608.11946 (2026), https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.11946
  18. Q. Jia, S. Kim, 'Classification of monopole deformed 3d N=2 Seiberg-like duality with an adjoint matter', JHEP 03 (2026), 247. DOI: 10.1007/JHEP03(2026)247, arXiv:2507.04950, https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.04950
  19. H. Kim, H. Kim, J. Song, 'Macdonald index from 3d TQFT', JHEP 03 (2026), 213. DOI: 10.1007/JHEP03(2026)213, arXiv:2511.11186, https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.11186