For an indeterminate Hamburger moment problem, all solutions are parametrized by the Nevanlinna formula built on a quartet (A, B, C, D) of entire functions. Kuznetsov (2017) gave an alternative construction: starting from an entire function f in his class M (canonical product with zeros in the upper half-plane and rapid decay in the closed lower half-plane), a contour-integral argument produces a family of measures with identical moments, parametrized in Nevanlinna form by a quadruple (a, b, c, d) of entire functions with ad - bc = 1. The paper shows by example that the classical Nevanlinna functions B, D may or may not be linear combinations of the constructed b, d (Case I versus Case II), and that both cases can generate the very same moment problem. The problem, posed in Section 3, is to find what properties of f in M allow one to distinguish the two cases, and, separately, to determine the connection between the quartet (A, B, C, D) and the constructed quadruple (a, b, c, d); the section closes with the verbatim question: "It is an interesting problem to find what properties of a function f ∈ M would allow one to distinguish between these two cases."

Background

The Hamburger moment problem asks for positive Borel measures on the real line whose power moments reproduce a prescribed sequence; it is called indeterminate when more than one such measure exists (in fact, then uncountably many exist). For an indeterminate problem, the Nevanlinna parametrization describes all solutions in terms of Pick functions - analytic functions on the open upper half-plane H+\mathbb{H}^+ that map it into the closed upper half-plane (the class P\mathcal{P}, taken together with the value ∞\infty; the parametrization is a bijection onto the full solution set). Writing PnP_n for the orthonormal polynomials of the problem (obtained by orthonormalizing 1,x,x2,…1, x, x^2, \dots; they are determined by the moment sequence alone), one defines four entire functions A,B,C,DA, B, C, D (the Nevanlinna quartet, or Nevanlinna matrix) by series in the PnP_n; they satisfy A(z)D(z)−B(z)C(z)≡1A(z)D(z)-B(z)C(z)\equiv 1, and every solution ν(⋅;ϕ)\nu(\cdot;\phi) of the moment problem is obtained from exactly one ϕ∈P∪{∞}\phi\in\mathcal{P}\cup\{\infty\} via

∫Rν(dx;ϕ)x−z=−A(z)ϕ(z)−C(z)B(z)ϕ(z)−D(z),z∈H+.\int_{\mathbb{R}} \frac{\nu(dx;\phi)}{x-z} = -\frac{A(z)\phi(z)-C(z)}{B(z)\phi(z)-D(z)}, \qquad z \in \mathbb{H}^+.

The quartet functions are real entire functions (entire functions taking real values on the real axis) of minimal exponential type - that is, growing more slowly than eε∣z∣e^{\varepsilon|z|} for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 - and sharing a common order and type (the standard growth characteristics of an entire function), as established by Berg and Pedersen; classical background is in the monographs of Akhiezer and Levin. Only a small number of indeterminate problems have had their quartet computed explicitly.

Kuznetsov (2017) approached these problems from the side of entire functions. He introduced a class M\mathcal{M} of entire functions ff of the form f(z)=C∏n≥1(1−z/zn)f(z)=C\prod_{n\geq 1}(1-z/z_n) with all zeros znz_n in H+\mathbb{H}^+ (the canonical product converging), such that for every n≥0n\geq 0 one has zn/f(z)→0z^n/f(z)\to 0 as z→∞z\to\infty, uniformly on the closed lower half-plane H−∪R\mathbb{H}^-\cup\mathbb{R}. Such an ff admits a unique decomposition f=b−i df=b-i\,d with b,db, d real entire, and −d/b-d/b is a Pick function; the class sits inside the Hermite-Biehler class of entire functions studied in Levin's monograph (entire functions, writable as b−i db-i\,d with b,db,d real entire, all of whose zeros lie in the open upper half-plane; by the Hermite-Biehler theorem this is equivalent to bb and dd having real, simple, interlacing zeros). For f∈Mf\in\mathcal{M} and ϕ\phi in a dense subclass Pb\mathcal{P}_b of the Pick functions (those with uniform boundary limits on compact subsets of the real axis and bounded image closure), Kuznetsov defines densities

μ(x;ϕ,f)=ℑ(ϕ(x))/π∣d(x)−ϕ(x)b(x)∣2,x∈R,\mu(x;\phi,f)=\frac{\Im(\phi(x))/\pi}{|d(x)-\phi(x)b(x)|^2}, \qquad x\in\mathbb{R},

and proves, by a contour-deformation and residue computation, that all these measures have identical moments: they are solutions of a single indeterminate Hamburger moment problem. His second main theorem shows that the function gg entering the construction extends to an entire function g=a−i cg=a-i\,c with a,ca, c real entire, that

a(z)d(z)−b(z)c(z)≡1,a(z)d(z)-b(z)c(z)\equiv 1,

and that the same family is parametrized in exact Nevanlinna form by the quadruple (a,b,c,d)(a,b,c,d).

This coexistence of two quadruples parametrizing the same solution set raises a structural question, which Section 3 of the paper shows is genuinely non-trivial. For the indeterminate moment problem of Ismail and Valent attached to elliptic-function weights - taking f(z)=2πcos⁡(z(K−iK′)/2)f(z)=\tfrac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}}\cos(\sqrt{z}(K-iK')/2) with K=K(k)K=K(k) the complete elliptic integral of the first kind, K(k)=π2 2F1(12,12;1;k2)K(k)=\tfrac{\pi}{2}\,{}_2F_1(\tfrac{1}{2},\tfrac{1}{2};1;k^2), k′=1−k2k' = \sqrt{1-k^2}, K′=K(k′)K'=K(k') - the constructed ff falls into Case I: the Nevanlinna functions B,DB, D are linear combinations of b,db, d. But the modified function f~=f+iz b\tilde f = f + iz\,b also belongs to M\mathcal{M} and yields Case II, even though it generates the same moment problem. Hence the desired classification is a property of the function ff itself, not of the moment problem it induces.

Problem Statement

Let M\mathcal{M} be Kuznetsov's class of entire functions: f(z)=C∏n≥1(1−z/zn)f(z)=C\prod_{n\geq 1}(1-z/z_n) with all zeros znz_n in the open upper half-plane H+\mathbb{H}^+ (the canonical product converging), such that for every n≥0n\geq 0, zn/f(z)→0z^n/f(z)\to 0 as z→∞z\to\infty uniformly on the closed lower half-plane H−∪R\mathbb{H}^-\cup\mathbb{R}. Write the unique decomposition f=b−i df=b-i\,d with b,db, d real entire, so that −d/b-d/b is a Pick function. The construction of Kuznetsov (2017) associates to ff the family of measures μ(x;ϕ,f) dx\mu(x;\phi,f)\,dx with μ(x;ϕ,f)=ℑ(ϕ(x))/π∣d(x)−ϕ(x)b(x)∣2\mu(x;\phi,f)=\frac{\Im(\phi(x))/\pi}{|d(x)-\phi(x)b(x)|^2} for ϕ\phi in a dense subclass Pb\mathcal{P}_b of the Pick functions; all these measures have identical moments, so they solve one indeterminate Hamburger moment problem, and the construction yields entire functions a,b,c,da, b, c, d with a(z)d(z)−b(z)c(z)≡1a(z)d(z)-b(z)c(z)\equiv 1 parametrizing this family in Nevanlinna form. The same moment problem carries its classical Nevanlinna quartet (A,B,C,D)(A,B,C,D), with A(z)D(z)−B(z)C(z)≡1A(z)D(z)-B(z)C(z)\equiv 1, built from its orthonormal polynomials.

Say that ff is of Case I if the Nevanlinna functions BB and DD of the induced moment problem are linear combinations of the constructed functions bb and dd, and of Case II otherwise; both cases occur.

(1) Find properties of f∈Mf\in\mathcal{M} - intrinsic to ff or to the pair (b,d)(b,d), for instance in terms of the zero sequence, the growth and indicator behavior (the Phragmen-Lindelof indicator, which measures the directional growth of an entire function), or the Pick function −d/b-d/b - that allow one to distinguish Case I from Case II; give a necessary and sufficient condition.

(2) Separately, and independently of (1), determine the connection between the Nevanlinna quartet (A,B,C,D)(A,B,C,D) and the constructed quadruple (a,b,c,d)(a,b,c,d): characterize when the two parametrizations of the same solution set coincide up to their natural normalization (the normalization freedom of the Nevanlinna formula, i.e. a simultaneous sign change of all four functions, under which the formula is invariant). Coincidence forces Case I but is strictly stronger than it - Case I does not force coincidence - so (1) and (2) are independent demands and both are required.

Any answer must be consistent with the two worked examples of the source paper. For k∈(0,1)k\in(0,1), let K=K(k)K=K(k) be the complete elliptic integral of the first kind, K(k)=π2 2F1(12,12;1;k2)K(k)=\tfrac{\pi}{2}\,{}_2F_1(\tfrac{1}{2},\tfrac{1}{2};1;k^2), and let k′=1−k2k'=\sqrt{1-k^2}, K′=K(k′)K'=K(k'); then f(z)=2πcos⁡(z(K−iK′)/2)f(z)=\tfrac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}}\cos(\sqrt{z}(K-iK')/2) lies in M\mathcal{M} and is of Case I, with B(x)=π2b(x)−1πln⁡(k/k′) d(x)B(x)=\tfrac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2}b(x)-\tfrac{1}{\sqrt{\pi}}\ln(k/k')\,d(x) and D(x)=2πd(x)D(x)=\tfrac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}}d(x), while f~(z)=f(z)+iz b(z)\tilde f(z)=f(z)+iz\,b(z) also lies in M\mathcal{M} and is of Case II (there b~=b\tilde b=b and d~=d−zb\tilde d=d-zb), even though f~\tilde f generates the same indeterminate moment problem as ff. In particular, a correct criterion cannot be a property of the induced moment problem alone: it must genuinely depend on ff.

References

  1. Alexey Kuznetsov, "Constructing measures with identical moments", Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 145(10) (2017), 4431-4441, doi:10.1090/proc/13585, https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/13585 (author manuscript: arXiv:1607.08003, https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.08003)
  2. M. E. H. Ismail and G. Valent, "On a family of orthogonal polynomials related to elliptic functions", Illinois Journal of Mathematics 42(2) (1998), 294-312, doi:10.1215/ijm/1256045046, https://doi.org/10.1215/ijm/1256045046
  3. Christian Berg, "Indeterminate moment problems and the theory of entire functions", Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 65 (1995), 27-55, doi:10.1016/0377-0427(95)00099-2, https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(95)00099-2
  4. Christian Berg and Henrik L. Pedersen, "On the order and type of the entire functions associated with an indeterminate Hamburger moment problem", Arkiv för Matematik 32 (1994), 1-11, doi:10.1007/BF02559520, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02559520
  5. B. Y. Levin, "Lectures on Entire Functions", Translations of Mathematical Monographs 150, American Mathematical Society, 1996, doi:10.1090/mmono/150, https://doi.org/10.1090/mmono/150
  6. N. I. Akhiezer, "The Classical Moment Problem and Some Related Questions in Analysis", Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh and London, 1965 (SIAM reissue: doi:10.1137/1.9781611976397, https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611976397)
  7. Alexey Kuznetsov, "A Direct Evaluation of an Integral of Ismail and Valent", in Frontiers in Orthogonal Polynomials and q-Series, 2018, 417-424, doi:10.1142/9789813228887_0021, https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813228887_0021
  8. Martin Nicholson, "On a specific family of orthogonal polynomials of Bernstein-Szegő type", arXiv:2505.05545 (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.05545
  9. Yicao Wang, "Complex analysis of symmetric operators. II: entire operators with deficiency index 1", arXiv:2510.20249 (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20249