A 2025 Physical Review B paper by N. G. Jones, R. Thorngren, R. Verresen and A. Prakash connected generalized charge pumps - adiabatic loops of symmetric gapped Hamiltonians that cannot be contracted to a point - to symmetry-protected topological (SPT) phases: non-trivial pumps force high-symmetry points of a loop into distinct SPT phases; 'strict circular' pivot loops are equivalent to the Dolan-Grady relation of integrable physics; Onsager-integrable chiral clock chains realize general group-cohomology pumps in one dimension; and some non-trivial pumps fail to imply genuine SPT order yet still entangle representation-SPTs (RSPTs), with the pump anomaly explaining the 'unnecessary' criticality between them. The paper's Outlook poses five interlinked open questions that together ask for a precise two-way correspondence between pump data and SPT/RSPT physics: whether pump-based arguments can recover full SPT classification rather than mere obstructions; whether RSPTs admit a unified pump/anomaly characterization with sharper boundary phase-diagram constraints; whether the Dolan-Grady-circular-loop equivalence generates new Onsager-algebra solutions and integrable pivot pairs, for instance in Hubbard-model limits; how equivariant-family invariants extend to non-manifold parameter spaces such as the intersecting circles of ZN×ZN\mathbb{Z}_N\times\mathbb{Z}_N pivots; and how Wiener-Hopf factorization and Toeplitz asymptotics connect to the many-body pump picture at the free-fermion point N=2N=2. As of 2026, all five directions remain open.

Background

A Thouless pump is an adiabatic cycle of gapped, symmetry-preserving Hamiltonians that transports a quantized amount of charge across a one-dimensional system (Thouless, 1983). In the modern formulation a generalized charge pump is a loop in the space of symmetric gapped Hamiltonians that cannot be continuously contracted to a point while preserving the symmetry and the spectral gap; it is a topological obstruction, not merely a transport phenomenon. Symmetry-protected topological (SPT) phases are gapped quantum phases whose ground states are short-range entangled (SRE) - reducible to product states by finite-depth local circuits once the protecting symmetry is abandoned - but which host anomalous boundary behavior protected by that symmetry. In one spatial dimension, bosonic SPT phases with on-site finite symmetry GG are classified by the second group cohomology H2(G,U(1))H^{2}(G,U(1)) - equivalently, by the projective representations of GG - and the standard classification arguments rest on the entanglement area law (the statement that the ground-state entanglement entropy of a subregion scales with its boundary size rather than its volume) together with matrix product states (MPS, a one-dimensional tensor-network ansatz whose injective form encodes gapped ground states), or on the operator-algebraic split property of the ground state (the requirement that the operator algebras of spatially separated regions behave as independent tensor factors).

A pivot loop is a particularly simple closed path of Hamiltonians: given two Hamiltonians H0H_0 and H~\tilde{H}, one defines H(θ)=e−iθH~H0 eiθH~H(\theta)=\mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}\theta\tilde{H}}H_0\,\mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\theta\tilde{H}}. Pivot Hamiltonians were introduced as generators of symmetry and entanglement - for example, evolving a trivial paramagnet by the cluster-model pivot produces the cluster SPT state, the canonical nontrivial one-dimensional SPT protected by a Z2×Z2\mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_2 on-site symmetry (Tantivasadakarn, Thorngren, Vishwanath and Verresen, 2023). The source paper (Jones, Thorngren, Verresen and Prakash, Physical Review B 112, 165123 (2025)) systematically connects such pivot loops to charge pumps. Its main results are: (i) under mild conditions a non-trivial pump forces the high-symmetry points of the loop into distinct SPT phases, so pump invariants obstruct symmetric gapped paths in the phase diagram; (ii) the nicest pivot families trace exact circles in Hamiltonian space, H(θ)=12(H0+Hπ)+12(H0−Hπ)cos⁡θ+H′sin⁡θ,H(\theta)=\tfrac{1}{2}(H_0+H_\pi)+\tfrac{1}{2}(H_0-H_\pi)\cos\theta+H'\sin\theta, where Hπ=e−iπH~H0 eiπH~H_\pi=\mathrm{e}^{-\mathrm{i}\pi\tilde{H}}H_0\,\mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i}\pi\tilde{H}} is the halfway point of the loop and H′=i[H0,H~]H'=\mathrm{i}[H_0,\tilde{H}], and this strict circular loop condition holds if and only if the pair (H0,H~)(H_0,\tilde{H}) satisfies the Dolan-Grady relation [H0,H~]=[[[H0,H~],H~],H~][H_0,\tilde{H}]=[[[H_0,\tilde{H}],\tilde{H}],\tilde{H}] (in the paper's non-standard normalisation, convenient for this setting; the relation in the standard literature carries numerical coefficients) - a two-generator commutation relation, known from self-dual models since Dolan and Grady (1982), whose solutions generate representations of Onsager's algebra, the infinite-dimensional Lie algebra discovered in Onsager's 1944 solution of the two-dimensional Ising model; (iii) the Onsager-integrable chiral clock chains (NN-state analogues of the Ising chain with chiral interactions) provide canonical strict circular pumps that pump ZN\mathbb{Z}_N charge, and these Onsager pivots underlie general group-cohomology pumps in one dimension; (iv) for odd NN the pumped clock Hamiltonian is not a genuine SPT but a representation-SPT (RSPT) - a phase whose bulk SPT invariant is trivial but whose entanglement spectrum still carries a symmetry doublet with limited stability - and the anomaly of the non-trivial pump explains the 'unnecessary' criticality (gaplessness not mandated by any SPT distinction, in the sense of Prakash and Parameswaran, 2025) observed between such phases; and (v) the entire discussion can be recast as equivariant families - uniformly gapped families of Hamiltonians over a parameter space MM equipped with an action of the symmetry group - whose deformation classes are expected to be classified by equivariant cobordism invariants (cobordism classes of manifolds equipped with an action of the symmetry group); for the ZN×ZN\mathbb{Z}_N\times\mathbb{Z}_N cluster pivots the parameter space is a union of intersecting circles, which is not a manifold.

Two further threads are woven in. Mathematically, Thouless pumps in one-dimensional invertible states (gapped phases that are short-range entangled, i.e. trivial once symmetry is abandoned) have been classified (Bachmann, De Roeck, Fraas and Jappens, 2024), but this classification does not by itself recover SPT invariants, and it is not known how the area law enters a pump-based classification argument. Analytically, at the free-fermion point N=2N=2 the clock-cluster pivot loop reduces, via Jordan-Wigner duality (the standard mapping between one-dimensional spin chains and fermion chains), to a loop of symmetric free-fermion Hamiltonians, where the pumped charge is a winding number of a loop of Fredholm operators (bounded operators whose kernel and cokernel dimensions are the objects of index theory) - the setting of Wiener-Hopf factorization of the matrix symbol (splitting the matrix-valued function of momentum whose Fourier coefficients define the single-particle Hamiltonian into factors analytic inside and outside the unit circle) and block-Toeplitz determinant asymptotics, the classical machinery for free-fermion boundary physics. The paper poses, in its Outlook, five interlinked questions about converting its one-way implications (pump implies SPT distinctions and phase-diagram constraints) into a precise two-way correspondence and extending the framework beyond its current algebraic, geometric, and analytic limits.

Problem Statement

The common scientific objective is a precise two-way correspondence between pump/anomaly data and SPT/RSPT physics, together with the extension of the pivot-loop realization of pumps beyond its current algebraic, geometric, and analytic limits. The source paper (Jones, Thorngren, Verresen and Prakash, Physical Review B 112, 165123 (2025), Section XI 'Outlook') poses the following five interlinked questions:

  1. Recovering classification from pumps: to what extent can classification results for dd-dimensional SPT phases be recovered or supplemented by arguments built from classifying non-trivial pumps? In particular, can pump-based reasoning - perhaps combined with area-law or split-property inputs - recover the exact SPT class of a Hamiltonian (its full invariant, for example its group-cohomology class in one dimension), rather than merely proving that two Hamiltonians lie in distinct phases? (The authors note that the non-trivial Levin-Gu Z2\mathbb{Z}_2 SPT - the nontrivial two-dimensional Z2\mathbb{Z}_2-protected phase - appears difficult to reach by pump arguments alone, so they expect this perspective to be useful only in a sub-class of models.)

  2. Pumps and representation-SPTs: how generally do pump invariants detect or control RSPTs? Can RSPTs be characterized in a unified way using pump/anomaly data, and can the constraints on the boundary phase diagrams produced by RSPT-entangling pumps be sharpened?

  3. New Onsager-algebra solutions and interacting pivots: can the interpretation of the Dolan-Grady relation as the generator of a strict circular loop be used to generate new solutions of the Onsager algebra - new integrable pivot pairs - and what (R)SPT physics arises when pivoting with such algebraic structures in interacting models, for instance in variants or limits of the Hubbard model?

  4. Singular parameter spaces: how should the equivariant-family analysis be extended to parameter spaces that are not manifolds, such as the intersecting-circle structures appearing for ZN×ZN\mathbb{Z}_N\times\mathbb{Z}_N pivots, and what are the precise anomaly and pump invariants for families labelled by such singular parameter spaces - including the anomalies of the large symmetry group of the Hamiltonian at the centre of this structure (the intersection point, whose symmetry is enlarged)?

  5. Free-fermion analytic bridge: at the free-fermion limit N=2N=2, how can Wiener-Hopf factorization of the matrix symbol and related Toeplitz asymptotic techniques be systematically connected to the many-body pump/anomaly picture, to give a refined bulk-boundary correspondence and to characterize the boundary criticality of these loops?

These five questions jointly delimit the problem as the source states it; a comprehensive resolution would establish the pump-SPT correspondence in both directions across all five facets. Because the source poses a research program rather than a single bounded question, a rigorous resolution of any one of these five facets is itself an accepted solution to this task, while the comprehensive, all-five resolution is the full objective; within facet 1 an answer to the general 'to what extent' question suffices on its own, the sharper 'exact SPT class' target being merely its strongest form rather than a separate requirement.

References

  1. Nick G. Jones, Ryan Thorngren, Ruben Verresen, Abhishodh Prakash, "Charge pumps, pivot Hamiltonians and symmetry-protected topological phases", Physical Review B 112, 165123 (2025), DOI: 10.1103/rtq1-pplf, arXiv:2507.00995, https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.00995
  2. Nathanan Tantivasadakarn, Ryan Thorngren, Ashvin Vishwanath, Ruben Verresen, "Pivot Hamiltonians as generators of symmetry and entanglement", SciPost Physics 14, 012 (2023), DOI: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.14.2.012, arXiv:2110.07599, https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.07599
  3. Nick G. Jones, Abhishodh Prakash, Paul Fendley, "Pivoting through the chiral-clock family", SciPost Physics 18, 094 (2025), DOI: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.18.3.094, arXiv:2406.01680, https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.01680
  4. D. J. Thouless, "Quantization of particle transport", Physical Review B 27, 6083 (1983), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.27.6083, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.27.6083
  5. L. Dolan, Michael Grady, "Conserved charges from self-duality", Physical Review D 25, 1587 (1982), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.25.1587, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.25.1587
  6. Lars Onsager, "Crystal Statistics. I. A Two-Dimensional Model with an Order-Disorder Transition", Physical Review 65, 117 (1944), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.65.117, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.65.117
  7. Michael Levin, Zheng-Cheng Gu, "Braiding statistics approach to symmetry-protected topological phases", Physical Review B 86, 115109 (2012), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.115109, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.115109
  8. Sven Bachmann, Wojciech De Roeck, Martin Fraas, Tijl Jappens, "A Classification of G-Charge Thouless Pumps in 1D Invertible States", Communications in Mathematical Physics 405, 157 (2024), DOI: 10.1007/s00220-024-05010-w, arXiv:2204.03763, https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.03763
  9. Abhishodh Prakash, S. A. Parameswaran, "Charge pumps, boundary modes, and the necessity of unnecessary criticality", Physical Review B 112, L241117 (2025), DOI: 10.1103/kztj-jcyc, arXiv:2408.15351, https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.15351
  10. Ken Shiozaki, "Equivariant parameter families of spin chains: A discrete MPS formulation", SciPost Physics 20, 024 (2026), DOI: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.20.1.024, arXiv:2507.19932, https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.19932
  11. Yabo Li, Matteo Dell'acqua, Aditi Mitra, "Classification of Thouless pumps with non-invertible symmetries and implications for Floquet phases", arXiv:2510.01626 (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.01626
  12. Imogen Camp, Nick G. Jones, "Matrix-Product State Skeletons in Onsager-Integrable Quantum Chains", Journal of Statistical Physics 193, 73 (2026), DOI: 10.1007/s10955-026-03637-8, arXiv:2511.07212, https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.07212
  13. Sayantan Mandal, Neelima Pulletikurty, Abhishodh Prakash, "Topological Phenomena Protected by Diabolical Textures", arXiv:2605.30421 (2026), https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30421
  14. Sashank Singam, Nick G. Jones, Abhishodh Prakash, "Textured phase diagrams of featureless insulators", arXiv:2605.20339 (2026), https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20339
  15. Naren Manjunath, Dominic V. Else, "In search of diabolical critical points", Physical Review B (2026), DOI: 10.1103/x3lk-wwn1, arXiv:2601.10783, https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.10783
  16. Shuhei Ohyama, Takamasa Ando, Ryan Thorngren, "Parameterized Families of Toric Code Phase: em-duality family and higher-order anyon pumping", arXiv:2605.03891 (2026), https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.03891
  17. Christian Copetti, "When Symmetries Twist: Anomaly Inflow on Monodromy Defects", arXiv:2605.16482 (2026), https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16482
  18. Chih-Yu Lo, Xueda Wen, "Detecting Higher Berry Phase via Boundary Scattering", arXiv:2602.21301 (2026), https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.21301
  19. Yichul Choi, "Higher Connection in Open String Field Theory", Journal of High Energy Physics 2026 (2026), DOI: 10.1007/JHEP05(2026)223, arXiv:2602.13627, https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.13627
  20. Arun Debray, Weicheng Ye, Matthew Yu, "How to Build Anomalous (3+1)d Topological Quantum Field Theories", arXiv:2510.24834 (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.24834
  21. Yuan Miao, Andras Molnar, Nick G. Jones, "Matrix-product operator dualities in integrable lattice models", Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 59, 305002 (2026), DOI: 10.1088/1751-8121/ae880b, arXiv:2602.17436, https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.17436