When tissue is heated, the energy of ultrasound backscattered from it changes measurably with temperature. Tsui et al. (Ultrasonics, 2012) showed that pixel-wise change-in-backscattered-energy (CBE) images, formed as a simple ratio of the current echo envelope to a baseline envelope without tracking and compensating the temperature-induced echo shifts, retain — and in fact amplify — temperature sensitivity in phantoms, excised porcine liver, and in vitro microwave ablation, suggesting that the computationally expensive echo-shift compensation step may be unnecessary for real-time thermometry. The paper left open the conditions under which this simplification is physically valid and clinically usable: (1) how uncompensated CBE performs under in vivo physiological motion (respiration, cardiac displacement) and what gating or motion-reduction strategies it requires; (2) a general model of CBE formation that accounts for local sound-speed and density variations, acoustic nonlinearity, phase cancellation among multiple scatterers, waveform distortion during heating, and tissue denaturation and gas formation during ablation; (3) the acquisition requirements (axial sampling, scan-line density, ensemble averaging) across imaging systems; and (4) tissue- and patient-specific calibration curves with uncertainty bounds. Adjacent work has reported in vitro CBE calibration up to 90 °C, in vivo small-animal calibrated CBE control at mild hyperthermia, qualitative clinical CBE imaging during human liver tumor ablation, and motion-compensated CBE variants, but no published general CBE model, no study of uncompensated CBE under physiological motion, and no cross-tissue calibration with uncertainty bounds exist.

Background

Minimally invasive thermal therapies — hyperthermia (roughly 40−45∘40{-}45^\circC, used with radiotherapy and drug delivery) and ablation (above roughly 55∘55^\circC, used to destroy tumors) — require spatially resolved temperature monitoring to control the delivered thermal dose. Magnetic resonance thermometry is the clinical standard for guidance but is expensive and relatively slow, which motivates ultrasound-based thermometry: ultrasound is real-time, low-cost, and already integrated in many interventional suites.

Two temperature-sensitive ultrasound observables dominate the field. First, because the speed of sound and tissue dimensions change with temperature, backscattered echoes shift in time as tissue heats; tracking these "echo shifts" (also called thermal strain) yields temperature change through a medium-dependent calibration coefficient. Second, the backscattered energy itself depends on temperature: the classical analysis of Straube and Arthur (1994) predicted that the backscattered power from a tissue changes by a fraction of a percent per degree as the backscatter coefficients of the scatterers and the intervening medium vary. The change in backscattered energy (CBE) image is formed pixel-wise, in decibels, as

CBE(x,T)=10log⁡10∣s(x,T)∣∣s(x,T0)∣,\mathrm{CBE}(x,T) = 10\log_{10}\frac{|s(x,T)|}{|s(x,T_0)|},

where ∣s(x,T)∣|s(x,T)| is the envelope (magnitude of the analytic radio-frequency signal) at temperature TT and ∣s(x,T0)∣|s(x,T_0)| is a baseline envelope at reference temperature T0T_0 (body temperature in vivo). Conventional wisdom held that the temperature-induced echo shifts must first be tracked and compensated, because uncompensated shifts misalign the two envelopes and contaminate the pixel-wise ratio; compensation requires dense sampling and computationally costly motion tracking, limiting frame rate.

Tsui, Chien, Liu, Shu, and Chen (Ultrasonics 52(7):925–935, 2012) tested the uncompensated shortcut directly. In agar phantoms with fully developed speckle (dense random scattering), excised porcine liver heated from 37∘37^\circC to 45∘45^\circC, and in vitro microwave ablation of pork tenderloin monitored with a commercial scanner, the uncompensated CBE images tracked temperature with a larger slope of CBE versus temperature than the compensated images, while exhibiting a characteristic interlaced positive/negative texture. The authors explained this texture qualitatively by echo shifts producing an intersection between the shifted and reference envelopes, so the ratio changes sign across the intersection. However, in a sparse-scatterer phantom the uncompensated maps did not reproduce the true per-scatterer CBE sign and magnitude, showing the shortcut is not universally valid.

Note the terminology: "uncompensated" here means without compensation of the temperature-induced echo shift; it is a separate issue from compensation of physiological tissue motion. The 2012 study was entirely in vitro and ex vivo, and its authors identified what must be established before uncompensated CBE imaging could serve as routine in vivo clinical thermometry: its behavior under unavoidable physiological motion (respiratory and cardiac-induced displacement) and the motion-reduction or gating strategies needed (e.g., electrocardiogram (ECG) gating, real-time motion compensation, spatial interpolation); a more general CBE model incorporating local sound-speed and density variations, acoustic nonlinearity, phase cancellation among multiple scatterers, waveform distortion during heating, and the effects of tissue denaturation and gas formation in the ablative regime, together with quantification of its impact on both compensated and uncompensated CBE; the limits of applicability across imaging systems, since commercial scanners with lower axial sampling rates and reduced scan-line density may behave differently from research rigs; and reliable calibration curves with uncertainty bounds across tissue types and inter-patient variability, given the substantial inter-sample standard deviations observed in the ablation experiments.

Problem Statement

Establish the physical and experimental foundations that determine whether change-in-backscattered-energy (CBE) ultrasound temperature imaging formed without echo-shift compensation can serve as a valid quantitative thermometer in vivo. This objective is resolved only when all three of the following challenges are addressed together; none is optional, and no single challenge alone resolves the task. (1) A general model of CBE formation during heating that incorporates each of the following physical effects — local variations in sound speed and density, acoustic nonlinearity, phase cancellation among multiple scatterers, waveform distortion during heating, and the effects of tissue denaturation and gas formation in the ablative regime — and that quantifies its impact on both compensated and uncompensated CBE; a model that omits any listed effect, or the compensated-versus-uncompensated comparison, satisfies this challenge only in part and does not resolve it; (2) characterization of uncompensated CBE performance in the presence of physiological motion (respiratory and cardiac-induced displacement) and identification of the motion-reduction or gating strategies (e.g., electrocardiogram (ECG) gating, real-time motion compensation, spatial interpolation) required for robustness in clinical settings; and (3) systematic characterization of the acquisition conditions — minimum axial sampling rate, scan-line density, and required ensemble averaging — across imaging systems, together with calibration curves and uncertainty bounds for temperature estimation from uncompensated CBE across tissue types and patient variability.

References

  1. Po-Hsiang Tsui, Yu-Ting Chien, Hao-Li Liu, Yu-Chen Shu, Wen-Shiang Chen, 'Using ultrasound CBE imaging without echo shift compensation for temperature estimation', Ultrasonics 52(7):925–935 (2012). DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2012.03.001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2012.03.001
  2. W. L. Straube, R. Martin Arthur, 'Theoretical estimation of the temperature dependence of backscattered ultrasonic power for noninvasive thermometry', Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology 20(9):915–922 (1994). DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(94)90051-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-5629(94)90051-5
  3. Matthew A. Lewis, Robert M. Staruch, Rajiv Chopra, 'Thermometry and ablation monitoring with ultrasound', International Journal of Hyperthermia 31(2):163–181 (2015). DOI: 10.3109/02656736.2015.1009180. https://doi.org/10.3109/02656736.2015.1009180
  4. Sinan Li, Zhuhuang Zhou, Shuicai Wu, Weiwei Wu, 'A Review of Quantitative Ultrasound-Based Approaches to Thermometry and Ablation Zone Identification Over the Past Decade', Ultrasonic Imaging 44(5–6):213–228 (2022). DOI: 10.1177/01617346221120069. https://doi.org/10.1177/01617346221120069
  5. H. Amiri, B. Makkiabadi, 'A Review of Ultrasound Thermometry Techniques', Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies 7(2):82–91 (2020). DOI: 10.18502/fbt.v7i2.3852. https://doi.org/10.18502/fbt.v7i2.3852
  6. Chiao-Yin Wang, Zhuhuang Zhou, Yu-Hsuan Chang, Ming-Chih Ho, Chiu-Min Lu, Chih-Horng Wu, Po-Hsiang Tsui, 'Ultrasound single-phase CBE imaging for monitoring radiofrequency ablation of the liver tumor: A preliminary clinical validation', Frontiers in Oncology 12:894246 (2022). DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.894246. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.894246
  7. Jingjing Xia, Qiang Li, Hao-Li Liu, Wen-Shiang Chen, Po-Hsiang Tsui, 'An Approach for the Visualization of Temperature Distribution in Tissues According to Changes in Ultrasonic Backscattered Energy', Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine 2013:682827 (2013). DOI: 10.1155/2013/682827. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/682827
  8. Yi-Da Liu, Qiang Li, Zhuhuang Zhou, Yao-Wen Yeah, Chien-Cheng Chang, Chia-Yen Lee, Po-Hsiang Tsui, 'Adaptive ultrasound temperature imaging for monitoring radiofrequency ablation', PLoS ONE 12(8):e0182457 (2017). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182457. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182457
  9. Kun Yang, Qiang Li, Hao-Li Liu, Chin-Kuo Chen, Cheng-Wei Huang, Jheng-Ru Chen, Yu-Wei Tsai, Zhuhuang Zhou, Po-Hsiang Tsui, 'Frequency-domain CBE imaging for ultrasound localization of the HIFU focal spot: a feasibility study', Scientific Reports 10:5468 (2020). DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-62363-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62363-7
  10. Kun Yang, Qiang Li, Xiaowei Zhou, Chiao-Yin Wang, Po-Hsiang Tsui, 'Ultrasound Delta CBE Imaging: A New Approach Based on Local Energy Subtraction to Localization of the HIFU Focal Spot Using Changes in Backscattered Energy', Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering 44(4):618–627 (2024). DOI: 10.1007/s40846-024-00887-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-024-00887-3
  11. E. Shaswary, H. Assi, C. Yang, J. C. Kumaradas, M. C. Kolios, G. Peyman, J. Tavakkoli, 'Noninvasive calibrated tissue temperature estimation using backscattered energy of acoustic harmonics', Ultrasonics 114:106406 (2021). DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2021.106406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2021.106406
  12. M. Nguyen, A. Agarwal, J. C. Kumaradas, M. C. Kolios, G. Peyman, J. Tavakkoli, 'Real-time non-invasive control of ultrasound hyperthermia using high-frequency ultrasonic backscattered energy in ex vivo tissue and in vivo animal studies', Physics in Medicine and Biology 69(21):215001 (2024). DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad7f19. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad7f19
  13. A. Rohfritsch, V. Barrere, L. Estienne, D. Melodelima, '2D ultrasound thermometry during thermal ablation with high-intensity focused ultrasound', Ultrasonics 142:107372 (2024). DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2024.107372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2024.107372
  14. Youjia Sun, Diya Wang, Chengzhi Yang, Qiao Wang, Peter Jones, Yaojie Wu, Pragya Gupta, E. C. Burdette, Chris Diederich, 'Energy Delivery Direction Monitoring during Directional Catheter-based Ultrasound Thermal Ablation using Fitted Ultrasonic MoCo-CBE: Ex Vivo and In Vivo Feasibility', IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (2026). DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2026.3705273. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2026.3705273
  15. C. Yin, G. Wang, Y. Xie, J. Tu, W. Sun, X. Kong, X. Guo, D. Zhang, 'Separated Respiratory Phases for In Vivo Ultrasonic Thermal Strain Imaging', IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 69(4):1219–1229 (2022). DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2022.3149287. https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2022.3149287
  16. C. Yin, F. Dong, H. Su, J. Tu, D. Zhang, X. Kong, X. Guo, 'In Vivo Multithread Ultrasound Thermal Strain Imaging', IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 70(8):843–853 (2023). DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2023.3290624. https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2023.3290624
  17. M. Pasternak, E. Samset, J. D'hooge, G. Haugen, 'Temperature monitoring by channel data delays: Feasibility based on estimated delays magnitude for cardiac ablation', Ultrasonics 77:32–37 (2017). DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2017.01.011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2017.01.011
  18. Chuhao Yin, Peiwei Cai, Huajin Su, J. Tu, Dong Zhang, Xiasheng Guo, 'A multi-sound-path approach for modeling thermal-induced artifacts in ultrasound imaging', Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 159(3):1776–1788 (2026). DOI: 10.1121/10.0042752. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0042752
  19. L. F. R. Oliveira, F. M. G. França, W. C. A. Pereira, 'A Data-Driven Approach for Estimating Temperature Variations Based on B-mode Ultrasound Images and Changes in Backscattered Energy', Ultrasonic Imaging 46(1):3–16 (2024). DOI: 10.1177/01617346231205810. https://doi.org/10.1177/01617346231205810
  20. Lian Feng, Ling Song, Zeqi Yang, Jieni Song, Wanting Peng, Zhenru Wu, Lin Huang, Yan Luo, 'Thermoacoustic CBE imaging for monitoring microwave ablation of the liver: A feasibility study', Applied Physics Letters 125(21):213701 (2024). DOI: 10.1063/5.0242212. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0242212