In ultrafast optical pump-probe experiments on paramagnetic manganites, the sub-picosecond recovery of the transient reflectivity is the redressing of a photoexcited carrier into its Jahn-Teller polaronic ground state. Measurements on the 3D perovskite La0.7_{0.7}Ca0.3_{0.3}MnO3_3 and the quasi-2D Ruddlesden-Popper bilayer (a layered perovskite) La1.4_{1.4}Sr1.6_{1.6}Mn2_2O7_7 find that this redressing is slower in the quasi-2D compound — the opposite of what finite-phonon-mass Holstein-polaron theory predicts — and the microscopic origin (layered crystal-field ege_g splitting, quantum confinement, modified lattice dynamics, or in-plane short-range ferromagnetic spin correlations above TCT_C) remains undetermined. The problem is to construct a dimension-sensitive microscopic dynamical model that couples Jahn-Teller/Holstein polaron energetics with fully dynamical (finite-phonon-mass) lattice degrees of freedom and spin-dependent double-exchange hopping, quantitatively reproduces the measured temperature-dependent relaxation time τ(T)\tau(T) of both compounds in the paramagnetic insulating phase, and identifies the dominant mechanism of the dimensionality dependence.

Background

Colossal-magnetoresistance (CMR) manganites — mixed-valence manganese oxides such as La0.7_{0.7}Ca0.3_{0.3}MnO3_3 — owe their physics to the interplay of three ingredients. Double exchange is the ferromagnetic transport mechanism: an ege_g electron hops between Mn ions with an amplitude tij=tcos⁡(θij/2)t_{ij}=t\cos(\theta_{ij}/2) set by the angle between neighboring local t2gt_{2g} core spins, which are tied to the itinerant electron's spin by Hund's-rule coupling. The Jahn-Teller (JT) effect is the coupling of the Mn3+^{3+} ege_g orbital degeneracy to distortions of the surrounding MnO6_6 oxygen octahedron. Their combination produces polarons: quasiparticles in which the charge carrier is self-trapped by the lattice distortion it induces. Above the Curie temperature TCT_C, CMR manganites are paramagnetic insulators whose carriers form small JT polarons; below TCT_C double exchange prevails and the compound becomes a ferromagnetic metal.

In an ultrafast optical pump-probe experiment, a femtosecond laser pulse momentarily liberates a carrier from its polaronic self-trapping and a delayed probe pulse monitors the transient reflectivity. The sub-picosecond recovery observed above TCT_C is attributed to polaron redressing: the relaxation of the photoexcited electron back into its polaronic ground state with phonon emission. This is a direct dynamical probe of the electron-phonon coupling that static probes (transport, neutron/x-ray diffuse scattering, optical conductivity) infer only indirectly.

J. Lee et al. (2016) compared τ(T)\tau(T) in 3D perovskite La0.7_{0.7}Ca0.3_{0.3}MnO3_3 (LCMO; TC≈250T_C\approx 250 K) and the quasi-2D bilayer La1.4_{1.4}Sr1.6_{1.6}Mn2_2O7_7 (bilayered LSMO; 3D ordering at TC≈90T_C\approx 90 K), the latter consisting of MnO2_2 bilayers separated by insulating (La,Sr)2_2O2_2 rock-salt blocks so that the electronic structure is quasi-two-dimensional. The key observation is that redressing is slower in the quasi-2D compound throughout the paramagnetic phase. This contradicts the standard microscopic picture. In the Emin-Holstein adiabatic scaling of the polaron energy — an approximation to the Holstein model, the minimal model of a charge carrier coupled locally to optical phonons, that treats the lattice as static (zero phonon mass) — with E(R)=Te/R2−VSint/(2Rd)E(R)=T_e/R^2 - V_S^{int}/(2R^d) for a polaron of radius RR in dd dimensions, no 2D bound state exists at all; and the refined calculation of Ku, Trugman and Bonča (Phys. Rev. B 65, 174306 (2002)), which includes a finite phonon mass, shows that a 2D polaronic bound state does exist but carries a smaller energy barrier between polaronic and free-electron ground states than in 3D, so the 2D redressing time was expected to be shorter. The authors discuss two candidate resolutions: in-plane short-range ferromagnetic correlations that persist well above TCT_C in the bilayer (a magnetization plateau between 90 and 250 K, and neutron pair-distribution-function evidence — scattering measurements of instantaneous interatomic distances — for double-exchange processes far above the 3D ordering temperature), and the crystal-field splitting of the ege_g levels by the lower symmetry of the layered structure, which competes with JT splitting and was neglected in their analysis. They state that a full treatment of lower-dimensionality effects — quantum confinement and crystal-field changes — is beyond the scope of their paper, call for the same measurements on thin-film manganites, and conclude that a new model is needed in which the polaron redressing time is governed by the dimensionality of the electronic structure and the presence of spin correlations above TCT_C. A fully quantitative account of this process is still missing: existing exact treatments of polaron formation and relaxation dynamics (Ku and Trugman, Phys. Rev. B 75, 014307 (2007); Golež, Bonča, Vidmar and Trugman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 236402 (2012)) solve the spinless single-polaron Holstein problem and do not include double-exchange spin physics, layered crystal fields, or a comparison to the measured manganite τ(T)\tau(T).

Problem Statement

Construct a predictive, dimension-sensitive microscopic dynamical model of polaron redressing in manganites — coupling Jahn-Teller/Holstein polaron energetics with a fully dynamical (finite-phonon-mass) lattice, spin-dependent double-exchange hopping tij=tcos⁡(θij/2)t_{ij}=t\cos(\theta_{ij}/2), the layered-structure crystal-field splitting of the ege_g levels, and short-range in-plane ferromagnetic spin correlations above TCT_C — and use it to determine the microscopic origin of the observed slower polaron redressing (apparently stronger electron-phonon coupling) in quasi-2D La1.4_{1.4}Sr1.6_{1.6}Mn2_2O7_7 relative to 3D La0.7_{0.7}Ca0.3_{0.3}MnO3_3. The model must quantitatively reproduce the measured temperature-dependent sub-picosecond relaxation time τ(T)\tau(T) of both compounds in the paramagnetic insulating phase, and its mechanism conclusion — identifying which ingredient(s) among crystal-field ege_g splitting, quantum confinement, modified lattice dynamics, and spin correlations above TCT_C dominate the dimensionality dependence — must be testable against targeted experiments such as probe-photon-energy-dependent, thin-film, or spin-correlation-controlled ultrafast measurements.

References

  1. J. Lee, H. J. Lee, R. D. Averitt, S. A. Trugman, J. Demsar, D. J. Funk, N. H. Hur, Y. Moritomo, A. J. Taylor, R. P. Prasankumar, D. A. Yarotski, 'Ultrafast Polaron Dynamics in Layered and Perovskite Manganites: 2D and 3D Polarons' (2016), arXiv:1609.09155, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1609.09155, https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.09155
  2. Li-Chung Ku, S. A. Trugman, J. Bonča, 'Dimensionality effects on the Holstein polaron', Physical Review B 65, 174306 (2002), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.174306, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.174306
  3. Li-Chung Ku, S. A. Trugman, 'Quantum dynamics of polaron formation', Physical Review B 75, 014307 (2007), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.014307, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.75.014307
  4. Denis Golež, Janez Bonča, Lev Vidmar, Stuart A. Trugman, 'Relaxation dynamics of the Holstein polaron', Physical Review Letters 109, 236402 (2012), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.236402, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.236402 (preprint arXiv:1209.2586)
  5. D. Talbayev, Jinho Lee, S. A. Trugman, C. L. Zhang, S.-W. Cheong, R. D. Averitt, A. J. Taylor, R. P. Prasankumar, 'Spin-dependent polaron formation dynamics in Eu0.75_{0.75}Y0.25_{0.25}MnO3_3 probed by femtosecond pump-probe spectroscopy', Physical Review B 91, 064420 (2015), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.064420, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.064420
  6. Huizhen Wang, Dongmei Deng, Zeyu Zhang, Kai Xu, Qunfeng Pan, Xian Lin, Long Yan, Shixun Cao, Zhenxiang Cheng, Zuanming Jin, Guohong Ma, 'Ultrafast Jahn-Teller polaron dynamics in a bi-layered manganite single crystal', physica status solidi (RRL) – Rapid Research Letters 10(7), 558-562 (2016), DOI: 10.1002/pssr.201600143, https://doi.org/10.1002/pssr.201600143
  7. P. C. Lingos, M. D. Kapetanakis, M. Mootz, J. Wang, I. E. Perakis, 'Theory of Ultrafast Spin-Charge Quantum Dynamics in Strongly Correlated Systems Controlled by Femtosecond Photoexcitation: an Application to Insulating Antiferromagnetic Manganites' (2018), arXiv:1804.07811, https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.07811
  8. M. Gandolfi, G. L. Celardo, F. Borgonovi, G. Ferrini, A. Avella, F. Banfi, C. Giannetti, 'Emergent ultrafast phenomena in correlated oxides and heterostructures', Physica Scripta 92, 034004 (2017), DOI: 10.1088/1402-4896/aa54cc, https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/aa54cc
  9. R. D. Averitt, A. I. Lobad, C. Kwon, S. A. Trugman, V. K. Thorsmølle, A. J. Taylor, 'Ultrafast Conductivity Dynamics in Colossal Magnetoresistance Manganites', Physical Review Letters 87, 017401 (2001), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.017401, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.017401
  10. A. Zafar, V. Petkov, A. M. Milinda Abeykoon, 'Local lattice distortions and electronic phases in perovskite manganite Pr0.5_{0.5}Sr0.5_{0.5}MnO3_3', Journal of Physics: Materials 7, 035007 (2024), DOI: 10.1088/2515-7639/ad5abf, https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7639/ad5abf
  11. H. J. Lee, R. D. Averitt, J. Demsar, D. J. Funk, A. J. Taylor, N. H. Hur, Y. Moritomo, 'Ultrafast quasiparticle dynamics in layered and perovskite manganites', IQEC 2004 conference abstract, DOI: 10.1364/iqec.2004.itul6, https://doi.org/10.1364/iqec.2004.itul6