Whether the fine-structure constant α\alpha varies — and whether any variation is a function of cosmic time, of position in space, or both — is an open question spanning precision cosmology, astrophysical spectroscopy, and laboratory metrology. Quasar absorption measurements have been interpreted both as a temporal drift and as a spatial dipole of amplitude about 9 parts per million: the archival Keck+VLT sample prefers a dipole at just over 4σ4\sigma, while dedicated, calibration-controlled measurements constrain the dipole amplitude to below ∼3\sim3 ppm, and the origin of this cross-sample discrepancy is unknown. Current data cannot discriminate a pure spatial dipole from a dipole with additional redshift (time) dependence. In the laboratory, the unambiguous discriminant — annual modulation of atomic-clock frequency ratios due to Earth's orbital motion through a spatial gradient of α\alpha — requires sensitivity near 10−20 yr−110^{-20}\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1}, roughly two orders of magnitude beyond current clock-comparison limits. The problem is to determine the spacetime structure of any variation of α\alpha — temporal only, spatial only, both, or none at the probed sensitivity — through resolved analysis of astrophysical samples with systematics under control, or through laboratory clock measurements that constrain the annual-modulation regime. Either route, carried to the completion boundary stated in the Problem Statement, resolves the objective.

Background

The fine-structure constant α≈1/137\alpha\approx 1/137 is the dimensionless number setting the strength of the electromagnetic interaction; it fixes atomic transition frequencies, so comparing frequencies measured at different times, in different places, or along different lines of sight tests whether α\alpha is truly constant. Such tests probe Local Position Invariance — the part of the Einstein equivalence principle asserting that the outcome of any local non-gravitational experiment is independent of where and when it is performed — and many extensions of the Standard Model, for example scalar fields coupled to electromagnetism possibly related to dark energy, predict small spacetime variations of α\alpha.

The most precise astrophysical test uses quasar absorption spectra: gas clouds along a quasar line of sight imprint narrow absorption lines whose rest wavelengths shift in a correlated way if α\alpha differed from its laboratory value when the light passed through the cloud. In the many-multiplet method, many transitions of different ionic species, each with a different sensitivity to α\alpha, are fitted simultaneously, reaching parts-per-million (ppm, 10−610^{-6}) precision in the relative shift Δα/α\Delta\alpha/\alpha. Two generations of measurements exist: an archival sample of 293 spectra from the Keck/HIRES and VLT/UVES spectrographs, and a smaller set of dedicated measurements taken specifically for this purpose with carefully controlled wavelength calibration (Subaru, X-Shooter, HARPS, and the ESPRESSO spectrograph on the VLT, whose wavelength scale is tied to a laser frequency comb — an array of evenly spaced, absolutely known reference lines — rather than to comparison lamps).

Analyzing the archival data as a single Keck+VLT dataset, Webb et al. (2011) reported that Δα/α\Delta\alpha/\alpha is better described by a spatial dipole, significant at the 4.2σ4.2\sigma level with amplitude A≈9A\approx 9 ppm,

Δαα=Acos⁡Ψ,\frac{\Delta\alpha}{\alpha}=A\cos\Psi,

where Ψ\Psi is the orthodromic (great-circle angular) distance between the line of sight and the dipole's north pole on the sky, than by a purely temporal drift. The standard phenomenological alternative adds a redshift dependence to the dipole amplitude,

Δαα=Aln⁡(1+z)cos⁡Ψ,\frac{\Delta\alpha}{\alpha}=A\ln(1+z)\cos\Psi,

which entangles space and time: a signal seen in a quasar sample could be a pure spatial gradient, a cosmic-time evolution that projects onto the sky, or a combination. Pinho & Martins (2016) showed that the data available then cannot discriminate between the pure spatial dipole and the redshift-dependent form. Moreover, the dipole is preferred only by the archival sample: in the dedicated sample, whose measurements have considerably smaller and better-characterized uncertainties, the dipole amplitude is constrained to be below ∼3\sim3 ppm (95% confidence), while the archival dipole stands at 9.4±2.29.4\pm2.2 ppm (Martins et al. 2022) — a cross-sample discrepancy whose origin (instrumental calibration, analysis pipelines, sky coverage, or astrophysical selection effects) has never been identified.

A laboratory discriminant exists in principle. Comparisons of atomic clocks based on different transitions constrain the present drift to α˙/α≈10−18 yr−1\dot{\alpha}/\alpha\approx 10^{-18}\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1} (Lange et al. 2021). A spatial gradient of α\alpha at rest in a cosmological frame would appear in the laboratory as a slow drift driven by the Sun's motion of 369 km s−1369\,\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}} relative to the cosmic microwave background, at the ∼10−19 yr−1\sim10^{-19}\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1} level for a dipole of the reported amplitude, while the clean separation of spatial from temporal variation would come from the annual modulation induced by Earth's orbital motion around the Sun (velocity ∼30 km s−1\sim30\,\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}}, direction varying over the year), requiring clock sensitivity near 10−20 yr−110^{-20}\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1} (Dzuba et al. 2015). Transition frequencies shift by δω/ω=K δα/α\delta\omega/\omega=K\,\delta\alpha/\alpha with a species-dependent sensitivity coefficient K=2q/ω0K=2q/\omega_0, where the frequency is expanded as ω(x)=ω0+qx\omega(x)=\omega_0+qx with x=(α/α0)2−1x=(\alpha/\alpha_0)^2-1; clock comparisons between species with large and different KK therefore amplify the signal. Dzuba, Safronova, Safronova & Flambaum (2015) identified the actinide highly charged ions (ions of heavy actinide elements stripped of many electrons) Cf15+\mathrm{Cf}^{15+} and Es16+\mathrm{Es}^{16+} — with about a hundredfold enhanced sensitivity and clock-quality transitions — as the best proposed system for such a test.

Problem Statement

Determine whether any variation of the fine-structure constant α\alpha is a function of cosmic time, of position in space, or both — including the possibility that there is no variation at the probed sensitivity. This single objective can be pursued through two independent routes; either route alone resolves it, with the completion boundary of each stated below, and it is not required to pursue both.

(1) Astrophysical discrimination. Using quasar absorption measurements (and, where applicable, other astrophysical probes), discriminate at the parts-per-million (ppm, 10−610^{-6}) level between a pure spatial dipole Δα/α=Acos⁡Ψ\Delta\alpha/\alpha=A\cos\Psi (where AA is the dipole amplitude and Ψ\Psi is the angular distance on the sky between the quasar line of sight and the dipole axis), a dipole with additional redshift dependence Δα/α=Aln⁡(1+z)cos⁡Ψ\Delta\alpha/\alpha=A\ln(1+z)\cos\Psi (where zz is the cosmological redshift of the absorbing cloud, so this form grows with lookback time), and purely temporal, direction-independent (monopole) models — against the background of the unresolved discrepancy between the archival sample (dipole amplitude 9.4±2.29.4\pm2.2 ppm, preferred at just over 4σ4\sigma) and the dedicated sample (dipole amplitude constrained to <2.9<2.9 ppm at 95% confidence), whose origin — cosmological or instrumental — has not been identified. This route is completed by a ppm-level discrimination among these three model forms with systematics under control, or by an explicit demonstration that a named, quantified systematic floor prevents such a discrimination; a bare restatement that the currently published samples do not discriminate does not complete it.

(2) Laboratory discrimination. Detect or bound the spatial gradient of α\alpha through atomic-clock frequency-ratio comparisons: a steady drift at the ∼10−19 yr−1\sim10^{-19}\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1} level, driven by the Sun's motion relative to the cosmic microwave background, would test the dipole hypothesis, and the annual modulation of clock frequency ratios induced by Earth's orbital motion — distinguishable from a monotonic temporal drift by its period and phase — would unambiguously separate spatial from temporal variation, requiring systematic control near the 10−20 yr−110^{-20}\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1} level with clock transitions of enhanced α\alpha-sensitivity (e.g., actinide highly charged ions: ions of heavy actinide elements stripped of many electrons, whose clock transitions respond anomalously strongly to changes in α\alpha). This route is completed by a quantified detection or bound of the spatial gradient and of the annual modulation at the clock-comparison sensitivity actually achievable now or in the near term, together with an explicit analysis of the systematic control that would be required to reach the 10−20 yr−110^{-20}\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1} annual-modulation regime (for example with the actinide highly charged ions above); a demonstrated measurement at the 10−20 yr−110^{-20}\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1} level is not required, since that sensitivity lies beyond current capability.

References

  1. J. K. Webb, J. A. King, M. T. Murphy, V. V. Flambaum, R. F. Carswell, M. B. Bainbridge, 'Indications of a spatial variation of the fine structure constant', Physical Review Letters 107, 191101 (2011). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.191101; arXiv:1008.3907; https://arxiv.org/abs/1008.3907
  2. A. M. M. Pinho, C. J. A. P. Martins, 'Updated constraints on spatial variations of the fine-structure constant', Physics Letters B 756, 121-125 (2016). DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2016.03.014; arXiv:1603.04498; https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.04498
  3. C. J. A. P. Martins, A. M. M. Pinho, 'Stability of fundamental couplings: a global analysis', Physical Review D 95, 023008 (2017). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.023008; arXiv:1701.08724; https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.08724
  4. C. J. A. P. Martins, F. P. S. A. Ferreira, P. V. Marto, 'Varying fine-structure constant cosmography', Physics Letters B 827, 137002 (2022). DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137002; arXiv:2203.02781; https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.02781
  5. C. J. A. P. Martins, 'Varying fundamental constants cosmography', Physics of the Dark Universe 49, 102047 (2025). DOI: 10.1016/j.dark.2025.102047; arXiv:2508.18458; https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.18458
  6. V. A. Dzuba, M. S. Safronova, U. I. Safronova, V. V. Flambaum, 'Actinide ions for testing the spatial alpha-variation hypothesis', Physical Review A 92, 060502 (2015). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.060502; arXiv:1508.07681; https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.07681
  7. V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum, 'Highly charged ions of heavy actinides as sensitive probes for time variation of the fine-structure constant', Physical Review A 110, 012801 (2024). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.110.012801; arXiv:2405.11839; https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.11839
  8. M. T. Murphy, P. Molaro, A. C. O. Leite, G. Cupani, S. Cristiani, V. D'Odorico, R. Genova Santos, C. J. A. P. Martins, D. Milakovic, N. J. Nunes, T. M. Schmidt, F. A. Pepe, R. Rebolo, N. C. Santos, S. G. Sousa, M.-R. Zapatero Osorio, M. Amate, V. Adibekyan, Y. Alibert, C. Allende Prieto, V. Baldini, W. Benz, F. Bouchy, A. Cabral, H. Dekker, P. Di Marcantonio, D. Ehrenreich, P. Figueira, J. I. Gonzalez Hernandez, M. Landoni, C. Lovis, G. Lo Curto, A. Manescau, D. Megevand, A. Mehner, G. Micela, L. Pasquini, E. Poretti, M. Riva, A. Sozzetti, A. Suarez Mascareno, S. Udry, F. Zerbi, 'Fundamental physics with ESPRESSO: Precise limit on variations in the fine-structure constant towards the bright quasar HE 0515-4414', Astronomy & Astrophysics 658, A123 (2022). DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142257; arXiv:2112.05819; https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.05819
  9. J. K. Webb, C.-C. Lee, D. Milakovic, V. V. Flambaum, V. A. Dzuba, J. Magueijo, 'The mystery of alpha and the isotopes', Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 539, L1-L6 (2025). DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slaf012; arXiv:2401.00888; https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.00888
  10. S. Muller, A. Beelen, M. Guélin, J. H. Black, F. Combes, H. L. Bethlem, M. Gérin, C. Henkel, K. M. Menten, M. T. Murphy, W. Ubachs, N. Wozny, 'A sub-ppm upper limit on the cosmological variations of the fine structure constant alpha', Astronomy & Astrophysics 706, A365 (2026). DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202557492; arXiv:2512.14441; https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.14441
  11. R. Lange, N. Huntemann, J. M. Rahm, C. Sanner, H. Shao, B. Lipphardt, C. Tamm, S. Weyers, E. Peik, 'Improved limits for violations of local position invariance from atomic clock comparisons', Physical Review Letters 126, 011102 (2021). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.011102; https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.011102
  12. Y. V. Stadnik, 'Robust laboratory limits on a cosmological spatial gradient in the electromagnetic fine-structure constant from accelerometer experiments', Physical Review A 103, 062807 (2021). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.103.062807; arXiv:2010.01798; https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.01798
  13. M. T. Murphy, D. A. Berke, F. Liu, C. Flynn, C. Lehmann, V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum, 'A limit on variations in the fine-structure constant from spectra of nearby Sun-like stars', Science 378, 634-636 (2022). DOI: 10.1126/science.abi9232; arXiv:2211.05150; https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.05150
  14. Linhua Jiang, Zhiwei Pan, Jessica Nicole Aguilar, Steven Ahlen, Robert Blum, David Brooks, Todd Claybaugh, Axel de la Macorra, Arjun Dey, Peter Doel, Kevin Fanning, Simone Ferraro, Jaime E. Forero-Romero, Enrique Gaztanaga, Satya Gontcho A Gontcho, Gaston Gutierrez, Klaus Honscheid, Stephanie Juneau, Martin Landriau, Laurent Le Guillou, Michael Levi, Marc Manera, Ramon Miquel, Eva-Maria Mueller, Andrea Munoz-Gutierrez, Adam Myers, Jundan Nie, Gustavo Niz, Claire Poppett, Francisco Prada, Mehdi Rezaie, Graziano Rossi, Eusebio Sanchez, Edward Schlafly, Michael Schubnell, Hee-Jong Seo, David Sprayberry, Gregory Tarle, Benjamin Alan Weaver, Hu Zou, 'Constraints on the spacetime variation of the fine-structure constant using DESI emission-line galaxies', The Astrophysical Journal 968, 120 (2024). DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad47b4; arXiv:2404.03123; https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.03123
  15. Linhua Jiang, Shuqi Fu, Feige Wang, Sarah E. I. Bosman, Zheng Cai, Hyunsung D. Jun, Zhiwei Pan, Fengwu Sun, Jinyi Yang, Huanian Zhang, 'Constraints on the variation of the fine-structure constant at 3<z<10 with JWST emission-line galaxies', The Astrophysical Journal 980, 93 (2025). DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/adad5b; arXiv:2405.08977; https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.08977