Holographic inflation drives the early universe with a holographic energy density ρ=3c2Mp2/L2\rho=3c^2M_p^2/L^2 (with MpM_p the reduced Planck mass and cc a dimensionless parameter), where the infrared cutoff LIRL_{\rm IR} (the particle or future event horizon) is combined with an ultraviolet correction L=LIR2+ΛUV−2L=\sqrt{L_{\rm IR}^2+\Lambda_{\rm UV}^{-2}}; the model reproduces Planck 2018 observables using approximate Hubble-flow relations, but completing its scientific assessment requires work left unfinished in the source, part of it flagged by its own authors. What remains open, and what this problem asks for, is the completion of the original model itself: a full perturbation analysis yielding exact scalar and tensor spectra (including the effective sound speed and stability of the holographic fluid), a quantitative reheating construction with its thermal history, and a microscopic or at least principled determination of ΛUV\Lambda_{\rm UV} and of the joint (c,ΛUV,N)(c,\Lambda_{\rm UV},N) region allowed by observation.

Background

The holographic principle states that the maximum number of independent degrees of freedom in a spatial region scales with its surface area rather than its volume. Applied to dark energy, it suggests the holographic dark energy (HDE) ansatz ρ=3c2Mp2/L2\rho=3c^2M_p^2/L^2 (M. Li, 2004), where MpM_p is the reduced Planck mass, cc is a dimensionless parameter, and LL is an infrared (IR) cutoff length, typically taken as a horizon scale: the particle horizon Lp=a∫0tdt′/aL_p=a\int_0^t dt'/a or the future event horizon Lf=a∫t∞dt′/aL_f=a\int_t^{\infty}dt'/a. The successful late-time phenomenology of this ansatz motivated Nojiri, Odintsov and Saridakis (Phys. Lett. B 797 (2019) 134829) to apply it at early times: since the horizons shrink as one goes back in time, the holographic energy density naturally grows to inflationary scales. Because inflation is a high-energy regime, they corrected the cutoff by an ultraviolet (UV) contribution, L=LIR2+ΛUV−2L=\sqrt{L_{\rm IR}^2+\Lambda_{\rm UV}^{-2}}, a form introduced in Nojiri–Odintsov, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 103522; this UV term proves essential, since it allows graceful exit from the de Sitter phase (a period of exponential expansion) that would otherwise be exact. The model yields an analytic implicit solution for the Hubble rate H(t)H(t), and the inflationary observables — the scalar spectral index nsn_s of curvature perturbations, its running αs\alpha_s, the tensor-to-scalar ratio rr, and the tensor spectral index nTn_T — are computed from the Hubble-flow (slow-roll) parameters, defined by ϵ1=−H˙/H2\epsilon_1=-\dot H/H^2 and ϵn+1=dln⁡∣ϵn∣/dN\epsilon_{n+1}=d\ln|\epsilon_n|/dN with N=ln⁡(a/aini)N=\ln(a/a_{\rm ini}) the e-folding number. The resulting predictions agree with the Planck 2018 constraints (Akrami et al., arXiv:1807.06211) deep inside the 1-sigma region, with rr small for cc slightly above 1 when the future event horizon is used. The paper also shows, in a generalized-cutoff section, that a cutoff built from HH and its derivatives can reproduce Starobinsky R2R^2 inflation (the scenario where an R+αR2R+\alpha R^2 gravitational action drives inflation through an extra scalar degree of freedom, the scalaron), and suggests correspondences with Gauss–Bonnet f(G)f(G) and teleparallel f(T)f(T) inflation models (modified-gravity theories built respectively from the Gauss–Bonnet curvature invariant and from torsion instead of curvature). Crucially, four gaps remain — (i) and (iii) flagged explicitly by the authors, (ii) and (iv) evident from the source itself: (i) the observables are extracted from approximate Hubble-flow relations, whereas exact expressions would require a full perturbation analysis of this specific model, along the lines of the late-time HDE perturbation treatment of M. Li, C. Lin and Y. Wang, JCAP 05 (2008) 023; (ii) reheating is only sketched qualitatively as a Starobinsky-like scalaron-driven transition; (iii) generalized IR cutoffs deserve systematic exploration; (iv) ΛUV\Lambda_{\rm UV} enters as a free phenomenological parameter with no microscopic motivation. The perturbation question is not a formality: the holographic fluid has no scalar-field Lagrangian, its density depends on HH, its derivatives and on horizon integrals, so its effective sound speed, the gauge-invariant treatment of the time-dependent cutoff, and the stability of perturbation modes must all be established before the published observable comparison can be considered exact.

Problem Statement

For holographic inflation as defined by Nojiri, Odintsov and Saridakis — a universe dominated by the holographic energy density ρ=3c2Mp2/L2\rho=3c^2M_p^2/L^2 with combined cutoff L=LIR2+ΛUV−2L=\sqrt{L_{\rm IR}^2+\Lambda_{\rm UV}^{-2}}, where LIRL_{\rm IR} is the particle horizon (m=1m=1) or the future event horizon (m=−1m=-1) — complete the physical assessment of the model on the three fronts the source leaves incomplete (the fourth front — the systematic exploration of generalized cutoffs — is outside the scope of this problem; see Paul 2019 and Nojiri–Odintsov–Oikonomou–Paul 2020): (1) perform the full cosmological perturbation analysis of this specific model: derive the complete, gauge-invariant scalar and tensor perturbation equations for the holographic fluid, determine its effective sound speed and whether gradient (growth of short-wavelength modes) or ghost (negative kinetic energy) instabilities arise on the inflationary attractor, extract the exact power spectra, spectral indices, running, and tensor-to-scalar ratio, and quantify the deviation from the approximate Hubble-flow predictions on which the published Planck 2018 agreement rests; (2) construct reheating quantitatively for this model: the particle-production mechanism and its channel, the induced decay or dissipation rate, the resulting reheating temperature, and the transition to the standard hot-Big-Bang radiation era, as functions of the model parameters cc and ΛUV\Lambda_{\rm UV}; and (3) resolve front (3) in two required parts: (3a) either derive ΛUV\Lambda_{\rm UV} from a microscopically motivated or internally consistent principle that fixes ΛUV\Lambda_{\rm UV} in terms of cc and the other model parameters (or to a definite value), stating that principle and the assumptions it rests on explicitly, or establish model-independent constraints on ΛUV\Lambda_{\rm UV} as an explicit interval on ΛUV\Lambda_{\rm UV} at a stated confidence level from named observables; and (3b) jointly with cc, determine, over the conventional e-folding range 50≤N≤6050\le N\le 60, the segment of the parametric observable curves (ns,r)(n_s,r) that lies inside the Planck 2018 constraints, stating how that segment depends on NN.

References

  1. S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, E. N. Saridakis, 'Holographic inflation', Phys. Lett. B 797 (2019) 134829, DOI 10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134829, arXiv:1904.01345, https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.01345
  2. S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, 'Final state and thermodynamics of a dark energy universe', Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 103522, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.103522, arXiv:hep-th/0408170, https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0408170
  3. Miao Li, 'A model of holographic dark energy', Phys. Lett. B 603 (2004) 1, DOI 10.1016/j.physletb.2004.10.014, arXiv:hep-th/0403127, https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0403127
  4. Miao Li, Chunshan Lin, Yi Wang, 'Some issues concerning holographic dark energy', JCAP 05 (2008) 023, DOI 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/05/023, arXiv:0801.1407, https://arxiv.org/abs/0801.1407
  5. Y. Akrami et al. [Planck Collaboration], 'Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation', Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A10, DOI 10.1051/0004-6361/201833887, arXiv:1807.06211, https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.06211
  6. Tanmoy Paul, 'Holographic correspondence of F(R) gravity with/without matter fields', EPL 127 (2019) 20004, DOI 10.1209/0295-5075/127/20004, arXiv:1905.13033, https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.13033
  7. S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, V. K. Oikonomou, Tanmoy Paul, 'Unifying holographic inflation with holographic dark energy: A covariant approach', Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 023540, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.023540, arXiv:2007.06829, https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.06829
  8. S. Nojiri, S. Odintsov, Tanmoy Paul, 'Different Faces of Generalized Holographic Dark Energy', Symmetry 13 (2021) 928, DOI 10.3390/sym13060928, arXiv:2105.08438, https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.08438
  9. S. Nojiri, S. Odintsov, Tanmoy Paul, 'Holographic realization of constant roll inflation and dark energy: An unified scenario', Phys. Lett. B 841 (2023) 137926, DOI 10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137926, arXiv:2304.09436, https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.09436
  10. S. Odintsov, S. D'Onofrio, Tanmoy Paul, 'Holographic realization from inflation to reheating in generalized entropic cosmology', Phys. Dark Univ. 42 (2023) 101277, DOI 10.1016/j.dark.2023.101277, arXiv:2306.15225, https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.15225
  11. S. Taghavi, T. Golanbari, K. Saaidi, 'Tsallis Holographic Inflation in f(R, T) Gravity: Planck/ACT Constraints, Reheating Dynamics, and Swampland Bounds', Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2026 (2026) 053E01, DOI 10.1093/ptep/ptag057, arXiv:2301.02631, https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.02631
  12. P. C. Delgado, A. Ganz, Chunshan Lin, 'Inflationary epoch in the presence of holographic dark energy', JCAP 08 (2022) 081, DOI 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/08/081, arXiv:2111.05760, https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.05760
  13. A. Oliveros, M. Acero, 'Inflation driven by a holographic energy density', EPL 128 (2020) 59001, DOI 10.1209/0295-5075/128/59001, arXiv:1911.04482, https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.04482
  14. E. Elizalde, A. Timoshkin, 'Viscous fluid holographic inflation', Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 732, DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7244-z, arXiv:1908.08712, https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.08712
  15. A. Mohammadi, 'Holographic warm inflation', Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 123538, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.123538, arXiv:2109.00247, https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.00247
  16. A. Mohammadi, T. Golanbari, K. Bamba, I. Lobo, 'Tsallis holographic dark energy for inflation', Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 083505, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.083505, arXiv:2101.06378, https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.06378
  17. Qihong Huang, He Huang, Bing Xu, Kaituo Zhang, 'Holographic inflation and holographic dark energy from entropy of the anti-de Sitter black hole', Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (2025) 395, DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14113-0, arXiv:2501.02759, https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.02759
  18. Qihong Huang, He Huang, Hao Chen, Qingdong Wu, 'Holographic Inflation and Slow-Roll Inflation Within Rényi Entropic Framework in the Light of ACT DR6', Universe 12 (2026) 171, DOI 10.3390/universe12060171, arXiv:2604.10518, https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.10518
  19. Farida Bargach, Aatifa Bargach, Brahim Asfour, Abdelkarim Oukouiss, Taoufik Ouali, 'Reheating constraints for an induced gravity model with a holographic description', Phys. Dark Univ. 50 (2025) 102080, DOI 10.1016/j.dark.2025.102080, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2025.102080