Ball lightning — a luminous, free-floating, roughly spherical object observed during thunderstorms — has no accepted formation mechanism. Boerner (2023) proposed that free electrons from a negative corona, structured into a submillimeter periodic grating by Trichel pulses and released by the rising leader field, act as a receiving antenna that converts the electromagnetic pulse (EMP) of the lightning return stroke into a localized electromagnetic structure of the kind hypothesized to constitute ball lightning. How this self-organization works — the antenna mechanism — is posed by the source as its central open question, together with a speculative terahertz-radiation variant, the need for simulations of negative corona under pulsed excitation, the proposal of negative-ion amplification media such as flue gases, and two untried laboratory routes (negative corona irradiated by an EMP; a conductor biased by a negative high-voltage pulse).

Background

Ball lightning is the name given to luminous, roughly spherical objects, typically tens of centimeters across, that appear mostly during thunderstorms, float freely for up to several seconds, and vanish silently or explosively. Despite reports going back centuries, no accepted physical model exists: proposed explanations range from plasma chemistries fed by vaporized soil to microwave cavities, electrochemical cells, and even dark matter, and no laboratory experiment has produced an object matching the observational record. The single natural ball lightning whose spectrum was fortuitously recorded (Cen, Yuan and Xue 2014) showed emission lines of soil elements, supporting one competing family of models and illustrating how far the field remains from a shared mechanism.

Two observational anchors motivate the present question. First, correlating ball-lightning reports with lightning-location-system data, Keul and Diendorfer (2018) found that positive cloud-to-ground (CG) flashes — those whose leader lowers positive charge to ground — are associated with ball lightning roughly an order of magnitude more often than negative CG flashes. Second, some reports describe ball lightning passing through window glass, at times cutting a more-or-less round hole in the pane, which is hard to reconcile with any purely material object.

The source synthesizes these anchors with the physics of corona discharges and with a specific class of candidate models for the nature of ball lightning. A corona discharge is a partial, non-arcing electrical discharge that develops at sharp electrodes in air; in negative corona the point acts as a cathode. Free electrons created in ionization avalanches near the point drift away, but because oxygen is strongly electronegative (molecular electron affinity about 0.45 eV), they attach to oxygen molecules within roughly 100 nanoseconds, so the charge is carried by slow negative ions. This space charge quenches the ionizing field until it drifts away, whereupon a new avalanche starts; the result is a train of very regular current bursts called Trichel pulses (typically 100 Hz to 10 kHz, up to about 3 MHz). The drifting ion bunches imprint a periodic vertical grating of negative charge with submillimeter spacing, about 0.1 to 1 mm. When the ambient field grows strong enough (hundreds of kV/m), electrons detach from the negative ions at much lower energy cost than fresh ionization, so a rising field converts the grating into a periodic population of free electrons.

A positive leader approaching ground drives current out of grounded points as a cathode, so positive CG lightning produces negative corona at ground; the observed positive-CG preference is thus explained if the free electrons of negative corona are essential to ball lightning formation. In the scenario for creation in open air, a positive leader approaches, negative corona builds the Trichel ion grating, the rising leader field releases free electrons from the ions, and the return stroke radiates an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) — the same pulse that at ionospheric altitude produces the expanding luminous rings called ELVES — which accelerates the grating electrons; the accelerated bunches radiate and are pulled back by the positive ions left in their wake. The author is careful to state that this chain is standard discharge physics.

What the electromagnetic energy should assemble into is, in this framework, a localized electromagnetic structure: exact source-free solutions of Maxwell's equations, introduced as candidate ball lightning models by Cameron (2018) under the name monochromatic knots, whose electric and magnetic field lines form closed loops and which are localized in all three spatial dimensions, storing electromagnetic energy without any cavity or reflector and behaving more like particles than propagating waves. Such a structure would ionize and excite air only in its vicinity, producing a thin luminous plasma envelope while the field configuration itself provides stability. Cameron, Löffler and Stephan (2021) proposed antenna configurations to generate such structures in the laboratory, but no realization has been reported. Mathematical work on the existence, classification and stability of these structures continues (Pérez-Carlos et al. 2023 on steady-state magnetic trap configurations; Bode and Peralta-Salas 2025 on their topology), but their actual formation is unexplored.

The open question at the heart of the candidate is the missing step between the two lines of argument: by what mechanism the structured free electrons act as the receiving and transmitting antenna that converts EMP energy into the field configuration of a localized electromagnetic structure. One speculative variant is that the accelerated electron bunches, interfering coherently because of their grating periodicity, emit terahertz radiation with wavelengths of 0.1 to 1 mm — consistent, it is argued, with reported cases of ball lightning passing through metallic mosquito screens of about 1 mm mesh. Auxiliary open pieces of the source question are the amplification of the electron bunches in air rich in negative ions, proposed to explain the statistical preference of ball lightning for emerging from hearths and chimneys already noted by Brand in 1923; the need for computer simulations of negative corona under pulsed excitation to define experimental parameters; and the observation of ball lightning inside all-metal aircraft, which form a Faraday cage and where the hypothesis admittedly has no ready explanation.

Problem Statement

The problem, posed by its source as the only open step in an otherwise standard chain of discharge physics, is to determine whether and how free electrons structured by the Trichel pulses of a negative corona convert the energy of the lightning return-stroke electromagnetic pulse into a localized, long-lived electromagnetic structure — the antenna mechanism of ball lightning formation. The single scientific objective is a validated or refuted quantitative account of this mechanism, with three jointly supporting components: (i) a physical model of the antenna mechanism, including whether the coherent interference of the accelerated electron bunches emits the speculated terahertz radiation (wavelengths of 0.1 to 1 mm) that forms the structure, and an energy-budget analysis of how much return-stroke EMP energy a submillimeter grating of electrons in air can absorb and confine; (ii) numerical simulations of negative corona under pulsed, EMP-like excitation — resolving attachment, detachment, ion drift, and Trichel-pulse dynamics — that predict the parameter windows (field strengths, pulse waveforms, ion densities, and the effect of negative-ion-rich amplification media such as flue gases) in which the process can occur; and (iii) a laboratory realization that either produces a luminous localized object in atmospheric air consistent with the observed size, lifetime, and behavior of natural ball lightning or refutes the free-electron hypothesis. The mechanism is established only if the modeled and simulated behaviour is carried through to a laboratory realization; it is ruled out if a model and simulations covering the parameter space (fields, pulse forms, gas composition, amplification media) show that the mechanism cannot meet the required energy budget. A resolution that replaces the free-electron premise with a different mechanism (soil-vapor chemistry, microwave cavity, soliton, or exotic-matter models) would refute this specific hypothesis and thereby answer the question in the negative, but the refutation must engage the corona–EMP route itself rather than merely proposing an alternative.

References

  1. Herbert Boerner, "The Role of Free Electrons in Ball Lightning Creation", arXiv:2304.01784 (2023), https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.01784
  2. Herbert Boerner, "Ball Lightning Experiments", chapter in Ball Lightning, Springer (2025), DOI 10.1007/978-3-032-02164-9_12, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-02164-9_12
  3. Robert P. Cameron, "Monochromatic knots and other unusual electromagnetic disturbances: light localised in 3D", Journal of Physics Communications 2, 015024 (2018), DOI 10.1088/2399-6528/aa9761, https://doi.org/10.1088/2399-6528/aa9761
  4. R P Cameron, W Löffler, K D Stephan, "Theoretical proposal for the experimental realisation of a monochromatic electromagnetic knot", Journal of Optics 23, 064006 (2021), DOI 10.1088/2040-8986/abfc33, https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8986/abfc33
  5. Chuliang Zhou, Dongdong Zhang, Rong Qi, Yafeng Bai, Yushan Zeng, Zhuorui Zheng, Liwei Song, Ye Tian, Ruxin Li, "Ball-lightning-like relativistic terahertz solitons", Nature Photonics 20, 727 (2026), DOI 10.1038/s41566-026-01899-y, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-026-01899-y
  6. Zhe Li, "A Topological Soliton Model for Ball Lightning: Theory and Numerical Verification with the 3D Gross-Pitaevskii Equation", arXiv:2605.09851 (2026), https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09851
  7. Sergey G. Fedosin, "Electron-ion model of ball and bead lightning", Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 265, 106374 (2024), DOI 10.1016/j.jastp.2024.106374, arXiv:2410.18132, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2024.106374
  8. Karl D. Stephan, "Could Ball Lightning Be Magnetic Monopoles?", arXiv:2408.10289 (2024), https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.10289
  9. John P. Ralston, "Is Ball Lightning a Signal of Magnetic Monopoles?", arXiv:2411.00240 (2024), https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.00240
  10. Ariel Zhitnitsky, "Ball Lightning as a Profound Manifestation of Dark Matter Physics", Universe 11, 284 (2025), DOI 10.3390/universe11090284, arXiv:2502.02653, https://doi.org/10.3390/universe11090284
  11. Benjamin Bode, Daniel Peralta-Salas, "The topology of stable electromagnetic structures and Legendrian fields on the 3-sphere", International Mathematics Research Notices, volume 2025, issue 11 (2025), DOI 10.1093/imamrn/rnaf155, arXiv:2302.01043, https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.01043
  12. David A. Pérez-Carlos, A. Gutiérrez-Rodríguez, Augusto Espinoza Garrido, "Steady-state magnetic trap configurations for the axially symmetric free electromagnetic field in vacuum", The European Physical Journal Plus 138, 334 (2023), DOI 10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-03945-y, https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-03945-y
  13. H.-C. Wu, "Relativistic-microwave theory of ball lightning", Scientific Reports 6, 28263 (2016), DOI 10.1038/srep28263, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28263
  14. Karl D. Stephan, "Extension of Relativistic-Microwave Theory of Ball Lightning Including Long-term Losses And Stability", arXiv:1608.00450 (2016), https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.00450
  15. Alexander G. Keul, Gerhard Diendorfer, "Assessment of ball lightning cases by correlated LLS data", 2018 34th International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP) (2018), DOI 10.1109/ICLP.2018.8503422, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICLP.2018.8503422
  16. Jianyong Cen, Ping Yuan, Simin Xue, "Observation of the Optical and Spectral Characteristics of Ball Lightning", Physical Review Letters 112, 035001 (2014), DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.035001, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.035001
  17. Walid S. Salah, O. Gazeli, C. Lazarou, C. Anastassiou, G. E. Georghiou, "Investigation of negative corona discharge Trichel pulses for a needle-plane geometry via two numerical 2D axisymmetric models", AIP Advances 12, 105123 (2022), DOI 10.1063/5.0084851, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0084851
  18. Xing Zhang, Yulin Guo, Anbang Sun, Congwei Yao, Guangyu Sun, Guanjun Zhang, "The pulsed mode of negative DC corona in nitrogen at atmosphere pressure: Comparison with Trichel pulses in air", Physics of Plasmas 27, 033501 (2020), DOI 10.1063/1.5136042, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5136042