Ball lightning — a luminous sphere, typically tens of centimetres across and lasting seconds, occasionally seen near lightning strikes — has no accepted explanation. Wu (2016) proposed that a relativistic electron bunch from the last step of a lightning stepped leader emits coherent transition radiation at gigahertz frequencies when it strikes the ground; the radiation ionizes air and its pressure evacuates a spherical plasma cavity that stably traps hundreds of joules of microwave energy, a mechanism supported by two-dimensional particle-in-cell simulations with an effective air-friction model. The source paper's own open problem is experimental verification of this mechanism, along two linked routes: direct field detection of intense GHz microwave bursts and high-flux energetic electrons correlated with lightning strikes and ball-lightning events; and laboratory creation of the microwave bubble, whose required source power (hundreds of gigawatts) is about an order of magnitude beyond existing devices, or an equivalent electron-beam route with the correct pulse shape and coupling into air. The paper also acknowledges that its supporting simulations remain two-dimensional with an effective collision model, so bubble formation, stability and the observed second-scale lifetimes are not yet demonstrated in three-dimensional geometry with realistic collisional kinetics. Current literature reports substantial progress on a scaled laboratory analogue — laser-driven millimetre-scale relativistic terahertz solitons with ball-lightning-like optical signatures — and indirect support for the coherent-transition-radiation source from stepped-leader radio observations and satellite trans-ionospheric pulse pairs, but no direct field detection of a natural GHz microwave bubble, no natural-scale laboratory realization, and no full three-dimensional collisional demonstration; the core verification problem at natural scale therefore remains open.

Background

Ball lightning is a rarely observed luminous phenomenon of thunderstorms: a free-floating, roughly spherical object, commonly reported diameters lying between roughly 20 and 50 cm, with a typical reported lifetime of 1–5 seconds, that appears near lightning strokes, sometimes indoors or inside aircraft, can pass through window glass, and may end silently or with an explosion. Its properties are known from several thousand published eyewitness reports and a handful of instrumentally documented events; no widely accepted physical explanation exists despite proposals dating to the 19th century.

One line of proposals treats ball lightning as confined electromagnetic radiation. Kapitza (1955) argued that ball lightning could form by air ionization at the antinodes of electromagnetic standing waves in the microwave regime, and Dawson and Jones (1969) proposed that ball lightning is a radiation bubble: microwave radiation confined inside a spherical plasma shell whose ionized state is maintained by the trapped radiation itself; Zheng (1990) calculated that hundreds of joules of microwaves can maintain such a plasma shell for a few seconds. These models naturally accommodate the reported passage through glass (microwaves cross dielectric panes much thinner than their wavelength) and the appearance of balls inside screened aircraft, but they all shared one decisive gap: no one had identified a physical process by which lightning could generate the required intense microwave emission.

That gap was addressed by Wu (2016) using results from high-energy atmospheric electricity, the study of x-rays, gamma rays and runaway electrons produced by thunderstorms. Cloud-to-ground lightning approaches the ground through a stepped leader whose tip emits x-ray bursts, strongest at the last step. Electric fields above a critical value of about 30 MV/m at the leader tip push thermal electrons into runaway acceleration, and avalanche multiplication in air can then produce relativistic electron populations with a Boltzmann-like energy distribution of mean energy about 7.3 MeV. When a short, dense bunch of such relativistic electrons crosses the interface between two media — the soil, or an aircraft skin — it emits coherent transition radiation (CTR): ordinary transition radiation whose power is enhanced by coherent addition of the fields of all electrons when the bunch is shorter than the radiated wavelength. Wu proposed that a collimated bunch of up to about 101410^{14} electrons emerging from the last leader step produces, by CTR at the ground, a powerful mono-cycle microwave pulse at gigahertz frequencies; the same mechanism on aircraft skins would explain indoor and airborne events.

The proposed pulse then forms the ball itself. The radiation ionizes the ambient air, and for an initial plasma denser than the wave's critical density (nc≈1.2×1010 cm−3n_c\approx 1.2\times 10^{10}\ \mathrm{cm}^{-3} at 1 GHz, the density above which a plasma reflects the wave), the relativistic radiation pressure (ponderomotive force) expels electrons and evacuates a spherical cavity that traps the radiation as a half-cycle standing wave. Two-dimensional particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations — which solve Maxwell's equations together with the relativistic electron and ion dynamics on a grid, here with air collisions represented by an embedded effective friction force because the real collision frequency, about 101210^{12} Hz, is unresolvable — show a trapping threshold field Ebl≈11Er≈120 MV/mE_{\mathrm{bl}}\approx 11E_r\approx 120\ \mathrm{MV/m} at 1 GHz (where Er=mcω/e≈10.7 MV/mE_r=mc\omega/e\approx 10.7\ \mathrm{MV/m} is the relativistic field threshold), a cavity of roughly 24 cm diameter (about half the trapped wavelength), and trapped field energies of 200–1500 J. The theory accounts qualitatively for the occurrence sites, the appearance inside aircraft, glass permeation, shape, size, sounds, odour, motion, lifetime, injuries and damage, and for the only high-quality optical spectrum of a natural event — the fortuitous spectroscopic recording of a 2012 Qinghai ball lightning by Cen, Yuan and Xue (2014), which showed emission lines of soil elements (Si, Fe, Ca) consistent with soil vaporized near the strike.

What the source paper itself leaves open, stated in its Discussion, is experimental verification: the mechanism is supported by particle simulations that, as the Methods acknowledges, are performed in two-dimensional geometry with an embedded effective air-friction model, which makes the resolution of individual collisions unrealistic in the present work. Two verification routes are posed: laboratory formation of the bubble, which will need hundreds of gigawatts of microwave power, one order of magnitude higher than manmade sources, or alternatively a high-power electron beam reproducing the bunch-strike geometry; and lightning-research detection of microwave radiation at GHz near a lightning strike point, together with in-situ evidence of high-flux energetic electrons, including attempts to trigger events with rocket-triggered lightning using ungrounded wires. A final remark notes that relativistic terahertz waves from laser-accelerated electrons could realize a millimetre-scale radiation bubble in the laboratory. The unresolved question is whether the relativistic-microwave bubble mechanism actually operates in natural ball lightning at all.

Problem Statement

Determine whether the relativistic-microwave bubble mechanism of Wu (2016) operates in natural ball lightning or can be realized at natural scale in the laboratory. Two linked questions, either or both of which jointly serve this single objective:

(1) Field detection: whether lightning strike sites yield intense gigahertz microwave bursts with the theory's energy and field scale — radiated energy of order hundreds of joules and near-source fields above the Ebl≈120 MV/mE_{\mathrm{bl}}\approx 120\ \mathrm{MV/m} bubble-formation threshold at 1 GHz — together with correlated high-flux relativistic-electron signatures, ideally in coincidence with an observed ball-lightning event; or whether bursts at these predicted energy and field scales are absent from lightning strikes and ball-lightning events.

(2) Laboratory realization: whether a self-trapped radiation-plasma bubble can be created in the laboratory, as a genuinely self-sustained cavity whose size, trapped energy and lifetime are consistent with the theory's scaling relations (for example a cavity diameter of about half the trapped wavelength).

A rigorous quantitative impossibility result — for example a dissipation or energy-budget bound showing that the bubble cannot form or survive in either setting, whether in natural lightning or in the laboratory — would establish that the mechanism does not operate. The underlying question is whether ball lightning is a self-trapped bubble of microwave radiation, or whether such a bubble can be realized at natural scale in the laboratory.

References

  1. H.-C. Wu, "Relativistic-microwave theory of ball lightning", Scientific Reports 6, 28263 (2016). DOI: 10.1038/srep28263, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28263 (source paper; open access)
  2. Jianyong Cen, Ping Yuan, Simin Xue, "Observation of the Optical and Spectral Characteristics of Ball Lightning", Physical Review Letters 112, 035001 (2014). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.035001, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.035001
  3. P. L. Kapitza, "On the nature of ball lightning", Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 101, 245–248 (1955); English reprint in "Collected Papers of P. L. Kapitza", pp. 776–780 (Pergamon Press, 1965). DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-010973-2.50020-3, https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-010973-2.50020-3
  4. G. A. Dawson, R. C. Jones, "Ball lightning as a radiation bubble", Pure and Applied Geophysics 75, 247–262 (1969). DOI: 10.1007/BF00875059, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00875059
  5. X.-H. Zheng, "Quantitative analysis for ball lightning", Physics Letters A 148, 463–469 (1990). DOI: 10.1016/0375-9601(90)90500-N, https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(90)90500-n
  6. Karl D. Stephan, "Extension of Relativistic-Microwave Theory of Ball Lightning Including Long-term Losses And Stability", arXiv:1608.00450 (2016), https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.00450 (preprint)
  7. H.-C. Wu, "Origin of transionospheric pulse pairs", Geophysical Research Letters 44, 2597–2603 (2017). DOI: 10.1002/2017GL072741, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL072741
  8. Y. Zhang, H.-C. Wu, "Dispersive propagation of trans-ionospheric pulse pairs in ionosphere", AIP Advances 12, 055126 (2022). DOI: 10.1063/5.0087725, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0087725
  9. Silin Guo, Zhongpeng Li, Chuliang Zhou, Ye Tian, "Proposal for experimentally observing expectant ball lightning", Chinese Optics Letters 19, 083201 (2021). DOI: 10.3788/COL202119.083201, https://doi.org/10.3788/COL202119.083201
  10. L. Guo, H.-W. Zhang, H.-C. Wu, "High-frequency radio-wave emission by coherent transition radiation of runaway electrons produced by lightning stepped leaders", Physics of Plasmas 29, 093102 (2022). DOI: 10.1063/5.0102132, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0102132
  11. Chuliang Zhou, Dongdong Zhang, Rong Qi, Yafeng Bai, Yushan Zeng, Zhuorui Zheng, Liwei Song, Ye Tian, Ruxin Li, "Ball-lightning-like relativistic terahertz solitons", Nature Photonics 20, 727–733 (2026). DOI: 10.1038/s41566-026-01899-y, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-026-01899-y
  12. Sergei Bulanov, "Is ball lightning a relativistic soliton?", Nature Photonics 20, 611–612 (2026), News & Views. DOI: 10.1038/s41566-026-01914-2, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-026-01914-2
  13. R. Morrow, "Ball lightning dynamics and stability at moderate ion densities", Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 50, 395201 (2017). DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/aa8398, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aa8398
  14. R. Morrow, "A general theory for ball lightning structure and light output", Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 51, 125205 (2018). DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/aaaf8d, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aaaf8d
  15. Francis Théberge, Gaston Nadeau, Vivian Issa, François Vidal, Jean-Claude Kieffer, "Generation of confined plasma balls propagating along discharge channels: A comparison with ball lightning", Physical Review Research 2, 013266 (2020). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013266, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013266
  16. Mikhail L. Shmatov, Karl D. Stephan, "Advances in ball lightning research", Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 195, 105115 (2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2019.105115, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2019.105115
  17. M. L. Shmatov, K. D. Stephan, "Questions regarding alleged laboratory creation of ball lightning", Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 242, 105995 (2023). DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2022.105995, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2022.105995
  18. Alexander Oreshko, "Answers to 'Questions regarding alleged laboratory creation of ball lightning' from the standpoint of plasma physics and electrodynamics", Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 277, 106674 (2025). DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2025.106674, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2025.106674
  19. A. G. Oreshko, "Generation of analogues of natural ball lightning in the laboratory", Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, article 106932 (2026; volume number not yet assigned). DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2026.106932, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2026.106932
  20. John P. Ralston, "Is Ball Lightning a Signal of Magnetic Monopoles?", arXiv:2411.00240 (2024), https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.00240