In a 1960 Science article, Freeman Dyson proposed that a technological species enclosing its star with orbiting structures would be detectable not by radio but by thermodynamics: the intercepted starlight must re-emerge as roughly 300 K waste heat, making the system optically dim but a strong point source near 10 micrometers, findable in an infrared sky survey. Dyson's question is whether artificial stellar sources of infrared radiation exist, whether they can be identified, and whether their prevalence can be quantitatively bounded, by systematic infrared survey against the natural mid-infrared background. Six decades of searching — IRAS-era pointed searches and whole-sky spectral fits, the WISE-based G-HAT survey, and Gaia+2MASS+WISE cross-matching by Project Hephaistos — have produced no confirmed detection; the strongest limits confine warm, near-complete swarms to below roughly 2×10⁻⁵ of stars within 100 pc, and of the seven M-dwarf candidates identified in 2024, the two observed with JWST by 2026 have been resolved as background galaxies, with the remainder still under investigation. The problem remains open, with active follow-up as of August 2026.

Background

The modern search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI) began in 1959–1960 as a search for narrow-band radio transmissions, which presupposes that the transmitting civilization wants to be noticed. In a 1960 article in Science, Freeman Dyson proposed a complementary, communication-independent strategy. His argument is thermodynamic: a technological species that captures a large fraction of its star's output cannot hide the energy — it must ultimately re-emit the intercepted starlight as waste heat. He envisaged a star enclosed by a swarm of orbiting habitats and collectors (he wrote of an 'artificial biosphere'; the popular name 'Dyson sphere' should not suggest a rigid shell, which would be mechanically unable to support its own weight against the star's gravity), radiating at a temperature of a few hundred kelvin and therefore brightest at a wavelength near 10 micrometers, in the mid-infrared. Dyson estimated the scale of such a project: Jupiter's mass distributed in a shell at about twice the Earth–Sun distance corresponds to an areal density of order tons per square meter, and he noted that assembling it would take on the order of 'the energy radiated by the sun in 800 years'. He then proposed the observational program that gives the problem its name: search infrared sky surveys for point sources with the spectrum of a few-hundred-kelvin blackbody — an ideal thermal emitter whose brightness distribution is fixed by temperature alone — i.e., objects that are optically dim but infrared-bright. A civilization operating at the scale of its star's total luminosity is often called a 'Type II' civilization in the SETI literature.

The search became practical only with space-based infrared astronomy, because the Earth's atmosphere both absorbs and emits strongly near 10 micrometers. The InfraRed Astronomical Satellite (IRAS, 1983) performed the first all-sky infrared survey, cataloging about 250,000 sources; the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) later provided all-sky near-infrared photometry, the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE, launched 2009) all-sky mid-infrared imaging, and the Gaia mission precise optical positions, distances, and stellar parameters. The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) now provides the mid-infrared imaging and spectroscopy needed for follow-up of individual candidates.

The essential difficulty is astrophysical rather than instrumental. The mid-infrared sky is full of natural sources that mimic a Dyson swarm's waste-heat signature: dusty, mass-losing evolved stars on the asymptotic giant branch (AGB stars, including carbon stars whose silicon-carbide dust radiates in the same band); young stellar objects still embedded in their natal clouds; circumstellar debris disks (rings of dust from colliding planetesimals) around visible stars; and, at the limited angular resolution of all-sky surveys (of order 6–12 arcseconds for WISE), distant hot dust-obscured galaxies (Hot DOGs) that happen to lie within an arcsecond of the line of sight to an ordinary star. A search must therefore combine an infrared-excess criterion — a measured flux above what the star's own luminosity and temperature predict, usually assessed through the spectral energy distribution (SED, the source's brightness as a function of wavelength) — with rejection of natural mimics, and any surviving candidate needs high-resolution follow-up. Searches distinguish complete swarms, in which the star is fully hidden and the object appears only in the infrared, from partial swarms or 'shrouds', in which the star remains visible with an anomalous mid-infrared excess; partial cases are parameterized by a covering factor, the fraction of the star's luminosity intercepted and reprocessed.

The search lineage is well documented. IRAS-era programs looked for infrared excess around nearby solar-type stars (Jugaku and Nishimura and collaborators) and fitted blackbody spectra to the IRAS low-resolution spectrometer catalog (Timofeev, Kardashev and Promyslov; Carrigan). The G-HAT survey (Glimpsing Heat from Alien Technologies) exploited WISE to search both Galactic stars and about 10⁵ galaxies for extreme mid-infrared emission. Project Hephaistos cross-matched Gaia, 2MASS and WISE photometry for millions of stars, set the strongest published upper limits on partial Dyson spheres, and produced a small set of candidate M dwarfs (the coolest, most numerous kind of star) that are currently being followed up. No confirmed artificial stellar infrared source exists to date.

Problem Statement

Dyson (1960) asked whether artificial stellar sources of infrared radiation exist and can be found: whether there are stars in the Milky Way enclosed — fully or partially — by artificial structures that reprocess the intercepted starlight into low-temperature waste heat, and whether such sources can be identified in a systematic infrared survey against the natural mid-infrared sky background. The problem is to answer this question observationally, and it is complete when one of two results is established: (1) a confirmed detection — at least one astronomical source demonstrated to be an artificial, star-enclosing structure reprocessing stellar luminosity, with the natural mimic channels (dusty evolved stars, young stellar objects, circumstellar debris disks, and line-of-sight background galaxies) excluded by follow-up observation; or (2) a quantitative constraint — an upper limit on the fraction of stars hosting such structures as a function of covering factor (the fraction of stellar luminosity intercepted) and characteristic temperature, over a stated Galactic volume, with the survey's selection function and detection completeness characterized; this constraint must be a new or strengthening result — either tighter than, or occupying a covering-factor, temperature, or Galactic-volume regime not already covered by, the published limits of Carrigan (2009) and Project Hephaistos I (Suazo et al. 2022) — rather than a restatement of those limits. The 1960-era instrumental-feasibility limitations (mid-infrared survey depth, atmospheric obstruction of the 10-micrometer window) are no longer part of the problem: space-based all-sky mid-infrared surveys now exist and have executed the search, and the residual question is detection or defensible constraint, not survey feasibility.

References

  1. F. J. Dyson, 'Search for Artificial Stellar Sources of Infrared Radiation', Science 131, 1667–1668 (1960). DOI: 10.1126/science.131.3414.1667, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.131.3414.1667
  2. Freeman J. Dyson and Richard Carrigan, 'Dyson sphere', Scholarpedia 4(5), 6647 (2009). DOI: 10.4249/scholarpedia.6647, https://doi.org/10.4249/scholarpedia.6647; article page: http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Dyson_sphere
  3. V. I. Slysh, 'A Search in the Infrared to Microwave for Astroengineering Activity', in The Search for Extraterrestrial Life: Recent Developments (IAU Symposium 112), ed. M. D. Papagiannis (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1985), pp. 315–319. DOI: 10.1017/s0074180900146649, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0074180900146649
  4. Jun Jugaku and Shiro Nishimura, 'A search for Dyson spheres around late-type stars in the IRAS catalog', in Bioastronomy — The Search for Extraterrestial Life: The Exploration Broadens, Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 390 (Berlin: Springer, 1991), pp. 295–298. DOI: 10.1007/3-540-54752-5_235, https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-54752-5_235
  5. M. Yu. Timofeev, N. S. Kardashev, V. G. Promyslov, 'A search of the IRAS database for evidence of Dyson Spheres', Acta Astronautica 46, 655–659 (2000). DOI: 10.1016/S0094-5765(00)00028-X, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-5765(00)00028-X
  6. Richard A. Carrigan, 'IRAS-Based Whole-Sky Upper Limit on Dyson Spheres', The Astrophysical Journal 698, 2075–2086 (2009). DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/698/2/2075, https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/698/2/2075; preprint arXiv:0811.2376, https://arxiv.org/abs/0811.2376
  7. J. T. Wright, B. Mullan, S. Sigurðsson, M. S. Povich, 'The Ĝ Infrared Search for Extraterrestrial Civilizations with Large Energy Supplies. I. Background and Justification', The Astrophysical Journal 792, 26 (2014). DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/792/1/26, https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/792/1/26; preprint arXiv:1408.1133, https://arxiv.org/abs/1408.1133
  8. J. T. Wright, R. L. Griffith, S. Sigurðsson, M. S. Povich, B. Mullan, 'The Ĝ Infrared Search for Extraterrestrial Civilizations with Large Energy Supplies. II. Framework, Strategy, and First Result', The Astrophysical Journal 792, 27 (2014). DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/792/1/27, https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/792/1/27; preprint arXiv:1408.1134, https://arxiv.org/abs/1408.1134
  9. Roger L. Griffith, Jason T. Wright, Jessica Maldonado, Matthew S. Povich, Steinn Sigurdsson, Brendan Mullan, 'The Ĝ Infrared Search for Extraterrestrial Civilizations with Large Energy Supplies. III. The Reddest Extended Sources in WISE', The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 217, 25 (2015). DOI: 10.1088/0067-0049/217/2/25, https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/217/2/25; preprint arXiv:1504.03418, https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.03418
  10. Matías Suazo, Erik Zackrisson, Jason T. Wright, Andreas J. Korn, Macy Huston, 'Project Hephaistos – I. Upper limits on partial Dyson spheres in the Milky Way', Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 512, 2988–3000 (2022). DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac280, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac280; preprint arXiv:2201.11123, https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11123
  11. Matías Suazo, Erik Zackrisson, Priyatam K. Mahto, Fabian Lundell, Carl Nettelblad, Andreas J. Korn, Jason T. Wright, Suman Majumdar, 'Project Hephaistos – II. Dyson sphere candidates from Gaia DR3, 2MASS, and WISE', Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 531, 695–707 (2024). DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stae1186, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae1186; preprint arXiv:2405.02927, https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.02927
  12. Tongtian Ren, Michael A. Garrett, Andrew P. V. Siemion, 'Background Contamination of the Project Hephaistos Dyson Spheres Candidates', Research Notes of the AAS 8, 145 (2024). DOI: 10.3847/2515-5172/ad5017, https://doi.org/10.3847/2515-5172/ad5017; preprint arXiv:2405.14921, https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.14921
  13. Tongtian Ren, Michael A. Garrett, Andrew P. V. Siemion, 'High-resolution imaging of the radio source associated with Project Hephaistos Dyson Sphere Candidate G', Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 538, L56–L61 (2025). DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slaf006, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slaf006; preprint arXiv:2501.05152, https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.05152
  14. Tongtian Ren, Michael A. Garrett, Erik Zackrisson, Andreas J. Korn, Andrew P. V. Siemion, Jason T. Wright, Alexis Brandeker, 'Archival Diagnostics for Potential Background Contaminants of Project Hephaistos Dyson Sphere Candidates' (2026). arXiv:2607.03619, https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.03619
  15. Andreas J. Korn, Matías Suazo, Erik Zackrisson, Pía Cortés-Zuleta, Adam D. Rains, Armin Nabizadeh, 'Project Hephaistos – III. Characterizing anomalous infrared sources identified as Dyson-sphere candidates' (2026). arXiv:2607.25701, https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.25701
  16. Erik Zackrisson, Arjan Bik, Anita Ali Asgar, Olivia Curtis, Jason T. Wright, Tongtian Ren, Roberto J. Assef, Andrew Blain, Alexis Brandeker, Michael A. Garrett, Uma Gorti, Andreas J. Korn, Priyatam K. Mahto, Armin Nabizadeh, 'Project Hephaistos – IV. James Webb Space Telescope Observations of Two Dyson Sphere Candidates' (2026). arXiv:2607.09460, https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.09460
  17. Olivia Curtis, Aidan J. Rowland, Jason T. Wright, Caryl Gronwall, Jakob M. Helton, Joel Leja, 'The Ĝ Infrared Search for Extraterrestrial Civilizations with Large Energy Supplies. V. When Galaxies Glow with Industry' (2026). arXiv:2608.12458, https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.12458
  18. Shant Baghram, 'In Search of Extraterrestrial Artificial Intelligence Through Dyson Sphere–like Structures around Primordial Black Holes', The Astrophysical Journal 978, 132 (2025). DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9b10, https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad9b10
  19. Paolo Mignone and Michele De Carolis, 'Machine learning for the prioritization of Dyson sphere candidates', Expert Systems with Applications 310, 131232 (2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2026.131232, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2026.131232