The Mermin-Wagner theorem, extended by Loss, Pedrocchi, and Leggett (Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 107201 (2011)) to lattice spins coupled by an isotropic on-site interaction to itinerant, interacting electrons, forbids ferromagnetic, antiferromagnetic, and helical long-range order at any finite temperature in one and two dimensions, covering the RKKY regime and closing the two-dimensional gap left by Bruno's extension to long-ranged interactions. The proof, however, depends on spin conservation: Rashba/Dresselhaus spin-orbit interactions break spin-rotation symmetry and generate equilibrium spin currents that cut off the infrared fluctuations entering the Bogoliubov inequality, so for generic couplings with alpha unequal to beta the argument is inconclusive - order is neither demonstrated nor excluded - while at the fine-tuned point alpha = beta order is again rigorously excluded. The open problem is to determine, for this model class supplemented with generic Rashba/Dresselhaus spin-orbit coupling, whether spontaneous magnetic order of the lattice spins exists at finite temperature in one and two dimensions in the thermodynamic limit. Model-specific mean-field studies - helical nuclear order in quantum wires (with indirect experimental support) and conditional analyses of two-dimensional Rashba systems - have not settled the general question.

Background

In a seminal line of rigorous work, Hohenberg and Mermin and Wagner showed that a continuous symmetry cannot be spontaneously broken at any finite temperature in one- and two-dimensional (1D, 2D) systems with sufficiently short-ranged interactions; in particular, an isotropic Heisenberg magnet has no ferro- or antiferromagnetic long-range order for dimension d≤2d\le 2. The proof uses the Bogoliubov inequality, a rigorous operator inequality bounding thermal averages through commutators with the Hamiltonian, applied to the continuity equation of a conserved spin density. Real magnetic moments in conductors, however, rarely interact directly: localized spins typically interact through the spin polarization they induce in itinerant electrons - the Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida (RKKY) interaction - which in two dimensions decays only as 1/R21/R^2, outside the short-range hypothesis of the original theorem. Bruno strengthened the theorem to long-ranged interactions and excluded 1D RKKY order, but his decay condition (oscillatory interactions falling off faster than 1/R5/21/R^{5/2} in 2D) left the two-dimensional RKKY case open. The physical setting of interest is nuclear spins in semiconductor nanostructures (GaAs or InAs wires and wells, carbon nanotubes), which couple to conduction electrons through the Fermi-contact hyperfine interaction; mean-field-level calculations had predicted that electron-electron interactions drive a ferromagnetic nuclear phase transition in an interacting two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) at millikelvin temperatures, and helical nuclear order in 1D Luttinger liquids (interacting 1D conductors described by bosonized collective modes rather than by quasiparticles).

Loss, Pedrocchi, and Leggett closed the 2D gap: for a lattice of spins I^j\hat{\mathbf{I}}_j at sites RjR_j coupled by an isotropic on-site spin-spin interaction to itinerant electrons - with the electronic Hamiltonian allowed to contain arbitrary spin-independent one-particle terms (lattice, disorder, confinement) and electron-electron interactions - they rigorously proved, via the Bogoliubov inequality, that neither ferromagnetic, antiferromagnetic, nor helical long-range order of the lattice spins is possible at any finite temperature in one and two dimensions, in the thermodynamic limit. This covers the RKKY regime (obtained as the lowest-order expansion in the on-site coupling) and thereby invalidates the isotropic 2D mean-field transition claim in the thermodynamic limit.

The theorem relies on spin conservation. Rashba and Dresselhaus spin-orbit interactions (SOI) - linear-in-momentum spin-momentum couplings generated by structural and bulk inversion asymmetry of the semiconductor, with coefficients α\alpha and β\beta - break spin-rotation symmetry explicitly. Then the commutator entering the Bogoliubov bound no longer vanishes; schematically [[Cq,HSO],Cq†]=4m(α j^xy(q=0)+β j^yy(q=0))[[C_q, H_{SO}], C_q^\dagger]=4m(\alpha\,\hat{j}^y_x(q{=}0)+\beta\,\hat{j}^y_y(q{=}0)) in terms of equilibrium spin-current operators, so a nonzero equilibrium spin current provides an intrinsic infrared cutoff of the qq-integral and the bound on the order parameter does not vanish. For generic α≠β\alpha\ne\beta the argument is therefore inconclusive: magnetic order is neither demonstrated nor excluded. The spin currents were evaluated only perturbatively (free electrons at T=0T=0, then a perturbative expansion in the interaction, hyperfine coupling, and temperature), with the explicit caveat that they presumably remain nonzero beyond the perturbative regime. At the fine-tuned point α=β\alpha=\beta a gauge transformation removes the SOI for one spin component (the persistent spin helix symmetry), and order is rigorously excluded again; since α\alpha is electrically gate-tunable, this suggests electrical control of low-dimensional magnetism. The no-go holds only in the thermodynamic limit, so effective order in finite nanostructures at low temperature is not excluded by the theorem.

Problem Statement

For the class of models covered by the theorem of Loss, Pedrocchi, and Leggett - a lattice of localized spins I^j\hat{\mathbf{I}}_j at sites RjR_j embedded in a continuum of itinerant electrons, coupled by an isotropic on-site spin-spin (hyperfine or exchange) interaction, with the electronic Hamiltonian allowed to contain arbitrary spin-independent one-particle terms (lattice, disorder, confinement) and electron-electron interactions, and optionally short-range Heisenberg interactions among the lattice spins - augmented with Rashba and Dresselhaus spin-orbit interactions of strengths α\alpha and β\beta at generic α≠β\alpha\ne\beta (including the Rashba-only and Dresselhaus-only cases): determine whether spontaneous ferromagnetic, antiferromagnetic, or helical (spiral) long-range order of the lattice spins can occur at any finite temperature in the thermodynamic limit, in spatial dimension d=1d=1 and d=2d=2.

The question is resolved for the generic α≠β\alpha\ne\beta class in one of two ways: (i) the order is absent, under explicitly stated hypotheses that do not silently reduce to the known α=β\alpha=\beta or spin-independent cases; or (ii) the order is present, with its mechanism resting on the nonperturbative behavior of the equilibrium spin-current expectation values (beyond the perturbative regime, at finite temperature, and in the presence of interactions and disorder) and their effect on the small-qq spectrum of fluctuations, i.e., whether the spin-current-induced infrared cutoff suffices to stabilize order at finite temperature.

The question is posed for the generic α≠β\alpha\ne\beta class, in both d=1d=1 and d=2d=2, and not for a proper subset of that class.

References

  1. D. Loss, F. L. Pedrocchi, A. J. Leggett, "Absence of Spontaneous Magnetic Order of Lattice Spins Coupled to Itinerant Interacting Electrons in One and Two Dimensions", Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 107201 (2011). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.107201; arXiv:1107.1223. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.107201
  2. N. D. Mermin, H. Wagner, "Absence of Ferromagnetism or Antiferromagnetism in One- or Two-Dimensional Isotropic Heisenberg Models", Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 1133 (1966). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.17.1133. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.17.1133
  3. P. C. Hohenberg, "Existence of Long-Range Order in One and Two Dimensions", Phys. Rev. 158, 383 (1967). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.158.383. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.158.383
  4. P. Bruno, "Absence of spontaneous magnetic order at nonzero temperature in one- and two-dimensional Heisenberg and XY systems with long-range interactions", Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 137203 (2001). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.137203. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.137203
  5. Yu. A. Bychkov, E. I. Rashba, "Oscillatory effects and the magnetic susceptibility of carriers in inversion layers", J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 17, 6039 (1984). DOI: 10.1088/0022-3719/17/33/015. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/17/33/015
  6. G. Dresselhaus, "Spin-Orbit Coupling Effects in Zinc Blende Structures", Phys. Rev. 100, 580 (1955). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.100.580. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.100.580
  7. J. Schliemann, J. C. Egues, D. Loss, "Nonballistic Spin-Field-Effect Transistor", Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 146801 (2003). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.146801. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.146801
  8. J. Nitta, T. Akazaki, H. Takayanagi, T. Enoki, "Gate Control of Spin-Orbit Interaction in an Inverted In0.53Ga0.47As/In0.52Al0.48As Heterostructure", Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1335 (1997). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1335. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1335
  9. J. D. Koralek, C. P. Weber, J. Orenstein, B. A. Bernevig, S.-C. Zhang, S. Mack, D. D. Awschalom, "Emergence of the persistent spin helix in semiconductor quantum wells", Nature 458, 610 (2009). DOI: 10.1038/nature07871. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07871
  10. P. Simon, D. Loss, "Nuclear Spin Ferromagnetic Phase Transition in an Interacting Two Dimensional Electron Gas", Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 156401 (2007). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.156401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.156401
  11. B. Braunecker, P. Simon, D. Loss, "Nuclear magnetism and electron order in interacting one-dimensional conductors", Phys. Rev. B 80, 165119 (2009). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.165119. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.165119
  12. R. A. Żak, D. L. Maslov, D. Loss, "Ferromagnetic order of nuclear spins coupled to conduction electrons: A combined effect of electron-electron and spin-orbit interactions", Phys. Rev. B 85, 115424 (2012). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.115424. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.115424
  13. T. Meng, D. Loss, "Helical nuclear spin order in two-subband quantum wires", Phys. Rev. B 87, 235427 (2013). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.235427. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.235427
  14. P. Stano, D. Loss, "NMR response of nuclear-spin helix in quantum wires with hyperfine and spin-orbit interaction", Phys. Rev. B 90, 195312 (2014). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.195312. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.195312
  15. C.-H. Hsu, P. Stano, J. Klinovaja, D. Loss, "Antiferromagnetic nuclear spin helix and topological superconductivity in 13C nanotubes", Phys. Rev. B 92, 235435 (2015). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.235435. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.235435
  16. P. P. Aseev, J. Klinovaja, D. Loss, "Finite-temperature conductance of strongly interacting quantum wire with a nuclear spin order", Phys. Rev. B 95, 125440 (2017). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.125440. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.125440
  17. C. P. Scheller, T.-M. Liu, G. Barak, A. Yacoby, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, D. M. Zumbühl, "Possible Evidence for Helical Nuclear Spin Order in GaAs Quantum Wires", Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 066801 (2014). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.066801. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.066801
  18. Yu-Wen Lee, Yu-Li Lee, "Electrical control and interaction effects of the RKKY interaction in helical liquids", Phys. Rev. B 91, 214431 (2015). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.214431. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.214431
  19. J. G. Roch, D. Miserev, G. Froehlicher, N. Leisgang, L. Sponfeldner, Kenji Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Klinovaja, D. Loss, R. Warburton, "First-Order Magnetic Phase Transition of Mobile Electrons in Monolayer MoS2", Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 187602 (2020). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.187602. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.187602
  20. Joel Hutchinson, Dmitry Miserev, Jelena Klinovaja, Daniel Loss, "Spin susceptibility in interacting two-dimensional semiconductors and bilayer systems at first order: Kohn anomalies and spin density wave ordering", Phys. Rev. B 109, 075139 (2024). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.075139. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.075139
  21. C.-H. Hsu, P. Stano, J. Klinovaja, D. Loss, "Helical liquids in semiconductors", Semicond. Sci. Technol. 36, 123003 (2021). DOI: 10.1088/1361-6641/ac2c27; arXiv:2107.13553. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6641/ac2c27
  22. M. Governale, U. Zülicke, "Spins Made to Order in Low Dimensions", Physics 5, 34 (2012). DOI: 10.1103/Physics.5.34. https://doi.org/10.1103/Physics.5.34 (APS Physics commentary on the primary paper.)