Long-term potentiation (LTP) at hippocampal CA3-CA1 synapses is the canonical cellular model of memory storage, yet a foundational question raised by Petersen, Malenka, Nicoll and Hopfield (PNAS, 1998) remains unresolved: is the strength of an individual synapse modified in a digital (all-or-none) or an analog (graded) manner? Using minimal stimulation of putative single synapses, the 1998 work observed abrupt, step-like potentiation events with heterogeneous thresholds across synapses, and explicitly left open whether this binary behavior holds under all induction conditions and in vivo, what mechanism (presynaptic release change versus postsynaptic AMPA receptor insertion or membrane fusion) implements the step, and whether threshold heterogeneity reflects fixed synapse-specific thresholds or stochastic variability. Later single-synapse measurements disagree: minimal-stimulation analysis found switch-like unitary events (O'Connor et al., 2005), two-photon uncaging studies find threshold-like induction with graded persistent expression (Matsuzaki et al., 2004), whereas optical quantal analysis at individually identified non-silent synapses found graded, bidirectional, mainly presynaptic plasticity (Enoki et al., 2009). The pre- versus postsynaptic locus debate has been advanced but not quantitatively closed, and the molecular cascade filling the original many-second delay is now mapped in outline. What survives is a precise open core: determine, at individually identified synapses, whether LTP expression is binary or graded — across induction protocols, in the intact brain in vivo — and identify the state-dependent mechanism and threshold structure that generate the single-synapse behavior, reconciling the conflicting measurements.

Background

Long-term potentiation (LTP) is a persistent activity-dependent strengthening of synaptic transmission, studied most intensively at the Schaffer collateral synapses between hippocampal CA3 and CA1 pyramidal neurons, and widely treated as a cellular substrate of memory. At these synapses, LTP is induced when the glutamate-gated NMDA receptor is activated (transmitter binding plus sufficient postsynaptic depolarization to relieve its magnesium block), admitting Ca2+^{2+} into the postsynaptic dendritic spine — the small protrusion that receives the excitatory input — and activating Ca2+^{2+}/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) and downstream signaling. Expression of potentiation involves increases in AMPA-type glutamate receptor (AMPAR)-mediated currents, the component of transmission that carries most of the fast excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC).

A central framework for interpreting synaptic strength is quantal analysis: presynaptic terminals release transmitter stochastically, so a single synapse's response fluctuates from trial to trial between successes and failures, characterized by a release probability prp_r (the fraction of trials on which vesicle release occurs) and a potency (the mean response amplitude given release). 'Minimal stimulation' is an electrophysiological technique in which stimulus strength is reduced until, presumably, a single axon — ideally a single synapse — is activated, so that putative single-synapse responses can be monitored in a whole-cell recording (an intracellular recording configuration in which the patch of membrane under the recording pipette is ruptured, giving electrical access to the currents of the cell). 'Silent synapses' are synapses that at rest contain NMDA but few or no functional AMPA receptors; LTP can 'unsilence' them by postsynaptic AMPA receptor insertion, which is itself a near-binary transition and one way a step-like change can arise. Two-photon glutamate uncaging bypasses the presynaptic terminal by photoreleasing glutamate onto a single spine, testing the postsynaptic compartment in isolation. Optical quantal analysis detects the Ca2+^{2+} transient evoked at a single visually identified synapse (an 'EPSCaT'), allowing release probability and potency to be separated at many individual synapses.

In this landscape, Petersen, Malenka, Nicoll and Hopfield (1998) paired minimal stimulation of putative single CA3-CA1 synapses with postsynaptic depolarization and observed abrupt, step-like, apparently all-or-none transitions from a baseline state to a potentiated state, with different synapses requiring different numbers of pairings (different 'thresholds') and a delay of many seconds between the NMDA receptor/Ca2+^{2+} signal and the onset of potentiation. The co-author Hopfield's computational argument drew out the stakes: information stored as analog synaptic strengths degrades under molecular turnover noise, whereas binary storage can be repeatedly restored to one of two stable states, so digital synapses would solve a fundamental reliability problem for long-term memory. The paper's Discussion explicitly left open: (i) whether the potentiation was long-lasting LTP rather than an NMDA receptor-dependent short-term potentiation (monitoring was relatively brief, although an internal occlusion control — a second, stronger pairing delivered after potentiation, which produced no further increase and thus indicated shared expression mechanisms — argued that the all-or-none potentiation occurred during LTP); (ii) whether potentiation occurs in an all-or-none manner 'under all induction conditions and in particular whether it occurs physiologically in vivo'; (iii) whether the step reflects postsynaptic up-regulation of clustered AMPA receptors, presynaptic enhancement of glutamate release, or a postsynaptic membrane fusion event; and (iv) whether threshold heterogeneity reflects fixed synapse-specific thresholds distributed across synapses or stochastic variability in essentially identical synapses — a distinction the authors noted could only be made by repeatedly potentiating and depotentiating the same synapse.

Subsequent single-synapse work has sharpened rather than settled the question. O'Connor, Wittenberg and Wang (2005), using minimal stimulation with population-level analysis, reported that unitary potentiation and depression events are switch-like, driving synapses between extreme strength states. Matsuzaki et al. (2004), using two-photon uncaging at single spines, found threshold-like induction of persistent spine enlargement and AMPAR-current increase in small spines. Enoki, Hu, Hamilton and Fine (2009), using optical quantal analysis at individual active (non-silent) Schaffer collateral synapses, reported the opposite: graded, bidirectional long-term plasticity expressed overwhelmingly as presynaptic changes in release reliability, with little change in potency. The mechanistic locus question evolved into the long-running 'pre versus post' expression debate, synthesized in a 2013-2014 exchange of reviews, while connectomic analyses (large-volume electron-microscopic reconstructions that map every synapse in a block of neural tissue) found spine sizes to be highly reproducible and apparently quantized. No functional single-synapse in vivo measurement of LTP currently exists. Note that 'all-or-none' here concerns the magnitude structure of the change at one synapse (a step versus a graded increment), which is distinct from the binary success/failure stochasticity of vesicle release on individual trials.

Problem Statement

Determine whether long-term potentiation at individual hippocampal CA3-CA1 synapses is expressed in an all-or-none (binary, step-like) or a graded (analog) manner, and establish the mechanism and threshold structure that generate this single-synapse behavior, by answering the following linked questions at individually identified synapses.

  1. Binary versus graded expression, and generality. Is the step-like, all-or-none potentiation reported under in vitro pairing protocols with minimal stimulation a general property of these synapses — does it hold under other induction conditions (for example high-frequency or theta-burst stimulation, meaning repetitive trains of presynaptic activation; spike-timing-dependent protocols, meaning pairing presynaptic and postsynaptic firing at fixed time offsets; and two-photon glutamate uncaging) and across synapse states (silent versus non-silent, different spine sizes) — and does it occur physiologically in vivo? Reconcile the conflicting single-synapse literature — all-or-none transitions under minimal stimulation (Petersen et al. 1998; O'Connor et al. 2005) versus graded, bidirectional, mainly presynaptic changes under optical quantal analysis (Enoki et al. 2009), with threshold-like induction and graded persistent expression under uncaging (Matsuzaki et al. 2004) — by specifying under what conditions each behavior arises.

  2. Mechanism and locus. Which process implements the single-synapse transition — a presynaptic change in the probability of transmitter release, a postsynaptic insertion, trapping or clustering of AMPA receptors (including a postsynaptic membrane fusion event), or a combination — and how does the mechanism depend on the state of the synapse (silent versus active), at the level of individually identified synapses rather than only in population averages?

  3. Threshold structure. Does the heterogeneity in induction thresholds among synapses reflect fixed, synapse-specific thresholds distributed across the population, or stochastic variability in essentially identical synapses? This requires inducing and reversing potentiation repeatedly at the same identified synapse, taking into account synapse-history-dependent metaplasticity — the dependence of a synapse's own plasticity threshold on its prior activity history (for example, the recently described synapse-specific refractory period for further potentiation after a potentiation event) — which itself reshapes effective thresholds.

These components form one scientific objective — the digital-versus-analog character of synaptic memory at the individual-synapse level and its mechanistic basis.

References

  1. Carl C. H. Petersen, Robert C. Malenka, Roger A. Nicoll, John J. Hopfield (1998). "All-or-none potentiation at CA3-CA1 synapses." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 95(8):4732-4737. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4732. URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.8.4732
  2. Lynn E. Dobrunz (1998). "Long-term potentiation and the computational synapse." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 95(8):4086-4088. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4086. URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.8.4086
  3. Dominique Debanne, Beat H. Gähwiler, Scott M. Thompson (1999). "Heterogeneity of Synaptic Plasticity at Unitary CA3-CA1 and CA3-CA3 Connections in Rat Hippocampal Slice Cultures." The Journal of Neuroscience 19(24):10664-10671. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-24-10664.1999. URL: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-24-10664.1999
  4. John Lisman (2003). "Long-term potentiation: outstanding questions and attempted synthesis." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 358(1432):829-842. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1242. URL: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1242
  5. Dimitri M. Kullmann (2003). "Silent synapses: what are they telling us about long-term potentiation?" Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 358(1432):727-733. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1229. URL: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1229
  6. Masanori Matsuzaki, Naoki Honkura, Graham C. R. Ellis-Davies, Haruo Kasai (2004). "Structural basis of long-term potentiation in single dendritic spines." Nature 429(6993):761-766. DOI: 10.1038/nature02617. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02617
  7. Daniel H. O'Connor, Gayle M. Wittenberg, Samuel S.-H. Wang (2005). "Graded bidirectional synaptic plasticity is composed of switch-like unitary events." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102(27):9679-9684. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0502332102. URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0502332102
  8. Ashish A. Bagal, Joseph P. Y. Kao, Cha-Min Tang, Scott M. Thompson (2005). "Long-term potentiation of exogenous glutamate responses at single dendritic spines." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102(40):14434-14439. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0501956102. URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0501956102
  9. Ryosuke Enoki, Yi-ling Hu, David Hamilton, Alan Fine (2009). "Expression of Long-Term Plasticity at Individual Synapses in Hippocampus Is Graded, Bidirectional, and Mainly Presynaptic: Optical Quantal Analysis." Neuron 62(2):242-253. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.02.026. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.02.026
  10. Matthew J. Kennedy, Ian G. Davison, Camenzind G. Robinson, Michael D. Ehlers (2010). "Syntaxin-4 Defines a Domain for Activity-Dependent Exocytosis in Dendritic Spines." Cell 141(3):524-535. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.042. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.042
  11. Cian O'Donnell, Matthew F. Nolan, Mark C. W. van Rossum (2011). "Dendritic Spine Dynamics Regulate the Long-Term Stability of Synaptic Plasticity." The Journal of Neuroscience 31(45):16142-16156. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2520-11.2011. URL: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2520-11.2011
  12. Tim V. P. Bliss, Graham L. Collingridge (2013). "Expression of NMDA receptor-dependent LTP in the hippocampus: bridging the divide." Molecular Brain 6:5. DOI: 10.1186/1756-6606-6-5. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-6606-6-5
  13. Adam J. Granger, Roger A. Nicoll (2014). "Expression mechanisms underlying long-term potentiation: a postsynaptic view, 10 years on." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 369(1633):20130136. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0136. URL: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0136
  14. Matthew J. MacDougall, Alan Fine (2014). "The expression of long-term potentiation: reconciling the preists and the postivists." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 369(1633):20130135. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0135. URL: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0135
  15. Zahid Padamsey, Nigel Emptage (2014). "Two sides to long-term potentiation: a view towards reconciliation." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 369(1633):20130154. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0154. URL: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0154
  16. Thomas M. Bartol, Cailey Bromer, Justin Kinney, Michael A. Chirillo, Jennifer N. Bourne, Kristen M. Harris, Terrence J. Sejnowski (2015). "Nanoconnectomic upper bound on the variability of synaptic plasticity." eLife 4:e10778. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.10778. URL: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.10778
  17. Johan Winnubst, Juliette E. Cheyne, Dragos Niculescu, Christian Lohmann (2015). "Spontaneous Activity Drives Local Synaptic Plasticity In Vivo." Neuron 87(2):399-410. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.06.029. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.06.029
  18. Kang K. L. Liu, Michael F. Hagan, John E. Lisman (2017). "Gradation (approx. 10 size states) of synaptic strength by quantal addition of structural modules." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 372(1715):20160328. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0328. URL: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0328
  19. Dennis L. H. Kruijssen, Corette J. Wierenga (2019). "Single Synapse LTP: A Matter of Context?" Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience 13:496. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00496. URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2019.00496
  20. Sven Dorkenwald, Nicholas L. Turner, Thomas Macrina, Kisuk Lee, Ran Lu, Jingpeng Wu, Agnes L. Bodor, Adam A. Bleckert, Derrick Brittain, Nico Kemnitz, William M. Silversmith, Dodam Ih, Jonathan Zung, Aleksandar Zlateski, Ignacio Tartavull, Szi-Chieh Yu, Sergiy Popovych, William Wong, Manuel Castro, Chris S. Jordan, Alyssa M. Wilson, Emmanouil Froudarakis, JoAnn Buchanan, Marc M. Takeno, Russel Torres, Gayathri Mahalingam, Forrest Collman, Casey M. Schneider-Mizell, Daniel J. Bumbarger, Yang Li, Lynne Becker, Shelby Suckow, Jacob Reimer, Andreas S. Tolias, Nuno Macarico da Costa, R. Clay Reid, H. Sebastian Seung (2022). "Binary and analog variation of synapses between cortical pyramidal neurons." eLife 11:e76120. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.76120. URL: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76120
  21. Roger A. Nicoll, Howard Schulman (2023). "Synaptic memory and CaMKII." Physiological Reviews 103(4):2897-2945. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00034.2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00034.2022
  22. Agata Nowacka, Angela M. Getz, Diogo Bessa-Neto, Daniel Choquet (2024). "Activity-dependent diffusion trapping of AMPA receptors as a key step for expression of early LTP." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 379(1906):20230220. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0220. URL: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0220
  23. Juan C. Flores, Dipannita Sarkar, Karen Zito (2025). "A synapse-specific refractory period for plasticity at individual dendritic spines." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 122(2):e2410433122. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2410433122. URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2410433122
  24. William J. Wright, Nathan G. Hedrick, Takaki Komiyama (2025). "Distinct synaptic plasticity rules operate across dendritic compartments in vivo during learning." Science 388(6744):322-328. DOI: 10.1126/science.ads4706. URL: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ads4706
  25. Jacques Carolan, Michelle A. Land, Xiaoyu Lu, Maxime Beau, Dimitar Kostadinov, François St-Pierre, Beverley A. Clark, Michael Häusser (2025). "All-optical voltage interrogation for probing synaptic plasticity in vivo." Nature Communications 16:8834. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-63867-4. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-63867-4