Detectability and discrimination of graviton noise in gravitational-wave detectors: realistic quantum states of the gravitational field, detector noise budgets, and the radiation-reaction term

When the gravitational field is treated quantum-mechanically, it induces a fundamental, state-dependent stochastic noise in the arm lengths of gravitational-wave detectors, governed by a quantum-corrected geodesic deviation (Langevin-type) equation derived by Parikh, Wilczek, and Zahariade with Feynman-Vernon influence functionals. Their 2020 essay 'The Noise of Gravitons' and its companion papers acknowledged a set of open issues: the omitted technical steps of the path-integral evaluation, the undetermined practical detectability of thermal or squeezed-state noise against realistic detector noise budgets, the model-dependent origin and spectral form of squeezed gravitational-field states, the unresolved problem of distinguishing graviton noise from instrumental, environmental, and classical stochastic backgrounds, and the treatment of the fifth-derivative radiation-reaction term. The technical derivation was completed in the authors' companion papers (2021), while the remaining issues define a precise surviving open core: establishing which realistic cosmological or astrophysical processes produce graviton states (thermal or squeezed) whose noise can exceed realistic detector noise budgets, constructing an experimental strategy to separate this fundamental noise from other stochastic backgrounds, and providing a controlled treatment of the radiation-reaction term. This open core remains unresolved.

Background

A gravitational-wave interferometer such as LIGO (the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory) or LISA (the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna) monitors the separation $\xi$ of two free-falling test masses. In classical general relativity this separation obeys the geodesic deviation equation, $\ddot{\xi} = \frac{1}{2}\ddot{h}\,\xi$, where $h$ is the metric perturbation (the gravitational-wave strain) and overdots denote time derivatives; the equation describes the tidal stretching and squeezing of the detector arm. Although general relativity is a classical theory, its perturbative quantization contains a massless helicity-two particle, the graviton, and consistency arguments originating with Feynman show that the quantum mechanics of a massless spin-2 field essentially forces Einstein gravity, so gravitons are unavoidable in any quantum theory of the gravitational field. Experimental support for the graviton nevertheless remains essentially nonexistent: Freeman Dyson argued in 2013 that the direct detection of individual gravitons lies beyond any realistic apparatus, because gravity couples so weakly to matter.

Parikh, Wilczek, and Zahariade (PWZ) revisited the question at the level of collective statistical effects rather than individual quanta. They modeled the detector as two free-falling masses and the weak gravitational field as a set of quantized oscillator modes coupled to the arm length through a derivative interaction over a finite time $T$. The gravitons were then integrated out using the Feynman-Vernon influence functional - the standard open-quantum-systems object, introduced by Feynman and Vernon in 1963, that encodes the complete effect of an eliminated quantum environment on the remaining degrees of freedom. After summing over the final states of the gravitons, the influence functional takes the schematic form $F_\Psi \sim \exp[(2\hbar^2)^{-1}\int A_\Psi (X-X')^2]$, where $X$ is a known quadratic functional of the arm length, $X'$ its copy on the second branch of the (doubled) path integral, and the kernel $A_\Psi$ - the noise kernel, related to the Hadamard (symmetrically ordered) two-point function of the gravitational field - depends on the quantum state $|\Psi\rangle$ of the gravitons. A Gaussian identity re-expresses this as an average over a stochastic source $N_\Psi(t)$, and a saddle point of the remaining path integral yields the quantum-corrected geodesic deviation equation, a Langevin-type (noise-driven) stochastic differential equation:

$$\ddot{\xi}(t) = \frac{1}{2}\left( \ddot{h}(t) + \ddot{N}_\Psi(t) - \frac{m_0 G}{c^5}\,\frac{d^5}{dt^5}\,\xi^2(t) \right)\xi(t),$$

where $m_0$ is the test mass and $G$ Newton's constant. The bracket contains the classical strain, a state-dependent quantum noise, and a gravitational radiation-reaction term with five time derivatives - the analogue of the three-derivative Abraham-Lorentz self-force on an accelerating electric charge, which is notorious for admitting runaway solutions.

The statistical properties of the noise depend strongly on the state. In the vacuum and in a coherent state - the most nearly classical state of an oscillator, produced by well-understood classical motion of a source - the induced arm-length fluctuations are of order the Planck length ($\sim 10^{-35}$ m), roughly seventeen orders of magnitude beyond LIGO's reach, consistent with Dyson's expectation. A thermal state (occupation numbers following a Bose-Einstein distribution at temperature $T$) moderately enhances the noise: even a cosmic gravitational background at $T \sim 1$ K would lie some thirteen orders of magnitude below LIGO's sensitivity and ten below LISA's. Most favorably, a squeezed state - a state in which fluctuations of one oscillator quadrature (one of the two canonical phase-space variables of the oscillator) are amplified by up to $e^{r}$, with $r$ the squeezing parameter, at the expense of the orthogonal quadrature - enhances the stationary noise amplitude by a factor $\sqrt{\cosh 2r}$, i.e., exponentially in $r$. Two-mode squeezed states of relic gravitons are a standard prediction of inflationary cosmology (Grishchuk and Sidorov; Albrecht, Ferreira, Joyce, and Prokopec), which makes the squeezed channel the most promising one. Detecting this fundamental noise would constitute direct evidence for the quantization of gravity and the existence of gravitons.

The 2020 essay 'The Noise of Gravitons' (First Prize, Gravity Research Foundation essay competition) and its companion papers acknowledged a set of open issues: the technical subtleties of the finite-time, derivative-coupled path-integral evaluation (deferred to companion papers); the undetermined practical detectability of thermal or squeezed-state noise against realistic detector noise budgets, given the model-dependence of thermal occupation numbers, squeeze parameters, and spectral shapes; the origin, magnitude, and realistic spectral form of squeezed gravitational-field states in cosmology or astrophysics; the unresolved experimental problem of distinguishing fundamental graviton noise from instrumental, environmental, and classical stochastic gravitational backgrounds; and the conceptual and practical implications of the fifth-derivative radiation-reaction term (potential instabilities and runaways, and whether further quantum corrections tame them beyond the saddle-point approximation).

Problem Statement

Determine the observational viability of graviton noise - the state-dependent stochastic fluctuations that the quantized gravitational field induces in gravitational-wave detector arm lengths - which is the open core of the issues acknowledged in 'The Noise of Gravitons' and its companion papers. Within the framework of the quantum-corrected geodesic deviation equation, the problem comprises four linked components serving this single objective: (1) Realistic states and their noise: identify which quantum states of the gravitational field are actually produced by cosmological and astrophysical processes - in particular whether naturally occurring thermal or squeezed states with sufficient occupation numbers, squeezing parameters, and appropriate spectral shapes exist (either class may qualify under this component) - and compute the resulting graviton noise statistics (kernels, spectra, variances, correlations) for those states. (2) Detectability: determine quantitatively whether this fundamental noise can exceed the complete noise budgets of realistic existing or proposed detectors (quantum shot and radiation-pressure noise, thermal coating and suspension noise, seismic and Newtonian noise - the gravity-gradient noise produced by moving local masses), yielding a definitive detectability verdict as a function of state and source parameters. (3) Discrimination: establish an experimental strategy by which fundamental graviton noise can be distinguished from instrumental, environmental, and classical stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds - specifying observables (spectra, higher-order statistics, inter-detector correlations with their angular and separation dependence) whose predicted form cannot be reproduced by those background classes. (4) Radiation reaction: provide a controlled treatment of the fifth-derivative radiation-reaction term in the stochastic geodesic-deviation equation - whether its runaway and instability pathologies are cured by the underlying path integral beyond the saddle-point approximation, and how the term should be handled in practice. Component (1) supplies the physically admissible states, (2) their detectability, (3) the means of experimental isolation, and (4) validates the equation whose noise is being sought; together they decide whether the noise of gravitons is a real, well-defined, and observationally accessible signal. Component (3) is a conditional, observable-level prescription for separating the noise if present, not a claim that the noise is measurable. The first item of the source's list - the omitted technical steps of the path-integral evaluation (derivative couplings, finite-time interactions, boundary terms, and robustness of the kernels $A_\Psi$) - was resolved by the companion papers published in 2021 and is not part of the surviving open core.

References

1. Maulik Parikh, Frank Wilczek, George Zahariade, 'The Noise of Gravitons', Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 29, 2042001 (2020). DOI: 10.1142/S0218271820420018; arXiv:2005.07211; https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271820420018
2. Maulik Parikh, Frank Wilczek, George Zahariade, 'Quantum Mechanics of Gravitational Waves', Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 081602 (2021). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.081602; arXiv:2010.08205; https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.081602
3. Maulik Parikh, Frank Wilczek, George Zahariade, 'Signatures of the quantization of gravity at gravitational wave detectors', Phys. Rev. D 104, 046021 (2021). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.046021; arXiv:2010.08208; https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.046021
4. Freeman Dyson, 'Is a graviton detectable?', Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28, 1330041 (2013). DOI: 10.1142/S0217751X1330041X; https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X1330041X
5. R. P. Feynman, F. L. Vernon Jr., 'The theory of a general quantum system interacting with a linear dissipative system', Annals of Physics 24, 118 (1963). DOI: 10.1016/0003-4916(63)90068-X; https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(63)90068-X
6. Sugumi Kanno, Jiro Soda, Junsei Tokuda, 'Noise and decoherence induced by gravitons', Phys. Rev. D 103, 044017 (2021). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.044017; arXiv:2007.09838; https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.044017
7. Sugumi Kanno, Jiro Soda, Junsei Tokuda, 'Indirect detection of gravitons through quantum entanglement', Phys. Rev. D 104, 083516 (2021). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.083516; arXiv:2103.17053; https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.083516
8. Hing-Tong Cho, Bei-Lok Hu, 'Quantum Noise of Gravitons and Stochastic Force on Geodesic Separation', Phys. Rev. D 105, 086004 (2022). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.086004; arXiv:2112.08174; https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.086004
9. Hing-Tong Cho, Bei-Lok Hu, 'Graviton noise on tidal forces and geodesic congruences', Phys. Rev. D 107, 084005 (2023). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.084005; arXiv:2301.06325; https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.084005
10. Mark P. Hertzberg, Jacob A. Litterer, 'Bound on Quantum Fluctuations in Gravitational Waves from LIGO-Virgo', J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2023) 009. DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2023/03/009; arXiv:2112.12159; https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2023/03/009
11. Maulik Parikh, Francesco Setti, 'Quantum-gravitational noise correlation in nearby detectors', Phys. Rev. D 111, 046004 (2025). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.046004; arXiv:2312.17335; https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.046004
12. Daniel Carney, Valerie Domcke, Nicholas L. Rodd, 'Graviton detection and the quantization of gravity', Phys. Rev. D 109, 044009 (2024). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.044009; arXiv:2308.12988; https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.044009
13. Daniel Carney, Manthos Karydas, Allic Sivaramakrishnan, 'Response of interferometers to the vacuum of quantum gravity', Phys. Rev. D 113, 106002 (2026). DOI: 10.1103/j5kj-zdky; arXiv:2409.03894; https://doi.org/10.1103/j5kj-zdky
14. Panagiotis Dorlis, Nick E. Mavromatos, Sarben Sarkar, Sotirios-Neilos Vlachos, 'How much can gravitons be squeezed?', Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 35, 2640003 (2026). DOI: 10.1142/S0218271826400031; arXiv:2605.14797; https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271826400031
15. Panagiotis Dorlis, Nick E. Mavromatos, Sarben Sarkar, Sotirios-Neilos Vlachos, 'Superradiant Axionic Black-Hole Clouds as Seeds for Graviton Squeezing', Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 151501 (2025). DOI: 10.1103/9crd-zj6l; arXiv:2507.01689; https://doi.org/10.1103/9crd-zj6l
16. Panagiotis Dorlis, Nick E. Mavromatos, Sarben Sarkar, Sotirios-Neilos Vlachos, 'Squeezed gravitons from superradiant axion fields around rotating black holes', Phys. Rev. D 113, 026023 (2026). DOI: 10.1103/t822-86qp; arXiv:2507.23475; https://doi.org/10.1103/t822-86qp
17. Arunima Das, Maulik Parikh, Frank Wilczek, Raphaela Wutte, 'Squeezed States in Gravity', arXiv:2512.20601 (2025); https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.20601
18. Sugumi Kanno, Jiro Soda, 'Squeezed quantum states of graviton and axion in the universe', Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 31, 2250098 (2022). DOI: 10.1142/S0218271822500985; arXiv:2112.14496; https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271822500985
19. Sugumi Kanno, Jiro Soda, Akira Taniguchi, 'Coherent State Description of Gravitational Waves from Binary Black Holes', Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 061404 (2026). DOI: 10.1103/kv1t-j27m; arXiv:2508.17947; https://doi.org/10.1103/kv1t-j27m
20. Sreenath K. Manikandan, Frank Wilczek, 'Squeezed Quasinormal Modes from Nonlinear Gravitational Effects', arXiv:2508.03380 (2025); https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.03380
21. Viktor T. Toth, 'Is graviton shot noise detectable?', Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 34, 2550070 (2025). DOI: 10.1142/S0218271825500701; arXiv:2411.06694; https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271825500701
22. Germain Tobar, Sreenath K. Manikandan, Thomas Beitel, Igor Pikovski, 'Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing', Nature Communications 15, 7229 (2024). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-51420-8; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51420-8
23. L. P. Grishchuk, Y. V. Sidorov, 'Squeezed quantum states of relic gravitons and primordial density fluctuations', Phys. Rev. D 42, 3413 (1990). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.42.3413; https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.42.3413
24. Andreas Albrecht, Pedro Ferreira, Michael Joyce, Tomislav Prokopec, 'Inflation and squeezed quantum states', Phys. Rev. D 50, 4807 (1994). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.50.4807; https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.50.4807
25. Samarth Chawla, Maulik Parikh, 'Quantum gravity corrections to the fall of an apple', Phys. Rev. D 107, 066024 (2023). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.066024; arXiv:2112.14730; https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.066024
26. Sang-Eon Bak, Maulik Parikh, Sudipta Sarkar, Francesco Setti, 'Quantum gravity fluctuations in the timelike Raychaudhuri equation', J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2023) 125. DOI: 10.1007/JHEP05(2023)125; arXiv:2212.14010; https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2023)125
27. Sang-Eon Bak, Maulik Parikh, Sudipta Sarkar, Francesco Setti, 'Quantum-gravitational null Raychaudhuri equation', J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 214. DOI: 10.1007/JHEP07(2024)214; arXiv:2312.17214; https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2024)214
28. Z. Haba, 'State-dependent graviton noise in the equation of geodesic deviation', Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 40 (2021). DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08805-y; arXiv:2009.12306; https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08805-y
29. Z. Haba, 'Graviton noise: the Heisenberg picture', Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 32, 2350005 (2023). DOI: 10.1142/S0218271823500050; arXiv:2202.06125; https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271823500050
30. Soham Sen, Sunandan Gangopadhyay, 'Minimal length scale correction in the noise of gravitons', Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 1044 (2023). DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12230-2; arXiv:2304.03178; https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12230-2
31. Soham Sen, Sunandan Gangopadhyay, 'Uncertainty principle from the noise of gravitons', Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 116 (2024). DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12481-7; arXiv:2312.07211; https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12481-7
32. Oliviero Angeli, Anirudh Gundhi, Angelo Bassi, 'Master equation for systems interacting with linearized gravity', arXiv:2608.06121 (2026); https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.06121
33. Fabio van Dissel, George Zahariade, 'Semiclassical backreaction: A qualitative assessment', Phys. Rev. D 111, 065008 (2025). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.065008; arXiv:2411.19825; https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.065008