Parisi and Rizzo (Phys. Rev. B 81, 094201, 2010) computed the positive (speed-) large deviations of the free energy in mean-field spin glasses with full replica symmetry breaking (fRSB) and conjectured that the small sample-to-sample fluctuations of the free energy in the whole fRSB class follow one universal law: in the rescaled variable the distribution is , with tails as and as , and with , , independent of the model and of the temperature throughout the spin-glass phase. Only the two tail asymptotics were obtained (from a divergent replica loop expansion, resummed with about 15% uncertainty in the amplitudes); the full universal function has never been derived, and neither the fluctuation scale it implies nor its universality has been established — numerically the scale is still contested against a rival per-spin (total ) law, and rigorously the best bounds are far from sharp. The problem is to determine in full, settling the anomalous fluctuation law of fRSB spin glasses together with the associated large-deviation structure: a speed- rate function for negative deviations behaving as near zero and a speed- rate function for positive deviations behaving as near zero.
Background
A spin glass is a system with quenched (frozen) random interactions whose low-temperature behavior is dominated by frustration, i.e. the impossibility of simultaneously satisfying all random interaction terms. The archetype is the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick (SK) model: Ising spins with couplings that are independent Gaussians of variance connecting every pair. Each disorder realization ("sample") has free energy , and the free-energy density concentrates as . Beyond the typical value, the natural questions are the statistics of the residual sample-to-sample fluctuations of and of its exponentially unlikely large deviations. For random systems these are encoded in large-deviation rate functions, and two speeds arise: negative deviations of (free energy below typical) cost , while positive deviations (above typical) are far rarer, costing — "very large deviations", because they require a collective fluctuation of all couplings rather than of an extensive subset. For replica-symmetric (RS) mean-field models the answer is complete and governed by random matrix theory: the spherical 2-spin spin glass (a model of continuous spins on a sphere with quadratic random couplings) has its ground state given by the largest eigenvalue of a matrix from the Gaussian orthogonal ensemble (the standard ensemble of large real-symmetric random matrices with independent Gaussian entries), its free-energy fluctuations are of order per spin and follow the Tracy-Widom law (the universal distribution of the normalized largest eigenvalue of large random matrices), with the below-typical tail governed by rate proportional to at speed and the above-typical tail by rate proportional to at speed . The SK model's low-temperature phase is instead described by Parisi's full replica symmetry breaking (fRSB). In the replica formalism, disorder averages are computed through at integer replica number and analytically continued to ; the exact saddle point in the glassy phase is a continuous hierarchy encoded in an order-parameter function , , whose slope at the origin, , enters the fluctuation formulas (for SK, as ). The fRSB saddle point is marginal: its Hessian has a continuum of zero modes (the replicon sector), so the loop expansion of the replica field theory diverges at every order and only a resummation can yield finite answers. Exploiting precisely this structure, Parisi and Rizzo computed both large-deviation functions of the SK free energy in a trilogy of papers: the 2008 Physical Review Letters (PRL) paper obtained the negative-deviation rate (from a nonanalytic structure of the replicated free energy ), the 2009 Physical Review B (PRB) paper mapped the phase diagram of , extended the computation to all temperatures and matched small and large deviations, and the 2010 PRB — the source of this problem — computed the positive-deviation rate via a four-loop resummed expansion, consistent with zero-temperature ground-state data. Matching the two rate functions near with the far tails of the small-deviation distribution yields the 2010 conjecture at the heart of this problem: in any fRSB model the typical fluctuation of the total free energy is anomalously small, of order (per spin — a phenomenon called superconcentration, far below the scale of naive concentration bounds), and the rescaled variable (with the disorder-averaged free-energy density at size ) is distributed as with tails (, ) and (, ), where — analogously to the Tracy-Widom law for the RS class — should be one and the same universal function for every model in the class and every temperature below the critical one. The scale was first conjectured by Crisanti, Paladin, Sommers and Vulpiani (1992) from an early replica computation of and is supported by the finite-size-scaling arguments of Aspelmeier, Billoire, Marinari and Moore (2008); rival numerical works support a per-spin fluctuation of order instead (a total scale ), and the two exponents are notoriously hard to separate numerically. What is missing is everything between the two tails: the full function has never been derived, computed, or measured; the universality across models and temperatures is an unproven "natural assumption"; the loop-expansion manipulations (the limit after introducing a block structure of size , the restriction to equal diagonal blocks of the fluctuation matrix, the continuation from the perturbative regime to the large-deviation regime) lack mathematical control; and the amplitudes carry a resummation uncertainty of about 15%. Rigorous results so far only bracket the claim: superconcentration upper bounds and lower bounds of order per spin, ground-state-energy fluctuations without field (Chen, Handschy and Lerman 2018), and — in a 2026 breakthrough by Chen, Guionnet, Ko, Lacroix-A-Chez-Toine and Mourrat — a first rigorous large-deviation principle for the ground-state energy of Ising p-spin models (speed , explicit rate function, non-quadratic near its minimum exactly when no external field is present), which nevertheless leaves open even the predicted behavior near the minimum and does not touch the -speed side.
Problem Statement
Let be the free-energy density of a fully connected Ising spin glass whose low-temperature phase is described by a full replica-symmetry-breaking (fRSB) Parisi solution — the archetype being the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model at temperature , below the critical temperature of the spin-glass transition; equivalently, a model whose large-deviation functional reduces to the cubic action for replicon fluctuations analyzed by Parisi and Rizzo (2010) — and let be the slope at the origin of its Parisi order-parameter function. Parisi and Rizzo conjectured that the sample-to-sample fluctuations of are anomalously small and universal: defining the rescaled variable (with the disorder-averaged free-energy density at size ), the distribution should converge to with a single function — the same for every model in the fRSB class and at every temperature in the spin-glass phase, including the limit — whose tails behave as as and as , with universal constants ( known; currently carrying about 15% resummation uncertainty). Equivalently, on the large-deviation side: negative deviations of the free-energy density should occur with probability with near zero, positive deviations with probability with near zero, and the typical scale of total free-energy fluctuations should be . The problem is to determine in full — resolving the fluctuation scale, in particular separating from the rival law, and resolving the shape of , with controlled finite-size extrapolation and quantified uncertainties — and, as a separate requirement, to establish or refute the claimed model-independence and temperature-independence of , the fluctuation scale, and the predicted rate-function exponents and . Determining in a single fRSB model at a single temperature is necessary but not sufficient for this second requirement, which asks that the same , scale, and exponents be shown (or refuted) to govern every model in the fRSB class and every temperature in the spin-glass phase. A refutation — for example a proof that two fRSB models, or one model at two temperatures, have different rescaled fluctuation laws, or that the fluctuation scale is not — equally solves the problem.
References
- G. Parisi and T. Rizzo, 'Universality and deviations in disordered systems', Phys. Rev. B 81, 094201 (2010), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.094201, arXiv:0901.1100, https://arxiv.org/abs/0901.1100
- G. Parisi and T. Rizzo, 'Large deviations in the free-energy of mean-field spin glasses', Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 117205 (2008), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.117205, arXiv:0706.1180, https://arxiv.org/abs/0706.1180
- G. Parisi and T. Rizzo, 'Phase diagram and large deviations in the free-energy of mean-field spin glasses', Phys. Rev. B 79, 134205 (2009), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.134205, arXiv:0811.1524, https://arxiv.org/abs/0811.1524
- H.-B. Chen, A. Guionnet, J. Ko, B. Lacroix-A-Chez-Toine, and J.-C. Mourrat, 'One-sided large deviations for the ground-state energy of spin glasses' (2026), arXiv:2603.06368, https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.06368
- E. Collins-Woodfin and H. G. Le, 'Free energy fluctuations in SK and related spin glass models: A literature survey' (2025), arXiv:2510.26960, https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26960
- S. Franz, G. Parisi, and F. Ricci-Tersenghi, 'Overlap locking and non-perturbative effects in spin glasses' (2026), arXiv:2602.18399, https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18399
- T. Aspelmeier, A. Billoire, E. Marinari, and M. A. Moore, 'Finite-size corrections in the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model', J. Phys. A 41, 324008 (2008), DOI: 10.1088/1751-8113/41/32/324008, arXiv:0711.3445, https://arxiv.org/abs/0711.3445
- A. Crisanti, G. Paladin, H.-J. Sommers, and A. Vulpiani, 'Replica trick and fluctuations in disordered systems', J. Phys. I France 2, 1325 (1992), DOI: 10.1051/jp1:1992213, https://doi.org/10.1051/jp1:1992213
- S. Chatterjee, 'Disorder chaos and multiple valleys in spin glasses' (2009), arXiv:0907.3381, https://arxiv.org/abs/0907.3381
- W.-K. Chen, M. Handschy, and G. Lerman, 'On the energy landscape of the mixed even p-spin model', Probab. Theory Related Fields 171, 53-95 (2018), DOI: 10.1007/s00440-017-0773-1, arXiv:1609.04368, https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.04368
- S. Boettcher, 'Simulations of ground state fluctuations in mean-field Ising spin glasses', J. Stat. Mech. (2010) P07002, DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/2010/07/P07002, arXiv:0906.1292, https://arxiv.org/abs/0906.1292
- C. Monthus and T. Garel, 'Matching between typical fluctuations and large deviations in disordered systems: application to the statistics of the ground state energy in the SK spin-glass model', J. Stat. Mech. (2010) P02023, DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/2010/02/P02023, arXiv:0912.2875, https://arxiv.org/abs/0912.2875
- B. Lacroix-A-Chez-Toine, Y. V. Fyodorov, and P. Le Doussal, 'Replica-symmetry breaking transitions in the large deviations of the ground-state of a spherical spin-glass', J. Stat. Phys. 191, 11 (2024), DOI: 10.1007/s10955-024-03232-9, arXiv:2306.11927, https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.11927
- M. Pastore, A. Di Gioacchino, and P. Rotondo, 'Large deviations of the free energy in the p-spin glass spherical model', Phys. Rev. Research 1, 033116 (2019), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.033116, arXiv:1909.06196, https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.06196
- E. M. Malatesta, G. Parisi, and G. Sicuro, 'Fluctuations in the random-link matching problem', Phys. Rev. E 100, 032102 (2019), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.100.032102, arXiv:1905.08529, https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.08529
- T. Aspelmeier and A. Braun, 'Sample-to-sample fluctuations and bond chaos in the m-component spin glass', Phys. Rev. B 81, 094439 (2010), DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.094439, arXiv:1001.0893, https://arxiv.org/abs/1001.0893
- Y. V. Fyodorov, B. Lacroix-A-Chez-Toine, and P. Le Doussal, 'Ground state energy fluctuations of pinned elastic manifolds' (2025), arXiv:2511.23060, https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.23060
- G. Parisi, L. Sarra, and L. Talamanca, 'Study of longitudinal fluctuations of the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model', J. Stat. Mech. (2019) 033302, DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/ab0c1b, arXiv:1812.06334, https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.06334