In work published in 1999-2001, A. A. Abrikosov, Jr. showed that the explicit 't Hooft and Jackiw-Nohl-Rebbi multi-instanton solutions of Euclidean SU(2) Yang-Mills theory can be rewritten compactly in curvilinear coordinates of flat four-dimensional Euclidean space by a gauge rotation that makes the 't Hooft eta-symbol constant; the price is an additive compensating gauge connection equal to the (anti-)self-dual projection of the spin connection, which is a pure gauge precisely because the flat-space Riemann tensor vanishes. One issue was explicitly left open by the source and remains untreated in the literature: whether the prescription and its compact geometric formulae extend beyond ansatz-based solutions to other topological configurations, paradigmatically the full Atiyah-Drinfeld-Hitchin-Manin (ADHM) construction in non-Cartesian frames. Two related facts were derived or demonstrated by the source without being posed as open questions, and they delimit the construction's current domain of validity: its compensating field strength equals −14Rαβγδξ^γδ±-\tfrac14 R_{\alpha\beta}{}^{\gamma\delta}\hat\xi^\pm_{\gamma\delta}, so on curved backgrounds the compensating connection is generally no longer a pure gauge; and the compensating gauge transformation is generally singular, making gauge-variant observables such as the Chern-Simons number dependent on the coordinate chart.

Background

In Euclidean Yang-Mills theory with gauge group SU(2), an instanton is a finite-action solution of the classical field equations whose field strength is self-dual, Fμν=F~μνF_{\mu\nu}=\tilde F_{\mu\nu}, where the dual is F~μν=12ϵμνλσFλσ\tilde F_{\mu\nu}=\tfrac12\epsilon_{\mu\nu\lambda\sigma}F^{\lambda\sigma}. Instantons are interpreted as tunneling events between topologically distinct vacua and are classified by an integer topological charge qq given by the integral of tr F∧F\mathrm{tr}\,F\wedge F; they underlie the QCD θ\theta-angle and instanton-liquid phenomenology. Belavin, Polyakov, Schwartz and Tyupkin found the unit-charge solution, and explicit multi-instanton families were constructed by 't Hooft and by Jackiw, Nohl and Rebbi (JNR). All of these are expressed in Cartesian coordinates xμx^\mu and take the ansatz form A^μ=−12η^μν− ∂νln⁡ρ(x)\hat A_\mu=-\tfrac12\hat\eta^-_{\mu\nu}\,\partial_\nu\ln\rho(x), where ρ\rho is a scalar function and η^μν±\hat\eta^\pm_{\mu\nu} are the 't Hooft symbols, constant numerical tensors that project spatial SO(4) rotations onto the SU(2) gauge algebra (they are built from Pauli matrices τa\tau^a as η^μν±=τaϵaμν\hat\eta^\pm_{\mu\nu}=\tau^a\epsilon^a{}_{\mu\nu} for μ,ν=1,2,3\mu,\nu=1,2,3 and ±τaδμa\pm\tau^a\delta^a_\mu for ν=4\nu=4). The general instanton, free of any ansatz, is produced by the Atiyah-Drinfeld-Hitchin-Manin (ADHM) construction, an algebraic procedure that encodes the gauge potential in quaternionic matrices subject to linear constraints.

Confinement-inspired models such as bags or strings are most naturally formulated in non-Cartesian frames (spherical or cylindrical coordinates), which motivated Abrikosov's construction. In a curvilinear chart qαq^\alpha with metric gαβ(q)g_{\alpha\beta}(q) one introduces the vierbein eaαe^a{}_\alpha, an orthonormal frame with gαβ=δabeaαebβg_{\alpha\beta}=\delta_{ab}e^a{}_\alpha e^b{}_\beta; covariant derivatives of frame indices are governed by the spin connection RαabR_\alpha{}^{ab}, the gauge field of local frame rotations, itself built from the Levi-Civita connection Γγαβ\Gamma^\gamma{}_{\alpha\beta} of the metric. Under the change of variables the constant symbol η^μν\hat\eta_{\mu\nu} becomes coordinate-dependent, η^μν→η^αβ=η^μν ∂xμ/∂qα ∂xν/∂qβ\hat\eta_{\mu\nu}\to\hat\eta_{\alpha\beta}=\hat\eta_{\mu\nu}\,\partial x^\mu/\partial q^\alpha\,\partial x^\nu/\partial q^\beta. Abrikosov proposed to factor out this coordinate dependence by a gauge transformation Ω(q)\Omega(q) satisfying

Ω†η^αβΩ=eaαebβ ξ^ab,\Omega^\dagger\hat\eta_{\alpha\beta}\Omega=e^a{}_\alpha e^b{}_\beta\,\hat\xi_{ab},

with ξ^ab\hat\xi_{ab} a constant numerical tensor. The rotated gauge potential is then the sum of the familiar instanton part and a compensating connection

A^αcomp=iΩ†∂αΩ=−14Rαab ξ^ab,\hat A^\mathrm{comp}_\alpha=i\Omega^\dagger\partial_\alpha\Omega=-\tfrac14 R_{\alpha ab}\,\hat\xi^{ab},

which is computable in three steps from the metric alone (Levi-Civita connection, then spin connection, then convolution with ξ^ab\hat\xi^{ab}). The compensating connection is a pure gauge in flat space because its field strength is

Fαβ(A^±comp)=−14Rαβγδ ξ^γδ±,F_{\alpha\beta}(\hat A^\mathrm{comp}_\pm)=-\tfrac14 R_{\alpha\beta}{}^{\gamma\delta}\,\hat\xi^\pm_{\gamma\delta},

which vanishes when the Riemann curvature RαβγδR_{\alpha\beta}{}^{\gamma\delta} vanishes; in genuinely curved space-times this is generally no longer so. The construction was verified for the JNR/'t Hooft ansatz in orthogonal curvilinear charts of flat space (O(4)-spherical and 2+2- and 3+1-cylindrical coordinates).

A characteristic side effect is that the compensating connection is generally singular: in O(4)-spherical coordinates its angular components fail to vanish on the polar axes. The singularity is invisible to gauge-invariant observables but not to gauge-variant ones. The standard example is the Chern-Simons number NCSN_{CS}, the surface integral of the Chern-Simons current KαK^\alpha (the current whose divergence equals the topological charge density), whose change between times measures the vacuum transition mediated by an instanton. In the O(4)-spherical chart the naive radial interpolation of NCSN_{CS} accounts for only ΔNCS=12\Delta N_{CS}=\tfrac12, the remaining half of the topological charge being carried by the singular hyperstrips θ=0,π\theta=0,\pi of the compensating field, so gauge-variant quantities depend on the coordinate frame and localize on the singularities of the compensating transformation.

Problem Statement

Determine the domain of validity of the compensating-connection construction of Yang-Mills instantons, and extend it beyond flat-space curvilinear reparametrizations of ansatz-based solutions. The construction - a coordinate-dependent gauge rotation Ω\Omega with Ω†η^αβΩ=eaαebβξ^ab\Omega^\dagger\hat\eta_{\alpha\beta}\Omega=e^a{}_\alpha e^b{}_\beta\hat\xi_{ab}, whose compensating connection A^αcomp=−14Rαabξ^ab\hat A^\mathrm{comp}_\alpha=-\tfrac14 R_{\alpha ab}\hat\xi^{ab} is built from the vierbein and spin connection - has been derived and verified only for 't Hooft/JNR-type self-dual ansätze in orthogonal curvilinear charts of flat four-dimensional Euclidean space. The open question, stated as future work by the source, is whether the same prescription, and the compact geometric formulae it yields, remain valid for - or generalize to - other topological configurations, paradigmatically the full Atiyah-Drinfeld-Hitchin-Manin construction written in non-Cartesian frames. The paradigmatic ADHM case fixes the completion target: establishing the prescription and its compact geometric formulae for the full ADHM instanton in non-Cartesian frames is the required demonstration, while the general class of other topological configurations remains the broader scope the source anticipates; the 'domain of validity' is delimited by stating the set of frames and backgrounds on which the construction is shown valid or invalid. Two further facts were derived or demonstrated by the source but not posed there as open questions; they delimit the domain in which the construction is currently known to work: on genuinely curved backgrounds the compensating field strength Fαβ(A^±comp)=−14Rαβγδξ^γδ±F_{\alpha\beta}(\hat A^\mathrm{comp}_\pm)=-\tfrac14 R_{\alpha\beta}{}^{\gamma\delta}\hat\xi^\pm_{\gamma\delta} may be nontrivial, so the compensating connection is generally no longer a pure gauge; and the compensating gauge transformation is generally singular, so gauge-variant observables such as the Chern-Simons number depend on the coordinate chart. Settling the open question would establish a validated geometric technique for writing general instantons in frames adapted to non-trivial geometry.

References

  1. A. A. Abrikosov, Jr., 'Instantons in curvilinear coordinates', Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 86 (2000) 452-455. DOI 10.1016/S0920-5632(00)00603-4; arXiv:hep-th/9910234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5632(00)00603-4
  2. A. A. Abrikosov, Jr., 'Instantons and multi-instantons in curvilinear coordinates', Nucl. Phys. B 586 (2000) 589-608. DOI 10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00450-8; arXiv:hep-th/9906008. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00450-8
  3. A. A. Abrikosov, Jr., 'Instantons in non-Cartesian coordinates', Phys. Atom. Nucl. 64 (2001) 946-951. DOI 10.1134/1.1378887; arXiv:hep-th/0009114. https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1378887
  4. S. Vandoren and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, 'Lectures on instantons', arXiv:0802.1862 (2008). https://arxiv.org/abs/0802.1862
  5. J. J. Oh, C. Park and H. S. Yang, 'Yang-Mills Instantons from Gravitational Instantons', JHEP 04 (2011) 087. DOI 10.1007/JHEP04(2011)087; arXiv:1101.1357. https://arxiv.org/abs/1101.1357
  6. K. Maharana, 'Representations of chiral alternative to vierbein and construction of non-Abelian instanton solution in curved space-time', arXiv:1808.10288 (2018). https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.10288
  7. A. A. Belavin, A. M. Polyakov, A. S. Schwartz and Yu. S. Tyupkin, 'Pseudoparticle solutions of the Yang-Mills equations', Phys. Lett. B 59 (1975) 85-87. DOI 10.1016/0370-2693(75)90163-x. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(75)90163-x
  8. G. 't Hooft, 'Computation of the quantum effects due to a four-dimensional pseudoparticle', Phys. Rev. D 14 (1976) 3432-3450. DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.14.3432. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.14.3432
  9. R. Jackiw, C. Nohl and C. Rebbi, 'Conformal properties of pseudoparticle configurations', Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 1642-1646. DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.15.1642. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.15.1642
  10. M. F. Atiyah, N. J. Hitchin, V. G. Drinfeld and Yu. I. Manin, 'Construction of instantons', Phys. Lett. A 65 (1978) 185-187. DOI 10.1016/0375-9601(78)90141-X. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(78)90141-X
  11. T. Schäfer and E. V. Shuryak, 'Instantons in QCD', Rev. Mod. Phys. 70 (1998) 323-425. DOI 10.1103/RevModPhys.70.323. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.70.323