Blind football (5-a-side football for athletes with vision impairment) requires a maximal toe kick without a run-up (a 'static kick') after fouls in the penalty area, making it one of the sport's decisive scoring actions. Sakuma et al. (2020) built a three-dimensional 'standard motion model' of this kick by averaging blindfolded sighted skilled players' whole-body kinematics and identified critical technical points: backward torso rotation extending the kicking-side hip during the back-swing and stable frontal-plane lower-torso posture during the forward-swing. The model's validity for its actual target population and environment remains unestablished. The open problem is to determine, with an adequately sized and stratified sample of blind football players, whether this standard motion pattern and its low-variability segments generalize across visually impaired players and skill levels, how impairment history and severity modulate static-kick mechanics, how the playing surface (laboratory floor versus artificial turf) affects kicking performance, and whether blindfolded sighted players are kinematically equivalent to actual blind players — thereby establishing (or refuting) the model's applicability to real match conditions.

Background

Blind football is a Paralympic 5-a-side sport in which outfield players are B1-classified (essentially no light perception up to very low residual vision; the B2 and B3 classes in the same sport classification denote progressively better residual vision), wear opaque eyeshades, and orient by sound — the ball contains bells and teammates and the goalkeeper call directions, while rebound boards surround the pitch. Fouls in the penalty area are punished with a kick taken from the penalty spot without a run-up; it is typically executed as a maximal toe kick, called a 'static kick', in which the player must generate foot speed from stance alone and, lacking vision, cannot visually correct the foot-to-ball contact position during the final swing. Sports biomechanics studies such kicks with optical three-dimensional motion capture: reflective markers tracked by cameras yield whole-body coordinates, which are normalized (by body height and by movement-phase duration) and averaged across trials and players to give a 'standard motion model' — a benchmark pattern of skilled execution. Segment consistency is quantified with the coefficient of variation (the ratio of a segment's movement variability to its mean), and skilled kicking is known to follow a proximal-to-distal sequence in which trunk rotation precedes thigh and then shank acceleration toward ball contact. Prior kinematic work on visually impaired (VI) players is sparse: Giagazoglou et al. (2011) compared instep kicks of blind and sighted soccer players and found that systematic training let blind players reach comparable skill, and Finocchietti et al. (2019) used inertial sensors to profile VI players during sport-specific actions (sprinting with the ball, turning, striking), reporting postural compensation strategies. Sakuma et al. (2020) provided the first detailed whole-body three-dimensional account of the blind-football static kick: six VI and eight sighted male players, all blindfolded, performed maximal static toe kicks under laboratory motion capture. The sighted group achieved significantly higher ball speed, kicking-side thigh linear velocity, and shank angular velocity, and a standard motion model was constructed from their normalized, averaged coordinates; the model's critical technical points were backward torso rotation that sufficiently extends the kicking-side hip during the back-swing and a stable lower-torso posture on the frontal plane (movement within about 3 degrees) during the forward-swing, with low-variability segments in the torso, support-side shank, and kicking-side thigh. Two VI players (one highly skilled, one ordinary) were compared against the model, the skilled one matching it closely. The authors themselves acknowledged that 'There may be limitations to regarding the kicking motion of a sighted football player wearing a blindfold as equivalent to that of an actual blind football player', while citing balance research (including Campayo-Piernas et al. 2017, on sighted and blind soccer players adapting to an unstable balance task) in support of their equivalence treatment, and they left the model's validity for actual blind football unresolved.

Problem Statement

Determine whether the standard motion model of the blind-football static kick — backward torso rotation that sufficiently extends the kicking-side hip during the back-swing and stable frontal-plane lower-torso posture during the forward-swing, with its associated low-variability segments, derived from blindfolded sighted skilled players kicking on a flat laboratory floor — describes and predicts static-kick execution by actual blind football players. Establish which of the source study's four unresolved issues the present evidence already settles and which remain open, and the conditions a decisive study would need to meet: (i) whether the standard motion pattern and its critical technical points generalize across blind football players of differing skill levels, using a substantially larger and adequately stratified sample of visually impaired players than the original six; (ii) how impairment history and severity — congenital versus acquired vision loss, and blindness versus low vision, the dimensions the source study recruited without separating and noted 'may be relevant to the static kick performance' — relate to static-kick mechanics and performance; (iii) how the playing surface — artificial turf as used in blind football versus a flat laboratory floor — affects static-kick kinematics and outcomes such as ball speed and contact precision; and (iv) whether blindfolded sighted players are kinematically equivalent to actual blind players for this task, and hence whether the standard motion model applies to real match conditions. The outcome of such a decisive study is either a validated (possibly refined) population-level motion model with quantified generalization criteria, or a demonstrated failure of the model on the blind-player population with an identified replacement pattern.

References

  1. Sakuma T., Kobayashi M., Kinoshita H., Matsui Y., Kobayashi Y., Watanabe M. (2020). Three-dimensional kinematics analysis of blind football kicking. Sports Biomechanics 22(9):1136–1152 (published online 2020-09-07; print issue dated 2023). DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2020.1787499. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2020.1787499
  2. Giagazoglou P., Katis A., Kellis E., Natsikas C. (2011). Differences in Soccer Kick Kinematics Between Blind Players and Controls. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 28(3):251–266. DOI: 10.1123/apaq.28.3.251. https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.28.3.251
  3. Campayo-Piernas M., Caballero C., Barbado D., Reina R. (2017). Role of vision in sighted and blind soccer players in adapting to an unstable balance task. Experimental Brain Research 235(4):1269–1279. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-4885-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-4885-8
  4. Finocchietti S., Gori M., Souza Oliveira A. (2019). Kinematic Profile of Visually Impaired Football Players During Specific Sports Actions. Scientific Reports 9:10660. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-47162-z. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47162-z
  5. Rajesh Y., Sindhu G. (2023). An efficient framework for improving accuracy in sports analysis using logistic regression algorithm compared with naive bayes algorithm. AIP Conference Proceedings 2821:020010 (Contemporary Innovations in Engineering and Management). DOI: 10.1063/5.0177011. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0177011
  6. Chen J., Peek K., Sanders R. H., Lee J., Pang J. C. Y., Ekanayake K., Fu A. C. L. (2024). The Role of Upper Body Motions in Stationary Ball-Kicking Motion: A Systematic Review. Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise 8(3):259–284 (published online 2024-04-06; print issue dated 2026). DOI: 10.1007/s42978-024-00276-x. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42978-024-00276-x
  7. Leivers H. K., Allen P. M., Timmis M. A., Zenk F., Uppal J., Runswick O. R. (2024). The effects of simulated monocular and binocular vision impairment on football penalty kick performance. European Journal of Sport Science 24(7):918–929. DOI: 10.1002/ejsc.12145. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsc.12145
  8. Becerra Patiño B. A., Pino-Ortega J., Olivares-Arancibia J. (2025). Exploratory review of the scientific production of 5-blind soccer with the Bibliometrix tool. Retos 68:1025–1047. DOI: 10.47197/retos.v68.115790. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v68.115790
  9. Leivers H. K., Allen P. M., Timmis M. A., Runswick O. R. (2025). Investigating the impairment-performance relationship during competition in elite blind and partially sighted football. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living 7:1697819. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1697819. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1697819
  10. Becerra-Patiño B. A., Montenegro-Bonilla A. D., Valencia-Sánchez W. G., Olivares-Arancibia J., Yáñez-Sepúlveda R., Pino-Ortega J. (2026). Identification of Performance Variables in Blind 5-A-Side Football: Physical Fitness, Physiological Responses, Technical–Tactical Actions and Recovery Variables: A Systematic Review. Sports 14(1):3. DOI: 10.3390/sports14010003. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports14010003
  11. Becerra-Patiño B. A., Yáñez-Sepúlveda R., Pino-Ortega J. (2026). An Expected Goals Model for Analyzing a 5-a-Side Soccer for the Blind Using Ten Machine Learning Algorithms with SHAP Interpretability. Data 11(7):164. DOI: 10.3390/data11070164. https://doi.org/10.3390/data11070164
  12. Mieda T., Kokubu M. (2024). Head movements affect skill acquisition for ball trapping in blind football. PLOS ONE 19(11):e0313336. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313336. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313336