Catalyst-free arc-discharge growth of multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) proceeds in a ~3000 K carbon plasma whose atomic-scale mechanism has never been observed directly. Sumio Iijima's 1993 microscopy study of arc-grown MWNTs established a topological grammar of tube ends — pentagons for positive curvature, heptagons for negative curvature, an open-rim 'kink-site' growth rule in which the number of carbon atoms delivered to a rim site selects hexagon, pentagon, or heptagon formation — and proposed an 'over-shooting growth' picture for the periodic single- and double-shell structures found inside conical tips. The paper itself flagged what remains unverified: which growth conditions control whether pentagons or heptagons are incorporated during arc growth (carbon-atom flux or buffer-gas pressure was suggested, with higher pressure hypothesized to favor heptagons; electric-field effects were explicitly called for investigation), and whether growing tips are actually open, with over-shooting wrapping layers, during these events. Later theory and in situ electron microscopy have supported, complicated, and competed with parts of this picture (diameter-controlled pentagon nucleation; lip-lip interactions at open edges that may stabilize or close them; surface-diffusion and nanoribbon alternatives for compartment formation), but no controlled experiment has mapped defect topology onto arc conditions, and no direct observation of growth inside the arc exists. The problem is to complete that experimental verification of the open-end growth model for catalyst-free arc-grown nanotubes.

Background

A carbon nanotube is a cylinder rolled from graphene, a single atomic sheet of carbon atoms in a hexagonal honeycomb lattice; multi-wall nanotubes (MWNTs) are concentric nested cylinders typically a few to a few tens of nanometers in diameter. The first practical source of MWNTs was the direct-current (dc) arc discharge, in which an electric arc burns between graphite electrodes in a low-pressure helium atmosphere (Iijima's 1993 study used 200 A, 25 V, helium at 100 Torr), consuming the anode and growing a deposit on the cathode that contains nanotubes, without any metal catalyst, at effective temperatures of order 3000 K. The walls are nearly perfect hexagonal networks, so every departure from a straight cylinder is controlled by non-hexagonal rings: a pentagon introduces positive curvature (a π/3\pi/3 disclination of the hexagonal lattice) and a heptagon introduces negative curvature, and exactly six pentagons are required to cap an open hexagonal tube end. Iijima's 1993 paper, together with the companion paper by Iijima, Ajayan and Ichihashi (Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3100 (1992)) presenting evidence for open-end growth, built a now-classic mechanistic picture on these rules. Growing tube ends are assumed to stay open, and carbon atoms arriving from the plasma attach at 'kink sites' along the open rim (a kink is a step in the atomic edge of the growing hexagonal sheet); the number of atoms delivered to a kink site selects the ring that forms there — two atoms close a hexagon and advance the rim, a single atom favors a pentagon (bending the tube into a cone), and three atoms favor a heptagon (allowing the tube to narrow). This rule was used to explain the two characteristic cone angles (about 19 and 40 degrees) repeatedly observed at arc-grown tube tips and the 'bill-like' tips in which a wide tube narrows through a cone to a thinner tube, the latter requiring a pentagon at the widening junction and a heptagon at the narrowing junction. Elongation and wall thickening then proceed by repeated cycles of open-rim growth, six-pentagon capping of an inner shell, and nucleation of a new shell on the outer wall. Inside conical tips, transmission electron microscopy revealed periodic single- and double-sheet internal shells with inter-shell gaps, with tip radii of curvature clustering near 0.7 nm; the paper explained these hypothetically by 'over-shooting growth', in which a newly wrapping sheet sometimes extends beyond (over-shoots) the existing cone tip instead of following its surface exactly. Open-ended tubes, however, were rare in the collected post-growth micrographs — their rims often decorated with granular carbonaceous material — implying that tube ends close rapidly in situ, so the entire growth-time picture was inferred from frozen, post-mortem images. The paper closed by stating what further work was needed: experiments to establish what actually controls the incorporation of non-hexagonal rings, in particular whether the carbon-atom flux or gas pressure of the arc plasma selects heptagon versus pentagon formation (with higher pressure suggested to increase the chance of heptagons), experimental investigation of possible electric-field effects on non-hexagon formation, and more direct evidence that growing tips are open during these events, including clarification of how and why wrapping sometimes over-extends. Subsequent theory introduced the 'lip-lip interaction' — chemical bonding between the dangling-bond edges of adjacent concentric open shells — as the candidate stabilizer of open rims during catalyst-free growth.

Problem Statement

For catalyst-free arc-discharge growth of multi-wall carbon nanotubes, specify the direct experiment that would establish the atomic-scale growth picture proposed in 1992-1993, which has never been directly verified under arc-growth conditions. Specifically: (1) determine which arc-growth conditions control the incorporation of non-hexagonal rings into the growing hexagonal network — in particular, what selects pentagon formation versus heptagon formation at an open rim, testing the suggested controlling variables of carbon-atom flux and buffer-gas pressure (with higher pressure hypothesized to favor heptagons) and the possible effect of the electric field of the arc plasma on non-hexagon formation; and (2) establish the state of the growing tip during growth — whether growth proceeds at open ends as the kink-site model assumes, and whether over-shooting of wrapping sheets beyond the existing cone tip is the actual origin of the periodic single- and double-shell internal structures observed near conical tips, including why and under what conditions wrapping over-extends instead of following the existing layer. The research target is the experimental program that would establish this picture: the arc conditions to be varied, the observables, and the falsifiable topological signatures predicted; the correlated measurements of defect topology (pentagon/heptagon incidence and placement, as inferred from tip and internal-shell morphology in atomic-resolution electron microscopy) against controlled arc conditions that the program would produce; and the direct or convergent evidence on the tip state and internal-shell formation that would confirm, refine, or replace the open-end kink-site and over-shooting growth picture. The two parts are one verification program: the ring-selection rule and the tip-state question are the same mechanism probed through different observables.

References

  1. S. Iijima, 'Growth of carbon nanotubes', Materials Science and Engineering: B 19, 172-180 (1993). DOI: 10.1016/0921-5107(93)90184-O, https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-5107(93)90184-O
  2. S. Iijima, P. M. Ajayan, T. Ichihashi, 'Growth model for carbon nanotubes', Physical Review Letters 69, 3100-3103 (1992). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.3100, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.3100
  3. A. Maiti, C. J. Brabec, C. Roland, J. Bernholc, 'Theory of carbon nanotube growth', Physical Review B 52, 14850-14858 (1995). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.52.14850, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.52.14850
  4. M. Buongiorno Nardelli, C. Brabec, A. Maiti, C. Roland, J. Bernholc, 'Lip-Lip Interactions and the Growth of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes', Physical Review Letters 80, 313-316 (1998). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.313, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.313
  5. J.-C. Charlier, S. Iijima, 'Growth Mechanisms of Carbon Nanotubes', in Carbon Nanotubes (Topics in Applied Physics vol. 80), pp. 55-81, Springer (2001). DOI: 10.1007/3-540-39947-X_4, https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39947-X_4
  6. O. A. Louchev, 'Formation Mechanism of Pentagonal Defects and Bamboo-Like Structures in Carbon Nanotube Growth Mediated by Surface Diffusion', Physica Status Solidi (a) 193, 585-596 (2002). DOI: 10.1002/1521-396X(200210)193:3<585::AID-PSSA585>3.0.CO;2-Y, https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-396X(200210)193:3%3C585::AID-PSSA585%3E3.0.CO;2-Y
  7. J. M. Lauerhaas, J. Y. Dai, A. A. Setlur, R. P. H. Chang, 'The effect of arc parameters on the growth of carbon nanotubes', Journal of Materials Research 12, 1536-1544 (1997). DOI: 10.1557/JMR.1997.0210, https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1997.0210
  8. D. Zhou, S. Wang, S. Seraphin, J. C. Withers, 'High-Density Production of Carbon Nanotubes in Contact Arc-Discharge at Low Helium Pressure', MRS Proceedings 349, 337 (1994). DOI: 10.1557/PROC-349-337, https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-349-337
  9. C. Jin, K. Suenaga, S. Iijima, 'Direct Evidence for Lip-Lip Interactions in Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes', Nano Research 1(5), 434-439 (2008). DOI: 10.1007/s12274-008-8045-0, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-008-8045-0
  10. M. Lin, J. P. Y. Tan, C. Boothroyd, K. P. Loh, E. S. Tok, Y.-L. Foo, 'Dynamical Observation of Bamboo-like Carbon Nanotube Growth', Nano Letters 7, 2234-2238 (2007). DOI: 10.1021/nl070681x, https://doi.org/10.1021/nl070681x
  11. K. Kazemi Kia, F. Bonabi, M. Shokrzadeh, 'Electric field-oriented growth of carbon nanotubes and Y-branches in a needle-pulsed arc discharge unit: mechanism of the production', Journal of Experimental Nanoscience 10, 1093-1105 (2014). DOI: 10.1080/17458080.2014.969337, https://doi.org/10.1080/17458080.2014.969337
  12. S. Karmakar, 'Unveiling the mystery of nucleation and growth of carbon nanotube and layered graphene inside carbon arc-discharge', arXiv:1705.01150 (2017, revised 2019). arXiv ID: 1705.01150, https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.01150
  13. S. Karmakar, 'Selective synthesis of DC carbon arc-generated carbon nanotube and layered-graphene and the associated mechanism', Nanotechnology 32, 105602 (2020). DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/abcdcd, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/abcdcd
  14. N. Arora, N. N. Sharma, 'Arc discharge synthesis of carbon nanotubes: Comprehensive review', Diamond and Related Materials 50, 135-150 (2014). DOI: 10.1016/j.diamond.2014.10.001, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2014.10.001
  15. J. Liu, L. Liu, J. Lu, H. Zhu, 'The formation mechanism of chiral carbon nanotubes', Physica B: Condensed Matter 530, 277-282 (2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2017.11.068, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2017.11.068
  16. D. S. Tang, S. S. Xie, W. Liu, B. H. Chang, L. F. Sun, Z. Q. Liu, G. Wan, W. Y. Zhou, 'Evidence for an open-ended nanotube growth model in arc discharge', Carbon 38, 480-483 (2000). DOI: 10.1016/S0008-6223(99)00249-3, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(99)00249-3