Self-assembled colloidal crystals (artificial opals) and their inverted replicas are the only low-cost route to large-scale three-dimensional photonic crystals, but whether they can be engineered to host complete photonic band gaps of the width predicted by ideal-structure calculations, and to realize the associated local-density-of-states-controlled radiative dynamics of embedded emitters, remains unestablished. Busch and John (Phys. Rev. E 58, 3896, 1998) calculated that incomplete infiltration of a sintered opal template with silicon or germanium yields complete three-dimensional band gaps of roughly 10% and 15% of the gap center frequency, that sintering and strain tune these gaps, and that the photonic local density of states varies strongly from point to point, with direct consequences for the radiative decay of dopant atoms, dye molecules, and quantum dots. The open problem is to translate these ideal-geometry predictions into real, experimentally realized self-organizing structures: whether deliberately engineered material-removal and infiltration patterns, feasible mechanical distortions, and controlled disorder can produce inverted networks with complete gaps at least as large as the computed benchmarks at visible and near-infrared frequencies, and whether the predicted non-Markovian emission dynamics of emitters placed at specific lattice sites can be demonstrated in such crystals.

Background

A photonic crystal is a dielectric material whose refractive index varies periodically on the scale of the optical wavelength, so that light propagating in it behaves analogously to electrons in a solid: Bloch bands form, Bragg scattering produces stop bands along given directions, and, for sufficiently high refractive-index contrast and the right network topology, a complete photonic band gap (PBG) — a frequency interval in which propagation is forbidden in every direction and for every polarization — can open. The total photonic density of states (DOS) vanishes inside a complete gap, and the local density of states (LDOS), the quantity that governs the spontaneous emission rate of an atom or molecule at a given position by Fermi's golden rule, can be strongly suppressed or enhanced near gap edges. A pseudogap is a partial suppression of the DOS that falls short of a complete gap.

Top-down micromachining of complete-gap structures (layer-by-layer 'woodpile' crystals, drilled silicon) works but is slow and yields small samples. The self-assembling alternative uses colloidal spheres (typically silica or polystyrene, a few hundred nanometers in diameter) that sediment or evaporate into face-centered-cubic (fcc) or hexagonal-close-packed (hcp) crystals known as artificial opals. To reach the high index contrast that close-packed sphere packs cannot provide, one infiltrates the void space of the opal with a high-index material such as silicon (refractive index about 3.45) or germanium (about 4.0) and dissolves away the spheres, leaving an inverted opal: a periodic network of air spheres in a dielectric backbone. 'Incomplete infiltration' means deliberately coating the sphere surfaces rather than filling the voids completely; 'sintering' the template beforehand merges neighboring spheres through cylindrical necks. Busch and John (1998) computed, by full-vector plane-wave band-structure methods, that a close-packed inverted fcc opal of silicon has a complete PBG between the 8th and 9th photonic bands of relative width Δω/ω0≈4.25%\Delta\omega/\omega_0 \approx 4.25\% (where ω0\omega_0 is the gap center frequency), rising to about 7.35% for germanium, and that incomplete infiltration and sintering can roughly double these figures, to about 10% and 15%. They also found that mechanical strain (uniaxial compression along crystallographic axes) tunes and can close or reopen the gap, though not convert the lower-frequency 4–5 band pseudogap of fcc into a complete gap; and that the LDOS projected onto different points of colloidal and inverted structures varies by factors of several across narrow frequency intervals, implying a 'colored vacuum' in which the radiative decay of dopants — atoms, dye molecules, quantum dots — becomes non-Markovian (its decay no longer a single exponential, because the reservoir spectrum varies strongly on the emitter linewidth) and position-dependent.

These predictions motivated an entire experimental program. Silicon inverse opals were synthesized at large scale (Blanco et al., Nature 2000), the experimental proof of a complete gap in them was immediately questioned (Norris and Vlasov, 2001), disorder and stacking faults were shown to degrade the gap (Vlasov et al., Nature 2001; Wang et al., 2003; Lavrinenko et al., 2009), engineered non-close-packed and conformally coated inverse structures were proposed to enlarge the gap and reduce the required index contrast (Gaillot et al., 2005, 2006), and the emission dynamics of quantum dots embedded in inverse opals was measured and modeled through the LDOS (Lodahl et al., Nature 2004; Nikolaev, Vos and Koenderink, 2009). Reviews nevertheless record that a complete three-dimensional band gap in the visible has not been realized by the self-assembly route (Hynninen et al., Nature Materials 2007) and that the opal route's original ambitions were partly 'abandoned' in favor of sensing and energy applications (Küchenmeister et al., 2013; Cai et al., 2021), while large complete gaps and strongly modified emission have been achieved only in top-down or non-opal structures such as silicon inverse woodpiles and diamond-structured lattices (Jorgensen et al., 2011; Schulz et al., 2024).

Problem Statement

Busch and John's 1998 band-structure calculations predict that self-assembled opal templates, converted by incomplete infiltration with silicon or germanium and removed afterwards, host complete three-dimensional photonic band gaps of roughly 10% and 15% of the gap center frequency, that sintering and mechanical strain tune these gaps, and that the local density of states varies by factors of several across the unit cell, with observable consequences for the radiative decay of embedded emitters. The open problem, raised by those calculations and not settled since, is whether these predictions can be realized in actual self-organizing systems. Specifically: (1) can deliberately engineered material-removal patterns or alternative template-infiltration and removal protocols — beyond the simple sphere-coating and sintering-neck geometries originally modeled — produce inverted networks with a complete gap-to-midgap ratio Δω/ω0\Delta\omega/\omega_0 at least as large as the 10–15% benchmarks, at visible or near-infrared frequencies and with experimentally available low-loss high-index materials; (2) can feasible mechanical or other distortions of the self-assembled lattice convert the lower-frequency fcc pseudogap (the 4–5 band pseudogap) into a complete band gap, or otherwise tune complete gaps dynamically; (3) can the degree of incomplete infiltration, neck geometry, and their uniformity be controlled well enough, in the presence of stacking faults, polydispersity, finite size, and material dispersion and absorption, that the complete gap survives in large real samples; and (4) can the predicted position-dependent, non-Markovian radiative dynamics and collective effects of dopants (atoms, dye molecules, quantum dots) placed at controlled lattice sites be demonstrated experimentally in such crystals? These four questions are independently meaningful and independently refutable, but they share one scientific objective and jointly define it: closing the gap between the ideal-geometry theoretical predictions and a functioning self-assembled complete-band-gap material with LDOS-engineered quantum-optical behavior at visible and near-infrared wavelengths. A complete resolution therefore requires all four sub-questions to be addressed together: no single one of them, and no proper subset, resolves the objective. The operative gap-width target is a complete gap at least as large as the 10–15% benchmarks.

References

  1. Kurt Busch and Sajeev John, "Photonic band gap formation in certain self-organizing systems", Physical Review E 58, 3896 (1998). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.58.3896, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.58.3896
  2. Sajeev John and Kurt Busch, "Photonic bandgap formation and tunability in certain self-organizing systems", Journal of Lightwave Technology 17, 1931-1943 (1999). DOI: 10.1109/50.802976, https://doi.org/10.1109/50.802976 (companion review by the same authors)
  3. Álvaro Blanco, Emmanuel Chomski, Serguei Grabtchak, Marta Ibisate, Sajeev John, S. W. Leonard, Cefe López, Francisco J. Meseguer, Hernán Míguez, Jessica P. Mondia, Geoffrey A. Ozin, Ovidiu Toader and Henry M. van Driel, "Large-scale synthesis of a silicon photonic crystal with a complete three-dimensional bandgap near 1.5 micrometres", Nature 405, 437-440 (2000). DOI: 10.1038/35013024, https://doi.org/10.1038/35013024
  4. D. J. Norris and Yu. A. Vlasov, "The Complete Photonic Band Gap in Inverted Opals: How Can We Prove it Experimentally?", in "Photonic Crystals and Light Localization in the 21st Century" (NATO Science Series), Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 229-237 (2001). DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-0738-2_17, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0738-2_17
  5. Yurii A. Vlasov, Xiang-Zheng Bo, James C. Sturm and David J. Norris, "On-chip natural assembly of silicon photonic bandgap crystals", Nature 414, 289-293 (2001). DOI: 10.1038/35104529, https://doi.org/10.1038/35104529
  6. Elisa E. Palacios-Lidón, Álvaro Blanco, Marta Ibisate, Francisco J. Meseguer, Cefe López and José Sánchez-Dehesa, "Optical study of the full photonic band gap in silicon inverse opals", Applied Physics Letters 81, 4925-4927 (2002). DOI: 10.1063/1.1530752, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1530752
  7. Zhen-Lin Wang, Che-Ting Chan, Wei-Yi Zhang, Zhuo Chen, Nai-Ben Ming and Ping Sheng, "Optical properties of inverted opal photonic band gap crystals with stacking disorder", Physical Review E 67, 016612 (2003). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.67.016612, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.67.016612
  8. Peter Lodahl, A. Floris van Driel, Ivan S. Nikolaev, Arie Irman, Karin Overgaag, Daniel A. M. Vanmaekelbergh and Willem L. Vos, "Controlling the dynamics of spontaneous emission from quantum dots by photonic crystals", Nature 430, 654-657 (2004). DOI: 10.1038/nature02772, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02772
  9. Davy Paul Gaillot, Tsuyoshi Yamashita and Christopher J. Summers, "Photonic band gaps in highly conformal inverse-opal based photonic crystals", Physical Review B 72, 205109 (2005). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.205109, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.205109
  10. Davy Paul Gaillot and Christopher J. Summers, "Photonic band gaps in non-close-packed inverse opals", Journal of Applied Physics 100, 113118 (2006). DOI: 10.1063/1.2396670, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2396670
  11. Antti-Pekka Hynninen, Job H. J. Thijssen, Esther C. M. Vermolen, Marjolein Dijkstra and Alfons van Blaaderen, "Self-assembly route for photonic crystals with a bandgap in the visible region", Nature Materials 6, 202-205 (2007). DOI: 10.1038/nmat1841, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1841
  12. Renaud A. L. Vallée, Kris Baert, Branko Kolarić, Mark Van der Auweraer and Koen Clays, "Nonexponential decay of spontaneous emission from an ensemble of molecules in photonic crystals", Physical Review B 76, 045113 (2007). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.045113, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.045113
  13. Durga P. Aryal, Kosmas L. Tsakmakidis and Ortwin G. Hess, "Complete bandgap switching in photonic opals", New Journal of Physics 11, 073011 (2009). DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/11/7/073011, https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/11/7/073011
  14. Frank Marlow, Muldarisnur, Parvin Sharifi, Rainer Brinkmann and Cecilia Mendive, "Opals: Status and Prospects", Angewandte Chemie International Edition 48, 6212-6233 (2009). DOI: 10.1002/anie.200900210, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200900210
  15. Andrei V. Lavrinenko, Wendel Wohlleben and Reinhold J. Leyrer, "Influence of imperfections on the insulating and guiding properties of finite Si-inverted opal crystals", Optics Express 17, 747 (2009). DOI: 10.1364/OE.17.000747, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.17.000747
  16. Ivan S. Nikolaev, Willem L. Vos and A. Femius Koenderink, "Accurate calculation of the local density of optical states in inverse-opal photonic crystals", Journal of the Optical Society of America B 26, 987 (2009). DOI: 10.1364/josab.26.000987, https://doi.org/10.1364/josab.26.000987
  17. Matthew R. Jorgensen, Jeremy W. Galusha and Michael H. Bartl, "Strongly Modified Spontaneous Emission Rates in Diamond-Structured Photonic Crystals", Physical Review Letters 107, 143902 (2011). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.143902, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.143902
  18. Jens Küchenmeister, Christian Wolff, Kurt Busch, Ulf Peschel and Sergei G. Romanov, "Abandoned Functionality of Thin-Film Opal Photonic Crystals", Advanced Optical Materials 1, 952-962 (2013). DOI: 10.1002/adom.201300311, https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201300311
  19. Alex Lonergan, David McNulty and Colm O'Dwyer, "Tetrahedral framework of inverse opal photonic crystals defines the optical response and photonic band gap", Journal of Applied Physics 124, 095106 (2018). DOI: 10.1063/1.5033367, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5033367
  20. Zhongyu Cai, Zhiwei Li, Serge Ravaine, Mingxin He, Yanlin Song, Yadong Yin, Hanbin Zheng, Jinghua Teng and Ao Zhang, "From colloidal particles to photonic crystals: advances in self-assembly and their emerging applications", Chemical Society Reviews 50, 5898 (2021). DOI: 10.1039/D0CS00706D, https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CS00706D
  21. Andreas S. Schulz, Marek Kozoň, Gyula Julius Vancso, Jurriaan Huskens and Willem L. Vos, "Strongly Inhibited Spontaneous Emission of PbS Quantum Dots Covalently Bound to 3D Silicon Photonic Band Gap Crystals", The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 128, 9142-9153 (2024). DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c01541, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c01541
  22. Jeremy W. Galusha, Kaycee Carter and Michael H. Bartl, "3-D Photonic Band Structure Engineering in Self-Assembled Macroporous Photonic Crystals", MRS Online Proceedings Library 988, 9880508 (2006). DOI: 10.1557/proc-988-0988-qq05-08, https://doi.org/10.1557/proc-988-0988-qq05-08
  23. Jingwen Jiang, Caixia Li, Shuangqi Zhu, Zhe Chen, Ming Fu, Dawei He and Yongsheng Wang, "Optical properties of PMMA inverse opal structures with anisotropic geometries by stretching", Materials Research Express 7, 045801 (2020). DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab88fe, https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab88fe