The (n+1)-dimensional Hénon-like map xˉ=f(x)+1y\bar{x}=f(x)+\mathbb{1}y, yˉ=bx+Ay\bar{y}=\mathbf{b}x+Ay (with AA a lower-shift matrix) was shown by Grechko, Belykh and Barabash (arXiv:2212.06672, 2022), via two auxiliary one-dimensional maps f±γf\pm\gamma, to possess attractors in explicitly computable trapping domains for the quadratic nonlinearity f(x)=μ−x2f(x)=\mu-x^2 and the cubic f(x)=x3−μxf(x)=x^3-\mu x, and to possess a topological Smale horseshoe under explicit parameter inequalities in the quadratic case only. The constructive completion of that program is open: (i) for a general nonlinearity ff, no criterion or procedure is known that decides whether trapping-interval endpoints α±\alpha^\pm (and the coupled radius γ\gamma) satisfying the trapping condition exist, or computes them; (ii) the horseshoe-existence parameter inequalities are not available for cubic or higher-degree polynomial ff (the paper only remarks that similar arguments should apply).

Background

The Hénon map (M. Hénon, 1976) is the planar invertible map (x,y)↦(μ−x2+y, bx)(x,y)\mapsto(\mu-x^2+y,\,bx) introduced as a simple model with a strange attractor; the rigorous study of its attractor culminated in the Benedicks-Carleson analysis (1991). A natural multidimensional generalization, studied for instance by Gonchenko, Ovsyannikov, Simó and Turaev (2005) and by Gonchenko and Gonchenko (2016) in dimension three, replaces the planar map by an (n+1)(n+1)-dimensional diffeomorphism whose linear part couples one 'nonlinear' direction with nn delay-like coordinates. Grechko, Belykh and Barabash (arXiv:2212.06672) study the concrete form

xˉ=f(x)+1y,yˉ=bx+Ay,\bar{x}=f(x)+\mathbb{1}y,\qquad \bar{y}=\mathbf{b}x+Ay,

where x∈Rx\in\mathbb{R}, y∈Rny\in\mathbb{R}^n, 1\mathbb{1} is the all-ones row (so 1y=∑iyi\mathbb{1}y=\sum_i y_i), b=col(b,0,…,0)\mathbf{b}=\mathrm{col}(b,0,\dots,0), and AA is the normalized lower-shift n×nn\times n matrix with entries aij=aj δi,j+1a_{ij}=a_j\,\delta_{i,j+1}; the parameters satisfy ∣b∣<1|b|<1 and ∣ai∣<a<1|a_i|<a<1. For n=1n=1 and f(x)=μ−x2f(x)=\mu-x^2 this is the original Hénon map. A trapping region (invariant domain) is a set mapped into itself by the map; every orbit entering it remains inside, and the maximal invariant set it contains is an attractor. Using the Manhattan norm ∥y∥=∑i∣yi∣\|y\|=\sum_i|y_i|, in which the yy-subsystem is contracting, the authors show (their Lemma 1) that if the slab Dy={∥y∥<γ}D_y=\{\|y\|<\gamma\} has radius γ=α∣b∣/(1−a)\gamma=\alpha|b|/(1-a) with α=max⁡{∣α−∣,∣α+∣}\alpha=\max\{|\alpha^-|,|\alpha^+|\}, then the image of the box Dα=Dx×DyD_\alpha=D_x\times D_y, Dx=(α−,α+)D_x=(\alpha^-,\alpha^+), is confined by the two auxiliary one-dimensional maps f±(x)=f(x)±γf^\pm(x)=f(x)\pm\gamma. Their Theorem 1 states that if

α−+γ≤f(x)≤α+−γfor all x∈Dx,\alpha^-+\gamma\le f(x)\le \alpha^+-\gamma \quad\text{for all } x\in D_x,

then the map has an attractor inside DαD_\alpha. Their Lemma 2 gives a partial sufficient condition of this kind: for a given γ\gamma, if an interval II satisfies inf⁡x∈If(x)−γ>α−\inf_{x\in I}f(x)-\gamma>\alpha^- and sup⁡x∈If(x)+γ<α+\sup_{x\in I}f(x)+\gamma<\alpha^+, then (α−,α+)(\alpha^-,\alpha^+) is a trapping domain with an attractor (equivalently, an invariant interval of the one-dimensional map x↦f(x)x\mapsto f(x) with a γ\gamma-margin supplies trapping endpoints). For the quadratic f(x)=μ−x2f(x)=\mu-x^2 (Theorem 2) and the odd cubic f(x)=x3−μxf(x)=x^3-\mu x (Theorem 3) they solve these inequalities explicitly, obtaining closed-form domains and parameter regions. A Smale horseshoe is a hyperbolic invariant Cantor set produced by the transverse self-intersection of a stretched-and-folded strip, carrying a full shift as symbolic dynamics; a topological horseshoe is the corresponding crossing/covering structure that yields a semiconjugacy to a shift (in the sense of Kennedy and Yorke's topological horseshoes). Their Theorem 4 proves that in the parameter region 2(μ+γ)<μ−γ\sqrt{2(\mu+\gamma)}<\mu-\gamma the quadratic multidimensional map has a topological Smale horseshoe, the images of the lines {y=const}\{y=\mathrm{const}\} forming a solid folded arc crossing DxD_x twice. Related earlier work (Li and Malkin 2006; Gonchenko, Li and Malkin 2008) established horseshoes for generalized Hénon maps only in perturbative regimes near a one-dimensional singular limit; the 2022 paper's point is to avoid smallness assumptions. Finally, for small coupling ∣b∣|b| their Theorem 5 shows each structurally stable periodic orbit of the one-dimensional map x↦f(x)x\mapsto f(x) persists in the full map, with multipliers governed by an explicit characteristic polynomial (their equation (42)); after the cubic Theorem 3 they also identify one saddle-node bifurcation curve of the auxiliary maps (their equation (34)) and note it lies outside the invariant-domain region. What the paper does not do, and what remains open, is: solve the trapping-endpoint problem for a general ff (their Remark 1 states it explicitly) and extend the horseshoe inequalities to cubic and polynomial ff (their Remark 2 only asserts that similar arguments should apply).

Problem Statement

For the multidimensional Hénon map xˉ=f(x)+1y\bar{x}=f(x)+\mathbb{1}y, yˉ=bx+Ay\bar{y}=\mathbf{b}x+Ay with x∈Rx\in\mathbb{R}, y∈Rny\in\mathbb{R}^n, 1\mathbb{1} the all-ones row, b=col(b,0,…,0)\mathbf{b}=\mathrm{col}(b,0,\dots,0), AA the normalized lower-shift matrix (aij=ajδi,j+1a_{ij}=a_j\delta_{i,j+1}), and parameters ∣b∣<1|b|<1, ∣ai∣<a<1|a_i|<a<1, the open problem posed explicitly in Remarks 1 and 2 of arXiv:2212.06672 is to complete the constructive existence theory beyond the quadratic and attractor-only cubic cases. It has two linked components sharing one objective - making attractor and horseshoe existence for this map family constructive and general in the nonlinearity:

  1. Trapping endpoints for general ff. Given a scalar nonlinearity ff (continuous smooth or piecewise-smooth, in particular any polynomial, beyond the solved cases f(x)=μ−x2f(x)=\mu-x^2 and f(x)=x3−μxf(x)=x^3-\mu x), decide constructively whether distinct interval endpoints α−<α+\alpha^-<\alpha^+ and a positive radius γ\gamma exist such that the trapping condition α−+γ≤f(x)≤α+−γ\alpha^-+\gamma\le f(x)\le\alpha^+-\gamma holds for all x∈(α−,α+)x\in(\alpha^-,\alpha^+) and the box Dα=Dx×DyD_\alpha=D_x\times D_y is a nonempty trapping domain, with γ\gamma coupled to α=max⁡{∣α−∣,∣α+∣}\alpha=\max\{|\alpha^-|,|\alpha^+|\} through γ=α∣b∣/(1−a)\gamma=\alpha|b|/(1-a) (Lemma 1 of the source); when they exist, compute them; the target is a genuinely general decision/construction procedure.

  2. Horseshoe conditions for polynomial ff. Prove the existence of topological Smale horseshoes for the map with a general polynomial ff of arbitrary degree and real coefficients, the cubic f(x)=x3−μxf(x)=x^3-\mu x being the first explicit case (which the general-polynomial result subsumes), under explicit parameter inequalities in the coefficients of ff and in the map parameters, analogous to the quadratic region 2(μ+γ)<μ−γ\sqrt{2(\mu+\gamma)}<\mu-\gamma (Theorem 4 of the source), including the verification that the image-arc crossing structure genuinely yields a (semi)conjugacy to a shift. This replaces the source's Remark 2, which asserts without proof or inequalities that similar arguments apply.

The target is, for the multidimensional Hénon map, what the source established only for f(x)=μ−x2f(x)=\mu-x^2 (and for the cubic attractor): constructive localization of attractors for general nonlinearity and explicit chaos-certifying parameter inequalities for polynomial nonlinearity.

References

  1. D. A. Grechko, V. N. Belykh, N. V. Barabash, Existence of an attractor and Horseshoe in multidimensional Hénon map, arXiv:2212.06672 (2022), https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.06672
  2. V. N. Belykh, N. V. Barabash, D. A. Grechko, From 1D Endomorphism to Multidimensional Hénon Map: Persistence of Bifurcation Structure, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 34(2), 2450026 (2024), doi:10.1142/S0218127424500263, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127424500263
  3. V. N. Belykh, N. V. Barabash, D. A. Grechko, Existence proofs for strange attractors in piecewise-smooth nonlinear Lozi-Hénon and Belykh maps, Journal of Difference Equations and Applications 29(9-12), 994-1014 (2023), doi:10.1080/10236198.2023.2193653, https://doi.org/10.1080/10236198.2023.2193653
  4. Dina Grechko, Vladimir Belykh, Nikita Barabash, Invariant cones for strange attractors of Lozi, Hénon and Belykh type maps, arXiv:2212.05467 (2022), https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.05467
  5. M. Hénon, A two-dimensional mapping with a strange attractor, Communications in Mathematical Physics 50, 69-77 (1976), doi:10.1007/BF01608556, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01608556
  6. M. Benedicks, L. Carleson, The Dynamics of the Hénon Map, Annals of Mathematics 133, 73-169 (1991), doi:10.2307/2944326, https://doi.org/10.2307/2944326
  7. S. V. Gonchenko, I. I. Ovsyannikov, C. Simó, D. Turaev, Three-dimensional Hénon-like maps and wild Lorenz-like attractors, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 15(11), 3493-3508 (2005), doi:10.1142/S0218127405014180, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127405014180
  8. Ming-Chia Li, Mikhail Malkin, Topological horseshoes for perturbations of singular difference equations, Nonlinearity 19(4), 795-811 (2006), doi:10.1088/0951-7715/19/4/002, https://doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/19/4/002
  9. Sergey Gonchenko, Ming-Chia Li, Mikhail Malkin, Generalized Hénon maps and Smale horseshoes of new types, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 18(10), 3029-3052 (2008), doi:10.1142/S0218127408022238, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127408022238
  10. A. S. Gonchenko, S. V. Gonchenko, Variety of strange pseudohyperbolic attractors in three-dimensional generalized Hénon maps, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 337, 43-57 (2016), doi:10.1016/j.physd.2016.07.006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2016.07.006
  11. Judy Kennedy, James Yorke, Topological horseshoes, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 353(6), 2513-2530 (2001), doi:10.1090/S0002-9947-01-02586-7, https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-01-02586-7
  12. Jizhou Li, Keisuke Fujioka, Akira Shudo, Coupled Hénon Map, Part II: Doubly and Singly Folded Horseshoes in Four Dimensions, arXiv:2303.06824 (2023), https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.06824
  13. Jizhou Li, Keisuke Fujioka, Akira Shudo, Paperfolding Structures as Templates for Horseshoes in Multidimensional Hénon Maps, arXiv:2509.08251 (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.08251
  14. Przemysław Kucharski, Maximal attractors for perturbations of unimodal maps near a homoclinic tangency, arXiv:2608.18761 (2026), https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18761