Let kk be an algebraically closed field of characteristic 22 and let GadG_{ad} be an adjoint algebraic group of type BB, CC or DD over kk, with Lie algebra gad\mathfrak{g}_{ad} and dual space gad∗\mathfrak{g}_{ad}^{*}. Two a priori different Springer correspondences are known for gad∗\mathfrak{g}_{ad}^{*}: the correspondence constructed directly by Xue (2009) by sheaf-theoretic methods on the simply connected group of the same type and transported across the isogeny class, and the correspondence obtained by applying the Fourier-Deligne transform to the Springer correspondence for gad\mathfrak{g}_{ad} constructed in the companion paper. Xue stated (Remark 5.19) the expectation that these two bijections from irreducible representations of the Weyl group to pairs of nilpotent coadjoint orbits and irreducible equivariant local systems coincide up to tensoring by the sign representation, and gave no proof. The problem is to prove or disprove this expectation, or to determine the precise relation between the two constructions, for all types BnB_n, CnC_n, DnD_n.

Background

Let kk be an algebraically closed field of characteristic 22 and let GG be a connected reductive algebraic group over kk of classical type, i.e. symplectic type CnC_n or orthogonal types BnB_n and DnD_n, or a group isogenous to one of these (two groups are isogenous if their root data differ only by the intermediate lattice between the character lattice and its dual; the simply connected and adjoint groups are the two extremes of an isogeny class). Write g\mathfrak{g} for the Lie algebra of GG and g∗\mathfrak{g}^{*} for its dual vector space. The group GG acts on g∗\mathfrak{g}^{*} by the coadjoint action, g.ξ(x)=ξ(Ad⁡(g−1)x)g.\xi(x)=\xi(\operatorname{Ad}(g^{-1})x) for g∈Gg\in G, ξ∈g∗\xi\in\mathfrak{g}^{*}, x∈gx\in\mathfrak{g}. Following Kac and Weisfeiler, an element ξ∈g∗\xi\in\mathfrak{g}^{*} is called nilpotent if it annihilates the Lie algebra of some Borel subgroup (a maximal connected solvable subgroup) of GG; its orbit under the coadjoint action is a nilpotent coadjoint orbit.

The Springer correspondence is a fundamental bridge between the geometry of nilpotent orbits and the representation theory of Weyl groups. The Weyl group W=NG(T)/TW=N_{G}(T)/T is the finite reflection group determined by a maximal torus TT of GG. In its sheaf-theoretic form, the correspondence is a bijection from the set Irr⁡(W)\operatorname{Irr}(W) of isomorphism classes of irreducible representations of WW to the set of pairs (O,F)(\mathcal{O},\mathcal{F}) where O\mathcal{O} is a nilpotent orbit and F\mathcal{F} is an irreducible GG-equivariant Q‾ℓ\overline{\mathbb{Q}}_{\ell}-local system (a locally constant sheaf for a prime ℓ≠char⁡k\ell\neq\operatorname{char}k) on O\mathcal{O}, up to isomorphism; such local systems are classified by the irreducible characters of the component group AG(ξ)=ZG(ξ)/ZG0(ξ)A_{G}(\xi)=Z_{G}(\xi)/Z_{G}^{0}(\xi), the group of connected components of the centralizer of a point ξ∈O\xi\in\mathcal{O}. Springer constructed the correspondence for g\mathfrak{g} when the characteristic is large, and Lusztig generalized it (for the group, in arbitrary characteristic) using intersection cohomology complexes, which are the simple objects of the category of perverse sheaves (an abelian category of constructible ℓ\ell-adic complexes adapted to this theory).

When the characteristic is good, g\mathfrak{g} carries a GG-invariant nondegenerate bilinear form identifying g\mathfrak{g} with g∗\mathfrak{g}^{*}, and the adjoint and coadjoint theories coincide. In characteristic 22 for types BB, CC, DD the invariant trace form is degenerate, so g\mathfrak{g} and g∗\mathfrak{g}^{*} are not GG-equivariantly isomorphic, and nilpotent orbits in g∗\mathfrak{g}^{*} form a genuinely different family: Xue classified them for symplectic and orthogonal groups over algebraically closed and finite fields, computed the component groups of the centralizers, and constructed a Springer correspondence γdir:Irr⁡(W)→Sg∗\gamma_{dir}:\operatorname{Irr}(W)\to\mathcal{S}_{\mathfrak{g}^{*}} directly, by a method parallel to Lusztig's construction for the group, where Sg∗\mathcal{S}_{\mathfrak{g}^{*}} denotes the set of pairs (O,F)(\mathcal{O},\mathcal{F}) as above with O\mathcal{O} a nilpotent coadjoint orbit. Her construction proceeds through the variety of pairs (ξ,gB)(\xi,gB) with g−1.ξg^{-1}.\xi in the annihilator of the Borel subalgebra and a principal WW-bundle over the regular semisimple elements of g∗\mathfrak{g}^{*}, and it relies on the theorem of Kac-Weisfeiler that regular semisimple elements of g∗\mathfrak{g}^{*} exist and form an open dense subset, which is guaranteed when GG is simply connected and can fail otherwise (this is Lemma 5.2 and Remark 5.3 of the source paper).

Independently, for the adjoint group GadG_{ad} of type BB, CC or DD, a Springer correspondence for the Lie algebra gad\mathfrak{g}_{ad} itself was constructed in the companion paper (assuming GadG_{ad} adjoint for the analogous reason). The Fourier-Deligne transform is a standard equivalence on the derived category of ℓ\ell-adic constructible sheaves from a vector space VV to its dual V∗V^{*}, defined by the kernel ψ(⟨v,ξ⟩)\psi(\langle v,\xi\rangle) for a nontrivial additive character ψ\psi; it carries GadG_{ad}-equivariant perverse sheaves on gad\mathfrak{g}_{ad} supported on the nilpotent cone to GadG_{ad}-equivariant perverse sheaves on gad∗\mathfrak{g}_{ad}^{*}, and hence converts the Springer correspondence for gad\mathfrak{g}_{ad} into a second Springer correspondence γFT:Irr⁡(W)→Sg∗\gamma_{FT}:\operatorname{Irr}(W)\to\mathcal{S}_{\mathfrak{g}^{*}} for the dual.

These two routes to a Springer correspondence on g∗\mathfrak{g}^{*} are logically independent: the direct one is built for the simply connected group and transported across the isogeny class (later work of Xue established that nilpotent coadjoint orbits and component groups of centralizers are naturally identified for groups in the same isogeny class), while the Fourier one is built on the adjoint group. In Remark 5.19 of the published paper, Xue states the expectation that the two correspondences coincide up to tensoring by the sign representation sgn⁡\operatorname{sgn} of WW (the one-dimensional character on which each simple reflection acts as −1-1), i.e. γFT(E)=γdir(E⊗sgn⁡)\gamma_{FT}(E)=\gamma_{dir}(E\otimes\operatorname{sgn}) for every E∈Irr⁡(W)E\in\operatorname{Irr}(W). The sign twist is the natural guess: in type AA, where the correspondence is classical, the zero and regular nilpotent orbits carry the sign and trivial representations respectively, and these are exactly the two extremes interchanged by the Fourier transform. No proof of the expectation is known in bad characteristic, where the classical good-characteristic arguments break down because there is no GG-invariant identification of g\mathfrak{g} with g∗\mathfrak{g}^{*}.

Problem Statement

Let kk be an algebraically closed field of characteristic 22, let GadG_{ad} be an adjoint connected algebraic group of type BnB_{n}, CnC_{n} or DnD_{n} over kk, let WW be its Weyl group, and let gad\mathfrak{g}_{ad} and gad∗\mathfrak{g}_{ad}^{*} be its Lie algebra and the dual vector space. Let Sg∗\mathcal{S}_{\mathfrak{g}^{*}} denote the set of pairs (O,F)(\mathcal{O},\mathcal{F}), up to isomorphism, where O\mathcal{O} is a nilpotent coadjoint orbit in gad∗\mathfrak{g}_{ad}^{*} and F\mathcal{F} is an irreducible GadG_{ad}-equivariant Q‾ℓ\overline{\mathbb{Q}}_{\ell}-local system on O\mathcal{O} (ℓ≠2\ell\neq 2). Consider the following two bijections from Irr⁡(W)\operatorname{Irr}(W) to Sg∗\mathcal{S}_{\mathfrak{g}^{*}}:

(1) γdir\gamma_{dir}, the Springer correspondence for g∗\mathfrak{g}^{*} constructed directly by Xue for the simply connected group of the same type, transported to GadG_{ad} through the natural identification of nilpotent coadjoint orbits and component groups of centralizers across the isogeny class;

(2) γFT\gamma_{FT}, the Springer correspondence for gad∗\mathfrak{g}_{ad}^{*} obtained by applying the Fourier-Deligne transform to the Springer correspondence for gad\mathfrak{g}_{ad} (constructed by Xue for the adjoint group).

Prove or disprove that, for every type BnB_{n}, CnC_{n}, DnD_{n} and every irreducible representation E∈Irr⁡(W)E\in\operatorname{Irr}(W), one has γFT(E)=γdir(E⊗sgn⁡)\gamma_{FT}(E)=\gamma_{dir}(E\otimes\operatorname{sgn}), where sgn⁡\operatorname{sgn} is the sign representation of WW. A proof of this coincidence must establish it for all types BnB_{n}, CnC_{n}, DnD_{n} and all E∈Irr⁡(W)E\in\operatorname{Irr}(W); a single type and a single E∈Irr⁡(W)E\in\operatorname{Irr}(W) with γFT(E)≠γdir(E⊗sgn⁡)\gamma_{FT}(E)\neq\gamma_{dir}(E\otimes\operatorname{sgn}) refutes it. If the coincidence fails, the task then requires determining, for each type BnB_{n}, CnC_{n}, DnD_{n}, the precise relation between γFT\gamma_{FT} and γdir\gamma_{dir} on Irr⁡(W)\operatorname{Irr}(W); this determination is a requirement in its own right, so a bare counterexample refutes the coincidence but does not by itself resolve the task. In particular, make explicit how the identification of nilpotent coadjoint orbits and centralizer component groups between the simply connected and adjoint groups enters the comparison, so that the statement is well posed for the adjoint group on which the Fourier construction naturally lives.

References

  1. Ting Xue, Nilpotent orbits in the dual of classical Lie algebras in characteristic 2 and the Springer correspondence, Representation Theory 13 (2009), 609-635, DOI 10.1090/S1088-4165-09-00364-1, https://arxiv.org/abs/0808.2998
  2. Ting Xue, Nilpotent orbits in classical Lie algebras over finite fields of characteristic 2 and the Springer correspondence, Representation Theory 13 (2009), 371-390, DOI 10.1090/S1088-4165-09-00357-4, https://arxiv.org/abs/0808.2995
  3. Ting Xue, Combinatorics of the Springer correspondence for classical Lie algebras and their duals in characteristic 2, Advances in Mathematics 230 (2012), 229-262, DOI 10.1016/j.aim.2011.11.010, https://arxiv.org/abs/0911.1350
  4. Ting Xue, Nilpotent pieces in the dual of odd orthogonal Lie algebras, Transformation Groups 17 (2012), 571-592, DOI 10.1007/s00031-012-9172-y, https://arxiv.org/abs/1102.4036
  5. Ting Xue, Nilpotent coadjoint orbits in small characteristic, Journal of Algebra 397 (2014), 111-140, DOI 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2013.09.001, https://arxiv.org/abs/1112.2399
  6. Ting Xue, Springer correspondence for exceptional Lie algebras and their duals in small characteristic, Journal of Lie Theory 27 (2017), 357-375, DOI 10.5802/jolt.950, https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.00340
  7. V. Kac and B. Weisfeiler, Coadjoint action of a semi-simple algebraic group and the center of the enveloping algebra in characteristic p, Indagationes Mathematicae (Proceedings) 79 (1976), 136-151, DOI 10.1016/1385-7258(76)90059-7, https://doi.org/10.1016/1385-7258(76)90059-7
  8. G. Lusztig, Unipotent elements in small characteristic, IV, Transformation Groups 15 (2010), 921-936, DOI 10.1007/s00031-010-9109-2, https://arxiv.org/abs/0909.2441
  9. G. Lusztig, Remarks on Springer's representations, Representation Theory 13 (2009), 391-400, DOI 10.1090/S1088-4165-09-00358-6, https://arxiv.org/abs/0811.0370
  10. Syu Kato, Deformations of nilpotent cones and Springer correspondences, American Journal of Mathematics 133 (2011), 519-553, DOI 10.1353/ajm.2011.0014, https://arxiv.org/abs/0801.3707
  11. Dongkwan Kim, On total Springer representations for the symplectic Lie algebra in characteristic 2 and the exotic case, Algebras and Representation Theory 26 (2022), 679-715, DOI 10.1007/s10468-021-10109-y, https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.01901
  12. Junbin Dong, Toshiaki Shoji and Gao Yang, Symmetric spaces associated to classical groups with even characteristic, Tokyo Journal of Mathematics 45 (2022), DOI 10.3836/tjm/1502179368, https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.09020
  13. Daniel Juteau, Cédric Lecouvey and Karine Sorlin, Springer basic sets and modular Springer correspondence for classical types, arXiv:1410.1477, https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.1477
  14. Richard Mathers, Normality of the dual nilcone in positive characteristic, arXiv:1906.04460, https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.04460
  15. Alexander Premet, Hesselink strata in small characteristic and Lusztig-Xue pieces, Pacific Journal of Mathematics 336 (2025), 415-432, DOI 10.2140/pjm.2025.336.415, https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.21469