After the negative resolution of the Connes embedding problem (CEP) via the complexity-theoretic identity MIP*=RE, the model-theoretic analysis of tracial von Neumann algebras leaves a central question open: does there exist an enforceable II1_1 factor EE, a separable II1_1 factor whose isomorphism type is forced by a winning strategy in the model-building game for tracial von Neumann algebras? Goldbring's dichotomy theorem states that exactly one of the following holds: either the necessarily unique enforceable factor EE exists, or every enforceable property of tracial von Neumann algebras is shared by continuum many pairwise nonisomorphic separable algebras. A positive answer would produce a canonical II1_1 factor rivaling the hyperfinite factor RR and embedding into every existentially closed factor; a negative answer is a strong, generic failure of Connes embedding. The problem remains open as of August 2026.

Background

A von Neumann algebra is a unital self-adjoint algebra of bounded operators on a Hilbert space that is closed in the weak operator topology. A II1_1 factor is an infinite-dimensional von Neumann algebra with trivial center that carries a faithful normal tracial state τ\tau (a positive linear functional with τ(1)=1\tau(1)=1 and τ(xy)=τ(yx)\tau(xy)=\tau(yx) for all elements xx and yy). The hyperfinite II1_1 factor RR is the unique separable II1_1 factor containing an increasing sequence of finite-dimensional matrix algebras with dense union; it embeds into every II1_1 factor and plays the role of the smallest II1_1 factor. Given a free ultrafilter U\mathcal U on the natural numbers, the tracial ultrapower RUR^{\mathcal U} is the quotient of the algebra of bounded sequences in RR by the ideal of sequences whose 2-norms ∥x∥τ=τ(x∗x)1/2\|x\|_\tau=\tau(x^*x)^{1/2} tend to zero along U\mathcal U; it is a nonseparable II1_1 factor that serves as an infinite-dimensional approximation scheme for RR.

The Connes embedding problem (CEP), raised in Connes' 1976 classification of the injective factors (those that are retracts of any von Neumann algebra containing them), asked whether every separable II1_1 factor embeds into some RUR^{\mathcal U}, that is, whether every II1_1 factor is approximable by matrices in trace norm. In 2020 the problem was resolved negatively: Ji, Natarajan, Vidick, Wright, and Yuen proved the complexity-theoretic identity MIP*=RE (equality of the class of languages verifiable by multi-prover interactive proofs with entangled quantum provers with the recursively enumerable languages), which, combined with the equivalence of the CEP with Tsirelson's problem on whether quantum correlations of commuting and of tensor-product observables coincide, yields separable II1_1 factors with no embedding into any RUR^{\mathcal U}.

The question comes from the model-theoretic aftermath of that refutation. In continuous logic, a first-order logic for metric structures in which truth values live in [0,1][0,1] and quantifiers are suprema and infima, separable tracial von Neumann algebras form an elementary class. Goldbring adapted to this setting a classical model-construction technique known as model-theoretic forcing or building models by games. Fix a countably infinite set CC of constant symbols. Two players, ∀\forall and ∃\exists, take turns playing finite sets Σ\Sigma of expressions of the form ∣ ∥p(c)∥τ−r ∣<ϵ|\,\|p(c)\|_\tau-r\,|<\epsilon, where pp is a *-polynomial (a noncommutative polynomial in variables and their adjoints), cc is a tuple from CC, and rr and ϵ\epsilon are rationals with ϵ>0\epsilon>0; each move must extend the previous one and be satisfiable in some tracial von Neumann algebra. A definitive play, one that pins down the 2-norm of every *-polynomial at every tuple of constants, compiles to a unique separable tracial von Neumann algebra, called the compiled structure. A property PP of tracial von Neumann algebras is enforceable if player ∃\exists has a strategy guaranteeing that the compiled structure has PP regardless of the opponent's moves, and a tracial von Neumann algebra MM is enforceable if the property of being isomorphic to MM is enforceable; at most one algebra can be enforceable up to isomorphism.

Enforceable properties turn out to be abundant: being a II1_1 factor, being McDuff (isomorphic to one's tensor product with RR), and being existentially closed are all enforceable, and a countable conjunction of enforceable properties is enforceable. An existentially closed (e.c.) tracial von Neumann algebra is one in which any behavior that could approximately occur in an extension already approximately occurs inside the algebra, the analog for this setting of an algebraically closed field. Every e.c. algebra is a McDuff II1_1 factor all of whose automorphisms are approximately inner; every tracial von Neumann algebra embeds into an e.c. one; and by a theorem of Farah, Goldbring, Hart, and Sherman, RR itself is e.c. exactly if the CEP holds, so after the refutation no e.c. algebra embeds into RUR^{\mathcal U}.

Goldbring proved that the CEP is equivalent to RR being the enforceable tracial von Neumann algebra, so the refutation of the CEP shows that RR is not enforceable, but it leaves open whether some other factor is. In many neighboring classes the enforceable object exists and is the canonical member of the class: the enforceable graph is the Rado random graph, the enforceable field of a fixed characteristic is the algebraic closure of the prime field, the enforceable metric space is the Urysohn space, and the enforceable Hilbert space is the separable infinite-dimensional one; for discrete groups, by contrast, no enforceable object exists. The dichotomy theorem of 'Enforceable operator algebras' states that exactly one of the following holds: (1) for every enforceable property PP of tracial von Neumann algebras there exist continuum many pairwise nonisomorphic separable tracial von Neumann algebras with property PP; or (2) the enforceable II1_1 factor EE exists. Should EE exist, it would be e.c. and McDuff with only approximately inner automorphisms, would embed into every e.c. factor just as RR embeds into every II1_1 factor, would have the Jung property (every embedding of EE into its own ultrapower EUE^{\mathcal U} is unitarily conjugate to the diagonal embedding; by a theorem of Kenley Jung, RR has this property, and Atkinson and Kunnawalkam Elayavalli showed that RR is the only RUR^{\mathcal U}-embeddable factor that does), and could not be isomorphic to M⊗MM\otimes M for any tracial von Neumann algebra MM; indeed it could not even satisfy the same continuous first-order sentences as E⊗EE\otimes E.

Problem Statement

Does the enforceable II1_1 factor exist? That is, does there exist a separable II1_1 factor EE such that the property of being isomorphic to EE is enforceable in the model-building game for tracial von Neumann algebras, equivalently such that player ∃\exists has a strategy guaranteeing that the compiled structure of any definitive play is isomorphic to EE?

By the dichotomy theorem, this is equivalent to deciding which of two alternatives holds for the class of tracial von Neumann algebras:

(1) for every enforceable property PP, there exist continuum many pairwise nonisomorphic separable tracial von Neumann algebras with property PP; or

(2) the enforceable II1_1 factor EE exists, necessarily unique up to isomorphism.

A positive answer should identify the factor EE, or otherwise prove its existence, together with a proof of its enforceability. A negative answer should establish alternative (1).

References

  1. Isaac Goldbring, The Connes Embedding Problem: A guided tour, 2021, arXiv:2109.12682, DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2109.12682, https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.12682
  2. Isaac Goldbring, Enforceable operator algebras, Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu 20 (2021), no. 1, 31-63, DOI 10.1017/S1474748019000112, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474748019000112; preprint arXiv:1706.09048, https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.09048
  3. Isaac Goldbring, Model theory and Ultrapower Embedding Problems in Operator Algebras, 2022, arXiv:2210.01223, also in Model Theory of Operator Algebras, de Gruyter, 2023, DOI 10.1515/9783110768282-011, https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.01223
  4. Srivatsav Kunnawalkam Elayavalli, 50 Open Problems: Ultraproduct II1_1 factors, 2025, arXiv:2511.20377 (version 3 revised 25 August 2026), https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.20377
  5. Aareyan Manzoor, There Is An Equivalence Relation Whose von Neumann Algebra Is Not Connes Embeddable, 2025, arXiv:2502.06697 (version 2 revised 4 April 2026), https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.06697
  6. Jananan Arulseelan and Aareyan Manzoor, The Universal Theory of Locally Universal Tracial von Neumann Algebras is not Computable, 2025, arXiv:2508.21709 (version 2 revised 4 April 2026), https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.21709
  7. Isaac Goldbring, David Jekel, Srivatsav Kunnawalkam Elayavalli, and Jennifer Pi, Uniformly Super McDuff II1_1 Factors, 2023, arXiv:2303.02809, https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.02809
  8. Isaac Goldbring, Non-embeddable II1_1 factors resembling the hyperfinite II1_1 factor, Journal of Noncommutative Geometry 17 (2023), no. 1, 233-239, DOI 10.4171/jncg/474, https://doi.org/10.4171/jncg/474; preprint arXiv:2101.10467, https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.10467
  9. I. Farah, I. Goldbring, B. Hart, and D. Sherman, Existentially closed II1_1 factors, Fundamenta Mathematicae 233 (2016), 173-196, DOI 10.4064/fm126-12-2015, https://doi.org/10.4064/fm126-12-2015
  10. Scott Atkinson and Srivatsav Kunnawalkam Elayavalli, On Ultraproduct Embeddings and Amenability for Tracial von Neumann Algebras, International Mathematics Research Notices 2021 (2021), no. 4, 2882-2918, DOI 10.1093/imrn/rnaa257, https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rnaa257
  11. Zhengfeng Ji, Anand Natarajan, Thomas Vidick, John Wright, and Henry Yuen, MIP* = RE, Communications of the ACM 64 (2021), no. 11, 131-138, DOI 10.1145/3485628, https://doi.org/10.1145/3485628; full version at arXiv:2001.04383, https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.04383
  12. Lewis Bowen, Michael Chapman, Alexander Lubotzky, and Thomas Vidick, The Aldous-Lyons Conjecture I: Subgroup Tests, 2024, arXiv:2408.00110, https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.00110
  13. Lewis Bowen, Michael Chapman, and Thomas Vidick, The Aldous-Lyons Conjecture II: Undecidability, 2024, arXiv:2501.00173, https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.00173
  14. Alain Connes, Classification of injective factors. Cases II1_1, II∞_\infty, IIIλ_\lambda, λ≠1\lambda\neq 1, Annals of Mathematics (2) 104 (1976), 73-115, DOI 10.2307/1971057, https://doi.org/10.2307/1971057
  15. Kenley Jung, Amenability, tubularity, and embeddings into Rω\mathcal{R}^\omega, Mathematische Annalen 338 (2007), 241-248, DOI 10.1007/s00208-006-0074-y, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-006-0074-y
  16. Isaac Goldbring, Srivatsav Kunnawalkam Elayavalli, and Yash Lodha, Generic algebraic properties in spaces of enumerated groups, 2020, arXiv:2006.14048, https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.14048