N. V. Krylov's 2026 paper on the parabolic Adams theorem states, as its third main result, an explicitly unproven conjecture: the Itô equation xs=x+∫0sσ(t+r,xr) dwr+∫0sb(t+r,xr) drx_s=x+\int_0^s\sigma(t+r,x_r)\,dw_r+\int_0^s b(t+r,x_r)\,dr with merely Borel coefficients, uniformly nondegenerate a=σσ∗a=\sigma\sigma^*, Dσ∈L1,locD\sigma\in L_{1,\mathrm{loc}}, and drift decomposed as b=bM+bBb=b_M+b_B — a Morrey part bMb_M that is small in a parabolic cylinder Morrey norm together with DσD\sigma, plus a part bBb_B bounded in space with ∫bˉB2(t) dt<∞\int\bar b_B^2(t)\,dt<\infty — should have a solution adapted to the Wiener filtration {Ftw}\{\mathcal{F}_t^w\}, i.e. a strong solution. The conjecture is stated verbatim, without proof, in the source paper; in the subsequent literature, Krylov's own 2026 book proves strong solvability for the same drift decomposition only under additional Morrey bounds uniform in time and a structural assumption on σ\sigma. The conjecture in its stated generality — allowing genuine time singularities of the Morrey part and an arbitrary Borel nondegenerate diffusion — remains open.

Background

For d≥2d\ge2 and d1≥dd_1\ge d consider the Itô stochastic differential equation xs=x+∫0sσ(t+r,xr) dwr+∫0sb(t+r,xr) dr,x_s=x+\int_0^s\sigma(t+r,x_r)\,dw_r+\int_0^s b(t+r,x_r)\,dr, where t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R} and x∈Rdx\in\mathbb{R}^d are parameters, ww is a d1d_1-dimensional Wiener process (Brownian motion), σ\sigma is a Borel d×d1d\times d_1 matrix-valued function on Rd+1\mathbb{R}^{d+1}, and bb is a Borel Rd\mathbb{R}^d-valued function. The diffusion is assumed uniformly nondegenerate: a:=σσ∗a:=\sigma\sigma^* takes values in SδS_\delta, the set of symmetric d×dd\times d matrices with eigenvalues in [δ,δ−1][\delta,\delta^{-1}] for a fixed δ∈(0,1]\delta\in(0,1]. A weak solution is a solution on some filtered probability space carrying a suitable Wiener process; a strong solution is a solution {xs}\{x_s\} adapted to the filtration of the driving noise, i.e. xsx_s is Fsw\mathcal{F}_s^w-measurable for each s≥0s\ge0, where Fsw\mathcal{F}_s^w is the completion of σ{wr,r≤s}\sigma\{w_r,r\le s\}, so that the solution is a functional of the observed Wiener path. Whether singular drift still admits strong solutions is a central well-posedness question of stochastic analysis, studied intensively since the 1970s.

The sharp scale-invariant conditions on the drift are expressed through parabolic Morrey norms. For p0∈(2,2+d]p_0\in(2,2+d] and ρ>0\rho>0, let Cr\mathbb{C}_r be the collection of parabolic cylinders Cr(t,x)=[t,t+r2)×Br(x)C_r(t,x)=[t,t+r^2)\times B_r(x) in Rd+1\mathbb{R}^{d+1}, with Br(x)B_r(x) the Euclidean ball, and set f^p0,ρ=sup⁡r≤ρ rsup⁡C∈Cr(∣C∣−1∫C∣f∣p0)1/p0\hat f_{p_0,\rho}=\sup_{r\le\rho}\,r\sup_{C\in\mathbb{C}_r}\big(|C|^{-1}\int_C|f|^{p_0}\big)^{1/p_0}. The prefactor rr makes the norm invariant under the parabolic scaling (t,x)↦(λ2t,λx)(t,x)\mapsto(\lambda^2t,\lambda x), so the class contains drifts behaving like c/∣x∣c/|x| with cc small — singularities far beyond any Lebesgue class. The analytic engine for handling such drifts is the parabolic Adams theorem, a mapping property of parabolic Riesz potentials (potential operators built from the heat kernel) weighted by Morrey functions, which lets integration-by-parts estimates be iterated with all constants kept under control. Here DσD\sigma denotes the matrix of first-order spatial partial derivatives of σ\sigma.

Krylov's paper (arXiv:2602.08130) uses this engine to prove, for smooth coefficients, L2nL_{2n}-estimates for the evolution family (the two-parameter family of solution operators) of a divergence-form parabolic operator (an operator ∂tu+12Di(aijDju)+biDiu\partial_tu+\frac12D_i(a^{ij}D_ju)+b^iD_iu with the second-order term in divergence form) with Morrey lower-order terms, and moment estimates for the derivatives of solutions of the above SDE with respect to the initial data — the estimates from which strong solvability follows by a classical analytic criterion. The strongest adjacent results are: Röckner–Zhao (Probab. Theory Related Fields 2025), strong well-posedness for a=Ia=I and drifts in the critical Ladyzhenskaya–Prodi–Serrin scale Lq,pL^{q,p} (i.e. LqL^q in time, LpL^p in space) with d/p+2/q≤1d/p+2/q\le1, the endpoint d/p+2/q=1d/p+2/q=1 being the critical case; and Kinzebulatov–Madou (Stoch. Dyn. 2024), strong solutions for form-bounded drifts (drifts whose quadratic-form bound against test functions is dominated by the Dirichlet form of the Laplacian), again with a=Ia=I, a class that however excludes drifts with L2L^2-in-time singularities. Neither covers measurable non-constant diffusion together with time-singular drift.

The paper then states, as its third main result and explicitly without proof, the conjecture that strong solvability should hold for drifts decomposed as b=bM+bBb=b_M+b_B, where the Morrey part bMb_M is small in the above parabolic cylinder norm together with DσD\sigma, and the bounded part bBb_B is bounded in xx for each tt with only ∫bˉB2(t) dt<∞\int\bar b_B^2(t)\,dt<\infty — the latter allowing rather strong singularities in time, unlike the form-bounded class. The author indicates a proof strategy via the paper's Theorem 5.3 but does not supply it. In the subsequent book-length account (arXiv:2605.03236), Krylov proves strong existence for exactly this drift decomposition (Theorem 6.8.2) but under additional hypotheses: the Morrey part and DσD\sigma must also satisfy spatial Morrey bounds uniform in tt (which excludes time singularities of the Morrey part), and σ\sigma must satisfy a structural condition under which spatial mollification preserves uniform nondegeneracy. The conjecture in its stated generality is what remains.

Problem Statement

Fix d≥2d\ge2, d1≥dd_1\ge d, δ∈(0,1]\delta\in(0,1], p0∈(2,2+d]p_0\in(2,2+d], and ρ0∈(0,∞)\rho_0\in(0,\infty). Let Cr\mathbb{C}_r denote the collection of parabolic cylinders Cr(t,x)=[t,t+r2)×Br(x)C_r(t,x)=[t,t+r^2)\times B_r(x) in Rd+1\mathbb{R}^{d+1}, where Br(x)B_r(x) is the Euclidean ball. Let σ\sigma be a Borel d×d1d\times d_1 matrix-valued function on Rd+1\mathbb{R}^{d+1} such that a=σσ∗a=\sigma\sigma^* is SδS_\delta-valued (symmetric matrices with eigenvalues in [δ,δ−1][\delta,\delta^{-1}]) and Dσ∈L1,loc(Rd+1)D\sigma\in L_{1,\mathrm{loc}}(\mathbb{R}^{d+1}), and let b=bM+bBb=b_M+b_B with Borel Rd\mathbb{R}^d-valued summands. Define Dσ^p0,ρ0=sup⁡r≤ρ0  rsup⁡C∈Cr(1∣C∣∫C∣Dσ∣p0 dxdt)1/p0,b^M,p0,ρ0=sup⁡r≤ρ0  rsup⁡C∈Cr(1∣C∣∫C∣bM∣p0 dxdt)1/p0,\widehat{D\sigma}_{p_0,\rho_0}=\sup_{r\le\rho_0}\;r\sup_{C\in\mathbb{C}_r}\Big(\frac{1}{|C|}\int_C|D\sigma|^{p_0}\,dxdt\Big)^{1/p_0},\qquad\hat b_{M,p_0,\rho_0}=\sup_{r\le\rho_0}\;r\sup_{C\in\mathbb{C}_r}\Big(\frac{1}{|C|}\int_C|b_M|^{p_0}\,dxdt\Big)^{1/p_0}, bˉB(t)=sup⁡x∈Rd∣bB(t,x)∣.\bar b_B(t)=\sup_{x\in\mathbb{R}^d}|b_B(t,x)|. Conjecture (Krylov, arXiv:2602.08130): there exists a constant N0=N0(d,δ,p0)N_0=N_0(d,\delta,p_0) such that, if N0(Dσ^p0,ρ0+b^M,p0,ρ0)≤1and∫RbˉB2(t) dt<∞,N_0\big(\widehat{D\sigma}_{p_0,\rho_0}+\hat b_{M,p_0,\rho_0}\big)\le1\qquad\text{and}\qquad\int_{\mathbb{R}}\bar b_B^2(t)\,dt<\infty, then for every t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R} and x∈Rdx\in\mathbb{R}^d the equation xs=x+∫0sσ(t+r,xr) dwr+∫0s(bM+bB)(t+r,xr) drx_s=x+\int_0^s\sigma(t+r,x_r)\,dw_r+\int_0^s\big(b_M+b_B\big)(t+r,x_r)\,dr has a solution {xs}\{x_s\} adapted to the filtration of ww, i.e. xsx_s is Fsw\mathcal{F}_s^w-measurable for every s≥0s\ge0, where Fsw\mathcal{F}_s^w is the completion of σ{wr,r≤s}\sigma\{w_r,r\le s\} and ww is the driving d1d_1-dimensional Wiener process. Prove this conjecture, or refute it by exhibiting coefficients satisfying all the stated assumptions for which no {Fsw}\{\mathcal{F}_s^w\}-adapted solution exists. The resolution must use only the stated hypotheses: no smoothness of σ\sigma or bb, no Morrey bounds uniform in time, and no structural assumption on σ\sigma beyond a=σσ∗∈Sδa=\sigma\sigma^*\in S_\delta and Dσ∈L1,locD\sigma\in L_{1,\mathrm{loc}}.

References

  1. N. V. Krylov, On the parabolic Adams theorem and its applications to diffusion processes, arXiv:2602.08130 (2026), DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2602.08130, https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.08130
  2. N. V. Krylov, Stochastic Itô Equations and Parabolic Second-Order Equations with singular Drift, arXiv:2605.03236 (2026), DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2605.03236, https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.03236
  3. N. V. Krylov, On strong solutions of time inhomogeneous Itô's equations with Morrey diffusion gradient and drift. A supercritical case, Stochastic Process. Appl. 185 (2025), Paper No. 104619, DOI 10.1016/j.spa.2025.104619, arXiv:2211.03719, https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.03719
  4. M. Röckner, G. Zhao, SDEs with critical time dependent drifts: strong solutions, Probab. Theory Related Fields 192 (2025), no. 3-4, 1071-1111, DOI 10.1007/s00440-025-01390-9, arXiv:2103.05803, https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.05803
  5. D. Kinzebulatov, K. R. Madou, Strong solutions of SDEs with singular (form-bounded) drift via Röckner-Zhao approach, Stoch. Dyn. 24 (2024), no. 7, Paper No. 2450050, DOI 10.1142/s0219493724500503, arXiv:2306.04825, https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.04825
  6. D. Kinzebulatov, C. Yue, Non-local SDEs, critical drifts and local blow-ups, arXiv:2606.02786 (2026), DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2606.02786, https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02786
  7. N. V. Krylov, On the heat equation with singular drift, arXiv:2604.11960 (2026), DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2604.11960, https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.11960