For the Dirichlet problem on a bounded smooth domain with a non-symmetric forcing term , the Bahri–Lions conjecture predicts infinitely many solutions for every throughout the subcritical range . Molle and Passaseo (2022) proved this for and, for , reduced it to a geometric uniformity condition on the bi-Lipschitz distortion of deformations of a tiling pattern (conditions (2.53)/(3.7)), which they could verify only in dimension one; for they proposed the localized variant (3.7) but did not verify it. The open problem is to establish the conjecture for on an arbitrary bounded smooth domain . The 2023 follow-up settles the conjecture only for cubes and special tessellable domains, by a method that bypasses rather than verifies the condition; the general-domain case remains open.
Background
Consider the model boundary-value problem in , on , where is a bounded smooth domain of , is a fixed forcing term, and is the subcritical range below the critical Sobolev exponent , the threshold for the compact embedding of the energy space into (for the critical exponent is infinite and the range is all finite ). When the nonlinearity is odd, the energy functional is even, and the symmetric mountain-pass theorem of Ambrosetti–Rabinowitz yields infinitely many solutions. The forcing term breaks the symmetry: solutions need not come in pairs, and infinite multiplicity is no longer automatic. (The Morse index of a solution is the maximal dimension of a subspace on which the second variation of the energy is negative definite; Bahri and Lions used lower bounds on it, combined with min–max constructions, to force the existence of many critical points.) Bahri (1981) proved that for a generic (open dense set of) there are infinitely many solutions in the full subcritical range; Bahri and Lions (1988), via Morse-index estimates on min–max critical points of the associated energy functional, proved infinite multiplicity for every but only in the smaller range , . The Bahri–Lions conjecture asserts that infinite multiplicity for every persists throughout the full subcritical range ; Ramos–Tavares–Zou (2009) revisited the 1988 theorem but the general full-range statement remained out of reach for general domains. Molle and Passaseo (2022) introduced a direct construction: for each they build a test configuration made of mutually interacting nodal regions (subdomains where the test function alternates sign) arranged by deforming a reference cubic tiling of (in dimension one, a subdivision of the interval), and minimize over a class of Lipschitz deformations of the tiling whose minimal bi-Lipschitz distortion constant — the least such that both and are -Lipschitz — is at most . Their Theorem 2.7 states that if there exists a distortion cap — where is a domain-dependent constant, defined in their (2.49) from the smoothness of , which guarantees that the class of surjective bi-Lipschitz deformations with is nonempty for all large — such that the minimizing deformations — defined by the two-step minimization of their (2.50)/(2.52), the strict inequality leaving room for the small bi-Lipschitz perturbations used in the proof of Proposition 2.8 — satisfy the uniformity condition
(the paper's condition (2.53)), then the subcritical problem has infinitely many solutions; Theorem 3.8 gives the analogous high-multiplicity statement, under the same condition (2.53) applied to the critical functional , for the critical problem with and . Lemma 2.9 verifies condition (2.53) for (where ), but for the class of all Lipschitz deformations is too large — equal-volume subdomains can still change shape, letting the distortion blow up — and the authors only introduce condition (3.7), a localized variant in which the deformations stay in a neighborhood of a fixed reference map (Remark 3.1 of the paper). They verify (3.7) only for (with the identity); for they note that (3.7) "seems to have more chances" than (2.53) to be satisfied, that it holds or fails depending on the choice of the cap , the reference map and the neighborhood radius , and they conjecture that by a suitable choice one should obtain infinitely many nodal solutions for every bounded domain. Thus for the multiplicity theorems are conditional: their uniformity hypothesis is verified only in dimension one, and not for a general bounded smooth domain .
Problem Statement
For the Dirichlet problem in a bounded domain () with arbitrary and (for : every finite ): prove that for every bounded smooth domain and every the problem admits infinitely many solutions throughout the full subcritical range — that is, settle the Bahri–Lions conjecture on arbitrary bounded smooth domains.
The 2023 cube result, which bypasses the condition via the cube's unique shape-factor minimization among polyhedra, does not answer this question: the general bounded smooth domain case remains open, whether it is reached by extending such a uniformity mechanism beyond cubes and the tessellable special classes or by any other proof of the conjecture. The analogous critical-exponent question — the critical problem with and (the exponent corresponding to ) on general domains — is a related question beyond this target.
References
- Riccardo Molle and Donato Passaseo, "Infinitely many solutions for elliptic equations with non-symmetric nonlinearities", Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations 61(3), art. 115 (2022). DOI: 10.1007/s00526-022-02223-6; arXiv:2112.02298; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-022-02223-6
- Riccardo Molle and Donato Passaseo, "On the Bahri–Lions conjecture for elliptic equations with non-symmetric nonlinearities", Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations 62(6), art. 177 (2023). DOI: 10.1007/s00526-023-02507-5; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-023-02507-5
- A. Bahri and P.-L. Lions, "Morse index of some min-max critical points. I. Application to multiplicity results", Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 41(8), 1027–1037 (1988). DOI: 10.1002/cpa.3160410803; https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160410803
- M. Ramos, H. Tavares, and W. Zou, "A Bahri–Lions theorem revisited", Advances in Mathematics 222(6), 2173–2195 (2009). DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2009.07.013; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2009.07.013