This problem concerns the open ends left by Dias (Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 145, 2017) in the study of Dziobek configurations, i.e. (n−2)(n-2)-dimensional central configurations of the nn-body problem with homogeneous potentials UaU_a. Of the remarks recorded in that paper, the resultant/cyclotomic obstruction concerns only an alternative proof technique (the same paper's Theorem 6.8 already proves generic finiteness for every semi-integer exponent, and Dias's 2026 Veronese-geometry preprint states generic finiteness for all real exponents a≠0a\neq 0 over the real mass space, outside an exceptional algebraic locus), and the 'extraneous components' remark is auxiliary. The open core is the paper's Remark 6.9: do continua of (n−2)(n-2)-dimensional central configurations with mixed-sign mass vectors exist for the potentials UaU_a, and can they be produced through points of W3a∩V~aW_3^a\cap\widetilde V^a of local dimension greater than nn? Adjacent results (Roberts' planar five-body continuum with one negative mass; Alfaro-Perez-Chavela's charged four-body continua with positive masses and charges of both signs) do not settle the Dziobek case. The question remains open.

Background

For nn point particles at positions x1,…,xnx_1,\dots,x_n in Rd\mathbb{R}^d with masses m1,…,mnm_1,\dots,m_n, consider the family of homogeneous pair potentials

Ua(x)=∑i<jmimj2a+2 rij2a+2,2a∈Z,  a≠−1,U_a(x)=\sum_{i<j}\frac{m_i m_j}{2a+2}\,r_{ij}^{2a+2},\qquad 2a\in\mathbb{Z},\; a\neq-1,

where rij=∥xi−xj∥r_{ij}=\lVert x_i-x_j\rVert and a=−3/2a=-3/2 gives the Newtonian nn-body problem (the logarithmic potential replaces this at a=−1a=-1). A configuration xx is a central configuration if there is a constant λ≠0\lambda\neq 0 with ∑i≠jmirij2a(xi−xj)+λ(xj−c)=0\sum_{i\neq j}m_i r_{ij}^{2a}(x_i-x_j)+\lambda(x_j-c)=0 for every jj, where cc is the center of mass: the gravitational force on each particle is then proportional to its displacement from cc, so such configurations are exactly the initial shapes of homographic (e.g. rigidly rotating) solutions. Central configurations are counted up to translation, rotation, reflection, and dilation; whether the number of classes is finite for every choice of positive masses is the classical finiteness problem, which appears on Smale's 1998 list of problems for the twenty-first century. It is fully settled only for n=3n=3, with finiteness for all positive masses known for planar four-body configurations (Hampton-Moeckel). A configuration is named by its dimension δ(x)\delta(x), the dimension of the smallest affine space containing the particles; the (n−2)(n-2)-dimensional central configurations are called Dziobek configurations (for n=4n=4 these are exactly the planar ones). Moeckel proved that for n≥4n\geq 4 the Newtonian Dziobek configurations are generically finite: there is a proper Zariski closed subset BB of the positive mass cone such that every mass vector outside BB admits only finitely many classes. Dias extended this to every semi-integer exponent a≠0a\neq 0 as follows. Introducing the coordinates (r,z,Δ0,m)(r,z,\Delta_0,m) — the mutual distances, auxiliary quantities ziz_i arising from the Dziobek equations, a scaling variable Δ0\Delta_0, and the masses — one defines a quasi-affine algebraic set V~a⊂Cq+2n+1\widetilde V^a\subset\mathbb{C}^{q+2n+1} (q=n(n−1)/2q=n(n-1)/2) by polynomial equations gija=0g_{ij}^a=0 expressing the Dziobek relations between the mutual distances and the ziz_i, the Cayley-Menger determinant F=0F=0 (the determinant of the bordered (n+1)×(n+1)(n+1)\times(n+1) matrix of squared mutual distances, whose vanishing encodes affine dimension n−2n-2), and moment equations Γl=0\Gamma_l=0 expressing the central-configuration equations in mutual distances; every Dziobek central configuration maps into it. Degenerate loci W1W_1 (some rij=0r_{ij}=0), W2W_2 (vanishing Cayley-Menger cofactors Fij=0F_{ij}=0), and W3aW_3^a (simultaneous vanishing of the polynomials Ψia\Psi_i^a, linear forms in the ziz_i whose coefficients are products of mutual distances times partial derivatives of FF) are removed to obtain VaV^a, and a Jacobian-criterion computation gives dim⁡Va≤n\dim V^a\leq n, from which generic finiteness of the fibres of the projection to mass space follows (Theorem 6.8). The positivity of the masses enters this argument essentially: it is what forces the Ψia\Psi_i^a not to vanish simultaneously at configuration points (Propositions 4.3 and 4.4, whose proofs reduce to strict positivity of masses, distances, and a nonzero constant α\alpha). In Remark 6.9 the author observes that with at least one negative mass these propositions fail, so no dimension bound on V~a\widetilde V^a near W3aW_3^a is available, and conjectures that continua of Dziobek configurations with mixed-sign masses might be produced by searching points P∈W3a∩V~aP\in W_3^a\cap\widetilde V^a with dim⁡PV~a>n\dim_P\widetilde V^a>n, whose fibres over the mass space would then be positive-dimensional. A subsequent preprint of Dias (the Veronese-geometry paper, arXiv:2601.07962) reframes the construction through the Veronese embedding — the map sending a vector of mutual distances to all its monomials of a fixed degree, which turns the algebraic analysis of V~a\widetilde V^a into the study of a Dziobek-Veronese variety — and states generic finiteness with a uniform Bezout-type bound 2(n+12)+n−12^{\binom{n+1}{2}+n-1} for all real exponents a≠0a\neq 0 and all real mass vectors outside an exceptional algebraic locus; since this is exactly a generic statement over the real mass space, any mixed-sign continuum would have to live on the exceptional locus, and the existence question is untouched. Nearby degeneracy phenomena are known: Roberts constructed a continuum of planar relative equilibria for the five-body Newtonian problem with one negative mass (persisting for the logarithmic point-vortex potential), Alfaro and Perez-Chavela found continua of central configurations in charged four-body problems with positive masses carrying electric charges of both signs (so that the effective pair interactions are of mixed sign, but not signed masses in a potential UaU_a), and Santoprete exhibited a three-body continuum for the harmonic potential U=MI/2U=MI/2, which in the normalization above is the degenerate exponent a=0a=0 at which every configuration is central. None of these produces a continuum in the Dziobek class for a potential UaU_a with a≠0a\neq 0 and genuinely signed masses.

Problem Statement

For n≥4n\geq 4 and a semi-integer exponent aa with 2a∈Z2a\in\mathbb{Z} and a≠0a\neq 0 (at a=−1a=-1, UaU_a denotes the logarithmic potential, as in the Background), determine whether there exists a mixed-sign mass vector m=(m1,…,mn)∈Rnm=(m_1,\dots,m_n)\in\mathbb{R}^n — at least one positive and at least one negative component, total mass M≠0M\neq 0, all mutual distances nonzero — for which the set of equivalence classes of (n−2)(n-2)-dimensional central configurations of the potential UaU_a contains a continuum. The two alternatives are a continuum of equivalence classes for a single exponent aa and a single mixed-sign mass vector mm, and finiteness of the set of equivalence classes for every semi-integer exponent a≠0a\neq 0, every n≥4n\geq 4, and every mixed-sign mass vector m∈Rnm\in\mathbb{R}^n; the exceptional locus of the mass space is not excluded, since the finiteness claimed for all real exponents a≠0a\neq 0 outside a proper algebraic locus of the real mass space by the Veronese-geometry preprint of Dias leaves that locus open. Remark 6.9 of Dias 2017 also asks, in the same mixed-sign setting and as a question in its own right, whether continua of (n−2)(n-2)-dimensional central configurations with mixed-sign masses can be constructed through points P∈W3a∩V~aP\in W_3^a\cap\widetilde V^a with dim⁡PV~a>n\dim_P\widetilde V^a>n whose fibres under the projection (r,z,Δ0,m)↦m(r,z,\Delta_0,m)\mapsto m are positive-dimensional, where V~a\widetilde V^a and W3aW_3^a are the loci defined in the Background. The first open case is n=4n=4, where (n−2)(n-2)-dimensional means planar.

References

  1. Thiago Dias, New equations for central configurations and generic finiteness, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 145 (2017), no. 7, 3069–3084. DOI: 10.1090/proc/13427, https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/13427 (preprint arXiv:1508.06593, https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.06593)
  2. Richard Moeckel, Generic finiteness for Dziobek configurations, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 353 (2001), no. 11, 4673–4686. DOI: 10.1090/S0002-9947-01-02828-8, https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-01-02828-8
  3. Marshall Hampton and Richard Moeckel, Finiteness of relative equilibria of the four-body problem, Inventiones Mathematicae 163 (2006), no. 2, 289–312. DOI: 10.1007/s00222-005-0461-0, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-005-0461-0
  4. Gareth E. Roberts, A continuum of relative equilibria in the five-body problem, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 127 (1999), no. 3–4, 141–145. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-2789(98)00315-7, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2789(98)00315-7
  5. Felipe Alfaro and Ernesto Perez-Chavela, Families of continua of central configurations in charged problems, Dynamics of Continuous, Discrete and Impulsive Systems. Series A. Mathematical Analysis 9 (2002), no. 4, 463-475. zbMATH: 1045.70009, https://zbmath.org/?q=an%3A1045.70009
  6. Manuele Santoprete, A counterexample to a generalized Saari's conjecture with a continuum of central configurations, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 89 (2004), no. 4, 357–364. DOI: 10.1023/b:cele.0000043575.00445.21, https://doi.org/10.1023/b:cele.0000043575.00445.21 (preprint arXiv:0909.4904, https://arxiv.org/abs/0909.4904)
  7. Steve Smale, Mathematical problems for the next century, The Mathematical Intelligencer 20 (1998), no. 2, 7–15. DOI: 10.1007/BF03025291, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03025291
  8. Thiago Dias, The Veronese Geometry of Dziobek Configurations and Generic Finiteness for Homogeneous Potentials, preprint (2026). arXiv: 2601.07962, https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.07962
  9. Thiago Dias and Bo-Yu Pan, Generic finiteness for a class of symmetric planar central configurations of the six-body problem and the six-vortex problem, Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations 32 (2020), no. 4, 1579–1602. DOI: 10.1007/s10884-019-09765-y, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-019-09765-y
  10. Thiago Dias and Ya-Lun Tsai, Generalized Laura-Andoyer equations and the enumeration of some symmetrical classes of Dziobek configurations, preprint (2026). arXiv: 2606.31582, https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.31582
  11. Eduardo S. G. Leandro, Moments, equilibrium equations, and mutual distances, preprint (2025, revised 2026). arXiv: 2507.13865, https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.13865
  12. Yangshanshan Liu and Shiqing Zhang, Stacked central configurations with a homogeneous potential in R3\mathbb{R}^3, SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems 22 (2023), no. 2, 635-656. DOI: 10.1137/22m1495032, https://doi.org/10.1137/22m1495032
  13. Thiago Dias, Brehm-Wintner-Conley Dimension, Plucker Coordinates, and Generalized Dziobek-Williams Equations for Central Configurations, preprint (2026). arXiv: 2608.07771, https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07771