Pujari (2018) introduced the volume deficiency δV(a)=1−lim sup⁡r→∞V(r,a)/T(r,f)\delta_V(a)=1-\limsup_{r\to\infty}V(r,a)/T(r,f) for meromorphic maps from the complex plane into an infinite-dimensional complex Banach space EE with a Schauder basis, where the volume function V(r,a)V(r,a) is the new term generated by the Laplacian of log⁡∥f−a∥\log\|f-a\|, which has no counterpart in scalar Nevanlinna theory. Her finiteness bound (at most (4−2δG)/η(4-2\delta_G)/\eta completely multiple values with δV(a)≥η\delta_V(a)\ge\eta for admissible maps of compact projection, and at most (2−2δG)/η(2-2\delta_G)/\eta in the entire case, where δG\delta_G is the Ricci index) and her countability theorem for the deficiency set E(δV)E(\delta_V) (conditional on countability of the auxiliary set E(ΔN‾)E(\Delta_{\overline N})) rest on the structural hypotheses of admissibility, compact projection, and a Schauder basis on EE, while her deficiency-sum inequalities hold for arbitrary EE-valued meromorphic maps under the vanishing counting hypothesis N(r,a)/T(r,f)→0N(r,a)/T(r,f)\to 0 for every aa. The open problem is to determine which of these finiteness, countability, and sum phenomena survive without their hypotheses or under weaker conditions on the Banach space or the map, to characterize when the auxiliary deficiency set E(ΔN‾)E(\Delta_{\overline N}) is countable, and to decide whether the Ricci-index-dependent constants are sharp.

Background

Classical Nevanlinna theory describes the value distribution of a scalar meromorphic function ff on the complex plane through its characteristic function T(r,f)=m(r,f)+N(r,f)T(r,f)=m(r,f)+N(r,f), where m(r,f)=12π∫02πlog⁡+∣f(reiφ)∣ dφm(r,f)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}\log^+|f(re^{i\varphi})|\,d\varphi measures the size of ff on circles and N(r,f)N(r,f) counts poles (an integrated counting function: for a discrete set with counting function n(t)n(t), the associated NN is ∫0rn(t) dt/t\int_0^r n(t)\,dt/t). The second fundamental theorem implies the deficiency relation ∑aδ(a)≤2\sum_a \delta(a)\le 2 for the Nevanlinna deficiency δ(a)=1−lim sup⁡r→∞N(r,a)/T(r,f)\delta(a)=1-\limsup_{r\to\infty}N(r,a)/T(r,f), from which it follows that the set of deficient values is at most countable and that for each η>0\eta>0 only finitely many values (at most 2/η2/\eta) can have δ(a)≥η\delta(a)\ge\eta; a value aa is called completely multiple if every solution of f(z)=af(z)=a has multiplicity at least 22, and ramification versions of the second fundamental theorem bound the number of such values.

This theory has been extended to vector-valued maps. Ziegler (1982) developed Nevanlinna theory for meromorphic maps into Cn\mathbb C^n; Hu and collaborators (the book of Hu and Yang, 1992, and Hu and Hu, 2006) extended the first and second fundamental theorems to maps into an infinite-dimensional complex Banach space EE equipped with a Schauder basis, i.e. a sequence (ej)(e_j) such that every x∈Ex\in E has a unique norm-convergent expansion x=∑jxjejx=\sum_j x_j e_j. A map f:C→Ef:\mathbb C\to E is called EE-valued meromorphic if each component function fjf_j (the coefficient of eje_j) is meromorphic. The characteristic is defined as in the scalar case with the norm in place of the modulus, m(r,f)=12π∫02πlog⁡+∥f(reiφ)∥ dφm(r,f)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}\log^+\|f(re^{i\varphi})\|\,d\varphi, and for a∈Ea\in E one has the counting function N(r,a)N(r,a) of aa-points (with multiplicity) and its reduced version N‾(r,a)\overline N(r,a) (ignoring multiplicity).

The extension produces one genuinely new object. For scalar ff, log⁡∣f−a∣\log|f-a| is harmonic away from the aa-points, so its Laplacian is a purely point measure carried by those points; for a norm, log⁡∥f(z)−a∥\log\|f(z)-a\| is merely subharmonic and its Laplacian carries a diffuse positive mass spread over the plane. The integrated Laplacian

v(t,a)=12π∫∣ξ∣<tΔlog⁡∥f(ξ)−a∥ dσ dτ,V(r,a)=∫0rv(t,a)t dt,v(t,a)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{|\xi|<t}\Delta\log\|f(\xi)-a\|\,d\sigma\,d\tau, \qquad V(r,a)=\int_0^r \frac{v(t,a)}{t}\,dt,

defines the volume function V(r,a)V(r,a), which enters the EE-valued first and second fundamental theorems alongside the counting terms (the same VV already appears in the EE-valued Borel-exceptional-value theory of Bhoosnurmath and Pujari, 2010). The volume deficiency is δV(a)=1−lim sup⁡r→∞V(r,a)/T(r,f)\delta_V(a)=1-\limsup_{r\to\infty}V(r,a)/T(r,f), and one also considers δ(a)=1−lim sup⁡r→∞(V(r,a)+N(r,a))/T(r,f)\delta(a)=1-\limsup_{r\to\infty}(V(r,a)+N(r,a))/T(r,f), the counting deficiencies δN(a)=lim inf⁡N(r,a)/T(r,f)\delta_N(a)=\liminf N(r,a)/T(r,f) and ΔN(a)=lim sup⁡N(r,a)/T(r,f)\Delta_N(a)=\limsup N(r,a)/T(r,f) (similarly δN‾,ΔN‾\delta_{\overline N},\Delta_{\overline N} with N‾\overline N), and Θ(a)=1−lim sup⁡r→∞(V(r,a)+N‾(r,a))/T(r,f)\Theta(a)=1-\limsup_{r\to\infty}(V(r,a)+\overline N(r,a))/T(r,f).

The infinite-dimensional theory depends on two structural hypotheses. First, ff is of compact projection if the coordinate projections PnfP_n f (PnP_n projects onto span⁡(e1,…,en)\operatorname{span}(e_1,\dots,e_n)) converge to ff uniformly on every compact subset of the domain; compact projection is what lets the finite-dimensional second fundamental theorem be passed to the limit. Second, ff is admissible (in the convention of this line of work) if along some sequence rγ→∞r_\gamma\to\infty the error term S(rγ)S(r_\gamma) of the second fundamental theorem satisfies S(rγ)/T(rγ,f)→0S(r_\gamma)/T(r_\gamma,f)\to 0, the standard device for neutralizing that error term. Finally, the curvature function G(r,f)=∫0rdt2πt∫∣ξ∣<tΔlog⁡∥f′(ξ)∥ dσ dτG(r,f)=\int_0^r\frac{dt}{2\pi t}\int_{|\xi|<t}\Delta\log\|f'(\xi)\|\,d\sigma\,d\tau plays the role of counting the spherical derivative, and its Ricci index δG=lim inf⁡r→∞G(r,f)/T(r,f)\delta_G=\liminf_{r\to\infty}G(r,f)/T(r,f) enters the EE-valued deficiency relations in place of part of the classical ramification bookkeeping.

Within this framework, deficiency relations for EE-valued maps were obtained by Wu and Xuan (2012, 2013) and Wu and Chen (2013), all for finite-order admissible maps of compact projection. Pujari (2018) then initiated the theory of the volume deficiency itself: she proved that v(r,a)v(r,a) and V(r,a)V(r,a) are non-negative and increasing and that VV is convex in log⁡r\log r; that V(⋅,a)≡0V(\cdot,a)\equiv 0 exactly when ff has an essentially scalar image, f(z)=a+λ(z)bf(z)=a+\lambda(z)b with λ\lambda scalar meromorphic and b∈Eb\in E fixed; the two-sided comparisons δN(a)+δ(a)≤δV(a)≤ΔN(a)+δ(a)\delta_N(a)+\delta(a)\le\delta_V(a)\le\Delta_N(a)+\delta(a) and δN‾(a)+Θ(a)≤δV(a)≤ΔN‾(a)+Θ(a)\delta_{\overline N}(a)+\Theta(a)\le\delta_V(a)\le\Delta_{\overline N}(a)+\Theta(a); the finiteness bounds stated in the abstract; the countability theorem that, for admissible maps of compact projection, E(δV)E(\delta_V) is countable whenever the auxiliary set E(ΔN‾)={a:ΔN‾(a)>0}E(\Delta_{\overline N})=\{a:\Delta_{\overline N}(a)>0\} is countable, and conversely countability of E(δV)E(\delta_V) forces countability of E(δN‾)E(\delta_{\overline N}); and deficiency-sum inequalities such as ∑a∈EδV(a)+δG≤1+lim sup⁡r→∞N‾(r,f)/T(r,f)\sum_{a\in E}\delta_V(a)+\delta_G\le 1+\limsup_{r\to\infty}\overline N(r,f)/T(r,f), which hold for arbitrary EE-valued meromorphic maps under the vanishing counting hypothesis N(r,a)/T(r,f)→0N(r,a)/T(r,f)\to 0 for every aa. What remains unsettled is precisely the robustness and optimality of this edifice: the finiteness and countability conclusions lean on admissibility, compact projection, and the Schauder basis, the sum inequalities lean on the vanishing counting hypothesis, and nothing is known about the sharpness of the numerical constants.

Problem Statement

Let EE be an infinite-dimensional complex Banach space with a Schauder basis (a sequence (ej)(e_j) in EE such that every x∈Ex\in E has a unique norm-convergent expansion x=∑jxjejx=\sum_j x_j e_j) and let f:C→Ef:\mathbb C\to E be a non-constant EE-valued meromorphic function (each component function fjf_j, the coefficient of eje_j, meromorphic; the theory extends verbatim to maps from a disc ∣z∣<R≤∞|z|<R\le\infty, and the deficiency questions below concern the plane case R=∞R=\infty). Using the characteristic T(r,f)=m(r,f)+N(r,f)T(r,f)=m(r,f)+N(r,f) with m(r,f)=12π∫02πlog⁡+∥f(reiφ)∥ dφm(r,f)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi}\log^+\|f(re^{i\varphi})\|\,d\varphi, the counting functions N(r,a)N(r,a) (with multiplicity) and N‾(r,a)\overline N(r,a) (reduced) of aa-points for a∈E∪{∞}a\in E\cup\{\infty\}, the volume function V(r,a)=∫0rv(t,a)t dtV(r,a)=\int_0^r\frac{v(t,a)}{t}\,dt with v(t,a)=12π∫∣ξ∣<tΔlog⁡∥f(ξ)−a∥ dσ dτv(t,a)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{|\xi|<t}\Delta\log\|f(\xi)-a\|\,d\sigma\,d\tau, the volume deficiency δV(a)=1−lim sup⁡r→∞V(r,a)/T(r,f)\delta_V(a)=1-\limsup_{r\to\infty}V(r,a)/T(r,f), the curvature function G(r,f)=∫0rdt2πt∫∣ξ∣<tΔlog⁡∥f′(ξ)∥ dσ dτG(r,f)=\int_0^r\frac{dt}{2\pi t}\int_{|\xi|<t}\Delta\log\|f'(\xi)\|\,d\sigma\,d\tau with Ricci index δG=lim inf⁡r→∞G(r,f)/T(r,f)\delta_G=\liminf_{r\to\infty}G(r,f)/T(r,f), the further deficiencies δ(a)=1−lim sup⁡r→∞(V(r,a)+N(r,a))/T(r,f)\delta(a)=1-\limsup_{r\to\infty}(V(r,a)+N(r,a))/T(r,f), Θ(a)=1−lim sup⁡r→∞(V(r,a)+N‾(r,a))/T(r,f)\Theta(a)=1-\limsup_{r\to\infty}(V(r,a)+\overline N(r,a))/T(r,f), δN(a)=lim inf⁡r→∞N(r,a)/T(r,f)\delta_N(a)=\liminf_{r\to\infty}N(r,a)/T(r,f), ΔN(a)=lim sup⁡r→∞N(r,a)/T(r,f)\Delta_N(a)=\limsup_{r\to\infty}N(r,a)/T(r,f), δN‾(a)=lim inf⁡r→∞N‾(r,a)/T(r,f)\delta_{\overline N}(a)=\liminf_{r\to\infty}\overline N(r,a)/T(r,f), and ΔN‾(a)=lim sup⁡r→∞N‾(r,a)/T(r,f)\Delta_{\overline N}(a)=\limsup_{r\to\infty}\overline N(r,a)/T(r,f), the deficiency sets E(δV)={a:δV(a)>0}E(\delta_V)=\{a:\delta_V(a)>0\}, E(ΔN‾)={a:ΔN‾(a)>0}E(\Delta_{\overline N})=\{a:\Delta_{\overline N}(a)>0\}, and E(δN‾)={a:δN‾(a)>0}E(\delta_{\overline N})=\{a:\delta_{\overline N}(a)>0\} (similarly for the other functionals), and calling aa completely multiple when every aa-point has multiplicity at least 22 (the multiplicity of an aa-point z0z_0 is the order of vanishing of f−af-a at z0z_0, i.e. the least integer m≥1m\ge 1 such that (f−a)(m)(z0)≠0(f-a)^{(m)}(z_0)\neq 0; for a=∞a=\infty it is the order of the pole), Pujari (2018) proved, for admissible ff of compact projection (admissibility: S(rγ)/T(rγ,f)→0S(r_\gamma)/T(r_\gamma,f)\to 0 along some rγ→∞r_\gamma\to\infty for the second-fundamental-theorem error term SS; compact projection: the coordinate projections PnfP_n f, with PnP_n the projection of EE onto span⁡(e1,…,en)\operatorname{span}(e_1,\dots,e_n), converge to ff uniformly on compact subsets of the domain):

(F) for every η\eta with 0<η≤10<\eta\le 1 there are at most (4−2δG)/η(4-2\delta_G)/\eta distinct points a∈E∪{∞}a\in E\cup\{\infty\} that are completely multiple for ff and satisfy δV(a)≥η\delta_V(a)\ge\eta; if ff is entire, the bound improves to (2−2δG)/η(2-2\delta_G)/\eta;

(C) if E(ΔN‾)E(\Delta_{\overline N}) is countable then E(δV)E(\delta_V) is countable, and conversely, if E(δV)E(\delta_V) is countable then E(δN‾)E(\delta_{\overline N}) is countable;

and, separately, for an arbitrary EE-valued meromorphic ff (no admissibility or compact projection assumed) under the vanishing counting hypothesis N(r,a)/T(r,f)→0N(r,a)/T(r,f)\to 0 for every a∈E∪{∞}a\in E\cup\{\infty\}:

(S) the sum inequalities ∑a∈EδV(a)+δG≤1+lim sup⁡r→∞N‾(r,f)/T(r,f)\sum_{a\in E}\delta_V(a)+\delta_G\le 1+\limsup_{r\to\infty}\overline N(r,f)/T(r,f) (and the analogous inequalities for ∑δ(a)\sum\delta(a) and ∑Θ(a)\sum\Theta(a)) hold, and in this regime δ(a)=δV(a)=Θ(a)\delta(a)=\delta_V(a)=\Theta(a) with E(δV)E(\delta_V) countable.

The common scientific objective of the problem is to determine the robustness and optimality of this volume-deficiency theory: decide, for each of the result families (F), (C), and (S), whether it is a genuine infinite-dimensional phenomenon or an artifact of its auxiliary structural hypotheses, and settle the optimality of the numerical constants. Concretely:

(Q1) Hypothesis necessity and extension. For an EE-valued meromorphic ff (with EE as above) that fails admissibility or fails compact projection: does (F), or the countability conclusion of (C), fail, or can these conclusions (possibly with modified constants) be proven for all EE-valued meromorphic maps, or under explicitly weaker hypotheses on ff or on EE? For (S), which is already available for arbitrary EE-valued meromorphic maps, the corresponding open regime is whether its vanishing counting hypothesis can be weakened or dropped. In particular, characterize the maps or spaces for which the auxiliary set E(ΔN‾)E(\Delta_{\overline N}) is countable - the condition on which the source countability theorem leans - including whether an EE-valued meromorphic map with uncountable E(ΔN‾)E(\Delta_{\overline N}) or uncountable E(δV)E(\delta_V) exists.

(Q2) Sharpness. Are the constants (4−2δG)/η(4-2\delta_G)/\eta and (2−2δG)/η(2-2\delta_G)/\eta in (F) best possible - that is, can 44 or 22 be replaced by a smaller constant while the corresponding bound remains valid for every admissible compact-projection map (respectively, for every such entire map)? In particular, already for admissible compact-projection maps with δG=0\delta_G=0: for each η\eta with 0<η≤10<\eta\le 1, does there exist such a map (entire, for the second constant; the map may depend on η\eta) with at least ⌊4/η⌋\lfloor 4/\eta\rfloor (respectively ⌊2/η⌋\lfloor 2/\eta\rfloor) completely multiple values of volume deficiency at least η\eta, so that the constants 44 and 22 cannot be decreased - or can the bounds be improved, with or without additional geometric hypotheses on the norm of EE?

The problem therefore has two parts, (Q1) and (Q2), which are posed jointly.

References

  1. Veena L. Pujari, Volume deficiency of E-valued meromorphic functions, The Journal of Analysis 26(1):103-117 (2018). DOI: 10.1007/s41478-017-0071-4, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41478-017-0071-4 (zbMATH Zbl 1395.30037)
  2. Subhas S. Bhoosnurmath, Veena L. Pujari, E-valued Borel exceptional values of meromorphic functions, International Journal of Mathematical Analysis 4(42):2089-2099 (2010). zbMATH Zbl 1218.30074, https://www.m-hikari.com/ijma/ijma-2010/ijma-41-44-2010/bhoosnurIJMA41-44-2010.pdf
  3. Chuan-Gan Hu, Qijian Hu, The Nevanlinna's theorems for a class, Complex Variables and Elliptic Equations 51(8-11):777-791 (2006). DOI: 10.1080/17476930600667510, https://doi.org/10.1080/17476930600667510 (zbMATH Zbl 1183.30027)
  4. Chuang-Gan Hu, Chung-Chun Yang, Vector-valued functions and their applications, Mathematics and Its Applications (Chinese Series) 3, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1992). zbMATH Zbl 0763.30001, https://zbmath.org/?q=an%3A0763.30001
  5. H. J. W. Ziegler, Vector valued Nevanlinna theory, Research Notes in Mathematics 73, Pitman Advanced Publishing Program, Boston (1982). zbMATH Zbl 0496.30026, https://zbmath.org/?q=an%3A0496.30026
  6. Zu-Xing Xuan, Nan Wu, On the Nevanlinna's theory for vector-valued mappings, Abstract and Applied Analysis 2010, Article ID 864539 (2010). DOI: 10.1155/2010/864539, https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/864539 (zbMATH Zbl 1194.30035)
  7. Zhaojun Wu, Zuxing Xuan, Deficiency of E-valued meromorphic functions, Bulletin of the Belgian Mathematical Society - Simon Stevin 19(4):703-715 (2012). DOI: 10.36045/bbms/1353695910, https://doi.org/10.36045/bbms/1353695910 (zbMATH Zbl 1318.30054)
  8. Zhaojun Wu, Zuxing Xuan, Deficiency and relative deficiency of E-valued meromorphic functions, Applied Mathematics E-Notes 13:100-108 (2013). zbMATH Zbl 1291.30222, https://www.math.nthu.edu.tw/~amen/2013/130509(final).pdf
  9. Zhaojun Wu, Yuxian Chen, E-valued meromorphic functions with maximal deficiency sum, Applied Mathematics E-Notes 13:141-147 (2013). zbMATH Zbl 1291.30221, https://www.math.nthu.edu.tw/~amen/2013/130408(finish).pdf
  10. Nan Wu, Zu-Xing Xuan, Spread relation of E-valued meromorphic functions and its application, Georgian Mathematical Journal 26(1):141-148 (2019). DOI: 10.1515/gmj-2017-0035, https://doi.org/10.1515/gmj-2017-0035 (zbMATH Zbl 1418.30025)
  11. Ashok Rathod, Shreekant Patil, Some results on value distribution theory for E-valued meromorphic function, Jnanabha 52(1):246-261 (2022). DOI: 10.58250/jnanabha.2022.52131, https://doi.org/10.58250/jnanabha.2022.52131 (zbMATH Zbl 1538.34354)
  12. V. Husna, Some results on uniqueness of meromorphic functions concerning differential polynomials, The Journal of Analysis 29(4):1191-1206 (2021). DOI: 10.1007/s41478-021-00305-w, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41478-021-00305-w (zbMATH Zbl 1483.30066)
  13. Rajeshwari S., Hypothesis of value distribution and its associated problems of infinite dimension, South East Asian Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences 16(2):297-304 (2020). https://rsmams.org/journals/articleinfo.php?articleid=475&tag=seajmams (zbMATH Zbl 1463.30163)