For a weighted projective space CPn(q)\mathbb{C}P^n(\mathbf{q}) with its standard symplectic orbifold structure, the real part RPn(q)\mathbb{R}P^n(\mathbf{q}) is a Lagrangian suborbifold, and Guangcun Lu proved the Arnold-type Lagrangian intersection estimate (AC2) for the pair (CPn(q),RPn(q))(\mathbb{C}P^n(\mathbf{q}),\mathbb{R}P^n(\mathbf{q})) when all weights are odd, while proving the Hamiltonian fixed-point estimate (AC1) for arbitrary weights. Lu explicitly asked whether (AC2) continues to hold when some weights are even — the case in which the Z2\mathbb{Z}_2-equivariant minimax proof degenerates because the involution's fixed set and its complement are both infinite-dimensional, or, when all weights are even, because the involution is trivial. This record poses that question: prove or refute that every Hamiltonian time-one map ϕ1\phi_1 of CPn(q)\mathbb{C}P^n(\mathbf{q}) satisfies ♯(RPn(q)∩ϕ1(RPn(q)))≥CL(RPn(q);Z2)+1\sharp(\mathbb{R}P^n(\mathbf{q})\cap\phi_1(\mathbb{R}P^n(\mathbf{q})))\ge CL(\mathbb{R}P^n(\mathbf{q});\mathbb{Z}_2)+1, with the transverse lower bound ≥SB(RPn(q);Z2)\ge SB(\mathbb{R}P^n(\mathbf{q});\mathbb{Z}_2), for every weight vector with not-all-odd weights. The follow-up literature (2008–2026) leaves the question open: available orbifold Floer theory covers only torus fibers in toric orbifolds and global quotients, and the recently introduced dihedral-twisted-sector framework needed here is still foundational. Resolving the question requires Lagrangian Floer or Lusternik–Schnirelman theory on symplectic orbifolds for Lagrangians that meet the orbifold strata, or an explicit disjoining Hamiltonian.

Background

A symplectic orbifold is an orbifold — a space locally modeled on a quotient of Euclidean space by a finite group, with compatible charts — equipped with a closed, nondegenerate 2-form. Weighted projective spaces are the basic examples. For a tuple q=(q1,…,qn+1)\mathbf{q}=(q_1,\dots,q_{n+1}) of positive integers, the weighted projective space CPn(q)\mathbb{C}P^n(\mathbf{q}) is the quotient of Cn+1∖{0}\mathbb{C}^{n+1}\setminus\{0\} by the C∗\mathbb{C}^*-action α⋅z=(αq1z1,…,αqn+1zn+1)\alpha\cdot z=(\alpha^{q_1}z_1,\dots,\alpha^{q_{n+1}}z_{n+1}). It is a compact symplectic orbifold: the point [z]q[z]_{\mathbf{q}} has structure group Z/m(z)Z\mathbb{Z}/m(z)\mathbb{Z}, where m(z)m(z) is the greatest common divisor of the weights qjq_j with zj≠0z_j\ne0, and the symplectic form is obtained by symplectic reduction of the standard structure on Cn+1\mathbb{C}^{n+1} along the Hamiltonian circle action of weights q\mathbf{q}. When all weights equal 1 this recovers the smooth manifold CPn\mathbb{C}P^n. Hamiltonian maps (time-one maps of time-dependent Hamiltonian vector fields) are defined on symplectic orbifolds exactly as on manifolds.

Arnold's conjecture (in its homological form) predicts for a Hamiltonian time-one map ϕ1\phi_1 of a closed symplectic manifold (P,ω)(P,\omega) that ♯Fix(ϕ1)≥CL(P)+1\sharp\mathrm{Fix}(\phi_1)\ge CL(P)+1, where CLCL denotes the cup-length (the maximal number of positive-degree cohomology classes with nonzero cup product), and ♯Fix(ϕ1)≥SB(P)\sharp\mathrm{Fix}(\phi_1)\ge SB(P) when all fixed points are nondegenerate, where SBSB is the sum of Betti numbers. For a closed Lagrangian submanifold LL — an nn-dimensional submanifold of a 2n2n-dimensional symplectic manifold on which the symplectic form vanishes — the companion Lagrangian intersection conjecture (AC2) predicts ♯(L∩ϕ1(L))≥CL(L)+1,\sharp(L\cap\phi_1(L))\ge CL(L)+1, and ♯(L∩ϕ1(L))≥SB(L)\sharp(L\cap\phi_1(L))\ge SB(L) when LL and ϕ1(L)\phi_1(L) intersect transversally. Fortune proved the fixed-point estimate for CPn\mathbb{C}P^n; Givental and, independently with different methods, Chang–Jiang proved (AC2) for (CPn,RPn)(\mathbb{C}P^n,\mathbb{R}P^n), giving ♯(RPn∩ϕ1(RPn))≥n+1\sharp(\mathbb{R}P^n\cap\phi_1(\mathbb{R}P^n))\ge n+1. Hofer developed a Lusternik–Schnirelman-theoretic approach to Lagrangian intersections valid when π2(P,L)=0\pi_2(P,L)=0, and Oh extended Floer-theoretic methods to monotone Lagrangians, including the pair (CPn,RPn)(\mathbb{C}P^n,\mathbb{R}P^n).

Lu carried these questions to weighted projective spaces. Writing r(q)r(\mathbf{q}) for the number of odd weights, the real part is RPn(q)=(Rn+1∖{0})/R∗,\mathbb{R}P^n(\mathbf{q})=(\mathbb{R}^{n+1}\setminus\{0\})/\mathbb{R}^*, with the same weighted scalar action; it embeds as a Lagrangian suborbifold of CPn(q)\mathbb{C}P^n(\mathbf{q}). It is a smooth manifold (diffeomorphic to RPn\mathbb{R}P^n) exactly when all weights are odd, i.e. r(q)=n+1r(\mathbf{q})=n+1. Lu proved: (i) (AC1) holds on CPn(q)\mathbb{C}P^n(\mathbf{q}) for arbitrary weights — any Hamiltonian time-one map has at least n+1n+1 fixed points; and (ii) (AC2) holds for (CPn(q),RPn(q))(\mathbb{C}P^n(\mathbf{q}),\mathbb{R}P^n(\mathbf{q})) when all weights are odd. The proof of (ii) adapts the Z2\mathbb{Z}_2-equivariant minimax scheme of Chang–Jiang on a space of loops/discs, using that the relevant involution acts freely off its fixed set. When some weight is even (0≤r(q)≤n0\le r(\mathbf{q})\le n), the equivariant argument degenerates: for 1≤r(q)≤n1\le r(\mathbf{q})\le n the induced Z2\mathbb{Z}_2-action has the nontrivial fixed-point set {u:ui=0 whenever qi∉2Z}\{u : u_i=0 \text{ whenever } q_i\notin 2\mathbb{Z}\}, and both this fixed set and its complement are infinite-dimensional, so the equivariant index arguments collapse; for r(q)=0r(\mathbf{q})=0 (all weights even) the involution is trivial. Lu left the question open in all these cases. The expected bounds are computable from the topology of the real part (with Z2\mathbb{Z}_2 coefficients): topologically RPn(q)\mathbb{R}P^n(\mathbf{q}) is the (n+1−r(q))(n+1-r(\mathbf{q}))-fold unreduced suspension of RPr(q)−1\mathbb{R}P^{r(\mathbf{q})-1}, so CL=1CL=1 and SB=2SB=2 for r(q)=0r(\mathbf{q})=0 (where RPn(q)≅Sn\mathbb{R}P^n(\mathbf{q})\cong S^n), CL=0CL=0 and SB=1SB=1 for r(q)=1r(\mathbf{q})=1, and CL=1CL=1 and SB=r(q)SB=r(\mathbf{q}) for 2≤r(q)≤n2\le r(\mathbf{q})\le n. Note an additional structural difficulty: whenever some weight qiq_i is even, the real part contains orbifold points of CPn(q)\mathbb{C}P^n(\mathbf{q}) (for instance the coordinate point with only zi≠0z_i\ne0, with structure group Z/qi\mathbb{Z}/q_i), so the Lagrangian meets the orbifold strata and is not contained in the smooth locus; even a Hofer-type theorem for Lagrangians inside the smooth locus of a symplectic orbifold — a generalization Lu suggested as a program — would not settle the present question.

Problem Statement

Let q=(q1,…,qn+1)\mathbf{q}=(q_1,\dots,q_{n+1}) be a tuple of positive integers with r(q)=#{i:qi odd}≤nr(\mathbf{q})=\#\{i : q_i \text{ odd}\}\le n, i.e. with at least one even weight. Equip the weighted projective space CPn(q)\mathbb{C}P^n(\mathbf{q}) with its standard reduced symplectic orbifold structure and let RPn(q)⊂CPn(q)\mathbb{R}P^n(\mathbf{q})\subset\mathbb{C}P^n(\mathbf{q}) be the real Lagrangian suborbifold. Let ϕ1\phi_1 be the time-one map of the Hamiltonian vector field of a time-dependent Hamiltonian on the orbifold CPn(q)\mathbb{C}P^n(\mathbf{q}). Does the Arnold-type Lagrangian intersection estimate (AC2) hold for (CPn(q),RPn(q))(\mathbb{C}P^n(\mathbf{q}),\mathbb{R}P^n(\mathbf{q})) in these cases? That is, is it true that ♯(RPn(q)∩ϕ1(RPn(q)))≥CL(RPn(q);Z2)+1,\sharp\bigl(\mathbb{R}P^n(\mathbf{q})\cap\phi_1(\mathbb{R}P^n(\mathbf{q}))\bigr)\ge CL(\mathbb{R}P^n(\mathbf{q});\mathbb{Z}_2)+1, with the stronger bound ♯(RPn(q)∩ϕ1(RPn(q)))≥SB(RPn(q);Z2)\sharp\bigl(\mathbb{R}P^n(\mathbf{q})\cap\phi_1(\mathbb{R}P^n(\mathbf{q}))\bigr)\ge SB(\mathbb{R}P^n(\mathbf{q});\mathbb{Z}_2) when the two real parts intersect transversally? Concretely, the first bound demands at least two intersection points for r(q)=0r(\mathbf{q})=0 (where RPn(q)≅Sn\mathbb{R}P^n(\mathbf{q})\cong S^n) and for 2≤r(q)≤n2\le r(\mathbf{q})\le n, and at least one — i.e. non-displaceability — for r(q)=1r(\mathbf{q})=1; the transverse bound demands 2, 1, and r(q)r(\mathbf{q}) points in the three ranges respectively. The problem is to settle this question of Lu (2008), Section 2.3: either prove the estimate for all weight vectors with 0≤r(q)≤n0\le r(\mathbf{q})\le n (with the transverse clause under transversality), or refute it by exhibiting a weight vector with an even weight and an explicit Hamiltonian time-one map of CPn(q)\mathbb{C}P^n(\mathbf{q}) whose intersection count violates the stated bound. This is question (i) of the source; the companion methodological program of the source — extending Hofer's Lusternik–Schnirelman theory and Oh's monotone Lagrangian Floer theory to closed symplectic orbifolds — is the natural route suggested by the source, since RPn(q)\mathbb{R}P^n(\mathbf{q}) meets the orbifold strata of CPn(q)\mathbb{C}P^n(\mathbf{q}) whenever some weight is even.

References

  1. Guangcun Lu, Symplectic fixed points and Lagrangian intersections on weighted projective spaces, Houston Journal of Mathematics 34(1):301–316, 2008; arXiv:math/0601281, https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0601281 (zbMATH 1171.37012, https://zbmath.org/1171.37012)
  2. Kung-Ching Chang and Mei-Yue Jiang, The Lagrange intersections for (CP^n, RP^n), Manuscripta Mathematica 68:89–100, 1990, doi:10.1007/BF02568753, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02568753
  3. A. B. Givental', The nonlinear Maslov index, in Geometry of Low-Dimensional Manifolds, Part 2 (S. K. Donaldson, C. B. Thomas, eds.), London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series 151, Cambridge University Press, pp. 35–43, 1990; doi:10.1017/CBO9780511629341.005, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511629341.005; zbMATH 0725.57013, https://zbmath.org/0725.57013
  4. H. Hofer, Lusternik-Schnirelman-theory for Lagrangian intersections, Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré, Analyse non linéaire 5:465–499, 1988, doi:10.1016/S0294-1449(16)30339-0, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0294-1449(16)30339-0
  5. Yong-Geun Oh, Floer cohomology of Lagrangian intersections and pseudo-holomorphic disks, II: (CP^n, RP^n), Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 46:995–1012, 1993, doi:10.1002/cpa.3160460703, https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160460703
  6. Barry Fortune, A symplectic fixed point theorem for CP^n, Inventiones Mathematicae 81:29–46, 1985, doi:10.1007/BF01388770, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01388770
  7. Cheol-Hyun Cho and Mainak Poddar, Holomorphic orbi-discs and Lagrangian Floer cohomology of symplectic toric orbifolds, Journal of Differential Geometry 98(1):21–116, 2014, doi:10.4310/jdg/1406137695, https://doi.org/10.4310/jdg/1406137695; arXiv:1206.3994, https://arxiv.org/abs/1206.3994
  8. Bohui Chen, Kaoru Ono, and Bai-Ling Wang, Twisted sectors for Lagrangian Floer theory on symplectic orbifolds, SIGMA (Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications) 20:011, 2024, doi:10.3842/SIGMA.2024.011, https://doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2024.011; arXiv:2308.01595, https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.01595
  9. Simon Allais, On the Hofer-Zehnder conjecture on weighted projective spaces, Compositio Mathematica 159(1):87–108, 2023, doi:10.1112/S0010437X22007825, https://doi.org/10.1112/S0010437X22007825; arXiv:2201.13277, https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.13277
  10. Wenmin Gong, Lagrangian intersections and a conjecture of Arnol'd, Israel Journal of Mathematics, 2026 (online first), doi:10.1007/s11856-026-2899-2, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-026-2899-2; arXiv:2111.15442, https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.15442
  11. Guangcun Lu, On the degenerated Arnold-Givental conjecture, arXiv:0806.0122 (v3, 2018), https://arxiv.org/abs/0806.0122
  12. Cheuk Yu Mak, Sobhan Seyfaddini, and Ivan Smith, Orbifold Hamiltonian Floer theory for global quotients, arXiv:2502.11290, https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.11290
  13. Kenji Fukaya, Yong-Geun Oh, Hiroshi Ohta, and Kaoru Ono, Antisymplectic involution and Floer cohomology, Geometry & Topology 21:1–106, 2017, doi:10.2140/gt.2017.21.1, https://doi.org/10.2140/gt.2017.21.1; arXiv:0912.2646, https://arxiv.org/abs/0912.2646