The Favard length of a planar set is the average length of its orthogonal projections and equals, up to normalization, the probability that Buffon's needle dropped at random hits the set. For the n-th generation KnK_n of the four-corner (1/4) Cantor set, Besicovitch's projection theorem forces the Favard length to tend to zero, but its sharp decay rate is unknown. The problem, posed in Bishop and Peres' chapter on Besicovitch–Kakeya sets, is to determine this rate. The best known bounds are the lower bound Fav⁡(Kn)≥c log⁡n/n\operatorname{Fav}(K_n)\ge c\,\log n/n (Bateman–Volberg, 2010) and the upper bound Fav⁡(Kn)≤Cεn−1/5+ε\operatorname{Fav}(K_n)\le C_\varepsilon n^{-1/5+\varepsilon} for every ε>0\varepsilon>0 (Marshall, 2025, improving Nazarov–Peres–Volberg's n−τn^{-\tau}, τ<1/6\tau<1/6), leaving a large gap; the conjectured truth, by analogy with random four-corner sets whose Favard length decays exactly like 1/n1/n, is n−1+o(1)n^{-1+o(1)}.

Background

Let C0=[0,1]C_0=[0,1], and let Cn+1C_{n+1} be obtained from CnC_n by keeping, inside each component interval, only the two subintervals of a quarter of the length situated at the ends (removing the middle half). The limit C=⋂nCnC=\bigcap_n C_n is the middle-half or 1/4 Cantor set, a set of Hausdorff dimension 1/21/2; CnC_n is a union of 2n2^n intervals of length 4−n4^{-n}. The four-corner Cantor set is the planar product K=C×CK=C\times C; its n-th generation Kn=Cn×CnK_n=C_n\times C_n is a union of 4n4^n closed squares of side 4−n4^{-n}. The limit set KK has Hausdorff dimension 11 and is purely unrectifiable, meaning it intersects every curve of finite length in length zero. It is also called the Garnett set, after John Garnett used it in complex analysis as an example of a set of positive length and zero analytic capacity, analytic capacity being the measure of removability for bounded analytic functions that appears in the Painlevé problem.

For a compact set E⊂R2E\subset\mathbb{R}^2, the Favard length is the angular average of the lengths of its orthogonal projections, Fav⁡(E)=1π∫0π∣proj⁡θ(E)∣ dθ,\operatorname{Fav}(E)=\frac{1}{\pi}\int_0^{\pi}\bigl|\operatorname{proj}_{\theta}(E)\bigr|\,d\theta, where ∣⋅∣|\cdot| denotes one-dimensional Lebesgue measure and proj⁡θ\operatorname{proj}_{\theta} is the orthogonal projection onto a line making angle θ\theta with the horizontal axis. Up to normalization, Fav⁡(E)\operatorname{Fav}(E) is the probability that Buffon's needle — a long line segment dropped at a uniformly random position and angle — meets EE; for sets built from squares of side 4−n4^{-n} it is also comparable to the probability that a random line meets the set. By the Besicovitch projection theorem, a purely unrectifiable set of finite length projects to measure zero in almost every direction, so Fav⁡(Kn)→0\operatorname{Fav}(K_n)\to 0 as n→∞n\to\infty. The question, posed in the Besicovitch–Kakeya chapter of Bishop and Peres' book Fractals in Probability and Analysis, is how fast.

The difficulty is that the pointwise decay of ∣proj⁡θ(Kn)∣|\operatorname{proj}_{\theta}(K_n)| in nn is extremely non-uniform in the direction θ\theta: in the coordinate directions the projection length is 2−n2^{-n}, there is a dense set of directions with exponential-in-nn decay, and there is a dense set of measure zero in which the projections of the limit set have positive length, phenomena governed by the tiling arithmetic of the digit set (see Lagarias and Wang, and the survey of Łaba). Any bound on the average must therefore control the measure of exceptional direction sets at every scale simultaneously.

The known bounds are as follows. Mattila proved a general lower bound Fav⁡(En)≥C/n\operatorname{Fav}(E_n)\ge C/n for self-similar dimension-one Cantor iterations, which Bateman and Volberg improved for the four-corner set to Fav⁡(Kn)≥c log⁡n/n\operatorname{Fav}(K_n)\ge c\,\log n/n. On the upper-bound side, Peres and Solomyak first obtained a general quantitative bound of the form exp⁡(−clog⁡∗n)\exp(-c\log_* n) (where log⁡∗n\log_* n is the iterated logarithm); Nazarov, Peres, and Volberg then proved the first power-law bound Fav⁡(Kn)≤Cτn−τ\operatorname{Fav}(K_n)\le C_\tau n^{-\tau} for every τ<1/6\tau<1/6 using Fourier-analytic methods, initiating the modern line of work; Bond, Łaba, and Volberg and subsequently Łaba and Marshall developed number-theoretic techniques based on vanishing sums of roots of unity — a vanishing sum of roots of unity is a sum of complex numbers of finite multiplicative order that equals zero, and such sums constrain how the projected copies of the digit set can overlap — for the wider class of rational product Cantor sets, that is, products of one-dimensional Cantor sets generated by integer digit sets in a fixed integer base; Marshall most recently improved the four-corner upper bound to Fav⁡(Kn)≤Cεn−1/5+ε\operatorname{Fav}(K_n)\le C_\varepsilon n^{-1/5+\varepsilon} for every ε>0\varepsilon>0. For contrast, Peres and Solomyak proved that for random four-corner sets the expected Favard length decays exactly like C/nC/n, and this sharp random theory has recently been extended to broad classes of planar random fractals by Chang, Shmerkin, and Suomala. Łaba's survey records the expectation that the optimal deterministic upper bound should be Cεn−1+εC_\varepsilon n^{-1+\varepsilon} for every ε>0\varepsilon>0, with the nεn^{\varepsilon} slack unavoidable in view of the log⁡n/n\log n/n lower bound.

Problem Statement

Let CnC_n denote the n-th generation of the middle-half (1/4) Cantor set in [0,1][0,1], obtained from [0,1][0,1] by iterating the removal of the open middle half of each component interval, so that CnC_n is a union of 2n2^n closed intervals of length 4−n4^{-n}, and let Kn=Cn×CnK_n=C_n\times C_n be the n-th generation of the four-corner Cantor set, a union of 4n4^n squares of side 4−n4^{-n}. Let Fav⁡(Kn)=1π∫0π∣proj⁡θ(Kn)∣ dθ\operatorname{Fav}(K_n)=\frac{1}{\pi}\int_0^{\pi}\bigl|\operatorname{proj}_{\theta}(K_n)\bigr|\,d\theta be its Favard length, the average length of its orthogonal projections, equivalently (up to normalization) the probability that Buffon's needle dropped at random meets KnK_n. Determine the sharp asymptotic decay rate of Fav⁡(Kn)\operatorname{Fav}(K_n) as n→∞n\to\infty, i.e. an explicit rate ff with c f(n)≤Fav⁡(Kn)≤C f(n)c\,f(n)\le\operatorname{Fav}(K_n)\le C\,f(n) for large nn, including any logarithmic corrections. In particular, close the gap between the best known lower bound Fav⁡(Kn)≥c log⁡n/n\operatorname{Fav}(K_n)\ge c\,\log n/n and the best known upper bound Fav⁡(Kn)≤Cεn−1/5+ε\operatorname{Fav}(K_n)\le C_\varepsilon n^{-1/5+\varepsilon} for every ε>0\varepsilon>0, and decide whether the conjectured behavior Fav⁡(Kn)=n−1+o(1)\operatorname{Fav}(K_n)=n^{-1+o(1)} holds.

References

  1. Christopher J. Bishop and Yuval Peres, Besicovitch–Kakeya sets, chapter in Fractals in Probability and Analysis, Cambridge University Press, 2016, pp. 270–312, DOI 10.1017/9781316460238.010, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316460238.010
  2. Fedor Nazarov, Yuval Peres, and Alexander Volberg, The power law for the Buffon needle probability of the four-corner Cantor set, St. Petersburg Mathematical Journal 22 (2011), 61–72, DOI 10.1090/S1061-0022-2010-01133-6 (arXiv:0801.2942), https://doi.org/10.1090/S1061-0022-2010-01133-6
  3. Michael Bateman and Alexander Volberg, An estimate from below for the Buffon needle probability of the four-corner Cantor set, Mathematical Research Letters 17 (2010), 959–967, DOI 10.4310/MRL.2010.v17.n5.a12 (arXiv:0807.2953), https://doi.org/10.4310/MRL.2010.v17.n5.a12
  4. Yuval Peres and Boris Solomyak, How likely is Buffon's needle to fall near a planar Cantor set?, Pacific Journal of Mathematics 204 (2002), No. 2, 473–496, DOI 10.2140/pjm.2002.204.473, https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.2002.204.473
  5. Pertti Mattila, Orthogonal projections, Riesz capacities, and Minkowski content, Indiana University Mathematics Journal 39 (1990), 185–198, DOI 10.1512/iumj.1990.39.39011, https://doi.org/10.1512/iumj.1990.39.39011
  6. Izabella Łaba, Recent progress on Favard length estimates for planar Cantor sets, arXiv:1212.0247 (2012), https://arxiv.org/abs/1212.0247
  7. Izabella Łaba and Kelan Zhai, The Favard length of product Cantor sets, Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 42 (2010), 997–1009, DOI 10.1112/blms/bdq059 (arXiv:0902.0964), https://doi.org/10.1112/blms/bdq059
  8. Matthew Bond, Izabella Łaba, and Alexander Volberg, Buffon's needle estimates for rational product Cantor sets, American Journal of Mathematics 136 (2014), 357–391, DOI 10.1353/ajm.2014.0013 (arXiv:1109.1031), https://doi.org/10.1353/ajm.2014.0013
  9. Matthew Bond and Alexander Volberg, Estimates from below of the Buffon noodle probability for undercooked noodles, arXiv:0811.1302 (2008), https://arxiv.org/abs/0811.1302
  10. Izabella Łaba and Caleb Marshall, Vanishing sums of roots of unity and the Favard length of self-similar product sets, Discrete Analysis (2022), Paper No. 19, 31 pp., arXiv:2202.07555, https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.07555 (journal version at https://discreteanalysisjournal.com/article/57602)
  11. Caleb Marshall, Improved Power Laws for the Favard Length Problem in All Dimensions, arXiv:2509.02882 (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.02882
  12. Alan Chang, Pablo Shmerkin, and Ville Suomala, Sharp Favard length of random Cantor sets, arXiv:2512.17753 (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.17753
  13. Shiwen Zhang, The exact Power Law for Buffon's needle landing near some Random Cantor Sets, arXiv:1801.06904 (2018), https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.06904
  14. Bobby Wilson, Sets with Arbitrarily Slow Favard Length Decay, arXiv:1707.08137 (2017), https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.08137
  15. Laura Cladek, Blair Davey, and Krystal Taylor, Upper and lower bounds on the rate of decay of the Favard curve length for the four-corner Cantor set, Indiana University Mathematics Journal 71 (2022), 1003–1025, DOI 10.1512/iumj.2022.71.8951 (arXiv:2003.03620), https://doi.org/10.1512/iumj.2022.71.8951
  16. Rosemarie Bongers and Krystal Taylor, Transversal families of nonlinear projections and generalizations of Favard length, Analysis & PDE 16 (2023), 279–308 (arXiv:2105.01708), https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.01708
  17. Jeffrey C. Lagarias and Yang Wang, Tiling the line with translates of one tile, Inventiones Mathematicae 124 (1996), 341–365, DOI 10.1007/s002220050056, https://doi.org/10.1007/s002220050056