The bilinear Bochner–Riesz means SRδS^\delta_R — the bilinear Fourier multiplier on Rn×Rn\mathbb{R}^n\times\mathbb{R}^n with symbol (1−(∣ξ∣2+∣η∣2)/R2)+δ(1-(|\xi|^2+|\eta|^2)/R^2)^\delta_+ — govern the spherical summability of products of Fourier series, and their Lp1×Lp2→LpL^{p_1}\times L^{p_2}\to L^p boundedness in the scaling-critical Hölder range 1/p=1/p1+1/p21/p=1/p_1+1/p_2 is a recognized open problem in multilinear harmonic analysis. The open questions left by Bernicot, Grafakos, Song and Yan (J. d'Analyse Math. 2015) are: (a) in dimension n=1n=1, whether the δ=0\delta=0 means — the bilinear disc multiplier — are bounded in the part of the Banach triangle where exactly one of p1,p2,p′p_1,p_2,p' lies in (1,2)(1,2); (b) in dimensions n≥2n\ge2, whether the means are bounded from L2×L∞L^2\times L^\infty to L2L^2 for the intermediate smoothness 0<δ≤(n−1)/20<\delta\le(n-1)/2; and (c) whether the known sufficient δ\delta-thresholds for generic exponents are sharp.

Background

For a Schwartz function ff on Rn\mathbb{R}^n (i.e. a smooth function all of whose derivatives decay faster than any power), the (linear) Bochner–Riesz means of order δ≥0\delta\ge0 are the Fourier multiplier operators with symbol (1−∣ξ∣2/R2)+δ(1-|\xi|^2/R^2)_+^{\delta}, where (t)+=max⁡(t,0)(t)_+=\max(t,0) and R>0R>0; they model summation of Fourier integrals and series over balls with a smoothing weight that fades at the boundary. The classical Bochner–Riesz problem asks for the smallest δ\delta such that these means are bounded on Lp(Rn)L^p(\mathbb{R}^n) uniformly in RR; at δ=0\delta=0 the symbol is the characteristic function of the ball, and Fefferman's celebrated counterexample shows this ball multiplier is unbounded on Lp(Rn)L^p(\mathbb{R}^n) for every p≠2p\ne2 whenever n≥2n\ge2.

The bilinear analogue is motivated by the spherical summability of products of Fourier series: the norm convergence, as R→∞R\to\infty, of ∑∣m∣2+∣k∣2≤R2f^(m)g^(k)e2πi(m+k)⋅x\sum_{|m|^2+|k|^2\le R^2}\hat f(m)\hat g(k)e^{2\pi i(m+k)\cdot x} to f(x)g(x)f(x)g(x) reduces to uniform-in-RR bounds for the bilinear Bochner–Riesz means

SRδ(f,g)(x)=∬e2πix⋅(ξ+η)(1−∣ξ∣2+∣η∣2R2)+δf^(ξ)g^(η) dξ dη,S^\delta_R(f,g)(x)=\iint e^{2\pi ix\cdot(\xi+\eta)}\Big(1-\frac{|\xi|^2+|\eta|^2}{R^2}\Big)^{\delta}_+\hat f(\xi)\hat g(\eta)\,d\xi\,d\eta,

i.e. the bilinear multiplier with symbol mδ(ξ,η)=(1−∣ξ∣2−∣η∣2)+δm^\delta(\xi,\eta)=(1-|\xi|^2-|\eta|^2)_+^\delta, which is singular along the sphere {∣ξ∣2+∣η∣2=1}\{|\xi|^2+|\eta|^2=1\}, a hypersurface of dimension 2n−12n-1 inside R2n\mathbb{R}^{2n}. The central question is Lp1×Lp2→LpL^{p_1}\times L^{p_2}\to L^p boundedness under the Hölder relation 1/p=1/p1+1/p21/p=1/p_1+1/p_2, which is the scaling-critical case and allows pp as small as 1/21/2. The Banach triangle is the part of this exponent simplex with p1,p2,p≥1p_1,p_2,p\ge1 (equivalently p1,p2,p′≥1p_1,p_2,p'\ge1, where p′=p/(p−1)p'=p/(p-1) is the Hölder conjugate of pp), and the local L2L^2 triangle is the subregion p1,p2,p′≥2p_1,p_2,p'\ge2 — the exponent range familiar from the Lacey–Thiele theory of the bilinear Hilbert transform, the prototypical bilinear singular integral whose symbol is singular along a line rather than a curve.

The main landmarks are as follows. Grafakos and Li (2006) settled the n=1n=1, δ=0\delta=0 case on the local L2L^2 range: the characteristic function of the disc is a bilinear multiplier for 2≤p1,p2,p′<∞2\le p_1,p_2,p'<\infty, and it fails at the three vertices (2,2,1)(2,2,1), (2,∞,2)(2,\infty,2), (∞,2,2)(\infty,2,2). Diestel and Grafakos (2007) proved a Fefferman-type negative result in dimensions n≥2n\ge2: at δ=0\delta=0, boundedness fails whenever exactly one of p1,p2,p′p_1,p_2,p' is less than 22. Bernicot, Grafakos, Song and Yan (2015) then gave an essentially complete picture for n=1n=1 and δ>0\delta>0 inside the Banach triangle (bounded in the strict local L2L^2 case already for δ≥0\delta\ge0, at the endpoints and on the triangle boundary for δ>0\delta>0), and for n≥2n\ge2 proved: boundedness at (2,2,1)(2,2,1) for every δ>0\delta>0 (sharp); boundedness L2×L∞→L2L^2\times L^\infty\to L^2 for δ>(n−1)/2\delta>(n-1)/2; boundedness L1×L∞→L1L^1\times L^\infty\to L^1 for δ>n/2\delta>n/2; and sufficient conditions δ>nα(p1,p2)−1\delta>n\alpha(p_1,p_2)-1 for 1≤p1,p2<2n/(n+1)1\le p_1,p_2<2n/(n+1). They also observed that S0S^0 fails at L2×L∞→L2L^2\times L^\infty\to L^2 and that even smooth bilinear symbols need not give bounded operators, so the linear L2L^2 theory has no bilinear counterpart. Jeong, Lee and Vargas (2018) introduced a decomposition into products of linear Bochner–Riesz square functions (a square function here being the ℓ2\ell^2-valued sum of the frequency-localized pieces of a function) and improved the thresholds for p1,p2≥2p_1,p_2\ge2, sharply at (2,2,1)(2,2,1) and, when n=2n=2, on the square [2,4]2[2,4]^2; but at the point (2,∞)(2,\infty) their threshold is still (n−1)/2(n-1)/2. Work on the maximal operators sup⁡R>0∣SRδ∣\sup_{R>0}|S^\delta_R| (Jeong–Lee 2020; Kaur–Shrivastava 2022) and on weighted estimates at the critical index δ=n−1/2\delta=n-1/2 requires even more smoothness and leaves the non-maximal cores untouched. What remains open at δ=0\delta=0 in n=1n=1, at the endpoint (2,∞,2)(2,\infty,2) in n≥2n\ge2, and for generic exponents in n≥2n\ge2 is the subject of the problem statement.

Problem Statement

Let SRδS^\delta_R be the bilinear Bochner–Riesz means on Rn\mathbb{R}^n and let δc(p1,p2,p;n)=inf⁡{δ≥0:sup⁡R>0∥SRδ∥Lp1×Lp2→Lp<∞}\delta_c(p_1,p_2,p;n)=\inf\{\delta\ge0:\sup_{R>0}\|S^\delta_R\|_{L^{p_1}\times L^{p_2}\to L^p}<\infty\} be the sharp smoothness threshold under the Hölder relation 1/p=1/p1+1/p21/p=1/p_1+1/p_2 with 1≤p1,p2≤∞1\le p_1,p_2\le\infty. Determine the boundedness region of the means, i.e. compute δc\delta_c and the behavior at δ=δc\delta=\delta_c, for the following loci left open by Bernicot–Grafakos–Song–Yan (2015) and still open in the literature:

(a) Dimension n=1n=1, endpoint δ=0\delta=0: for every triplet with 1<p1,p2,p′<∞1<p_1,p_2,p'<\infty such that exactly one of p1,p2,p′p_1,p_2,p' lies in (1,2)(1,2) (the interior of the Banach triangle minus the local L2L^2 triangle), decide whether sup⁡R>0∥SR0∥Lp1(R)×Lp2(R)→Lp(R)<∞\sup_{R>0}\|S^0_R\|_{L^{p_1}(\mathbb{R})\times L^{p_2}(\mathbb{R})\to L^p(\mathbb{R})}<\infty — equivalently, whether the characteristic function of the disc is a bilinear multiplier on that triplet.

(b) Dimensions n≥2n\ge2, the endpoint (2,∞,2)(2,\infty,2) (and by symmetry (∞,2,2)(\infty,2,2)): determine δc(2,∞,2;n)\delta_c(2,\infty,2;n). Known: S0S^0 is unbounded and SδS^\delta is bounded for δ>(n−1)/2\delta>(n-1)/2; decide boundedness for every 0<δ≤(n−1)/20<\delta\le(n-1)/2.

(c) Dimensions n≥2n\ge2, generic exponents: determine whether the known sufficient conditions — the Jeong–Lee–Vargas thresholds for p1,p2≥2p_1,p_2\ge2 (sharp only near (2,2,1)(2,2,1) and, for n=2n=2, on [2,4]2[2,4]^2) and the Bernicot–Grafakos–Song–Yan condition δ>nα(p1,p2)−1\delta>n\alpha(p_1,p_2)-1 for 1≤p1,p2<2n/(n+1)1\le p_1,p_2<2n/(n+1) — are sharp, by proving matching necessary conditions or improving the sufficient δ\delta-range for each Hölder triplet. Here, writing an=n+12na_n=\frac{n+1}{2n} and bn=n+12n+n−1n2+nb_n=\frac{n+1}{2n}+\frac{n-1}{n^2+n}, the exponent α(p1,p2)\alpha(p_1,p_2) is the piecewise function

α(p1,p2)={4n+1,(1/p1,1/p2)∈(an,bn)×(an,bn),2n+1−n−12n+1p2,(1/p1,1/p2)∈(an,bn)×[bn,1],2n+1−n−12n+1p1,(1/p1,1/p2)∈[bn,1]×(an,bn),1p1+1p2−n−1n,(1/p1,1/p2)∈[bn,1]×[bn,1],\alpha(p_1,p_2)=\begin{cases}\tfrac{4}{n+1}, & (1/p_1,1/p_2)\in(a_n,b_n)\times(a_n,b_n),\\ \tfrac{2}{n+1}-\tfrac{n-1}{2n}+\tfrac{1}{p_2}, & (1/p_1,1/p_2)\in(a_n,b_n)\times[b_n,1],\\ \tfrac{2}{n+1}-\tfrac{n-1}{2n}+\tfrac{1}{p_1}, & (1/p_1,1/p_2)\in[b_n,1]\times(a_n,b_n),\\ \tfrac{1}{p_1}+\tfrac{1}{p_2}-\tfrac{n-1}{n}, & (1/p_1,1/p_2)\in[b_n,1]\times[b_n,1],\end{cases}

defined in the source paper (equation (3.10) there, with the infinitesimal parameter ϵ\epsilon set to 00).

At each locus, boundedness holds for δ>δc\delta>\delta_c and unboundedness for δ<δc\delta<\delta_c, and the behavior at δ=δc\delta=\delta_c itself is left to be decided; the common objective is the sharp Lp1×Lp2→LpL^{p_1}\times L^{p_2}\to L^p boundedness region of SδS^\delta, of which (a)–(c) are the concrete unfinished parts in the Banach range.

References

  1. C. Fefferman, The multiplier problem for the ball, Annals of Mathematics (2) 94 (1971) 330–336. DOI 10.2307/1970864, https://doi.org/10.2307/1970864
  2. L. Grafakos and X. Li, The disc as a bilinear multiplier, American Journal of Mathematics 128 (2006), no. 1, 91–119. DOI 10.1353/ajm.2006.0006, https://doi.org/10.1353/ajm.2006.0006
  3. G. Diestel and L. Grafakos, Unboundedness of the ball bilinear multiplier operator, Nagoya Mathematical Journal 185 (2007), 151–159. DOI 10.1017/s0027763000025794, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0027763000025794
  4. F. Bernicot, L. Grafakos, L. Song and L. Yan, The bilinear Bochner–Riesz problem, Journal d'Analyse Mathématique 127 (2015), no. 1, 179–217. DOI 10.1007/s11854-015-0028-y, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11854-015-0028-y (arXiv:1212.4018)
  5. E. Jeong, S. Lee and A. Vargas, Improved bound for the bilinear Bochner–Riesz operator, Mathematische Annalen 372 (2018), no. 1–2, 581–609. DOI 10.1007/s00208-018-1696-6, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-018-1696-6 (arXiv:1711.02425)
  6. E. Jeong and S. Lee, Maximal estimates for the bilinear spherical averages and the bilinear Bochner–Riesz operators, Journal of Functional Analysis 279 (2020), no. 7, 108629. DOI 10.1016/j.jfa.2020.108629, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2020.108629 (arXiv:1903.07980)
  7. H. Liu and M. Wang, Boundedness of the bilinear Bochner–Riesz means in the non-Banach triangle case, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 148 (2020), no. 3, 1121–1130. DOI 10.1090/proc/14819, https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/14819 (arXiv:1712.09235)
  8. J. Kaur and S. Shrivastava, Maximal estimates for bilinear Bochner–Riesz means, Advances in Mathematics 395 (2022), 108100. DOI 10.1016/j.aim.2021.108100, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2021.108100 (arXiv:2010.06843)
  9. S. S. Choudhary and S. Shrivastava, On the bilinear Bochner–Riesz problem at critical index, The Journal of Geometric Analysis 33 (2023), no. 2, article 58. DOI 10.1007/s12220-022-01122-8, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12220-022-01122-8 (arXiv:2201.12036)
  10. A. Bhojak, S. S. Choudhary and S. Shrivastava, Bilinear Bochner–Riesz means for convex domains and Kakeya maximal function, Mathematische Annalen 391 (2025), no. 2, 2281–2318. DOI 10.1007/s00208-024-02976-9, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-024-02976-9 (arXiv:2305.04077)
  11. S. Bagchi, M. N. Molla and J. Singh, Bilinear Bochner–Riesz means on Métivier groups, Journal of Functional Analysis 290 (2026), no. 10, 111397. DOI 10.1016/j.jfa.2026.111397, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2026.111397 (arXiv:2504.04359)
  12. D. He, K. Li and J. Zheng, On pointwise convergence of multilinear Bochner–Riesz means, arXiv:2412.00296 (2024), https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.00296
  13. X. Gao and L. Grafakos, A.E. Convergence vs Boundedness, arXiv:2602.16654 (2026), https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16654