The irreducible highest-weight representations of the orthosymplectic Lie superalgebra osp(2m∣2n)\mathfrak{osp}(2m|2n) with Dynkin labels [0,…,0,r,p−r][0,\ldots,0,r,p-r] (nonzero labels only on the two fork nodes of the distinguished Dynkin diagram) are infinite-dimensional; together with the chiral spinors and self-dual tensors [0,…,0,p][0,\ldots,0,p] they realize a correspondence between superdimensions of osp(m∣n)\mathfrak{osp}(m|n) modules and dimensions of so(m−n)\mathfrak{so}(m-n) representations, motivated by covariant quantization in supergravity. Stoilova, Thierry-Mieg and Van der Jeugt proved a positive Schur-function expansion for the so(2k)\mathfrak{so}(2k) analogues of these fork representations and for the chiral osp(2m∣2n)\mathfrak{osp}(2m|2n) case, and conjectured that the same pattern holds for the osp(2m∣2n)\mathfrak{osp}(2m|2n) fork modules: the character equals a fixed prefactor times an infinite positive sum of supersymmetric Schur functions sλ(x/y)s_\lambda(x/y) indexed by the partitions λ\lambda of width at most pp that belong to Br\mathcal{B}_r (partitions in which every part occurs an even number of times, with a horizontal strip of length rr attached), with Br\mathcal{B}_r replaced by Bp−r\mathcal{B}_{p-r} when ∣m−n∣|m-n| is odd. The problem is to prove the two character identities for all admissible (m,n,p,r)(m,n,p,r), or to refute them by an explicit counterexample.

Background

The orthosymplectic Lie superalgebra osp(m∣n)\mathfrak{osp}(m|n) is the Z2\mathbb{Z}_2-graded analogue of the orthogonal Lie algebras: its even part is so(m)⊕sp(n)\mathfrak{so}(m)\oplus\mathfrak{sp}(n) (with nn even) and its odd part carries the tensor product of the defining so(m)\mathfrak{so}(m) and sp(n)\mathfrak{sp}(n) modules. It is the natural symmetry algebra of supergravity models built on an antisymmetric tensor calculus, where spinor-type osp(m∣n)\mathfrak{osp}(m|n) representations play the role that spinors and self-dual tensors play for so(m)\mathfrak{so}(m). A module of a Lie superalgebra splits into an even and an odd part, V=V0ˉ⊕V1ˉV=V_{\bar 0}\oplus V_{\bar 1}, and its superdimension is sdim⁡V=dim⁡V0ˉ−dim⁡V1ˉ\operatorname{sdim}V=\dim V_{\bar 0}-\dim V_{\bar 1}; even when VV is infinite-dimensional, the superdimension can be finite and is computed by specialization of the character (the tt-superdimension, which weights each level of the induced Z\mathbb{Z}-gradation relative to the gl(m∣n)\mathfrak{gl}(m|n) subalgebra by a factor (−t)level(-t)^{\text{level}}).

Fix the distinguished Dynkin diagram of osp(2m∣2n)\mathfrak{osp}(2m|2n), with simple roots δ1−δ2,…,δn−1−δn\delta_1-\delta_2,\ldots,\delta_{n-1}-\delta_n, δn−ϵ1\delta_n-\epsilon_1, ϵ1−ϵ2,…,ϵm−1−ϵm\epsilon_1-\epsilon_2,\ldots,\epsilon_{m-1}-\epsilon_m, ϵm−1+ϵm\epsilon_{m-1}+\epsilon_m; a highest-weight module is specified by its list of Dynkin labels (the integer coefficients of its highest weight in the basis of fundamental weights). The spinor representation has labels [0,…,0,1][0,\ldots,0,1] and the self-dual tensor [0,…,0,2][0,\ldots,0,2]; these, and more generally the modules [0,…,0,p][0,\ldots,0,p], are atypical (singular with respect to an odd root) and hence infinite-dimensional. Stoilova, Thierry-Mieg and Van der Jeugt established an osp(m∣n)∼so(m−n)\mathfrak{osp}(m|n)\sim\mathfrak{so}(m-n) correspondence for them: the superdimension of [0,…,0,p][0,\ldots,0,p] of osp(m∣n)\mathfrak{osp}(m|n) coincides with the dimension of a finite-dimensional so(m−n)\mathfrak{so}(m-n) representation, a fact of interest for covariant quantization schemes in supergravity. Their technique rests on expanding characters as positive sums of supersymmetric Schur functions.

The supersymmetric Schur function sλ(x/y)s_\lambda(x/y) in the variables x=(x1,…,xm)x=(x_1,\ldots,x_m) and y=(y1,…,yn)y=(y_1,\ldots,y_n), introduced by Berele and Regev, is the character of the covariant gl(m∣n)\mathfrak{gl}(m|n) module labelled by the partition λ\lambda (its Young diagram), and it vanishes unless λ\lambda lies in the (m,n)(m,n)-hook, i.e. λm+1≤n\lambda_{m+1}\le n. Expanding an osp(2m∣2n)\mathfrak{osp}(2m|2n) character in the functions sλ(x/y)s_\lambda(x/y) is therefore equivalent to describing the branching to the subalgebra gl(m∣n)\mathfrak{gl}(m|n). For the chiral case the following formula is proven (without any restriction on the parity of ∣m−n∣|m-n|): char⁡[0,…,0,p]osp(2m∣2n)=(y1⋯ynx1⋯xm)p/2∑λ∈B, λ1≤psλ(x/y),\operatorname{char}[0,\ldots,0,p]_{\mathfrak{osp}(2m|2n)}=\left(\frac{y_1\cdots y_n}{x_1\cdots x_m}\right)^{p/2}\sum_{\lambda\in\mathcal{B},\ \lambda_1\le p}s_\lambda(x/y), where B\mathcal{B} is the set of partitions in which every part occurs an even number of times (equivalently, partitions of the form (μ1,μ1,μ2,μ2,…)(\mu_1,\mu_1,\mu_2,\mu_2,\ldots) obtained by writing each part of a partition μ\mu twice; this includes the zero partition). The same authors also proved the purely Lie-algebraic fork theorem: for the so(2k)\mathfrak{so}(2k) module with Dynkin labels [0,…,0,r,p−r][0,\ldots,0,r,p-r], whose only nonzero labels sit on the two fork nodes ϵk−1−ϵk\epsilon_{k-1}-\epsilon_k and ϵk−1+ϵk\epsilon_{k-1}+\epsilon_k of the DkD_k diagram, one has, for kk even, char⁡[0,…,0,r,p−r]so(2k)=(x1⋯xk)−p/2∑λ1≤p, ℓ(λ)≤k, λ∈Brsλ(x),\operatorname{char}[0,\ldots,0,r,p-r]_{\mathfrak{so}(2k)}=(x_1\cdots x_k)^{-p/2}\sum_{\lambda_1\le p,\ \ell(\lambda)\le k,\ \lambda\in\mathcal{B}_r}s_\lambda(x), and for kk odd the same identity with Br\mathcal{B}_r replaced by Bp−r\mathcal{B}_{p-r}. Here Br\mathcal{B}_r consists of the partitions of B\mathcal{B} to which a horizontal strip (a skew Young diagram with at most one box in each column) of length rr is attached, and the sum runs over diagrams fitting inside the k×pk\times p rectangle. Its proof, via the so(2k)⊃gl(k)\mathfrak{so}(2k)\supset\mathfrak{gl}(k) branching rules of King and Wybourne, is technical but standard. The conjecture asserts that the identical pattern survives the passage from so(2k)\mathfrak{so}(2k) to the infinite-dimensional osp(2m∣2n)\mathfrak{osp}(2m|2n) fork modules: one drops the rectangle constraint ℓ(λ)≤k\ell(\lambda)\le k and replaces ordinary by supersymmetric Schur functions. This is valuable because the alternative character formulas in the literature, notably the Howe-duality combinatorial character formula of Cheng and Zhang for orthosymplectic Lie superalgebras, give alternating sums of S-functions (a traditional name for Schur functions) that are hard to handle, whereas the conjectured expansion is a positive (non-alternating) sum.

Problem Statement

Prove or refute the following conjecture of Stoilova, Thierry-Mieg and Van der Jeugt (Conjecture, equation (26) of arXiv:1904.00074; Conjecture 1, equation (32) of arXiv:1904.00067).

Let m≥2m\ge 2, n≥1n\ge 1, p≥1p\ge 1, and 0≤r≤p0\le r\le p. Consider the irreducible highest-weight representation [0,…,0,r,p−r][0,\ldots,0,r,p-r] of osp(2m∣2n)\mathfrak{osp}(2m|2n) with respect to the distinguished Dynkin diagram, i.e. the module whose only nonzero Dynkin labels are rr on the node ϵm−1−ϵm\epsilon_{m-1}-\epsilon_m and p−rp-r on the node ϵm−1+ϵm\epsilon_{m-1}+\epsilon_m. Then:

  • for ∣m−n∣|m-n| even, char⁡[0,…,0,r,p−r]osp(2m∣2n)=(y1⋯ynx1⋯xm)p/2∑λ∈Br, λ1≤psλ(x/y);\operatorname{char}[0,\ldots,0,r,p-r]_{\mathfrak{osp}(2m|2n)}=\left(\frac{y_1\cdots y_n}{x_1\cdots x_m}\right)^{p/2}\sum_{\lambda\in\mathcal{B}_r,\ \lambda_1\le p}s_\lambda(x/y);
  • for ∣m−n∣|m-n| odd and 1≤r≤p1\le r\le p, the same identity holds with Br\mathcal{B}_r replaced by Bp−r\mathcal{B}_{p-r}. (At r=0r=0 the module [0,…,0,0,p][0,\ldots,0,0,p] is the chiral module [0,…,0,p][0,\ldots,0,p], whose character is given for every (m,n)(m,n) by the proven chiral formula of the Background, i.e. by the B\mathcal{B}-indexed sum; the source states the odd-parity replacement without restricting rr, but at r=0r=0 it is superseded by that proven formula.)

Here xi=eϵix_i=e^{\epsilon_i} and yj=eδjy_j=e^{\delta_j} are the character variables, sλ(x/y)s_\lambda(x/y) are the supersymmetric Schur functions (the sum effectively runs over partitions in the (m,n)(m,n)-hook, since sλ(x/y)=0s_\lambda(x/y)=0 outside it), B\mathcal{B} is the set of partitions in which every part occurs an even number of times (equivalently, partitions of the form (μ1,μ1,μ2,μ2,…)(\mu_1,\mu_1,\mu_2,\mu_2,\ldots) obtained by writing each part of a partition μ\mu twice; this includes the zero partition), and Br\mathcal{B}_r is the set of partitions of B\mathcal{B} to which a horizontal strip of length rr is attached.

An explicit counterexample is a specific admissible quadruple (m,n,p,r)(m,n,p,r) for which the two formal characters differ, exhibited at an identifiable weight or gl(m∣n)\mathfrak{gl}(m|n)-degree.

References

  1. N.I. Stoilova, J. Thierry-Mieg, J. Van der Jeugt, "On characters and superdimensions of some infinite-dimensional irreducible representations of osp(m∣n)\mathfrak{osp}(m|n)", Physics of Atomic Nuclei 81 (2018) 939–944; arXiv:1904.00074; DOI 10.1134/S1063778818060285, https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.00074
  2. N.I. Stoilova, J. Thierry-Mieg, J. Van der Jeugt, "On superdimensions of some infinite-dimensional irreducible representations of osp(m∣n)osp(m|n)", Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics 263 (2018) 165–176; arXiv:1904.00067; DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-2715-5_9, https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.00067
  3. N.I. Stoilova, J. Thierry-Mieg, J. Van der Jeugt, "Extension of the osp(m∣n)∼so(m−n)\mathfrak{osp}(m|n)\sim\mathfrak{so}(m-n) correspondence to the infinite-dimensional chiral spinors and self dual tensors", Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 50 (2017) 155201; arXiv:1609.06350; DOI 10.1088/1751-8121/aa5e8f, https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.06350
  4. Shun-Jen Cheng, R.B. Zhang, "Howe duality and combinatorial character formula for orthosymplectic Lie superalgebras", Advances in Mathematics 182 (2004) 124–172; DOI 10.1016/S0001-8708(03)00076-8, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8708(03)00076-8
  5. A. Berele, A. Regev, "Hook young diagrams with applications to combinatorics and to representations of Lie superalgebras", Advances in Mathematics 64 (1987) 118–175; DOI 10.1016/0001-8708(87)90007-7, https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8708(87)90007-7
  6. R.C. King, B.G. Wybourne, "Analogies between finite-dimensional irreducible representations of SO(2n) and infinite-dimensional irreducible representations of Sp(2n,R). I. Characters and products", Journal of Mathematical Physics 41 (2000) 5002–5019; DOI 10.1063/1.533389, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.533389
  7. Steven V. Sam, Keller VandeBogert, "An infinite-dimensional character coincidence between Lie algebras of type B and BC", arXiv:2503.18918 (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.18918
  8. Jean Thierry-Mieg, Peter D. Jarvis, "Conformal invariance of antisymmetric tensor field theories in any even dimension", arXiv:2311.01701 (2023, revised 2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.01701