For integers m≥2m\ge 2, n≥1n\ge 1, a metric space (X,d)(X,d) is called (m,n)(m,n)-equidistant if every mm-point subset A⊆XA\subseteq X has exactly nn points of XX equidistant from all of its points. Popvassilev (2008) posed the problem of determining for which pairs (m,n)(m,n) there exists a metric continuum — a compact connected metric space — that is (m,n)(m,n)-equidistant, and of classifying all such continua up to homeomorphism (Problem 5.2), together with the central special case (Conjecture 5.1): every (3,2)(3,2)-equidistant continuum is homeomorphic to the 22-sphere, a higher-point analogue of the classical Double Midset Conjecture for circles. Only three realizations are known: the interval for (2,1)(2,1), the circle for (2,2)(2,2), and the 22-sphere with the chord metric for (3,2)(3,2); the conjecture is open even for continua lying in R3\mathbb{R}^3 with the usual metric. The problem remains open.

Background

For two distinct points a,ba,b of a metric space (X,d)(X,d), the midset (or bisector) is the set E({a,b})={x∈X:d(x,a)=d(x,b)}E(\{a,b\})=\{x\in X: d(x,a)=d(x,b)\}. Popvassilev generalized this as follows: for a subset AA with at least two points, the equidistance set is E(A)={x∈X:d(x,a)=d(x,b)E(A)=\{x\in X: d(x,a)=d(x,b) for all a,b∈A}a,b\in A\}, and XX is (m,n)(m,n)-equidistant (for integers m≥2m\ge 2, n≥1n\ge 1) if XX has at least mm points and every mm-point subset A⊆XA\subseteq X has ∣E(A)∣=n|E(A)|=n. The case m=2m=2 is classical: it is the nn-point midset property (nn-MP), with 11-MP, 22-MP, 33-MP called UMP, DMP, and TMP (unique, double, triple midset property). The real line is (2,1)(2,1)-equidistant (each pair has one midpoint), a circle is (2,2)(2,2)-equidistant, and a continuum means a compact connected metric space. Berard (1971) proved that a connected metric space with the UMP is homeomorphic to an interval in R\mathbb{R}; Loveland and Valentine (1978) showed that generalized midset properties characterize geodesic circles and intervals; and Loveland and Wayment (1974) posed the Double Midset Conjecture (DMC): a continuum with the DMP, i.e. a (2,2)(2,2)-equidistant continuum, is homeomorphic to a circle. Loveland (1991) proved the DMC for continua contained in the plane with the usual metric, and his TMP results (1990, 1992) show that no continuum in the plane has the triple midset property; for arbitrary continua the DMC itself remains unresolved. Popvassilev (2008) initiated the general (m,n)(m,n) theory. Among his results for concrete spaces: for k≥2k\ge 2 the Euclidean space Rk\mathbb{R}^k contains an (m,1)(m,1)-equidistant set if and only if k≥mk\ge m; any (m,n)(m,n)-equidistant subset of Rk\mathbb{R}^k with n≥1n\ge 1 has all subsets of at most mm points affinely independent, forcing m≤k+1m\le k+1; Rk\mathbb{R}^k contains no (m,n)(m,n)-equidistant set when m≥max⁡{k,3}m\ge\max\{k,3\} and n≥3n\ge 3; the 22-sphere S2⊆R3\mathbb{S}^2\subseteq\mathbb{R}^3 with the chord metric (the Euclidean distance of R3\mathbb{R}^3 restricted to the sphere) is (3,2)(3,2)-equidistant, since any three points of S2\mathbb{S}^2 lie on a unique circle whose pole pair is exactly the equidistance set; but neither S3\mathbb{S}^3 nor R4\mathbb{R}^4 contains any (4,2)(4,2)-equidistant set; and the real projective plane P2\mathbb{P}^2 (the antipodal quotient of S2\mathbb{S}^2 with the induced metric) contains a 66-point set with all pairwise distances equal, hence (m,n)(m,n)-equidistant subsets whenever m+n≤6m+n\le 6. These discrete and spherical results delimit but do not touch the continuum question, since continua are connected (and uncountable), while the extremal discrete examples — finite sets with a constant metric — are disconnected. Note also that a (3,2)(3,2)-equidistant space need not have the DMP: on S2\mathbb{S}^2 with the chord metric the midset of two points is a great circle, so Conjecture 5.1 is a genuinely new higher-point analogue of the DMC rather than an instance of it. At the end of the paper Popvassilev states Conjecture 5.1 — every (3,2)(3,2)-equidistant continuum is homeomorphic to S2\mathbb{S}^2 — and Problem 5.2, which asks for the full existence and classification picture, admitting he cannot prove the conjecture even for continua contained in R3\mathbb{R}^3 with the usual metric.

Problem Statement

Determine all pairs of integers (m,n)(m,n) with m≥2m\ge 2 and n≥1n\ge 1 for which there exists a metric continuum XX that is (m,n)(m,n)-equidistant — i.e. a compact connected metric space (X,d)(X,d) with at least mm points such that every mm-point subset A⊆XA\subseteq X has an equidistance set E(A)={x∈X:d(x,a)=d(x,b) for all a,b∈A}E(A)=\{x\in X: d(x,a)=d(x,b)\ \text{for all}\ a,b\in A\} of exactly nn points — and, for each such pair, classify all (m,n)(m,n)-equidistant continua up to homeomorphism (Popvassilev's Problem 5.2). The designated central open special case is Popvassilev's Conjecture 5.1: every (3,2)(3,2)-equidistant continuum is homeomorphic to the 22-sphere S2\mathbb{S}^2; this is open even when XX is assumed to be a subset of R3\mathbb{R}^3 with the usual Euclidean metric. The known realizations are the interval (2,1)(2,1), the circle (2,2)(2,2), and S2\mathbb{S}^2 with the chord metric (3,2)(3,2); whether any pair with m≥4m\ge 4, n≥3n\ge 3, or (m,n)=(3,1)(m,n)=(3,1) admits an (m,n)(m,n)-equidistant continuum is unknown.

References

  1. Strashimir G. Popvassilev, (m,n)-Equidistant Sets in Rk\mathbb{R}^{k}, Sk\mathbb{S}^{k}, and Pk\mathbb{P}^{k}, Discrete & Computational Geometry 40(2):279–288, 2008. DOI: 10.1007/s00454-007-9048-4, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00454-007-9048-4
  2. A. D. Berard Jr., Characterizations of metric spaces by the use of their midsets: intervals, Fundamenta Mathematicae 73(1):1–7, 1971. DOI: 10.4064/fm-73-1-1-7, https://doi.org/10.4064/fm-73-1-1-7
  3. L. D. Loveland, S. G. Wayment, Characterizing a Curve with the Double Midset Property, The American Mathematical Monthly 81:1003–1006, 1974. DOI: 10.1080/00029890.1974.11993716, https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.1974.11993716
  4. L. D. Loveland, J. E. Valentine, Generalized midset properties characterize geodesic circles and intervals, Colloquium Mathematicum 38(2):231–241, 1978. DOI: 10.4064/cm-38-2-231-241, https://doi.org/10.4064/cm-38-2-231-241
  5. L. D. Loveland, The double midset conjecture for continua in the plane, Topology and its Applications 40(2):117–129, 1991. DOI: 10.1016/0166-8641(91)90045-N, https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-8641(91)90045-N
  6. L. D. Loveland, No continuum in E2E^2 has the TMP. I. Arcs and spheres, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 110(4):1119–1128, 1990. DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-1990-1027099-x, https://doi.org/10.1090/s0002-9939-1990-1027099-x
  7. L. D. Loveland, No Continuum in E2E^2 Has the TMP; II. Triodic Continua, Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics 22(3):957–971, 1992. DOI: 10.1216/rmjm/1181072708, https://doi.org/10.1216/rmjm/1181072708
  8. L. D. Loveland, S. M. Loveland, Equidistant sets in plane triodic continua, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 115(2):553–562, 1992. DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-1992-1120508-9, https://doi.org/10.1090/s0002-9939-1992-1120508-9
  9. Hallard T. Croft, Kenneth J. Falconer, Richard K. Guy, Unsolved Problems in Geometry, Springer, New York, 1991. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-0963-8, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0963-8