In 2018 Ebenfelt, Son, and Zaitsev resolved the classical Chern–Moser question by constructing a bounded strictly pseudoconvex domain in C2\mathbb C^2, diffeomorphic to T2×DT^2\times\mathbb D, whose boundary is a compact strictly pseudoconvex CR manifold with no CR umbilical points, and they explicitly posed the natural refinement: can such a domain be chosen ball-like, i.e. with closure diffeomorphic to the closed unit ball in C2\mathbb C^2, so that the boundary is diffeomorphic to S3S^3? The refinement remains open to date. The only known CR structures on S3S^3 without umbilical points (the Rossi spheres and their perturbations) are non-embeddable into C2\mathbb C^2; every known ball-like or symmetric class of strictly pseudoconvex boundaries (real ellipsoids, circular and U(1)U(1)-symmetric hypersurfaces, generic almost-circular perturbations of the sphere) must carry umbilical points; and all subsequently constructed non-umbilical examples (the torus boundaries of the source paper and the boundaries of Grauert tubes over closed hyperbolic surfaces) have non-spherical topology. The problem asks for either an embedded ball-like example or a theorem forcing an umbilical point on every such boundary.

Background

A smooth real hypersurface M⊂C2M\subset\mathbb C^2 of real dimension three carries an induced CR structure (Cauchy–Riemann structure): the complex structure of the ambient space makes the complex tangent bundle H=TM∩iTMH=TM\cap iTM a complex line bundle over MM. The hypersurface (or a bounded domain it bounds) is strictly pseudoconvex where the Levi form — the Hermitian form on HH induced by i∂∂ˉρi\partial\bar\partial\rho of a smooth defining function ρ\rho — is positive definite; this is the basic strong positivity condition in several complex variables, and such boundaries have bases of holomorphically convex (Stein) neighborhoods and support an intrinsic biholomorphism-invariant geometry. In their 1974 theory of real hypersurfaces in complex manifolds, Chern and Moser introduced the CR umbilical points of such a hypersurface: points where the local CR curvature invariant vanishes and the hypersurface is, to the relevant order, osculated by the unit sphere. In complex dimension n≥4n\geq 4 a generic strictly pseudoconvex boundary has no umbilical points at all (a Thom transversality argument), and, by a result of Webster recounted in the source paper, every non-spherical real ellipsoid in Cn\mathbb C^n, n≥3n\geq 3, is free of them; in C2\mathbb C^2, however, umbilicity is detected by a sixth-order invariant going back to É. Cartan's classification work of the early 1930s — Cartan's umbilical tensor QQ — and the situation is genuinely different: Huang and Ji proved that every real ellipsoid in C2\mathbb C^2 must have umbilical points, and Chern and Moser's question of whether some bounded strictly pseudoconvex domain in C2\mathbb C^2 has a boundary with no CR umbilical points stayed open for four decades. Ebenfelt, Son, and Zaitsev settled it in 2018: for the domain Dϵ={(log⁡∣z∣)2+(log⁡∣w∣)2<ϵ2}D_\epsilon=\{(\log|z|)^2+(\log|w|)^2<\epsilon^2\}, the boundary Mϵ=∂DϵM_\epsilon=\partial D_\epsilon is a compact strictly pseudoconvex CR manifold, locally homogeneous and without umbilical points. Their domain is diffeomorphic to T2×DT^2\times\mathbb D, so ∂Dϵ\partial D_\epsilon is a three-torus, and they explicitly asked whether the question can be reopened with the simplest possible topology: can DD be chosen with D‾\overline D diffeomorphic to the closed unit ball, so that ∂D\partial D is diffeomorphic to S3S^3? Two structural facts frame this refinement. First, the only known compact strictly pseudoconvex CR structures on S3S^3 without umbilical points are the Rossi spheres μα(4)\mu^{(4)}_\alpha — a homogeneous family of deformations of the standard CR sphere introduced in Rossi's 1965 work — and their perturbations; these do not admit Stein neighborhoods at all, hence cannot occur as boundaries of domains in C2\mathbb C^2, since an embedded compact strictly pseudoconvex hypersurface in C2\mathbb C^2 is the boundary of a bounded strictly pseudoconvex domain with a Stein neighborhood basis. Consequently, as the source paper observes using an extension theorem for local CR automorphisms and the classification of homogeneous three-dimensional CR manifolds, the boundary of any ball-like example cannot be locally homogeneous: a simply connected locally homogeneous example would be homogeneous, hence a Rossi sphere, hence not embeddable. Second, all known results in the opposite direction — every real ellipsoid in C2\mathbb C^2 has an umbilical point (Huang–Ji), every compact strictly pseudoconvex three-dimensional CR manifold with a free transverse circle action whose quotient is not a torus has an orbit of umbilical points, in particular every circular hypersurface in C2\mathbb C^2 (Ebenfelt–Son), and generic almost-circular perturbations of the unit sphere contain curves or surfaces of umbilical points (Ebenfelt–Zaitsev) — concern ball-like or highly symmetric classes, and none covers general ball-like domains. A later construction of Foo–Merker–Ta produces further non-umbilical examples (boundaries of thin Grauert tubes — canonical strictly pseudoconvex disk-bundle neighborhoods — over closed hyperbolic surfaces of genus at least two), but their topology is that of a circle bundle over a surface, never S3S^3; their paper records the sphere-like case as still open. Thus neither an embedded ball-like example without umbilics, nor any mechanism forcing an umbilical point on every embedded sphere-like strictly pseudoconvex boundary, is currently known.

Problem Statement

Does there exist a bounded strictly pseudoconvex domain D⊂C2D\subset\mathbb C^2 with smooth boundary such that (i) the closure D‾\overline D is diffeomorphic to the closed unit ball in C2\mathbb C^2 (which makes the boundary ∂D\partial D diffeomorphic to the three-sphere S3S^3), and (ii) ∂D\partial D has no CR umbilical points, i.e. Cartan's sixth-order umbilical tensor QQ is nonzero at every point of ∂D\partial D? This is the refinement of the classical Chern–Moser umbilical-point question explicitly proposed by Ebenfelt–Son–Zaitsev after their torus-boundary resolution.

References

  1. S. S. Chern and J. K. Moser, Real hypersurfaces in complex manifolds, Acta Mathematica 133 (1974), 219–271. DOI: 10.1007/BF02392146, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02392146
  2. H. Rossi, Attaching analytic spaces to an analytic space along a pseudoconcave boundary, in Proc. Conf. Complex Analysis (Minneapolis, 1964), Springer, Berlin, 1965, pp. 242–256. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-48016-4_21, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48016-4_21
  3. Xiaojun Huang and Shanyu Ji, Every real ellipsoid in C2\mathbb C^2 admits CR umbilical points, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 359 (2007), no. 3, 1191–1204. DOI: 10.1090/S0002-9947-06-04069-4, https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-06-04069-4
  4. Peter Ebenfelt and Duong Ngoc Son, Umbilical points on three dimensional strictly pseudoconvex CR manifolds. I. Manifolds with U(1)U(1)-action, Mathematische Annalen 368 (2017), no. 1–2, 537–560. DOI: 10.1007/s00208-016-1439-5, arXiv:1508.02612, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-016-1439-5
  5. Peter Ebenfelt and Dmitri Zaitsev, A new invariant equation for umbilical points on real hypersurfaces in C2\mathbb C^2 and applications, Communications in Analysis and Geometry 27 (2019), no. 7, 1549–1582. DOI: 10.4310/CAG.2019.v27.n7.a4, arXiv:1605.08709 (preprint issued under the title Invariants and Umbilical Points on Three Dimensional CR Manifolds embedded in C2\mathbb C^2), https://doi.org/10.4310/CAG.2019.v27.n7.a4
  6. Peter Ebenfelt, The umbilical locus on the boundary of strictly pseudoconvex domains in C2\mathbb C^2, International Journal of Mathematics 28 (2017), no. 9, 1740001. DOI: 10.1142/S0129167X17400018, arXiv:1704.03283, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129167X17400018
  7. Peter Ebenfelt, Duong Ngoc Son, and Dmitri Zaitsev, A family of compact strictly pseudoconvex hypersurfaces in C2\mathbb C^2 without umbilical points, Mathematical Research Letters 25 (2018), no. 1, 75–84. DOI: 10.4310/MRL.2018.v25.n1.a4, arXiv:1609.02415, https://doi.org/10.4310/MRL.2018.v25.n1.a4
  8. Wei Guo Foo, Joel Merker, and The-Anh Ta, Nonvanishing of Cartan CR curvature on boundaries of Grauert tubes around hyperbolic surfaces, preprint, arXiv:1904.10203 (2019). arXiv:1904.10203, https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.10203
  9. Sean N. Curry and Peter Ebenfelt, Bounded strictly pseudoconvex domains in C2\mathbb C^2 with obstruction flat boundary, American Journal of Mathematics 143 (2021), no. 1, 265–306. DOI: 10.1353/ajm.2021.0004, https://doi.org/10.1353/ajm.2021.0004
  10. Sean N. Curry and Peter Ebenfelt, Bounded strictly pseudoconvex domains in C2\mathbb C^2 with obstruction flat boundary II, Advances in Mathematics 352 (2019), 611–631. DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2019.06.011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2019.06.011
  11. Sean N. Curry and Peter Ebenfelt, Obstruction flat rigidity of the CR 3-sphere, Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 2021 (2021), no. 781, 105–126. DOI: 10.1515/crelle-2021-0051, arXiv:2104.01223, https://doi.org/10.1515/crelle-2021-0051
  12. Peter Ebenfelt, Ming Xiao, and Hang Xu, On the analytic and geometric aspects of obstruction flatness, Acta Mathematica Sinica, English Series 42 (2025), no. 5, 1171–1182. DOI: 10.1007/s10114-025-3239-x, arXiv:2212.04034, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10114-025-3239-x
  13. Duong Ngoc Son, The CR umbilical locus of a real ellipsoid in C2\mathbb C^2, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 518 (2023), no. 1, 126701. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2022.126701, arXiv:2205.03342, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2022.126701
  14. Duong Ngoc Son, The total Cartan curvature of Reinhardt surfaces, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 530 (2024), no. 1, 127652. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2023.127652, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2023.127652