A noetherian ring is a splinter if it is a direct summand of every finite extension ring. Datta and Tucker proved that the splinter locus of a locally noetherian scheme of prime characteristic is open in the two large classes they treat (F-finite schemes, and schemes locally essentially of finite type over a noetherian local G-ring of characteristic p), and in equal characteristic zero openness is immediate because splinters coincide with normal rings. They state the expectation that splinter loci should be open for arbitrary excellent schemes in any characteristic. The expectation remains unproved: no work settles openness for excellent mixed-characteristic schemes (for instance spectra of rings essentially of finite type over the p-adic integers) or for excellent prime-characteristic schemes outside the two treated classes, and the parallel openness question for the adjacent property of birational derived splinters is likewise explicitly open (Lyu, Question 8.1).

Background

A noetherian ring RR is called a splinter if every finite ring map R→SR\to S that is surjective on spectra admits an RR-linear left inverse; equivalently, RR is a direct summand, as an RR-module, of every module-finite extension ring. The assertion that regular noetherian rings are splinters is the direct summand conjecture, now a theorem in all characteristics (settled in mixed characteristic around 2016-2018 by perfectoid methods), and it makes the splinter condition a fundamental notion of singularity. Splinters are always normal, and conversely every normal noetherian Q\mathbf{Q}-algebra is a splinter, so the notion is substantive precisely in prime and mixed characteristic. For a locally noetherian scheme XX one accordingly studies the splinter locus

Spl⁡(X)={x∈X: OX,x is a splinter}.\operatorname{Spl}(X)=\{x\in X:\ \mathcal{O}_{X,x}\ \text{is a splinter}\}.

For the local ring properties usually met in geometry and arithmetic (normal, Cohen-Macaulay, Gorenstein, complete intersection) the corresponding loci are open on the schemes one encounters, and asking the same for the splinter locus is a basic question about these singularities; Datta and Tucker single it out as one of the outstanding unresolved issues. In equal characteristic zero the question is immediate: there the splinter locus is the normal locus, and the normal locus of a quasi-excellent scheme is open. (Excellence, and its weakening quasi-excellence, are standard regularity conditions on formal fibers and regular loci, satisfied by schemes of finite type over fields, over the integers, and over complete local rings; virtually all schemes arising in arithmetic geometry are excellent.) In prime and mixed characteristic the question is genuinely open beyond the classes settled by Datta and Tucker.

Their theorem covers schemes of prime characteristic p>0p>0 that are either FF-finite (the Frobenius endomorphism x↦xpx\mapsto x^p makes the ring a finite module over its image, as for varieties over perfect fields) or locally essentially of finite type over a noetherian local ring of characteristic pp whose formal fibers are geometrically regular (the G-ring condition underlying excellence); this includes all varieties over fields of positive characteristic and complete local rings of characteristic pp. Their method shapes what remains open: for an FF-pure domain RR (Frobenius is pure, i.e. universally injective), the trace ideals τS/R=im⁡(Hom⁡R(S,R)→R)\tau_{S/R}=\operatorname{im}(\operatorname{Hom}_R(S,R)\to R) of the finite subalgebras SS of the absolute integral closure R+R^{+} (the integral closure of RR in an algebraic closure of its fraction field) are uniformly FF-compatible ideals, that is, ideals stable under all Frobenius-compatible maps, a prime-characteristic analogue of centers of log canonicity. In their classes there are only finitely many such ideals, the traces stabilize, and the non-splinter locus is the closed set V(τR)V(\tau_R) cut out by a single trace ideal. The authors write: "We expect the splinter loci to be open for arbitrary excellent schemes in any characteristic," while noting that excellence-type hypotheses cannot be dropped entirely: by a meta construction of Hochster there exist locally excellent (but not excellent) noetherian domains whose splinter loci are not open.

The difficulty is that this whole mechanism is Frobenius-based. In prime and mixed characteristic, excellent local splinters are known to be Cohen-Macaulay and pseudo-rational (a characteristic-free strengthening of rational singularities), and in prime characteristic splinters are conjectured to coincide with strongly FF-regular rings, the tight-closure-theoretic analogue of Kawamata log terminal singularities (tight closure being an ideal-closure operation defined via the Frobenius); this conjecture is known for Gorenstein rings, for Q\mathbf{Q}-Gorenstein rings (Singh), and for rings with noetherian anti-canonical cover. In mixed characteristic, where none of the Frobenius machinery exists, splinter-type conditions are currently approached through perfectoid techniques: mixed-characteristic splinters are Cohen-Macaulay and have rational singularities, and an active line of work develops perfectoid pure and perfectoid injective singularities (purity of the ring into a suitable perfectoid, i.e. p-adically complete and 'almost perfect', extension, as analogues of FF-pure and FF-injective singularities). None of this delivers an analogue of the finite stabilization of traces, which is what openness of splinter loci in mixed characteristic would seem to require.

Problem Statement

Determine whether the splinter locus of every excellent noetherian scheme is open. Following the expectation stated by Datta and Tucker at the end of the introduction of "Openness of splinter loci in prime characteristic": is

Spl⁡(X)={x∈X: OX,x is a splinter}\operatorname{Spl}(X)=\{x\in X:\ \mathcal{O}_{X,x}\ \text{is a splinter}\}

an open subset of XX for every excellent noetherian scheme XX, in arbitrary characteristic?

The following cases are known: (a) equal characteristic zero, where quasi-excellence suffices because the splinter locus is the normal locus; (b) prime characteristic p>0p>0, where openness holds when XX is FF-finite or locally essentially of finite type over a noetherian local G-ring of characteristic pp (Datta and Tucker). The remaining open cases are mixed characteristic (the central one, for example X=Spec⁡RX=\operatorname{Spec}R with RR essentially of finite type over Zp\mathbf{Z}_p or over an excellent mixed-characteristic local ring such as a discrete valuation ring or a formal power series ring over one) and excellent schemes of prime characteristic that are neither FF-finite nor locally essentially of finite type over a noetherian local G-ring of characteristic pp. An affirmative answer is a proof of openness for all excellent schemes in every characteristic; a negative answer is an excellent scheme together with a point of Spl⁡(X)\operatorname{Spl}(X) at which openness fails (non-splinter points in every neighborhood). Some excellence-type hypothesis is necessary: locally excellent non-excellent domains with non-open splinter locus exist by Hochster's meta construction.

References

  1. Rankeya Datta and Kevin Tucker, Openness of splinter loci in prime characteristic, Journal of Algebra 629 (2023), 307-357, DOI 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2023.03.025; arXiv:2103.10525, https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.10525
  2. Rankeya Datta and Kevin Tucker, On some permanence properties of (derived) splinters, Michigan Mathematical Journal 73 (2023), no. 2, 371-400, DOI 10.1307/mmj/20205951; arXiv:1909.06891, https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.06891
  3. Melvin Hochster, Non-openness of loci in Noetherian rings, Duke Mathematical Journal 40 (1973), 215-219, DOI 10.1215/s0012-7094-73-04020-9, https://doi.org/10.1215/s0012-7094-73-04020-9
  4. Bhargav Bhatt, Algebraic geometry in mixed characteristic, arXiv:2112.12010, https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.12010
  5. Bhargav Bhatt, Linquan Ma, Zsolt Patakfalvi, Karl Schwede, Kevin Tucker, Joe Waldron, Jakub Witaszek, Perfectoid pure singularities, arXiv:2409.17965, https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.17965
  6. Benjamin Baily, Karina Dovgodko, Austyn Simpson, Jack Westbrook, On deformation of perfectoid purity in Gorenstein domains, arXiv:2504.02966, https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.02966
  7. Hanlin Cai, Suchitra Pande, Eamon Quinlan-Gallego, Karl Schwede, Kevin Tucker, Plus-pure thresholds of some cusp-like singularities in mixed characteristic, arXiv:2501.07528, https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.07528
  8. Shiji Lyu, On some properties of birational derived splinters, Michigan Mathematical Journal (2026), DOI 10.1307/mmj/20236489; arXiv:2210.03193, https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03193
  9. Shiji Lyu, Permanence properties of splinters via ultrapower, Michigan Mathematical Journal 75 (2025), no. 3, 615-622, DOI 10.1307/mmj/20226274; arXiv:2203.09019, https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.09019
  10. Linquan Ma and Thomas Polstra, F-Singularities: A Commutative Algebra Approach, book manuscript (continuously updated draft), Purdue University, accessed August 2026, https://www.math.purdue.edu/~ma326/F-singularitiesBook.pdf
  11. Anurag K. Singh, Q-Gorenstein splinter rings of characteristic p are F-regular, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 127 (1999), no. 2, 201-205, DOI 10.1017/s0305004199003710, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305004199003710
  12. Ian Aberbach, Craig Huneke, Thomas Polstra, On the equality of test ideals, Advances in Mathematics 441 (2024), 109559, DOI 10.1016/j.aim.2024.109559; arXiv:2301.02202, https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.02202
  13. Felipe Pérez and Rebecca R. G., Characteristic-free test ideals, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Series B 8 (2021), no. 24, 754-787, DOI 10.1090/btran/55; arXiv:1907.02150, https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.02150
  14. Johannes Krah and Charles Vial, On proper splinters in positive characteristic, Compositio Mathematica 161 (2025), no. 10, 2493-2544, DOI 10.1112/S0010437X25102418; arXiv:2309.02511, https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.02511
  15. S. Loepp and Austyn Simpson, Noncatenary splinters in prime characteristic, Journal of Algebra 677 (2025), 61-87, DOI 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2025.03.029; arXiv:2401.00925, https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.00925
  16. Takumi Murayama, Equidimensional morphisms onto splinters are pure, arXiv:2512.15563, https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.15563