The model problem introduced by Crandall, Lions and Souganidis in 1989 asks for solutions of ut−Δu+∣∇u∣p=0u_t-\Delta u+|\nabla u|^p=0 in Ω×(0,∞)\Omega\times(0,\infty) with u=0u=0 on ∂Ω\partial\Omega and the singular initial datum u(⋅,0)=+∞u(\cdot,0)=+\infty on a smooth subdomain D⊂⊂ΩD\subset\subset\Omega, u(⋅,0)=0u(\cdot,0)=0 on Ωˉ∖Dˉ\bar\Omega\setminus\bar D, the initial conditions being uniform limits on compact subsets as t↓0t\downarrow 0. They proved existence for every p>1p>1, the interface trichotomy lim⁡t↓0u=0\lim_{t\downarrow 0}u=0, ln⁡2\ln 2, +∞+\infty on ∂D\partial D according as p>2p>2, p=2p=2, 1<p<21<p<2, and uniqueness for p≥2p\ge 2; for 1<p<21<p<2 uniqueness was proved only when Ω\Omega and DD are star-shaped with respect to a common point, and they conjectured that the geometric assumption can be dropped. Bidaut-Véron and Dao (2012-2015) recast the question in the initial-trace framework, constructing a minimal solution YDΩY_D^\Omega and a maximal solution uDΩu_D^\Omega with this singular trace, proving uniqueness when DD alone is star-shaped, and showing that the weak and classical solution classes coincide for 1<p<(N+2)/(N+1)1<p<(N+2)/(N+1); whether YDΩ=uDΩY_D^\Omega=u_D^\Omega for a general smooth DD was left open and is explicitly described as delicate. The problem: does uniqueness hold in the natural class for arbitrary smooth D⊂⊂ΩD\subset\subset\Omega and all 1<p<21<p<2?

Background

The study of evolution equations with infinite initial data was systematized in the late 1980s, motivated in particular by large-deviation asymptotics for diffusion processes: if Pε(x,t)P_\varepsilon(x,t) is the probability that a small-noise diffusion remains in a bounded domain up to a prescribed time, the logarithmic transform uε=−εlog⁡Pεu_\varepsilon=-\varepsilon\log P_\varepsilon leads, as ε→0\varepsilon\to 0, to Hamilton–Jacobi equations whose initial datum is identically +∞+\infty on part of the domain. Crandall, Lions and Souganidis developed an abstract theory for such data: given an order-preserving semigroup S(t)S(t) on a function lattice (the solution flow of an evolution equation, mapping smaller data to smaller solutions and satisfying S(t)∘S(s)=S(t+s)S(t)\circ S(s)=S(t+s)), the supremum M(t)=sup⁡{S(t)φ}M(t)=\sup\{S(t)\varphi\} over a suitable family of admissible data defines a maximal trajectory, a universal upper bound for all solutions with data below the given one. They proved universal boundary bounds of the form u(x,t)≤B(t) d(x)u(x,t)\le B(t)\,d(x), where d(x)d(x) is the distance from xx to ∂Ω\partial\Omega, for solutions of ut−εLu+H(x,∇u)=0u_t-\varepsilon Lu+H(x,\nabla u)=0 with Hamiltonians HH growing superlinearly in the gradient, and used them to construct and characterize maximal solutions with data u(⋅,0)≡+∞u(\cdot,0)\equiv+\infty. Here a viscosity solution is the standard weak notion for Hamilton–Jacobi and degenerate elliptic equations, defined by replacing derivatives at test points by those of smooth functions touching the graph from above (subsolution) and from below (supersolution), and lower semicontinuous means u(x)≤lim inf⁡y→xu(y)u(x)\le\liminf_{y\to x}u(y). For the first-order equation ut+H(x,∇u)=0u_t+H(x,\nabla u)=0 the maximal solution is in general only lower semicontinuous, and its continuity was among the issues the paper left open. The concrete model problem isolating the effect of the singular datum is ut−Δu+∣∇u∣p=0in Ω×(0,∞),u_t-\Delta u+|\nabla u|^p=0 \quad\text{in } \Omega\times(0,\infty), with u=0u=0 on ∂Ω×(0,∞)\partial\Omega\times(0,\infty) and initial conditions u(⋅,t)→+∞u(\cdot,t)\to+\infty uniformly on compact subsets of DD and u(⋅,t)→0u(\cdot,t)\to 0 uniformly on compact subsets of Ωˉ∖Dˉ\bar\Omega\setminus\bar D as t↓0t\downarrow 0, where Ω\Omega is bounded and smooth and D⊂⊂ΩD\subset\subset\Omega is smooth. The equation — a heat equation with nonlinear gradient absorption, also called the viscous Hamilton–Jacobi equation, arising in stochastic control and in KPZ-type (Kardar–Parisi–Zhang) models of surface growth (as recalled for instance in the recent classification results of Damagui Chabi and Souplet) — is exactly solvable for the borderline exponent p=2p=2 by the Hopf–Cole transform v=e−uv=e^{-u}, under which vv solves the heat equation with datum 00 on DD and 11 on Ω∖Dˉ\Omega\setminus\bar D, so that at the interface v→1/2v\to 1/2 and u→ln⁡2u\to\ln 2. Crandall–Lions–Souganidis proved: existence of a solution for every p>1p>1; for x∈∂Dx\in\partial D the trichotomy lim⁡t↓0u(x,t)=0\lim_{t\downarrow 0}u(x,t)=0, ln⁡2\ln 2, +∞+\infty according as p>2p>2, p=2p=2, 1<p<21<p<2; and uniqueness for p≥2p\ge 2 with no restriction on the geometry, while for 1<p<21<p<2 uniqueness was established under the assumption that Ω\Omega and DD are star-shaped with respect to the same point (a set is star-shaped if it contains a point x0x_0 such that the segment from x0x_0 to every point of the set lies in the set). That proof is a scaling-comparison argument: the equation is invariant under u(x,t)↦η−γu(x/η,t/η2)u(x,t)\mapsto\eta^{-\gamma}u(x/\eta,t/\eta^2) with γ=(2−p)/(p−1)\gamma=(2-p)/(p-1), and star-shapedness makes the dilates of the pair (Ω,D)(\Omega,D) nested, so any solution is squeezed between the canonical solutions on the dilates ηD\eta D and forced to coincide with their limit. The authors conjectured that star-shapedness can be dropped. The question was taken up by Bidaut-Véron and Dao within a broader initial-trace program: every nonnegative weak solution (distributional, with ∣∇u∣q|\nabla u|^q locally integrable) of ut−Δu+∣∇u∣q=0u_t-\Delta u+|\nabla u|^q=0 has an initial trace, a Borel measure which is +∞+\infty on a closed singular set SS and a locally finite measure off it; the model datum above is the trace (Dˉ,0)(\bar D,0). They proved universal decay estimates of order t−1/(q−1)t^{-1/(q-1)} valid for all weak solutions without any uniqueness assumption, and new uniqueness results for finite measure or LrL^r data, but only in subcritical ranges (q<(N+2)/(N+1)q<(N+2)/(N+1) for measures, q<(N+2r)/(N+r)q<(N+2r)/(N+r) for LrL^r data), which do not cover the infinite datum on DD. For the trace (Dˉ,0)(\bar D,0) they constructed the minimal solution YDΩY_D^\Omega (supremum of solutions with data supported in DD) and the maximal solution uDΩu_D^\Omega (infimum of solutions with data supported in small outer neighborhoods of DD), proved uniqueness in the classical class whenever DD alone is star-shaped — dropping the condition on Ω\Omega — and proved that the weak and classical classes coincide for 1<q<(N+2)/(N+1)1<q<(N+2)/(N+1). They also constructed a nonradial self-similar solution with trace (R+N,0)(\mathbb{R}^N_+,0) growing like t−1/(q−1)t^{-1/(q-1)} in the singular half-space and t−(2−q)/(q−1)t^{-(2-q)/(q-1)} along its boundary, showing the solution class is rich. Uniqueness for a general smooth DD — an annulus, or a disjoint union of balls — with 1<p<21<p<2 remains open and is the surviving core of the conjecture.

Problem Statement

Let N≥1N\ge 1, let Ω⊂RN\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^N be a bounded domain with smooth boundary, let D⊂⊂ΩD\subset\subset\Omega be a nonempty open set with smooth boundary, and let 1<p<21<p<2. Consider the Crandall–Lions–Souganidis model problem ut−Δu+∣∇u∣p=0in Ω×(0,∞),u_t-\Delta u+|\nabla u|^p=0 \quad\text{in } \Omega\times(0,\infty), u=0on ∂Ω×(0,∞),u=0 \quad\text{on } \partial\Omega\times(0,\infty), with the singular initial condition lim⁡t↓0u(x,t)=+∞ uniformly on compact subsets of D,lim⁡t↓0u(x,t)=0 uniformly on compact subsets of Ωˉ∖Dˉ.\lim_{t\downarrow 0}u(x,t)=+\infty \text{ uniformly on compact subsets of } D, \qquad \lim_{t\downarrow 0}u(x,t)=0 \text{ uniformly on compact subsets of } \bar\Omega\setminus\bar D. Let C\mathcal{C} denote the class of nonnegative functions u∈C2,1(Ω×(0,∞))∩C(Ωˉ×(0,∞))u\in C^{2,1}(\Omega\times(0,\infty))\cap C(\bar\Omega\times(0,\infty)) satisfying the equation, the Dirichlet condition, and both initial limits above (this is the solution class of the model problem as defined by Crandall–Lions–Souganidis, namely a classical solution for t>0t>0 attaining the initial conditions as uniform limits on compact subsets; it is the class C\mathcal{C} of Bidaut-Véron and Dao). Question: does C\mathcal{C} contain exactly one solution for every such triple (Ω,D,p)(\Omega,D,p) — that is, does uniqueness hold without any geometric assumption such as star-shapedness of DD (or of Ω\Omega and DD with respect to a common point)? Equivalently, do the minimal solution YDΩY_D^\Omega and the maximal solution uDΩu_D^\Omega of Bidaut-Véron and Dao coincide for every such triple? A single configuration (Ω,D,p)(\Omega,D,p) with 1<p<21<p<2 and DD not star-shaped carrying two distinct elements of C\mathcal{C} would refute the conjecture. The same question for the Cauchy problem on RN\mathbb{R}^N with bounded smooth singular set is the natural companion; the present statement concerns the bounded-domain Dirichlet case above.

References

  1. Michael G. Crandall, Pierre-Louis Lions, Panagiotis E. Souganidis. Maximal solutions and universal bounds for some partial differential equations of evolution. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 105 (1989), no. 2, 163-190. DOI: 10.1007/BF00250835. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00250835
  2. Marie-Françoise Bidaut-Véron, Nguyen Anh Dao. Initial trace of solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi parabolic equation with absorption. Advanced Nonlinear Studies 15 (2015), no. 4, 889-921. DOI: 10.1515/ans-2015-0408. arXiv:1407.4442. https://doi.org/10.1515/ans-2015-0408
  3. Marie-Françoise Bidaut-Véron, Nguyen Anh Dao. L∞ estimates and uniqueness results for nonlinear parabolic equations with gradient absorption terms. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 91 (2013), 121-152. DOI: 10.1016/j.na.2013.06.013. arXiv:1202.2674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2013.06.013
  4. Marie-Françoise Bidaut-Véron, Nguyen Anh Dao. Isolated initial singularities for the viscous Hamilton-Jacobi equation. Advances in Differential Equations 17 (2012), no. 9-10, 903-934. DOI: 10.57262/ade/1355702927. https://doi.org/10.57262/ade/1355702927
  5. E. N. Barron, R. Jensen. Semicontinuous viscosity solutions for Hamilton-Jacobi equations with convex Hamiltonians. Communications in Partial Differential Equations 15 (1990), no. 12, 293-309. DOI: 10.1080/03605309908820745. https://doi.org/10.1080/03605309908820745
  6. Nguyen Anh Dao, J. I. Díaz. Existence and uniqueness of singular solutions of p-Laplacian with absorption for Dirichlet boundary condition. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 145 (2017), no. 12, 5235-5245. DOI: 10.1090/PROC/13647. https://doi.org/10.1090/PROC/13647
  7. Razvan Gabriel Iagar, Philippe Laurençot. Self-similar extinction for a diffusive Hamilton–Jacobi equation with critical absorption. Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations 56 (2017), no. 3, Paper No. 77. DOI: 10.1007/s00526-017-1158-0. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00526-017-1158-0
  8. Philippe Souplet, Qi S. Zhang. Global solutions of inhomogeneous Hamilton-Jacobi equations. Journal d'Analyse Mathématique 99 (2006), 355-396. DOI: 10.1007/BF02789452. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02789452
  9. Loth Damagui Chabi, Philippe Souplet. Classification of entire and ancient solutions of the diffusive Hamilton-Jacobi equation. Preprint (2025). arXiv:2507.12214. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.12214
  10. Wen Tao, Wantong Li, Jianwen Sun, Wenbing Xu. Interface dynamics in nonlocal dispersal Fisher-KPP equations. Acta Mathematica Scientia 45 (2025), no. 5, 1774-1813. DOI: 10.1007/s10473-025-0503-1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10473-025-0503-1