Weil's 1976 paper Sur les periodes des integrales abeliennes expresses the periods of the Fermat-type curves Ca:yl=xa(1−x)C_a: y^l=x^a(1-x), and the special values of the Jacobi-sum Hecke L-series attached to their Jacobians, in terms of products of Euler beta and gamma values - in both cases only up to undetermined algebraic factors - and asks two things: to identify the number fields, denominators, and p-adic continuity properties of these factors, and to extend the method beyond the special index sets TaT_a that the curves CaC_a supply (the quadratic residues mod 11 already form no TaT_a, and primes such as 23 point to intermediate Jacobians of higher-dimensional varieties). Later work resolved the structural extension up to a rational factor within the Jacobi-sum (abelian-field) range and for the prime discriminants p≡3(mod4)p\equiv 3 \pmod 4: Gross (1978) treats all prime discriminants p≡3(mod4)p\equiv 3 \pmod 4 geometrically, and Anderson (1986) proves Lichtenbaum's gamma hypothesis for every abelian field. What remains open is the exact arithmetic of the undetermined factor - its number field, integrality, and p-adic interpolation - which later authors tie to integral Beilinson and Tamagawa-number refinements.

Background

A period of a smooth projective curve or abelian variety over Q‾\overline{\mathbb{Q}} is the integral of an algebraic differential form over a topological cycle; periods are the coordinates through which de Rham cohomology and singular homology are compared. The Jacobian of a curve is the abelian variety carrying its holomorphic differentials. An abelian variety has complex multiplication (CM) when its endomorphism ring is an order in a number field of degree twice its dimension; the L-function of such a variety factors into Hecke L-series, where a Hecke character (Grossencharakter) is a continuous complex-valued character on the ideals of a number field. The Hecke characters attached to Fermat-type covers of the line are generated by Jacobi sums, finite-field analogues of beta integrals studied by Weil in 1952.

The prototype result is the Chowla-Selberg formula (1967): the periods of an elliptic curve with CM by an imaginary quadratic order equal, up to algebraic factors, explicit products of values of Euler's gamma function Γ\Gamma at rational arguments; their proof was analytic, via the Kronecker limit formula, which computes the constant term at s=1s=1 in the expansion of the Epstein zeta function (the zeta function attached to a positive definite quadratic form).

Weil's 1976 paper Sur les periodes des integrales abeliennes provides a geometric route. For the Fermat-type curves Ca:yl=xa(1−x)C_a: y^{l}=x^{a}(1-x) with ll prime and aa coprime to ll, write ζ\zeta for a primitive ll-th root of unity and ⟨t⟩\langle t\rangle for the fractional part of tt. A natural basis of differentials on CaC_a has periods equal, up to roots of unity and algebraic numbers, to beta-function values B(⟨at⟩,⟨t⟩)B(\langle at\rangle,\langle t\rangle) with B(x,y)=Γ(x)Γ(y)/Γ(x+y)B(x,y)=\Gamma(x)\Gamma(y)/\Gamma(x+y), for t=n/lt=n/l, 1≤n≤l−11\le n\le l-1; the index set governing which pairs occur is Ta={n∈{1,…,l−1}:⟨an/l⟩+⟨n/l⟩<1}T_a=\{n\in\{1,\dots,l-1\} : \langle an/l\rangle+\langle n/l\rangle<1\}. Via a theorem of Shimura relating periods of CM abelian varieties to special values of automorphic forms, the computation transfers to L-values: the special values at s=1s=1 of the Jacobi-sum Hecke L-series attached to the Jacobian of CaC_a equal, up to algebraic factors, the same gamma products, such as Γ(⟨at⟩)Γ(⟨t⟩)Γ(⟨−(a+1)t⟩)\Gamma(\langle at\rangle)\Gamma(\langle t\rangle)\Gamma(\langle -(a+1)t\rangle). Weil's paper records two issues it does not resolve. First, the algebraic factors relating the L-values and the gamma products are unidentified: their number fields, denominators, and p-adic continuity properties are undetermined. Second, the method is tied to the index sets TaT_a that the curves CaC_a supply: the quadratic residues modulo 11, for example, form no TaT_a (while for l=7l=7, T2T_2 is exactly the set of quadratic residues), so the method cannot recover Chowla-Selberg for the elliptic curves with CM by Q(−11)\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-11}); and for primes such as 23 one is led to intermediate Jacobians - abelian varieties obtained from the middle cohomology of higher-dimensional varieties by integrating middle-dimensional forms over middle-dimensional cycles - where the needed period information was unavailable in 1976.

A modern up-to-algebraic-number reformulation of the first issue is the Gross-Deligne conjecture (stated by Gross in 1978): for an abelian variety with CM, the determinant of its period matrix in a suitable basis equals, up to an algebraic number, an explicit product of gamma values at rational arguments; equivalently, for a CM motive - a piece of the cohomology of a variety cut out by its CM automorphisms, of cohomological degree called its weight - the periods are pinned by gamma values up to an algebraic number. In weight 1 the statement is essentially proved; in higher weight it is open in general and would follow from the Hodge conjecture (the conjecture that every rational Hodge class on a smooth projective complex variety is the class of an algebraic cycle). The exact rational factor in the known up-to-Q×\mathbb{Q}^{\times} statements is governed by Beilinson's conjecture relating L-values to regulators (integrals of motivic cohomology classes) and by the Tamagawa number conjecture of Bloch and Kato, which predicts the exact rational numbers involved; the p-adic side involves the Gross-Koblitz pp-adic gamma function, the p-adic analogue of Γ\Gamma whose values at fractions are Gauss sums (exponential sums over finite fields).

Problem Statement

Weil's question, in its original generality: for the Fermat-type curves Ca:yl=xa(1−x)C_a: y^l=x^a(1-x) and the Jacobi-sum Hecke characters their Jacobians carry, the periods and the corresponding special Hecke L-values are beta/gamma products up to unidentified algebraic factors. Determine those factors exactly: (i) the number field to which each factor belongs; (ii) its denominator, i.e. for which integral structures (choice of integral differential basis and normalization of the Hecke L-series) the factor is integral; (iii) its p-adic continuity and interpolation properties as the data vary p-adically; and (iv) extend the formulae beyond the index sets TaT_a arising from the curves CaC_a - to arbitrary Jacobi-sum data (the quadratic residues mod 11, for instance, form no TaT_a) and arbitrary imaginary quadratic fields (all abelian fields, in the sense of the Jacobi-sum Hecke characters Weil considers), and to the higher-dimensional cases, such as primes like 23, that lead to intermediate Jacobians. Status of the window: within the Jacobi-sum/abelian-field scope of Weil's question, part (iv) is settled up to a rational factor - Anderson (1986) proves the gamma hypothesis for every abelian field - and Gross (1978) handles the prime-discriminant p≡3(mod4)p\equiv 3 \pmod 4 higher-dimensional cases geometrically; for CM abelian varieties with general (non-abelian) CM fields, only the up-to-algebraic-factor structure is known (Deligne's results as formulated and proved in Anderson (1982); Gross's formulae for B(p)B(p) recorded in Gross (2020)). The surviving crux is therefore the exact arithmetic of the undetermined factor in (i)-(iii). As related open context: Otsubo (2015) relates the exact rational factors for Fermat motives to the predictions of the Tamagawa-number (Bloch-Kato) conjecture and leaves general formulae and p-adic regulators open, and Fresán (2017) records the Gross-Deligne conjecture - itself an up-to-algebraic-number statement - as wide open in weight greater than one.

The task is to determine the factors (i)-(iii) for the Fermat-type curves CaC_a and their Jacobi-sum Hecke L-series and for the extension data of (iv) - arbitrary Jacobi-sum data such as the quadratic residues mod 11, arbitrary imaginary quadratic and abelian fields, and the higher-dimensional cases such as prime 23 - over the full range of Weil's question; the target is the exact arithmetic in general, not only for an explicitly bounded family.

References

  1. André Weil, Sur les périodes des intégrales abéliennes, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 29(6) (1976) 813-819, DOI 10.1002/cpa.3160290620, https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160290620
  2. André Weil, Jacobi sums as "Grössencharaktere", Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 73(3) (1952) 487-495, DOI 10.1090/s0002-9947-1952-0051263-0, https://doi.org/10.1090/s0002-9947-1952-0051263-0
  3. S. Chowla and A. Selberg, On Epstein's zeta-function, Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 227 (1967) 86-110, DOI 10.1515/crll.1967.227.86, https://doi.org/10.1515/crll.1967.227.86
  4. Benedict H. Gross, On the periods of abelian integrals and a formula of Chowla and Selberg, Inventiones Mathematicae 45(2) (1978) 193-211, DOI 10.1007/BF01390273, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01390273
  5. Benedict H. Gross and David E. Rohrlich, Some results on the Mordell-Weil group of the Jacobian of the Fermat curve, Inventiones Mathematicae 44(3) (1978) 201-224, DOI 10.1007/BF01403161, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01403161
  6. Neal Koblitz and David Rohrlich, Simple factors in the Jacobian of a Fermat curve, Canadian Journal of Mathematics 30(6) (1978) 1183-1205, DOI 10.4153/CJM-1978-099-6, https://doi.org/10.4153/CJM-1978-099-6
  7. Goro Shimura, Automorphic forms and the periods of abelian varieties, Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan 31(3) (1979) 561-592, DOI 10.2969/JMSJ/03130561, https://doi.org/10.2969/JMSJ/03130561
  8. Benedict H. Gross and Neal Koblitz, Gauss sums and the p-adic gamma function, Annals of Mathematics (2) 109(3) (1979) 569-581, DOI 10.2307/1971226, https://doi.org/10.2307/1971226
  9. Greg W. Anderson, Logarithmic derivatives of Dirichlet L-functions and the periods of abelian varieties, Compositio Mathematica 45(3) (1982) 315-332, NUMDAM item CM_1982__45_3_315_0, https://www.numdam.org/item/CM_1982__45_3_315_0/
  10. Daniel S. Kubert and Stephen Lichtenbaum, Jacobi-sum Hecke characters and Gauss-sum identities, Compositio Mathematica 48(1) (1983) 55-87, NUMDAM item CM_1983__48_1_55_0, https://www.numdam.org/item/CM_1983__48_1_55_0/
  11. A. A. Beilinson, Higher regulators and values of L-functions, Journal of Soviet Mathematics 30(2) (1985) 2036-2070, DOI 10.1007/bf02105861, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02105861
  12. Greg W. Anderson, Cyclotomy and an extension of the Taniyama group, Compositio Mathematica 57(2) (1986) 153-217, NUMDAM item CM_1986__57_2_153_0, https://www.numdam.org/item/CM_1986__57_2_153_0/
  13. Spencer Bloch and Kazuya Kato, L-functions and Tamagawa numbers of motives, in The Grothendieck Festschrift, Vol. I (Progress in Mathematics 86), Birkhäuser (1990) 333-400, DOI 10.1007/978-0-8176-4574-8_9, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4574-8_9
  14. Pierre Colmez, Périodes des variétés abéliennes à multiplication complexe, Annals of Mathematics (2) 138(3) (1993) 625-683, DOI 10.2307/2946559, https://doi.org/10.2307/2946559
  15. Takeshi Saito and Tomohide Terasoma, Determinant of period integrals, Journal of the American Mathematical Society 10(4) (1997) 865-937, DOI 10.1090/S0894-0347-97-00243-9, https://doi.org/10.1090/S0894-0347-97-00243-9
  16. Vincent Maillot and Damian Rössler, On the periods of motives with complex multiplication and a conjecture of Gross-Deligne, Annals of Mathematics (2) 160 (2004) 727-754, DOI 10.4007/annals.2004.160.727, https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2004.160.727
  17. Noriyuki Otsubo, On special values of Jacobi-sum Hecke L-functions, Experimental Mathematics 24(2) (2015) 247-259, DOI 10.1080/10586458.2014.971199, https://doi.org/10.1080/10586458.2014.971199 (preprint arXiv:1404.7476, https://arxiv.org/abs/1404.7476)
  18. Javier Fresán, Periods of Hodge structures and special values of the gamma function, Inventiones Mathematicae 208(1) (2017) 247-282, DOI 10.1007/s00222-016-0690-4, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-016-0690-4 (preprint arXiv:1403.4105, https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.4105)
  19. Benedict H. Gross, On the periods of abelian varieties, Notices of the International Congress of Chinese Mathematicians 8(2) (2020) 10-18, DOI 10.4310/ICCM.2020.V8.N2.A2, https://doi.org/10.4310/ICCM.2020.V8.N2.A2 (preprint arXiv:2005.04194, https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04194)