For each nonzero integer kk, the Mordell equation y2=x3+ky^2 = x^3 + k has only finitely many integer solutions, and Baker's 1968 paper converted this qualitative finiteness into the first fully explicit bound max⁡(∣x∣,∣y∣)<exp⁡{(1010∣k∣)104}\max(|x|,|y|) < \exp\{(10^{10}|k|)^{10^4}\}, with numerical constants far from what the method should deliver. This statement concerns the research program launched by that gap: Stark's effective bound log⁡max⁡{∣x∣,∣y∣}≪ϵ∣k∣1+ϵ\log\max\{|x|,|y|\} \ll_\epsilon |k|^{1+\epsilon} (1973), the explicit-constant refinements of Sprindžuk, Hajdu-Herendi, and Juricevic, von Känel's modularity-based bound (2014), the complete computational resolution of all 0<∣k∣≤1070 < |k| \le 10^7 by Bennett-Ghadermarzi (2015), and Pasten's power-saving bound log⁡max⁡{∣x∣,∣y∣}≪∣k∣1/2(log⁡(2∣k∣))4\log\max\{|x|,|y|\} \ll |k|^{1/2}(\log(2|k|))^4 (August 2026), which is the first improvement of the ∣k∣|k|-exponent in over fifty years. The surviving open core is precise: prove a new effective upper bound on log⁡max⁡{∣x∣,∣y∣}\log\max\{|x|,|y|\}, uniform over all nonzero kk, with asymptotically strictly smaller growth than ∣k∣1/2(log⁡(2∣k∣))4|k|^{1/2}(\log(2|k|))^4 (in particular any reduction of the exponent 1/21/2), thereby taking the next rigorous step from the current record toward the Oϵ(log⁡∣k∣)O_\epsilon(\log|k|) growth predicted by Hall's conjecture.

Background

The Mordell equation is the Diophantine equation y2=x3+ky^2 = x^3 + k in integer unknowns x,yx, y, for a fixed nonzero integer parameter kk. Its rational solutions form an elliptic curve (a smooth projective curve of genus one with a chosen origin, given here in short Weierstrass form), and its integer solutions are called the integral points of that curve. Mordell proved in the 1920s, building on Thue's work, that for each fixed kk the equation has only finitely many integer solutions; a Thue equation is an equation F(x,y)=mF(x,y) = m where FF is a homogeneous irreducible binary form (a homogeneous polynomial in two variables) of degree at least 33, and the classical reduction associates to a solution of y2=x3+ky^2 = x^3 + k the binary cubic form X3−3xXY2−2yY3X^3 - 3xXY^2 - 2yY^3 of discriminant −108k-108k and certain cubic Thue equations attached to it. Mordell's finiteness argument, like Siegel's more general theorem on integral points, is ineffective: it proves that a finite search would terminate without yielding any computable bound on where the search must end.

Effectivity came from Baker's theory of linear forms in logarithms, which gives explicit lower bounds for nonzero expressions b1log⁡α1+⋯+bnlog⁡αnb_1\log\alpha_1 + \dots + b_n\log\alpha_n with algebraic αi\alpha_i and integer bib_i. The source paper of this problem (Baker 1968) made the earlier effective arguments fully explicit and proved its Theorem 1: every integer solution of y2=x3+ky^2 = x^3 + k satisfies

max⁡(∣x∣,∣y∣)<exp⁡{(1010∣k∣)104}.\max(|x|,|y|) < \exp\left\{\left(10^{10}|k|\right)^{10^4}\right\}.

This closed the explicitness gap but with grotesquely non-optimal constants, obtained from many deliberately conservative numerical simplifications in the chain of estimates; the size of the bound was recognized as far from what the method should deliver, and improving it became the natural continuation.

The subsequent improvement program has two prongs. On the asymptotic prong, Stark (1973) proved that log⁡max⁡{∣x∣,∣y∣}≪ϵ∣k∣1+ϵ\log\max\{|x|,|y|\} \ll_\epsilon |k|^{1+\epsilon} with an effective constant depending only on ϵ\epsilon (here ≪\ll means inequality up to a constant factor, and an effective constant is one that is in principle computable). This shape was refined but not fundamentally improved for over fifty years: Sprindžuk's monograph systematized the effective theory of classical equations; Hajdu and Herendi (1998) gave the best fully explicit bounds for general elliptic equations, of roughly ∣k∣2(log⁡∣k∣)10|k|^2(\log|k|)^{10}-type growth for Mordell equations, and Juricevic (2008) improved the shape to roughly ∣k∣(log⁡∣k∣)4|k|(\log|k|)^4-type growth in the logarithm of the solution size for Mordell equations over Z\mathbb{Z}, with explicitly written but enormous constants; and von Känel (2014) found a fundamentally different, modularity-based proof (using the Shimura-Taniyama conjecture, now the modularity theorem asserting that every elliptic curve over the rationals arises from a modular form, together with Faltings heights of elliptic curves, where the height is a logarithmic measure of arithmetic complexity) yielding the explicit bound h(x),h(y)≤h(k)+4aS(log⁡aS)2h(x), h(y) \le h(k) + 4a_S(\log a_S)^2, with hh the logarithmic Weil height (for a rational number in lowest terms, the logarithm of the maximum of the absolute values of its numerator and denominator) and aSa_S a truncated version of kk bounded by a constant times ∣k∣|k|, which improved the previous explicit records and gave a new proof of Baker's effective finiteness not relying on transcendence techniques. On the practical prong, the equation has been completely solved for ever larger ranges of kk: Gebel, Pethő and Zimmer (1998) determined all solutions for ∣k∣<104|k| < 10^4 using linear forms in elliptic logarithms (elliptic analogues of Baker's logarithmic estimates, adapted to points on a fixed elliptic curve); Bennett and Ghadermarzi (2015) reached all 0<∣k∣≤1070 < |k| \le 10^7 through the classical reduction to cubic Thue equations combined with lower bounds for linear forms in logarithms and lattice-basis reduction (the LLL algorithm for finding short vectors in a lattice); and von Känel and Matschke (2023), followed by a Lean 3 formalization of class-group-based resolutions by Baanen, Best, Coppola and Dahmen (2023), developed modularity-based algorithms covering large classes of Mordell equations.

In August 2026 Pasten proved a new effective bound for cubic Thue-Mahler equations (Thue equations whose right-hand side is allowed to vary over integers with prime factors in a fixed finite set) with power-saving dependence on the regulator (a measure of the size of a unit lattice of a number field), and deduced that all integer solutions of y2=x3+ky^2 = x^3 + k satisfy log⁡max⁡{∣x∣,∣y∣}≪∣k∣1/2(log⁡(2∣k∣))4\log\max\{|x|,|y|\} \ll |k|^{1/2}(\log(2|k|))^4 with an effective absolute constant: the first power saving in the ∣k∣|k|-aspect, without restrictions on kk, in more than fifty years. This is the current record. For calibration, Hall's conjecture on the separation between squares and cubes asserts ∣x3−y2∣≫ϵx1/2−ϵ|x^3 - y^2| \gg_\epsilon x^{1/2-\epsilon} whenever x3≠y2x^3 \ne y^2 (supported by extensive computation, notably Elkies's lattice-reduction searches); applied to y2=x3+ky^2 = x^3 + k it predicts x≪ϵ∣k∣2+ϵx \ll_\epsilon |k|^{2+\epsilon}, hence max⁡{∣x∣,∣y∣}≪ϵ∣k∣3+ϵ\max\{|x|,|y|\} \ll_\epsilon |k|^{3+\epsilon}, that is, log⁡max⁡{∣x∣,∣y∣}≪ϵlog⁡∣k∣\log\max\{|x|,|y|\} \ll_\epsilon \log|k| — an unconditional polynomial bound on the largest solution in terms of ∣k∣|k|. The gap between the proven ∣k∣1/2(log⁡∣k∣)4|k|^{1/2}(\log|k|)^4 and the conjectural log⁡∣k∣\log|k| is the open territory that the source paper's question has become.

Problem Statement

Let kk be a nonzero integer and let (x,y)∈Z2(x,y) \in \mathbb{Z}^2 range over the integer solutions of the Mordell equation y2=x3+ky^2 = x^3 + k. The problem is to sharpen the effective quantitative control of the solution sizes in terms of ∣k∣|k| beyond the current record: prove, with a complete and effective argument, a new upper bound

log⁡max⁡{∣x∣,∣y∣}≤C F(∣k∣)\log\max\{|x|,|y|\} \le C\,F(|k|)

valid for every nonzero integer kk and every integer solution, where FF is an explicitly given growth function and CC is an effectively computable (ideally fully explicit) constant, such that F(t)=o(t1/2(log⁡2t)4)F(t) = o\left(t^{1/2}(\log 2t)^4\right) as t→∞t \to \infty; in particular, reducing the exponent 1/21/2 of ∣k∣|k| (a further power saving) is the strong form of the requested improvement. A further goal of this program is an explicit-constant refinement at the same record growth shape ∣k∣1/2(log⁡(2∣k∣))4|k|^{1/2}(\log(2|k|))^4 — the record bound of Pasten (2026) has only an effective and absolute implicit constant — improving the explicit bound provided by Baker. The bound must be uniform in kk: no restriction on the sign, size, or prime factorization of kk (bounds exploiting special factorizations, such as von Känel's truncation by ∏p∣kpmin⁡(2,vp(k))\prod_{p|k}p^{\min(2,v_p(k))}, already exist and do not by themselves answer the question), and no unhandled exceptional set of kk. No particular method is required. For calibration, the conjectural endpoint is the Hall-conjecture/abc-strength bound log⁡max⁡{∣x∣,∣y∣}≪ϵlog⁡∣k∣\log\max\{|x|,|y|\} \ll_\epsilon \log|k| (implied by Hall's prediction x≪ϵ∣k∣2+ϵx \ll_\epsilon |k|^{2+\epsilon}, since y2=x3+ky^2 = x^3 + k then gives max⁡{∣x∣,∣y∣}≪ϵ∣k∣3+ϵ\max\{|x|,|y|\} \ll_\epsilon |k|^{3+\epsilon}); the problem asks for the next rigorous step from the current record ≪∣k∣1/2(log⁡(2∣k∣))4\ll |k|^{1/2}(\log(2|k|))^4 toward that endpoint.

References

  1. A. Baker, Contributions to the theory of Diophantine equations II. The Diophantine equation y^2 = x^3 + k, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 263, no. 1139 (1968), 193-208. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.1968.0011, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1968.0011
  2. H. M. Stark, Effective estimates of solutions of some diophantine equations, Acta Arithmetica 24 (1973), 251-259. DOI: 10.4064/aa-24-3-251-259, https://doi.org/10.4064/aa-24-3-251-259
  3. V. G. Sprindžuk, Classical Diophantine Equations, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1559, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993. DOI: 10.1007/bfb0073786, https://doi.org/10.1007/bfb0073786
  4. L. Hajdu and T. Herendi, Explicit bounds for the solutions of elliptic equations with rational coefficients, Journal of Symbolic Computation 25 (1998), no. 3, 361-366. DOI: 10.1006/jsco.1997.0181, https://doi.org/10.1006/jsco.1997.0181
  5. J. Gebel, A. Pethő and H. G. Zimmer, On Mordell's equation, Compositio Mathematica 110 (1998), no. 3, 335-367. DOI: 10.1023/a:1000281602647, https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1000281602647
  6. R. Juricevic, Explicit estimates of solutions of some Diophantine equations, Functiones et Approximatio Commentarii Mathematici 38 (2) (2008), 171-194. DOI: 10.7169/facm/1229696538, https://doi.org/10.7169/facm/1229696538
  7. A. Baker and G. Wüstholz, Logarithmic Forms and Diophantine Geometry, New Mathematical Monographs 9, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511542862, https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511542862
  8. R. von Känel, Integral points on moduli schemes of elliptic curves, Transactions of the London Mathematical Society 1 (1) (2014), 85-115. DOI: 10.1112/tlms/tlu003, https://doi.org/10.1112/tlms/tlu003 (preprint: arXiv:1310.7263, https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.7263)
  9. M. A. Bennett and A. Ghadermarzi, Mordell's equation: a classical approach, LMS Journal of Computation and Mathematics 18 (2015), no. 1, 633-646. DOI: 10.1112/s1461157015000182, https://doi.org/10.1112/s1461157015000182 (preprint: arXiv:1311.7077, https://arxiv.org/abs/1311.7077)
  10. N. D. Elkies, Rational points near curves and small nonzero |x^3 - y^2| via lattice reduction, in: Algorithmic Number Theory (ANTS-IV, Leiden, 2000), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1838, Springer, Berlin, 2000, pp. 33-63. DOI: 10.1007/10722028_2, https://doi.org/10.1007/10722028_2
  11. R. von Känel and B. Matschke, Solving S-unit, Mordell, Thue, Thue-Mahler and generalized Ramanujan-Nagell equations via the Shimura-Taniyama conjecture, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society 286 (2023), no. 1419. DOI: 10.1090/memo/1419, https://doi.org/10.1090/memo/1419 (preprint: arXiv:1605.06079, https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.06079)
  12. A. Baanen, A. J. Best, N. Coppola and S. R. Dahmen, Formalized class group computations and integral points on Mordell elliptic curves, Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Certified Programs and Proofs (CPP 2023), ACM, 2023, pp. 47-62. DOI: 10.1145/3573105.3575682, https://doi.org/10.1145/3573105.3575682 (preprint: arXiv:2209.15492, https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.15492)
  13. H. Pasten, Power-saving bounds for Thue-Mahler and Mordell equations, preprint, 24 August 2026 (v2: 6 September 2026). arXiv:2608.23559, https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.23559
  14. M. P. Young, The number of solutions to Mordell's equations in constrained ranges, preprint (2014). arXiv:1405.7022, https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.7022
  15. H. Shabani-Solt and A. S. Janfada, A lower bound for the number of integral solutions of Mordell equation, Kodai Mathematical Journal 41 (2018), no. 1. DOI: 10.2996/kmj/1521424830, https://doi.org/10.2996/kmj/1521424830
  16. I. Jimenez Calvo, J. Herranz and G. Saez, A new algorithm to search for small nonzero |x^3 - y^2| values, preprint (2005). arXiv:math/0504579, https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0504579
  17. S. Aanderaa, L. Kristiansen and H. K. Ruud, A Preliminary Report on Search for Good Examples of Hall's Conjecture, preprint (2014). arXiv:1401.4345, https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.4345
  18. A. Dubickas, Small differences between cubic and rational numbers, Glasgow Mathematical Journal (2026), pp. 1-8, published online 17 June 2026. DOI: 10.1017/s0017089526100998, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0017089526100998