For a finite set AA in the residue class ring Zq\mathbb{Z}_q (the integers modulo qq), the sum-product theorem of Bourgain and Chang (2004) asserts that the sumset A+AA+A and the product set A⋅AA\cdot A cannot both be of size close to ∣A∣|A| unless AA is large relative to qq or concentrates in residue classes modulo a divisor of qq; the associated bounds for exponential sums over multiplicative subgroups of the unit group have the same shape. The 2004 result was restricted to moduli with few large prime factors and produced only unspecified savings δ(ε)>0\delta(\varepsilon)>0. Bourgain (2005-2008) removed the restriction on the modulus, so the structural question is closed; the quantitative questions remain open. This record states the surviving open core: (i) make the exponent functions in the composite-modulus sum-product theorem and subgroup exponential-sum estimates explicit and effective - currently no explicit value is known for any of them; and (ii) prove explicit power-saving bounds for the Heilbronn exponential sums Hn=max⁡pn∤y∣∑x∈Gnepn(yx)∣H_n=\max_{p^n\nmid y}|\sum_{x\in G_n}e_{p^n}(yx)|, where GnG_n is the group of (p−1)(p-1)-th roots of unity modulo pnp^n, approaching the conjectured square-root cancellation Hn≪εp1/2+εH_n\ll_\varepsilon p^{1/2+\varepsilon} - the best current bounds are H2≪p5/6log⁡1/6pH_2\ll p^{5/6}\log^{1/6}p, H3≪p1−29/702+o(1)H_3\ll p^{1-29/702+o(1)}, and Hn≪p1−3.269(34/151)/n+o(1)H_n\ll p^{1-3.269(34/151)/n+o(1)} for n≥4n\ge4.

Background

Let eq(y)=exp⁡(2πiy/q)e_q(y)=\exp(2\pi i y/q) denote the standard additive character on the residue class ring Zq=Z/qZ\mathbb{Z}_q=\mathbb{Z}/q\mathbb{Z}; for a divisor q1q_1 of qq, let πq1\pi_{q_1} be the reduction map from Zq\mathbb{Z}_q onto Zq1\mathbb{Z}_{q_1}, and let Zq∗\mathbb{Z}_q^* be the group of units (invertible elements) of Zq\mathbb{Z}_q.

The sum-product phenomenon is the observation that a finite set of numbers cannot simultaneously have a small sumset A+A={a+a′:a,a′∈A}A+A=\{a+a':a,a'\in A\} and a small product set A⋅A={aa′:a,a′∈A}A\cdot A=\{aa':a,a'\in A\}. Over prime residue rings this was made into a quantitative theorem in the early 2000s, and the 2004 note of Bourgain and Chang extended the theory to composite moduli q=p1α1⋯prαrq=p_1^{\alpha_1}\cdots p_r^{\alpha_r} with a bounded total number of prime-power factors, each prime factor pip_i larger than qε0q^{\varepsilon_0}. Two obstructions are specific to composite moduli: additive subgroups (ideals), such as the kernel of πp\pi_p, have small sumsets and product sets, so a non-degeneracy condition on the projections πq1(A)\pi_{q_1}(A) is unavoidable; and Zq∗\mathbb{Z}_q^* can contain large multiplicative subgroups with degenerate additive behavior.

Their Theorem 1.1 states that if A⊂ZqA\subset\mathbb{Z}_q satisfies ∣A+A∣+∣A⋅A∣<∣A∣1+ε|A+A|+|A\cdot A|<|A|^{1+\varepsilon}, then either ∣A∣>q1−δ|A|>q^{1-\delta} or ∣πp(A)∣<Cqδ|\pi_p(A)|<Cq^{\delta} for some prime divisor pp of qq, where δ=δ(ε)>0\delta=\delta(\varepsilon)>0 tends to 00 as ε→0\varepsilon\to0 and is not explicitly determined - equivalently, ∣A+A∣+∣A⋅A∣≥c∣A∣1+ε|A+A|+|A\cdot A|\ge c|A|^{1+\varepsilon} whenever ∣A∣≤q1−δ|A|\le q^{1-\delta} and ∣πp(A)∣≥Cqδ|\pi_p(A)|\ge Cq^{\delta} for every prime divisor pp of qq. The journal version (Geom. Funct. Anal. 2006) proves the companion estimate for exponential sums: if HH is a multiplicative subgroup of Zq∗\mathbb{Z}_q^* with ∣πp(H)∣>qε|\pi_p(H)|>q^{\varepsilon} for every prime divisor pp of qq, then max⁡(a,q)=1∣∑x∈Heq(ax)∣<C∣H∣q−δ\max_{(a,q)=1}|\sum_{x\in H}e_q(ax)|<C|H|q^{-\delta}, again with undetermined δ=δ(ε)\delta=\delta(\varepsilon).

A striking consequence concerns Heilbronn's exponential sum, a problem attributed to Davenport in work of Odoni (1985). For a prime pp and integer n≥1n\ge1, let Gn={x∈Zpn∗:xp−1=1}G_n=\{x\in\mathbb{Z}_{p^n}^*:x^{p-1}=1\} be the group of (p−1)(p-1)-th roots of unity modulo pnp^n (of order p−1p-1), and let

Hn=max⁡pn∤y∣∑x∈Gnepn(yx)∣=max⁡pn∤y∣∑x=1p−1epn(yxpn−1)∣.H_n=\max_{p^n\nmid y}\left|\sum_{x\in G_n}e_{p^n}(yx)\right|=\max_{p^n\nmid y}\left|\sum_{x=1}^{p-1}e_{p^n}\left(yx^{p^{n-1}}\right)\right|.

The case n=2n=2 is Heilbronn's original sum (up to one negligible summand). The sum has p−1p-1 terms of modulus 1, so random-phase heuristics predict HnH_n of size about p1/2p^{1/2} - square-root cancellation - while the trivial bound is pp. The 2004 note (Corollary 2.4) already gives Hn≪p1−εnH_n\ll p^{1-\varepsilon_n} for each fixed n≥2n\ge2, with εn>0\varepsilon_n>0 undetermined. The history of explicit bounds: H2≪p11/12H_2\ll p^{11/12} (Heath-Brown 1996) and H2≪p7/8H_2\ll p^{7/8} (Heath-Brown and Konyagin 2000), both by Stepanov's method - the classical technique of constructing an auxiliary polynomial that vanishes to high multiplicity at the points of an auxiliary curve and deriving a contradiction unless the exponential sum is small; the first nontrivial bounds for n≥3n\ge3 are due to Malykhin (2006). The current records are H2≪p5/6log⁡1/6pH_2\ll p^{5/6}\log^{1/6}p (Shkredov 2014), H3≪p1−29/702+o(1)H_3\ll p^{1-29/702+o(1)}, and Hn≪p1−3.269(34/151)/n+o(1)H_n\ll p^{1-3.269(34/151)/n+o(1)} for n≥4n\ge4 (the latter two due to Cochrane-De Silva-Pinner 2017, the H3H_3 bound also obtained independently by Shteinikov 2015). These sums control the distribution of Fermat quotients qp(m)=(mp−1−1)/pq_p(m)=(m^{p-1}-1)/p (the quantity measuring how far mp−1m^{p-1} is from 1 modulo p2p^2), the Lind-Lehmer constants of the groups Zpn\mathbb{Z}_{p^n} (an analogue of Lehmer's problem on how small a nonzero logarithmic Mahler measure - the average of log⁡∣f∣\log|f| over the unit torus - can be for an integer polynomial ff), and the maximal gaps between (p−1)(p-1)-th roots of unity modulo pnp^n.

Between 2005 and 2008 Bourgain removed the restriction on the modulus: exponential sums over subgroups of Zq∗\mathbb{Z}_q^* for arbitrary qq (J. Anal. Math. 2005), the square-free case of the sum-product theorem (with Gamburd and Sarnak, 2006), a general framework for finite commutative rings (J. Anal. Math. 2007), and the sum-product theorem for arbitrary modulus (2007 announcement; full version J. Anal. Math. 2008): given δ1,δ2>0\delta_1,\delta_2>0 there are ε,δ3>0\varepsilon,\delta_3>0 such that every A⊂ZqA\subset\mathbb{Z}_q with ∣A∣<q1−δ1|A|<q^{1-\delta_1} and ∣πq1(A)∣>q1δ2|\pi_{q_1}(A)|>q_1^{\delta_2} for all divisors q1>qεq_1>q^{\varepsilon} of qq satisfies ∣A+A∣+∣A⋅A∣>qδ3∣A∣|A+A|+|A\cdot A|>q^{\delta_3}|A|. All of these results are non-effective: the exponents exist, but no explicit values are produced, because the proofs iterate sum-product estimates along a combinatorial 'tree' decomposition of the divisor lattice of qq in which each level loses an unspecified amount. The nearest effective-constant results in this circle of ideas concern a different problem, the equidistribution of orbit averages for dilations of the circle (Bourgain-Lindenstrauss-Michel-Venkatesh 2009).

Problem Statement

Two linked quantitative questions, both implicit in the 2004 note of Bourgain and Chang and neither settled by the subsequent literature.

(1) Effective exponents. In the sum-product theorem for the residue class ring Zq\mathbb{Z}_q in its final form for arbitrary modulus qq (Bourgain 2007/2008) - given δ1,δ2>0\delta_1,\delta_2>0 there exist ε,δ3>0\varepsilon,\delta_3>0 such that every A⊂ZqA\subset\mathbb{Z}_q with ∣A∣<q1−δ1|A|<q^{1-\delta_1} and ∣πq1(A)∣>q1δ2|\pi_{q_1}(A)|>q_1^{\delta_2} for all divisors q1>qεq_1>q^{\varepsilon} of qq satisfies ∣A+A∣+∣A⋅A∣>qδ3∣A∣|A+A|+|A\cdot A|>q^{\delta_3}|A| - and in the associated subgroup exponential-sum estimate max⁡(a,q)=1∣∑x∈Heq(ax)∣≪∣H∣q−δ\max_{(a,q)=1}|\sum_{x\in H}e_q(ax)|\ll|H|q^{-\delta} for multiplicative subgroups H<Zq∗H<\mathbb{Z}_q^* with ∣πp(H)∣>qε|\pi_p(H)|>q^{\varepsilon} for every prime divisor pp of qq, determine explicit, effectively computable exponents - a function δ3(δ1,δ2)>0\delta_3(\delta_1,\delta_2)>0 together with ε(δ1,δ2)\varepsilon(\delta_1,\delta_2) for the sum-product theorem, and δ(ε)>0\delta(\varepsilon)>0 for the subgroup estimate - for which such estimates hold. Any explicit, provably positive decay qualifies; no explicit value is currently known for any of these exponents. The exponents for the sum-product statement are asked for the non-vacuous range δ1+δ2<1\delta_1+\delta_2<1: because the projection condition is imposed at q1=qq_1=q, where πq\pi_q is the identity and ∣πq(A)∣=∣A∣|\pi_q(A)|=|A|, it says ∣A∣>qδ2|A|>q^{\delta_2}, which is incompatible with ∣A∣<q1−δ1|A|<q^{1-\delta_1} once δ1+δ2≥1\delta_1+\delta_2\ge1; there the hypotheses are empty and the estimate is vacuously true, so no explicit exponent is needed on that range.

(2) Heilbronn exponential sums. For a prime pp, let Gn={x∈Zpn∗:xp−1=1}G_n=\{x\in\mathbb{Z}_{p^n}^*:x^{p-1}=1\} and

Hn=max⁡pn∤y∣∑x∈Gnepn(yx)∣.H_n=\max_{p^n\nmid y}\left|\sum_{x\in G_n}e_{p^n}(yx)\right|.

Obtain explicit power-saving bounds Hn≪p1−cnH_n\ll p^{1-c_n} with cnc_n as large as possible, toward the conjectured square-root cancellation Hn≪εp1/2+εH_n\ll_\varepsilon p^{1/2+\varepsilon}. The current best bounds are H2≪p5/6log⁡1/6pH_2\ll p^{5/6}\log^{1/6}p, H3≪p1−29/702+o(1)H_3\ll p^{1-29/702+o(1)}, and Hn≪p1−3.269(34/151)/n+o(1)H_n\ll p^{1-3.269(34/151)/n+o(1)} for n≥4n\ge4.

References

  1. J. Bourgain, M.-C. Chang, Sum-product theorem and exponential sum estimates in residue classes with modulus involving few prime factors, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 339 (2004) 463-466. DOI 10.1016/j.crma.2004.08.007, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crma.2004.08.007
  2. J. Bourgain, M.-C. Chang, Exponential sum estimates over subgroups and almost subgroups of ZQ∗\mathbb{Z}_Q^*, where QQ is composite with few prime factors, Geom. Funct. Anal. 16 (2006) 327-366. DOI 10.1007/s00039-006-0558-7, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00039-006-0558-7
  3. J. Bourgain, Exponential sum estimates over subgroups of Zq∗\mathbb{Z}_q^*, qq arbitrary, J. Anal. Math. 97 (2005) 317-355. DOI 10.1007/BF02807410, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02807410
  4. J. Bourgain, A. Gamburd, P. Sarnak, Sieving and expanders, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 343 (2006) 155-159. DOI 10.1016/j.crma.2006.05.023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crma.2006.05.023
  5. J. Bourgain, Exponential sum estimates in finite commutative rings and applications, J. Anal. Math. 101 (2007) 325-355. DOI 10.1007/S11854-007-0012-2, https://doi.org/10.1007/S11854-007-0012-2
  6. J. Bourgain, Sum-product theorems and exponential sum bounds in residue classes for general modulus, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 344 (2007) 349-352. DOI 10.1016/j.crma.2007.01.019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crma.2007.01.019
  7. J. Bourgain, The sum-product theorem in Zq\mathbb{Z}_q with qq arbitrary, J. Anal. Math. 106 (2008) 1-93. DOI 10.1007/S11854-008-0044-2, https://doi.org/10.1007/S11854-008-0044-2
  8. D. R. Heath-Brown, An estimate for Heilbronn's exponential sum, in: Analytic Number Theory (Proc. Conf. in honor of H. Halberstam), Progress in Mathematics 139, Vol. 2, Birkhauser Boston, 1996, pp. 451-463. ISBN 0-8176-3933-0, Zbl 0857.11041, https://zbmath.org/0857.11041
  9. D. R. Heath-Brown, S. Konyagin, New bounds for Gauss sums derived from kth powers, and for Heilbronn's exponential sum, Quart. J. Math. 51 (2000) 221-235. DOI 10.1093/qjmath/51.2.221, https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmath/51.2.221
  10. R. W. K. Odoni, Trigonometric sums of Heilbronn's type, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 98 (1985) 389-396. DOI 10.1017/s0305004100063593, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100063593
  11. Yu. V. Malykhin, Estimates of trigonometric sums modulo prp^r, Math. Notes 80 (2006) 748-752. DOI 10.1007/S11006-006-0197-1, https://doi.org/10.1007/S11006-006-0197-1
  12. Yu. V. Malykhin, Bounds for exponential sums modulo p2p^2, J. Math. Sci. (New York) 146 (2007) 5686-5696. DOI 10.1007/s10958-007-0385-x, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-007-0385-x
  13. I. D. Shkredov, On Heilbronn's exponential sum, Quart. J. Math. 64 (2013) 1221-1230. DOI 10.1093/qmath/has037 (arXiv:1208.6124), https://doi.org/10.1093/qmath/has037
  14. I. D. Shkredov, On exponential sums over multiplicative subgroups of medium size, Finite Fields Appl. 30 (2014) 72-87. DOI 10.1016/j.ffa.2014.06.002 (arXiv:1311.5726), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ffa.2014.06.002
  15. I. D. Shkredov, E. V. Solodkova, I. V. Vyugin, Intersections of multiplicative subgroups and Heilbronn's exponential sum, preprint arXiv:1302.3839 (2013), https://arxiv.org/abs/1302.3839
  16. Yu. N. Shteinikov, Estimates of trigonometric sums over subgroups and some of their applications, Math. Notes 98 (2015) 667-684. DOI 10.1134/S0001434615090333, https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001434615090333
  17. T. Cochrane, D. De Silva, C. Pinner, (p−1)(p-1)th roots of unity mod pnp^n, generalized Heilbronn sums, Lind-Lehmer constants, and Fermat quotients, Michigan Math. J. 66 (2017) 203-219. DOI 10.1307/mmj/1488510033, https://doi.org/10.1307/mmj/1488510033
  18. I. V. V’yugin, E. V. Solodkova, I. D. Shkredov, On the additive energy of the Heilbronn subgroup, Math. Notes 101 (2017) 58-70. DOI 10.1134/S0001434617010060, https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001434617010060
  19. T. Tao, The sum-product phenomenon in arbitrary rings, preprint arXiv:0806.2497 (2008), https://arxiv.org/abs/0806.2497
  20. J. Bourgain, E. Lindenstrauss, P. Michel, A. Venkatesh, Some effective results for ×a×b\times a\times b, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 29 (2009) 1705-1722. DOI 10.1017/S0143385708000898, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143385708000898