When does an S1S^1-valued Sobolev map have a phase, and how much regularity must be sacrificed to obtain one? Bourgain, Brezis and Mironescu (2000) classified the pairs (s,p)(s,p) for which every u∈Ws,p(Ω;S1)u\in W^{s,p}(\Omega;S^1), with Ω⊂Rn\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^n smooth bounded simply connected, admits a phase φ\varphi with u=eiφu=e^{i\varphi} in the same space Ws,pW^{s,p}, and posed the quantitative refinement: determine the minimal lifting index t∗(s,p,n)t^*(s,p,n), the supremum of all t∈[0,s]t\in[0,s] such that every u∈Ws,p(Ω;S1)u\in W^{s,p}(\Omega;S^1) has a phase in Wt,p(Ω)W^{t,p}(\Omega) — the precise loss of regularity in lifting, stated as open for n≥3n\ge3, with the exemplar n=3n=3, p=4p=4: does some u∈Ws,4u\in W^{s,4} for all s<3/4s<3/4 have no phase even in W1/4,4W^{1/4,4}? A second open component concerns the Bessel potential (Triebel-Lizorkin) spaces Hs,p=Fp,2sH^{s,p}=F^s_{p,2}, where lifting is known only for sp<1sp<1 with p≥2p\ge2, and for p=2p=2 (where Hs,2=Ws,2H^{s,2}=W^{s,2}) by the Sobolev classification. The surrounding theory is settled — sum-space decompositions, density, optimal phase estimates, the Besov-scale and covering-space analogues, and the d=1d=1 optimality of the 2000 estimate, settled in 2002 — but t∗t^* is determined only on the topological range 1≤sp<21\le sp<2, and the remaining Bessel-potential ranges are open; both components remain open.

Background

Let Ω⊂Rn\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^n be smooth, bounded and simply connected, and let S1={z∈C:∣z∣=1}S^1=\{z\in\mathbb{C}:|z|=1\} be the unit circle. Maps u:Ω→S1u:\Omega\to S^1 are the natural state variables of models with a phase (Ginzburg-Landau vortices, liquid crystals), and one repeatedly needs a real-valued phase φ\varphi with u=eiφu=e^{i\varphi} almost everywhere. For smooth uu a phase exists locally wherever uu has no winding; for rough uu the question is which function space the phase can occupy.

For 0<s<10<s<1 and 1≤p<∞1\le p<\infty, the Sobolev-Slobodeckij space Ws,p(Ω)W^{s,p}(\Omega) consists of the LpL^p functions with finite Gagliardo seminorm (∫Ω∫Ω∣u(x)−u(y)∣p/∣x−y∣n+sp dx dy)1/p(\int_\Omega\int_\Omega|u(x)-u(y)|^p/|x-y|^{n+sp}\,dx\,dy)^{1/p}; for integer s≥1s\ge1 it is the usual Sobolev space with ss derivatives in LpL^p. By Ws,p(Ω;S1)W^{s,p}(\Omega;S^1) one denotes the maps with values in S1S^1 a.e. A map is liftable in Ws,pW^{s,p} if it has a phase in Ws,p(Ω;R)W^{s,p}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}).

Bourgain, Brezis and Mironescu [1] classified liftability without loss of regularity: every u∈Ws,p(Ω;S1)u\in W^{s,p}(\Omega;S^1) has a phase in Ws,pW^{s,p} exactly when (i) n=1n=1; or (ii) 0<s<10<s<1 with sp<1sp<1 or sp≥nsp\ge n; or (iii) s≥1s\ge1 with sp≥2sp\ge2. In the remaining negative ranges two explicit obstructions exist. The topological example u(x)=(x1,x2)/∣(x1,x2)∣u(x)=(x_1,x_2)/|(x_1,x_2)| (defined off the codimension-2 plane {x1=x2=0}\{x_1=x_2=0\}, extended arbitrarily on it) belongs to Ws,pW^{s,p} exactly when sp<2sp<2; it winds once around almost every circle linking the singular set. Off a branch cut any phase φ\varphi differs from the smooth angular branch by a 2πZ2\pi\mathbb{Z}-valued function, which is a.e. constant by the constancy lemma (a Z\mathbb{Z}-valued function in Wr,qW^{r,q} with rq≥1rq\ge1 is a.e. constant on connected sets); hence every phase inherits the 2π2\pi jump of the branch across the cut, and such a jump is incompatible with membership in Wt,pW^{t,p} when tp≥1tp\ge1. So no phase exists even in W1/p,pW^{1/p,p}. The analytical example uses, when 0<s<10<s<1 and 1≤sp<n1\le sp<n, a phase ψ∈W1,sp∖Ws,p\psi\in W^{1,sp}\setminus W^{s,p} with eiψ∈Ws,pe^{i\psi}\in W^{s,p} (the latter by the Gagliardo-Nirenberg embedding W1,sp∩L∞↪Ws,pW^{1,sp}\cap L^\infty\hookrightarrow W^{s,p}); every phase of eiψe^{i\psi} differs from ψ\psi by a 2πZ2\pi\mathbb{Z}-valued function, and the same constancy lemma forces ψ∈Ws,p\psi\in W^{s,p}, a contradiction.

In the negative ranges one therefore asks how much regularity must be sacrificed. Define the minimal lifting index t∗(s,p,n)t^*(s,p,n) as the supremum of all t∈[0,s]t\in[0,s] such that every u∈Ws,p(Ω;S1)u\in W^{s,p}(\Omega;S^1) has a phase in Wt,p(Ω)W^{t,p}(\Omega). The construction of [1] always produces phases in Wt,pW^{t,p} once tp<1tp<1, and the topological example blocks t≥1/pt\ge1/p whenever sp<2sp<2; hence on the range 1≤sp<21\le sp<2 the index equals 1/p1/p by the results of [1] itself. For n≥3n\ge3, however, the negative range also contains the region 0<s<10<s<1 with 2≤sp<n2\le sp<n, where the topological example is absent, and [1] states verbatim: "When n ≥ 3 the precise loss of regularity in lifting is not fully understood." For the exemplar n=3n=3, p=4p=4, [1] notes that any u∈Ws,4u\in W^{s,4} has a phase in Ws,4W^{s,4} if s<1/4s<1/4 or s≥3/4s\ge3/4, that some maps in Ws,4W^{s,4} with 1/4≤s<3/41/4\le s<3/4 have no such phase, and asks whether there exists u∈Ws,4u\in W^{s,4} for all s<3/4s<3/4 which has no phase even in W1/4,4W^{1/4,4}.

The same paper raised the question for Bessel potential spaces Hs,p(Ω)=(I−Δ)−s/2Lp(Ω)H^{s,p}(\Omega)=(I-\Delta)^{-s/2}L^p(\Omega), the Triebel-Lizorkin scale Fp,2sF^s_{p,2}: these coincide with Ws,2W^{s,2} for p=2p=2 but differ from Ws,pW^{s,p} for p≠2p\ne2 (which is close to the Besov scale Bp,psB^s_{p,p}). Appendix F of [1] proves lifting in Hs,pH^{s,p} when sp<1sp<1 and p≥2p\ge2, and states that the remaining cases — p<2p<2, or sp≥1sp\ge1 — "have not been investigated"; for p=2p=2, where Hs,2=Ws,2H^{s,2}=W^{s,2}, the full Sobolev classification of [1] of course applies.

Subsequent work settled the surrounding structure theory: phases in sums of spaces Ws,p+W1,spW^{s,p}+W^{1,sp} [4, 5], the structure of Ws,p(Sn;S1)W^{s,p}(\mathbb{S}^n;S^1) through singular sets [7], factorizations u=veiφu=ve^{i\varphi} [6], density of smooth maps [8], optimal phase estimates [2, 9], the Besov-scale classification [10], lifting for compact covering spaces [11], the monograph synthesis [12], and a recent expository account [13].

Problem Statement

Let n≥3n\ge3, let Ω⊂Rn\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^n be smooth, bounded and simply connected, and let 1<p<∞1<p<\infty. First, for every s>0s>0 such that (s,p)(s,p) lies in the negative ranges of the lifting classification — (i) 0<s<10<s<1 with 1≤sp<n1\le sp<n, or (ii) s≥1s\ge1 with 1≤sp<21\le sp<2 — determine the minimal lifting index t∗(s,p,n)t^*(s,p,n), defined as the supremum of all t∈[0,s]t\in[0,s] such that every u∈Ws,p(Ω;S1)u\in W^{s,p}(\Omega;S^1) admits a phase φ∈Wt,p(Ω)\varphi\in W^{t,p}(\Omega) with u=eiφu=e^{i\varphi} a.e., together with the endpoint behavior (whether lifting holds at t=t∗t=t^* itself). Of these, the range 1≤sp<21\le sp<2 has the known value t∗=1/pt^*=1/p from the primary source [1], and sp=nsp=n already gives t∗=st^*=s by the classification, so the determination reduces to the still-open part: the region 0<s<10<s<1 with 2≤sp<n2\le sp<n, which is nonempty exactly when n≥3n\ge3, together with the remaining borderline cases sp=2sp=2, the endpoint t=1/pt=1/p, and the borderline index t=1−n/(sp)+n/pt=1-n/(sp)+n/p when it exceeds 1/p1/p (where the embedding W1,sp↪Wt,pW^{1,sp}\hookrightarrow W^{t,p} is critical). Answer, as a separate question not implied by the per-(s,p)(s,p) determination of t∗t^* (which does not by itself supply a single map lying in Ws,4W^{s,4} for all s<3/4s<3/4 at once), the exemplar of [1] for n=3n=3, p=4p=4: does there exist a map u∈Ws,4(Ω;S1)u\in W^{s,4}(\Omega;S^1) for every s<3/4s<3/4 which has no phase in W1/4,4(Ω)W^{1/4,4}(\Omega)? The index is fixed by two matching bounds: every u∈Ws,p(Ω;S1)u\in W^{s,p}(\Omega;S^1) has a phase in Wt,pW^{t,p} for all tt up to the index, while some u∈Ws,p(Ω;S1)u\in W^{s,p}(\Omega;S^1) has no phase in Wt,pW^{t,p} for any tt above the index. Second, for the Bessel potential spaces Hs,p(Ω)=Fp,2s(Ω)H^{s,p}(\Omega)=F^s_{p,2}(\Omega): determine for which (s,p)(s,p) every u∈Hs,p(Ω;S1)u\in H^{s,p}(\Omega;S^1) has a phase in Hs,p(Ω)H^{s,p}(\Omega). Known: yes for sp<1sp<1, p≥2p\ge2 (Corollary F.1 of [1]), and for p=2p=2 by the classification of [1] since Hs,2=Ws,2H^{s,2}=W^{s,2}; open: p<2p<2 with arbitrary s>0s>0, and sp≥1sp\ge1 with p>2p>2.

References

  1. J. Bourgain, H. Brezis, P. Mironescu, "Lifting in Sobolev spaces", Journal d'Analyse Mathématique 80 (2000), 37-86. DOI: 10.1007/BF02791533. Author manuscript: https://hal.science/hal-00747691.
  2. J. Bourgain, H. Brezis, P. Mironescu, "Limiting embedding theorems for Ws,pW^{s,p} when s↑1s\uparrow1 and applications", Journal d'Analyse Mathématique 87 (2002), 77-101. DOI: 10.1007/BF02868470. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02868470. [Its Theorem 2 proves the one-dimensional optimality.]
  3. P. Mironescu, "Sobolev maps on manifolds: degree, approximation, lifting", in: Perspectives in Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations (in honor of Haïm Brezis), Contemporary Mathematics 446, American Mathematical Society, 2007, 413-436. DOI: 10.1090/conm/446/08642. https://hal.science/hal-00747679.
  4. P. Mironescu, "Lifting default for S1S^1-valued maps", Comptes Rendus Mathématique 346 (2008), 1039-1044. DOI: 10.1016/j.crma.2008.08.001. https://hal.science/hal-00747676.
  5. P. Mironescu, "Lifting of S1S^1-valued maps in sums of Sobolev spaces", preprint, June 2008. HAL: hal-00747663. https://hal.science/hal-00747663. [Circulated preprint with detailed proofs of the announcement [4].]
  6. P. Mironescu, "Decomposition of S1S^1-valued maps in Sobolev spaces", Comptes Rendus Mathématique 348 (2010), 743-746. DOI: 10.1016/j.crma.2010.06.020. https://hal.science/hal-00747677.
  7. P. Mironescu, "S1S^1-valued Sobolev maps", Journal of Mathematical Sciences 170 (2010), 340-355. DOI: 10.1007/s10958-010-0090-z. https://hal.science/hal-00356333.
  8. H. Brezis, P. Mironescu, "Density in Ws,p(Ω;N)W^{s,p}(\Omega;N)", Journal of Functional Analysis 269 (2015), 2045-2109. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2015.04.005. https://hal.science/hal-01101299.
  9. P. Mironescu, I. Molnar, "Phases of unimodular complex valued maps: optimal estimates, the factorization method, and the sum-intersection property of Sobolev spaces", Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré C, Analyse Non Linéaire 32 (2015), 965-1013. DOI: 10.1016/j.anihpc.2014.04.005. https://hal.science/hal-00960317.
  10. P. Mironescu, E. Russ, Y. Sire, "Lifting in Besov spaces", Nonlinear Analysis 193 (2020), 111489. DOI: 10.1016/j.na.2019.03.012. arXiv:1705.04271. https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.04271.
  11. P. Mironescu, J. Van Schaftingen, "Lifting in compact covering spaces for fractional Sobolev mappings", Analysis & PDE 14 (2021), 1851-1871. DOI: 10.2140/apde.2021.14.1851. arXiv:1907.01373. https://hal.science/hal-02171533.
  12. H. Brezis, P. Mironescu, "Sobolev Maps to the Circle: From the Perspective of Analysis, Geometry, and Topology", Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and their Applications 96, Birkhäuser, New York, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1512-6. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-0716-1512-6.
  13. P. Mironescu, "Sobolev maps to manifolds", graduate course notes, in: Function Spaces and Applications XII, Matfyz Press, Prague, 2023, pp. 1-74. ISBN: 978-80-7378-485-0. HAL: hal-04101540. https://hal.science/hal-04101540.