The minimum number of edges in a maximal triangle-free graph on vertices with maximum degree at most is denoted . Füredi and Seress (1994) proved that the limit exists for every outside a possible exceptional sequence tending to , determined exactly for , and conjectured on whenever the projective plane exists. Erdős and Holzman (1994) determined on and on , refuting the conjecture's first instance (), and left open the behaviour to the left of : a Fano-plane-based construction gives on and is suggested to be optimal there; the optimality ranges of the -generalized constructions are unknown; the conjecture for and the boundary values are unsettled; and it is unknown whether has infinitely many discontinuities. No published work determines on any subinterval of ; the problem remains open.
Background
A graph is triangle-free if it contains no three pairwise adjacent vertices, and maximal triangle-free if, in addition, every missing edge, when inserted, completes a triangle; equivalently, a maximal triangle-free graph is a -saturated graph (saturated with respect to the complete graph on three vertices, i.e. -free but such that every added edge creates a ) or, since any two non-adjacent vertices must then share a common neighbour, a triangle-free graph of diameter 2. The classical saturation theorem of Erdős, Hajnal and Moon (1964) states that an -vertex -saturated graph has at least edges; the unique extremal example, a star, has a vertex of degree , so the unconstrained minimum is attained only by graphs with very large degrees. This motivates the degree-restrained variant of Füredi and Seress (1994): let be the minimum number of edges of a maximal triangle-free graph on vertices with maximum degree at most . A counting argument shows must be at least on the order of (a vertex together with the neighbours of its neighbours must cover all vertices), and the elementary bound (each vertex has degree at least ) gives ; but the true answer in the linear regime , , is larger and structurally subtle. Füredi and Seress proved that the limit exists for every with the possible exception of a sequence of values tending to , determined exactly for (that is, on ), and gave only constant-factor bounds for the sublinear regime , . Their central tool, sharpened by Erdős and Holzman, is a reduction to finite linear programming: a core is a pair where is an intersecting hypergraph (any two hyperedges intersect) and a triangle-free graph on the same finite vertex set, satisfying compatibility axioms; to is attached the linear program minimizing subject to for every vertex , , , feasible precisely when , where is the fractional matching number of (the maximum total weight on hyperedges subject to each vertex being covered by weight at most ). Blowing up hyperedges into vertex classes yields maximal triangle-free graphs with about edges for the LP optimum , and is the infimum of over cores; on every interval this becomes a finite problem. Constructions from finite geometry drive the conjectured values: the projective plane (which exists for every prime power ; existence for other orders is a long-standing open problem) has points and lines of points, its lines forming an intersecting hypergraph with , and is the fraction of points on a line — the endpoints of the conjectured intervals. Erdős and Holzman (1994) determined the middle window: for (attained by a core built from the Petersen graph, the 3-regular graph on 10 vertices, whose five independent 4-sets carry the uniform weight ) and for . Since strictly to the right of , this refuted the first instance () of the Füredi–Seress conjecture that on whenever exists. The easier-looking variant without triangle-freeness — graphs of diameter 2, i.e. -semisaturated graphs, where added edges must create a triangle but pre-existing triangles are allowed — has a parallel limit function, determined for with a leading-term conjecture of Füredi on ; the two problems are distinct, and the triangle-free (saturation) problem treated here is the one left with an undetermined window below .
Problem Statement
Determine for maximal triangle-free graphs — where is the minimum number of edges of a maximal triangle-free graph on vertices with maximum degree at most — throughout the remaining window , at every point where the limit exists. That is, extend the determination of Erdős and Holzman, which covers , and of Füredi and Seress, which covers , to the left of . The paper of Erdős and Holzman poses this window through the following explicit facets: (i) the suggested value for , where the Fano-plane-based construction (the Fano plane being the projective plane ) gives — prove this optimal or find the correct value; (ii) the optimality ranges of the generalizations of that construction obtained by replacing the Fano plane by ; (iii) the Füredi–Seress conjecture for , that on when exists — the first instance is refuted, and it is open whether the failure is exceptional or systematic — together with the boundary values for ; and (iv) whether has infinitely many discontinuities (the limit is known to exist everywhere except possibly on a sequence tending to , and the source paper notes that this determination creates a discontinuity at , where the left limit of is ). These four facets are independently meaningful sub-questions: settling any one of them resolves that part of the problem, whereas the overall objective remains the determination of throughout , which the facets do not by themselves exhaust.
References
- Paul Erdős and Ron Holzman, On maximal triangle-free graphs, Journal of Graph Theory 18(6):585–594, 1994. DOI: 10.1002/jgt.3190180606, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgt.3190180606
- Zoltán Füredi and Ákos Seress, Maximal triangle-free graphs with restrictions on the degrees, Journal of Graph Theory 18(1):11–24, 1994. DOI: 10.1002/jgt.3190180103, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgt.3190180103
- Zoltán Füredi, Intersecting designs from linear programming and graphs of diameter two, Discrete Mathematics 127(1–3):187–207, 1994. DOI: 10.1016/0012-365X(92)00478-A, https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-365X(92)00478-A
- Noga Alon, Paul Erdős, Ron Holzman and Michael Krivelevich, On k-saturated graphs with restrictions on the degrees, Journal of Graph Theory 23(1):1–20, 1996. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0118(199609)23:1<1::AID-JGT1>3.0.CO;2-O, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0118(199609)23:1%3C1::AID-JGT1%3E3.0.CO;2-O
- Zhen He, Mei Lu, Yanzhe Qiu and Yiduo Xu, Degree-restricted semi-saturation numbers of cliques and its applications, preprint, 2026. arXiv:2606.28727, https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.28727
- P. Erdős, A. Hajnal and J. W. Moon, A Problem in Graph Theory, The American Mathematical Monthly 71:1107–1110, 1964. DOI: 10.2307/2311408, https://doi.org/10.2307/2311408
- Curtiss Barefoot, Karen Casey, David Fisher, Kathryn Fraughnaugh and Frank Harary, Size in maximal triangle-free graphs and minimal graphs of diameter 2, Discrete Mathematics 138(1–3):93–99, 1995. DOI: 10.1016/0012-365X(94)00190-T, https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-365X(94)00190-T
- Wayne Goddard and Daniel J. Kleitman, A note on maximal triangle-free graphs, Journal of Graph Theory 17(5):629–631, 1993. DOI: 10.1002/jgt.3190170510, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgt.3190170510
- A. Nicholas Day, Saturated Graphs of Prescribed Minimum Degree, Combinatorics, Probability and Computing 26(2):201–207, 2017. DOI: 10.1017/S0963548316000377, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963548316000377
- Bryan L. Currie, Jill R. Faudree, Ralph J. Faudree and John R. Schmitt, A Survey of Minimum Saturated Graphs, Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, Dynamic Survey DS19, 2011 (with later updates). DOI: 10.37236/41, https://doi.org/10.37236/41