Freedman and He introduced the asymptotic crossing number ac(K) of a knot K — the least over-crossing density achieved by pairs of high-degree satellite curves in a tubular neighborhood of K — as a topological invariant that lower-bounds the L^{3/2} energy of divergence-free vector fields leaving K invariant, and conjectured that ac(K) equals the ordinary crossing number c(K) for every knot, with an analogous statement for components of links. The conjecture implies the satellite crossing number question recorded as Kirby's Problem 1.68, which asks whether AC(K)=inf_d c(K_d)/d^2 equals c(K); the converse implication is not known. Despite partial results — the genus bound ac(K) ≥ 2g(K)−1, Lackenby's satellite bound c(K) ≥ c(k)/10^{13}, Ito's braid-index-dependent linear lower bound, and quadratic bounds for cables of adequate knots — the conjecture remains open in general.

Background

Physical origin. An ideal incompressible fluid or perfectly conducting plasma is modeled by a divergence-free vector field WW (one with ∇⋅W=0\nabla\cdot W=0, so the field lines have no sources or sinks) transported by volume-preserving diffeomorphisms, i.e. smooth deformations of space that preserve the volume element. The helicity H(W)=∫W⋅(∇−1W) dVH(W)=\int W\cdot(\nabla^{-1}W)\,dV (Moffatt's reformulation of Arnol'd's asymptotic Hopf invariant) measures the average pairwise linking of the field lines and is conserved under such transport (Moffatt 1990; Arnold-Khesin 1998). Moffatt's magnetic relaxation program asks how far a knotted or linked configuration of magnetic flux tubes can lower its energy while its topology is frozen in; helicity gives the first topological lower bound on that energy. Helicity is nevertheless a homological quantity, a function of pairwise linking numbers only, and is blind to knotting: the Whitehead link (a two-component link whose components have zero pairwise linking number yet cannot be pulled apart) is the standard example. Enciso, Peralta-Salas and Torres de Lizaur (2016) proved that every sufficiently regular integral invariant of volume-preserving transformations (a conserved quantity of the form ∫A(W) dvol\int A(W)\,d\mathrm{vol}) is a function of helicity alone, so knot-sensitive invariants of divergence-free fields must be of a different, non-integral kind.

Freedman and He's construction. In their 1991 Annals paper "Divergence-free fields: Energy and asymptotic crossing number", with the companion note "Links of tori and the energy of incompressible flows" (1991), they introduced such an invariant: the asymptotic crossing number of two divergence-free fields WW and VV is the unsigned Gauss-type double integral c(W,V)=14π∫R3∫R3∣⟨W(x),V(y),x−y⟩∣∣x−y∣3 dx dy,c(W,V)=\frac{1}{4\pi}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\frac{|\langle W(x),V(y),x-y\rangle|}{|x-y|^3}\,dx\,dy, where ⟨a,b,c⟩\langle a,b,c\rangle denotes the scalar triple product; for a field supported on thin tubes it measures the average number of crossing points between the two families of field lines in a projection. Applying the sharp Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality (with Lieb's optimal constant), they proved the energy inequality E3/2(W)≥(16/π)1/4c(W,W)3/4E_{3/2}(W)\ge(16/\pi)^{1/4}c(W,W)^{3/4}, where E3/2E_{3/2} is the L3/2L^{3/2}-energy of the field — the topological basis for Moffatt's proposed energy spectrum of knots and links. Since c(W,W)c(W,W) is not itself invariant under volume-preserving diffeomorphisms, one defines ctop(W,W)=inf⁡hc(h∘W,h∘W)c_{\mathrm{top}}(W,W)=\inf_h c(h\circ W,h\circ W) over volume-preserving hh, a genuine topological quantity that still lower-bounds the energy after relaxation.

Knot-theoretic input. Estimating ctopc_{\mathrm{top}} requires knot theory. When WW leaves invariant a solid torus TT of knot type KK carrying flux Φ\Phi (the situation of a knotted flux tube), an ergodic-theoretic averaging argument gives c(W,W)≥Φ2ac⁡(K)c(W,W)\ge\Phi^2\operatorname{ac}(K), where ac⁡(K)\operatorname{ac}(K) is the asymptotic crossing number of the knot KK, defined by satellite links as follows. Let N(K)N(K) be a closed tubular neighborhood of KK, a solid torus, i.e. an embedded copy of D2×S1D^2\times S^1. For integers p,q≥1p,q\ge1 let cp,q(K)c_{p,q}(K) be the minimum, over disjoint oriented closed curves P,QP,Q in the interior of N(K)N(K) whose homological degrees in H1(N(K);Z)\conZH_1(N(K);\mathbb{Z})\con\mathbb{Z} are pp and qq (each curve wraps that many times around the core direction), and over all diagrams of the two-component link (P,Q)(P,Q), of the number of crossings at which PP passes over QQ. Then ac⁡(K)=inf⁡p,q≥1cp,q(K)/(pq)\operatorname{ac}(K)=\inf_{p,q\ge1}c_{p,q}(K)/(pq), the least over-crossing density achievable by high-degree satellite links around KK. For a link L=(L1,…,Lk)L=(L_1,\dots,L_k) one defines ac⁡(Li;L)\operatorname{ac}(L_i;L) analogously, with the curve QQ allowed to run through the neighborhoods of the other components.

Known bounds and the conjecture. Freedman and He proved ac⁡(K)≥2g(K)−1\operatorname{ac}(K)\ge2g(K)-1, where g(K)g(K) is the Seifert genus (the minimal genus of a compact oriented surface spanning KK, a Seifert surface), using the classical identification of the knot genus with the Thurston norm of the dual class (a theorem of Gabai; the Thurston norm of a homology class is the minimum, over embedded surfaces representing it, of the sum of the absolute Euler characteristics of their components); the link analogue is ac⁡(Li;L)≥χ−(Li;L)\operatorname{ac}(L_i;L)\ge\chi_-(L_i;L), the negative Euler characteristic of a minimal spanning surface dual to the component. They conjectured the sharp statements (see the Problem Statement below). The satellite-knot reformulation is recorded as Problem 1.68 in Kirby's problem list: defining AC(K)=inf⁡dc(Kd)/d2AC(K)=\inf_d c(K_d)/d^2 over satellite knots Kd⊂N(K)K_d\subset N(K) of homological degree dd (i.e. winding dd times around the core KK), is AC(K)=c(K)AC(K)=c(K)? The inequality AC(K)≥ac⁡(K)≥2g(K)−1AC(K)\ge\operatorname{ac}(K)\ge2g(K)-1 is known (recorded by Ito 2022), the upper bound AC(K)≤c(K)AC(K)\le c(K) is elementary, and Freedman-He's over-crossing form implies the satellite form; no implication in the other direction is known.

Consequences in conformal geometry. Freedman and He define the modulus of a solid torus TT as m(T)=inf⁡f∫T∣∇f∣3m(T)=\inf_f\int_T|\nabla f|^3 over Lipschitz maps f:T→R/Zf:T\to\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z} of degree one, and prove the duality m(T)2m∗(T)=1m(T)^2m^*(T)=1, where the dual modulus m∗(T)m^*(T) is defined via divergence-free fields of unit flux in TT, generalizing Gehring's classical ring-domain duality (Lohvansuu 2023), together with the bound m(T)≤(π/4)ac⁡(K)−3/2m(T)\le(\sqrt{\pi}/4)\operatorname{ac}(K)^{-3/2}. Under the conjecture this yields that for each m0m_0 only finitely many knot types admit an embedded solid torus of modulus at least m0m_0, a compactness theorem for fat knotted tori not known unconditionally. The paper's adjacent question on the optimal conformal capacity of linked curves developed into the Gehring-Martin-Palka conjecture in higher-dimensional quasiconformal geometry, an active thread (Gehring-Martin-Palka 2017; Guerra-Prywes 2023; Lohvansuu 2023).

Status orientation. The knot-theoretic core of the conjecture, the exact quadratic behavior of the crossing numbers of high-degree satellites, has been attacked through the satellite crossing number literature (He 1998; Lackenby 2014; Ito 2022; Kalfagianni-McConkey 2024; Baker-Motegi 2024); the best general results are the genus bound, Lackenby's general satellite bound with a large multiplicative constant, a linear bound with braid-index-dependent coefficient, and quadratic bounds for cables of adequate knots.

Problem Statement

Definitions. Let K⊂S3K\subset S^3 be a knot and N(K)N(K) a closed tubular neighborhood. For integers p,q≥1p,q\ge1, let cp,q(K)c_{p,q}(K) be the minimum number of crossings at which PP passes over QQ, minimized over all diagrams of the two-component link (P,Q)(P,Q) and over all pairs of disjoint oriented closed curves P,Q⊂int⁡N(K)P,Q\subset\operatorname{int}N(K) whose homological degrees in H1(N(K);Z)\conZH_1(N(K);\mathbb{Z})\con\mathbb{Z} are pp and qq (each curve wraps that many times around the core direction of the solid torus N(K)N(K)). The asymptotic crossing number of KK is ac⁡(K)=inf⁡p,q≥1cp,q(K)/(pq)\operatorname{ac}(K)=\inf_{p,q\ge1}c_{p,q}(K)/(pq). For a link L=(L1,…,Lk)L=(L_1,\dots,L_k), ac⁡(Li;L)\operatorname{ac}(L_i;L) is defined the same way with P⊂N(Li)P\subset N(L_i) of degree pp and QQ of degree qq in the union of the neighborhoods N(Lj)N(L_j), j≠ij\ne i. Let c(K)c(K) denote the minimal crossing number of KK (the least number of crossings in any diagram of KK), and cr⁡(Li;L)\operatorname{cr}(L_i;L) the over-crossing number of LiL_i over the other components, i.e. the minimum over all diagrams of LL of the number of crossings at which LiL_i passes above some LjL_j, j≠ij\ne i.

Problem (Freedman-He asymptotic crossing number conjecture). Prove or refute: (1) for every knot KK: ac⁡(K)=c(K)\operatorname{ac}(K)=c(K); (2) for every link LL and every component LiL_i: ac⁡(Li;L)=cr⁡(Li;L)\operatorname{ac}(L_i;L)=\operatorname{cr}(L_i;L).

Known without the conjecture: the easy direction ac⁡(K)≤c(K)\operatorname{ac}(K)\le c(K) (draw degree-pp and degree-qq satellite curves as parallel strands along a minimal diagram of KK), the genus bound ac⁡(K)≥2g(K)−1\operatorname{ac}(K)\ge2g(K)-1 with g(K)g(K) the Seifert genus (Freedman-He), the link bound ac⁡(Li;L)≥χ−(Li;L)\operatorname{ac}(L_i;L)\ge\chi_-(L_i;L) (the negative Euler characteristic of a minimal spanning surface dual to the component), Ito's linear bound ac⁡(K)≥1f(b(K))c(K)−b(K)\operatorname{ac}(K)\ge\frac{1}{f(b(K))}c(K)-b(K), where b(K)b(K) is the braid index (the minimal number of strands of a braid whose closure is KK) and ff is an explicit fast-growing function, and the quadratic bound c(Kp,q)>q2c(K)c(K_{p,q})>q^2c(K) for cables of adequate knots (the (p,q)(p,q)-cable of KK is the satellite curve on ∂N(K)\partial N(K) with winding number qq; adequate knots form a large class including the alternating knots, characterized by a combinatorial condition on their Kauffman states).

Equivalent and adjacent forms. The satellite-knot form, recorded as Kirby's Problem 1.68, asks whether AC(K)=inf⁡dc(Kd)/d2AC(K)=\inf_d c(K_d)/d^2 equals c(K)c(K), where KdK_d ranges over satellite knots contained in N(K)N(K) of homological degree dd (winding dd times around KK); the inequality AC(K)≥ac⁡(K)AC(K)\ge\operatorname{ac}(K) is known, so statement (1) implies AC(K)=c(K)AC(K)=c(K), while the upper bound AC(K)≤c(K)AC(K)\le c(K) is elementary, and no implication from the satellite form back to statement (1) is known. By Lackenby's analysis, the conjecture would also follow from sufficiently strong versions of the satellite crossing number conjecture (Kirby's Problem 1.67), for instance the winding-number quadratic bound c(K)≥ω2c(k)c(K)\ge\omega^2c(k) for every satellite KK of kk with winding number ω\omega (He 1998).

Scope. Statement (1) is asserted for every knot and statement (2) for every link and every component, with no restriction to special classes; the conjecture remains open in general, and a single explicit counterexample to either (1) or (2) refutes it.

References

  1. Michael H. Freedman and Zheng-Xu He, "Divergence-free fields: Energy and asymptotic crossing number", Annals of Mathematics (2) 134 (1991), no. 1, 189-229. DOI: 10.2307/2944336, https://doi.org/10.2307/2944336
  2. Michael H. Freedman and Zheng-Xu He, "Links of tori and the energy of incompressible flows", Topology 30 (1991), no. 2, 283-287. DOI: 10.1016/0040-9383(91)90014-U, https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-9383(91)90014-U
  3. H. K. Moffatt, "The energy spectrum of knots and links", Nature 347 (1990), no. 6291, 367-369. DOI: 10.1038/347367a0, https://doi.org/10.1038/347367a0
  4. Vladimir I. Arnold and Boris A. Khesin, "Topological Methods in Hydrodynamics", Applied Mathematical Sciences 125, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998. ISBN 978-0-387-94947-5. DOI: 10.1007/b97593, https://doi.org/10.1007/b97593
  5. Elliott H. Lieb, "Sharp constants in the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev and related inequalities", Annals of Mathematics (2) 118 (1983), no. 2, 349-374. DOI: 10.2307/2007032, https://doi.org/10.2307/2007032
  6. Zheng-Xu He, "On the crossing number of high degree satellites of hyperbolic knots", Mathematical Research Letters 5 (1998), no. 2, 235-246. DOI: 10.4310/mrl.1998.v5.n2.a10, https://doi.org/10.4310/mrl.1998.v5.n2.a10
  7. Marc Lackenby, "The crossing number of satellite knots", Algebraic & Geometric Topology 14 (2014), no. 4, 2379-2409. DOI: 10.2140/agt.2014.14.2379, https://doi.org/10.2140/agt.2014.14.2379 (preprint: arXiv:1106.3095, https://arxiv.org/abs/1106.3095)
  8. Tetsuya Ito, "A quantitative Birman-Menasco finiteness theorem and its application to crossing number", Journal of Topology 15 (2022), no. 4, 1794-1806. DOI: 10.1112/topo.12259, https://doi.org/10.1112/topo.12259 (preprint: arXiv:2010.12150, https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.12150)
  9. Robion Kirby (ed.), "Problems in low-dimensional topology", in Geometric Topology (Athens, GA, 1993), AMS/IP Studies in Advanced Mathematics 2, part 2, American Mathematical Society and International Press, Providence, RI, 1997, pp. 35-473, Problems 1.67-1.68. https://math.berkeley.edu/~kirby/problems.ps.gz
  10. Efstratia Kalfagianni and Rob McConkey, "Crossing numbers of cable knots", Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 56 (2024), no. 11, 3400-3411. DOI: 10.1112/blms.13140, https://doi.org/10.1112/blms.13140 (preprint: arXiv:2309.03814, https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.03814)
  11. Kenneth L. Baker and Kimihiko Motegi, "The stable crossing number of a twist family of knots and the satellite crossing number conjecture", Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Classe di Scienze (2024), article no. 377. DOI: 10.2422/2036-2145.202404_011, https://doi.org/10.2422/2036-2145.202404_011 (preprint: arXiv:2404.05308, https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.05308)
  12. Alberto Enciso, Daniel Peralta-Salas and Francisco Torres de Lizaur, "Helicity is the only integral invariant of volume-preserving transformations", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (2016), no. 8, 2035-2040. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1516213113, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516213113 (preprint: arXiv:1602.04745, https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.04745)
  13. Frederick W. Gehring, Gaven J. Martin and Bruce P. Palka, "An Introduction to the Theory of Higher-Dimensional Quasiconformal Mappings", Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 216, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2017. ISBN 978-1-4704-4046-6. DOI: 10.1090/surv/216, https://doi.org/10.1090/surv/216
  14. Andre Guerra and Eden Prywes, "On the optimal conformal capacity of linked curves", preprint (2023). arXiv:2305.17015, https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.17015
  15. Atte Lohvansuu, "On the Modulus Duality in Arbitrary Codimension", International Mathematics Research Notices 2023 (2023), no. 24, 21068-21085. DOI: 10.1093/imrn/rnac238, https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rnac238